Engen's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Engen's Profile › Engen's Posts
South Africa's Zulu king has raised eyebrows by using a highly derogatory term for foreigners and saying they must all leave the country during a much-hyped speech that was supposed to have been aimed at calming anti-migrant feelings in his home province of KwaZulu-Natal. Warning: This story contains language some people may find offensive Misuzulu kaZwelithini was addressing his supporters at the place where 20,000 Zulus warriors defeated a British contingent of 1,800 soldiers 147 years ago beneath the rocky outcrop of Isandlwana hill. The Battle of Isandlwana, fought during the Anglo-Zulu war, is something many Zulus wear like a badge of honour: they fought against a foreign army and won - the foreigners were cowed. The ire of many of King Misuzulu's subjects is now directed not at British invaders but at migrants from neighbouring countries like Lesotho, Mozambique and Zimbabwe who have come to South Africa to work. According to official statistics, the country is home to about 2.4 million migrants, about 4% of the population. The 51-year-old monarch did not advocate violence but said all "kwerekwere", an offensive word for African migrants, must pack their bags - even if they were in relationships with South Africans and had children with them. "We must now sit down and discuss this because even if my nephew's father is a 'kwerekwere', the 'kwerekwere' must leave, only the child will remain," he said on Thursday to the delight of his audience - a response which prompted him to burst out laughing. Many online have been quick to point out the irony of his remarks, considering the king's own mother was from Eswatini and one of his wives is also from the neighbouring kingdom. But such xenophobic attitudes have long been an issue in South Africa, leading to deadly outbreaks of violence - and his comments echo those made by his late father Goodwill Zwelithini, who urged migrants in 2015 to "pack their belongings". He later tried to back-pedal, claiming he was misquoted, but the country's human rights body found his comments "hurtful and harmful". More than a decade on, xenophobia and anger directed at migrants remain a key political issue - with some believing foreigners are stealing jobs and benefiting from public services meant for South Africans. The rate of unemployment in the country remains one of the highest in the world at around 33%. This is something new opposition parties - like uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) led by former President Jacob Zuma, whose main support base is in KwaZulu-Natal - have latched on to with populist policies that support the expulsion of undocumented migrants. This has led in recent years to the rise of vigilante anti-migrant groups, like Operation Dudula and March on March, which have gained notoriety for their demands that foreign nationals be removed from the country. "Dudula" means "to remove something by force" in the Zulu language. Their latest campaign took place a few days before the king's speech and not long after the start of the academic year. An angry group of protesters descended on a primary school in the KwaZulu-Natal port city of Durban, claiming that 90% of the pupils there were the children of migrants. The heated demonstration forced the school to call parents to come and collect the students because of safety concerns - and the next day a large contingent of police was deployed to the gates of Addington Primary School. The local authorities hit out at the organisers of the march, which was also supported by MK, and accused them of spreading misinformation. "This has put a lot of people's lives at risk. It is a lie that 90% of learners are children of immigrants. The truth is that immigrants form 37% of the learner population," Mlu Mtshali, an education spokesperson for KwaZulu-Natal, told South Africa's Daily Maverick newspaper. This prompted the education department to reveal that nationally, 253,618 foreign pupils are enrolled in South Africa's public schools - 1.8% of all students. Of these, 14,929 are at public schools in KwaZulu-Natal. Commentators have also pointed out that in South Africa, all children have a legal right to basic education, irrespective of their nationality or status in the country. Following the Addington Primary School protests and ahead of the Battle of Isandlwana commemoration, royal envoys hinted that King Misuzulu would address these concerns. He has no formal political power, but a fifth of South Africa's population is Zulu and the monarchy remains hugely influential with a large budget funded by taxpayers. The king also oversees a trust that owns and controls vast tracts of communal land in KwaZulu-Natal, which is supposed to be for the benefit local communities. "We will speak to the 'kwerekweres' and tell them to leave. There is nobody who does not have a home to return to," the king said. For Dr Vusumusi Sibanda, a human rights lawyer and expert on African diaspora issues, such words are "unfortunate" and "worrying" and encourage ordinary citizens to take the law into their own hands. "The king is respected by [many people], including foreigners, and he's supposed to be that symbol," he told the BBC. Lizette Lancaster, who works at South Africa's Institute for Security Studies think-tank, echoes this, telling me that the king's comments only served to "fuel anti-migrant sentiment and should be strongly condemned". She also weighed in on the actions of vigilante groups, saying that while South African law protected activism, orchestrating vigilante activity "including incitement or actions against migrants, must be identified and dealt with". The leader of March on March, Jacinta Ngobese Zuma, is now facing a public violence charge over the protests at Addington Primary School. And in November, a court ordered Operation Dudula to stop blocking foreign nationals from accessing public health facilities and schools, saying it was illegal. Another topic raised by the king that has the nation talking is his call to drop "Natal" from KwaZulu-Natal's name - again echoing a wish of his father. "We need to remove this 'Natal'. This is KwaZulu, so I don't understand why we have this Natal," the king said. Prior to 1994 and the end of South Africa's racist system of apartheid, the province now known as KwaZulu-Natal was split into two. KwaZulu was classified as a "homeland", a semi-autonomous area reserved for ethnic Zulus, which existed within Natal province. When South Africa ushered in democratic rule with Nelson Mandela elected president, the two were merged and the name conjoined. Over the last three decades, many cities, towns and roads in South Africa have been renamed, replacing them with indigenous ones or calling them after heroes of the struggle against apartheid. But for some commentators, the call to name the province simply KwaZulu is an unpalatable reminder of Zulu nationalism and its potential dangers. In the years after Mandela's release from prison in 1990, political violence between his supporters and those of a Zulu nationalist party nearly derailed the process that led to the end of white-minority rule. There are fears that renaming KwaZulu-Natal would create a kind of exceptionalism that could lead to more trouble in the ethnically diverse country which has 11 official languages. Cultural expert Prof Musa Xulu is also quick to add that it would be wrong to regard KwaZulu-Natal as a Zulu province. "In reality, it's a multicultural province," he told the BBC. "[Re]naming it KwaZulu would be a distortion of history. There was never a time in history when this whole region… was a kingdom of the Zulus," he said. Zulus "don't have the powers to simply push people around and say that the province should be known as KwaZulu", the academic added. Until now King Misuzulu, on the throne since 2022, has mainly made the headlines with regard to the royal succession battle and his controversial divorce. But now he seems to be following in his father's footsteps - and picking at scabs that never get a chance to heal in what is a politically charged environment.
|
The hardest thing I have ever faced in my life was burying my 11-year-old daughter. It broke me in ways words can’t explain, and the sadness never stops. |
obiekunie01:And what is wrong with that? they should not make money back? |
Mama should be about Professor Soyinka's age, what would a 90year old doing all out by her self? |
SportblitsNews:Nigeria is within its rights DR Congo is within their right to defend FIFA is the only referee that matters Social media outrage changes nothing |
As of late 2025, the HoR’s constitutional review process includes 87 proposed constitutional-amendment bills spanning many themes: state & local government autonomy, devolution of powers, policing & security, electoral and judicial reforms, socio-economic rights, traditional institutions, citizenship and indigene/ethnic-identity, human rights, and more. My source: The Nation Newspaper and Nigerian News Today Among these, the following relate directly to Citizenship, Indigene-ship (Indigene Status), and Identity rights: Indigene-ship for anyone who has lived long enough in your state - HB 2057 📌 Why it is extremely sensitive Indigeneship in Nigeria is not just identity; it is tied to: *Access to state jobs *Scholarships *Political appointments *Traditional rulership qualifications *Land rights *Cultural belonging *State benefits *Representation in federal/state quotas Giving someone “indigene rights” simply because they lived 10 years in a place can: ❗ Erase ancestral ties and cultural ownership A Hausa person born and raised in Enugu or Kano does not automatically become Igbo or Yoruba. Same for the reverse. Indigene status is cultural, ancestral, and tied to the people who built, governed, and defended the land for centuries. It’s not just residency or Citizenship, it’s heritage. ❗Undermine minority groups Small ethnic groups (Ijaw, Berom, Tiv, Itsekiri, Nupe, Ibibio, etc.) could be politically outnumbered over time by migrants who settle in their land. 10 years is nothing. A community that survived 500 years can lose political control in one generation. ❗ weaponize migration Certain groups with large demographic numbers could “colonize” states by migrating en masse and later claiming indigeneship. ❗ cause cultural tension and political takeover Imagine this scenario: A state with 2 million natives 1.5 million settlers move in over 20 years After 10 years they gain “indigene-ship” They now vote, run for office, and control the local government The indigenous people become strangers on their own land This is not theoretical, it has happened in Plateau, Kaduna, the Middle Belt, Southern Kaduna, Warri, and other regions historically. This law can worsen it. I am raising my voice today regarding two troubling constitutional proposals before the Nigerian House of Representatives: the expansion of “indigene-ship” by residency and marriage, and the introduction of “citizenship by investment.” While reforms are necessary, these particular clauses strike at the heart of identity, cultural continuity, and the survival of indigenous groups across Nigeria. Indigeneship is not a casual administrative label—it is a deeply historical and ancestral marker tied to heritage, land, cultural obligations, and community preservation. Granting it automatically after a few years of residence, or through marital ties, risks political domination of minority groups and could destabilize communities whose cultural existence relies on clear ancestral belonging. Equally concerning is the idea of citizenship being granted through financial investment alone. In a country already battling weak institutions, porous borders, and complex ethnic dynamics, introducing a pay-to-enter citizenship system creates security vulnerabilities and undermines the meaning of nationhood. Nationhood cannot be bought, and ancestral identity cannot be awarded through residency. Nigeria must protect the integrity of its peoples, cultures, and sovereignty. Any reform must be approached with caution, transparency, and respect for the nation’s unique and delicate multi-ethnic foundation. |
jeff1993:I'm sure, you just jump to comment, you didn't border to comprehend what you were responding to |
Slytiger:Lies, that man never represent Nigeria, I went through all competition that year no Simeon Ekpa |
FuckFuckPastor: |
Quest7777:So what is English? or what are you saying? |
agentNija:Think of it this way: Lagos is the commercial heart of Yorubaland, much like Paris is to France. Before the British amalgamation of Nigeria, the Yoruba people, across what are now six Nigerian states, had a well-structured monarchical system. Each town or settlement was governed by an Oba (king), in council with chiefs and other key officials. Importantly, this wasn’t a dictatorship; the Oba’s authority was balanced by a council of chiefs who represented various segments of society, ensuring a form of consultative governance." "Now, just as a French citizen from Marseille or Lyon doesn’t need permission to belong in Paris, a Yoruba person from Abeokuta, Ibadan, Ado-Ekiti, or Akure doesn’t need to justify their presence in Lagos. They are not outsiders, they are part of the same cultural, historical, and ancestral family. Yorubaland is one body, and Lagos is a vital organ within it." "The Yoruba people are not guests in Lagos; Lagos is part of the Yoruba civilization. Our dialects may vary slightly, but our Oríkì, deities, traditions, and ancestral claims are deeply interconnected. So when we say 'Lagos belongs to the Yoruba,' we mean all Yoruba people, not just those whose immediate forebears were born on Lagos soil." |
owobokiri:naaa...no need...na only developer names we are changing for now... |
Levesor:Don't worry, he's still coming to play the Naija side |
iwaeda:This account, Somto Okonkwo, clearly harbors deep resentment towards Nigeria. He hides under the guise of advocating for good governance, but it’s all a smokescreen. His posts are consistently negative—targeting Nigeria and Tinubu’s government—with not a single word of positivity. He's not interested in building the country. He openly agitates for Biafra and is a hardcore Obidient. I’ve blocked his account on X because, frankly, he can't be trusted. His bitterness over Peter Obi’s loss has turned into a campaign of wishing harm upon Nigeria—and that’s unacceptable.
|
TouchNfollow:Is there another South-East I don’t know about? Tinubu won the last election without a single vote from the region—so what’s all the fuss now? |
RealityKings1:There have been numerous distressing reports from Nigerians living in South Africa.* |
Love800:Well, you're right, once the smell is gone, they come back..But that smell lasted for 2 weeks, I always respray every 3 weeks |
Ikaeniyan0:This statement shows you know nothing about Yoruba people...They see all the states of the SW as one... |
Believeintruth:Look at that, usual Igbo sentiment, arrested ko, answer simple questions, and stop gaslighting us here |
Ofemannnu:Wow, thank you for this, and I must admit, I feel quite ashamed. As a Yoruba man who recently joined the Ronu group here in London – many of us are new members due to Peter Obi and the Obedient movement – I've never had an issue with Igbo people. I actively supported and campaigned for Peter Obi in the last elections. However, I now feel a great deal of hatred and anger. This stems from how some within the Obedient movement have begun treating our people simply because Peter Obi did not win the election. I don't know if my heart will heal from this...I love my Igbo brothers and sisters, but enough now, the insults and name-calling have to stop; we are really tired. |
EZENDIZUOGU:No one has an issue with your residency, or whether you pay tax or not, the Lagos state government will provide for your safety, so u can work and play...But stay out of the sole benefits meant for their indigenous people, and stop contesting in their elections. |
themanderon:Are you for real? Tinubu caused this? Not Peter Obi and his entourage? stop your lies |
Retmis:I said it, the truth hurt them, when they can't travel to South Africa, Italy, Germany, or China, they come to Yoruba land and start preaching inclusiveness, only in YorubaLand they practice inconclusivity |
D00msDay:That's so common among Igbo people, gaslighting, most posts of this person were so tribalist |
Tflex01:But, to be honest, should we blame them? No other tribe in our country will tolerate the disrespect, together with constant insults, that the Yorubas endure on their land. |
Obaaderemi2:No, Nigeria ain't divided, let's say the truth, will the Anambra government buy JAMB FORM for a Yoruba boy living in Anambra? Yoruba people all over their land have been accommodating, but Peter Obi and the obidients are opening their eyes gradually. The Igbo's and other tribes can have choices, but you talk down on the Yorubas in their land when they don't vote according to your desire. Look, Nigeria is a country but can never be a Nation, so even as the Yorubas love their country, they will never through away their core identities. |