₦airaland Forum

aliondo:
Draymond

aliondo:
If simmons works on his shooting....he will be difficult to contain.....

aliondo:
I concur bro..was about typing the same..

Ibime:
Stop lying. You only started talking timeline long after Airmark exposed your goof and you knew you were on the back foot. Look at you busy calculating points against Burnley and others, when Airmark warned you that the first thing a smart person would do is go and check the exceptions - West Brom and Stoke. You only started talking of timeline after cornering yourself.

Eruditor:
LOL. Still forming activity.

We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to flunctuate.

For e.g United losing today made it go back to 16 whereas it was 13 just before and 16 before they played themselves (City vs United).

That is why even if the points lost from both teams is 2more for City. It does not matter.

Ibime:
You should be because you claimed you have workings that would show us City 15 points ahead and now you can't produce them.

We are not responsible for your stüpidity, excuse my rudeness. Of course if City are leading by 11 points in GW 29 when we exclude West Brom and Stoke, and you try to make City lose their next 5 matches while Utd win theirs, Utd will win by 4 points. You just corroborated our 11 point gap figure with that foolish projection.

What is this? We asked you to show working of your 15 point gap, you are now speaking latin.

We saw you calculating results against Sheffield Wednesday and all sorts, now it's turned to an estimation. It's OK to admit your calculation was wrong and let's leave it there, but you wanted to do agidi when Airmark was correcting your calculation having already accepted the terms of comparison.

Eruditor:
You are just forming activity. The person I am posting at understands the estimations.

Eruditor:
We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to fluctuate.

Ibime:
We gave you percentage completeness which is the correct method and should end there.

You wanted to see what would happen "if" the league was 34 matches.

We gave you criteria of comparing top 18 teams in Germany vs top 18 teams in England. . . you accepted the criteria and fücked up the JSS 2 mathematics in front of you.

Ibime:
Stop trying to be slippery nigga.

We gave you percentage completeness which is the correct method and should end there.

You wanted to see what would happen "if" the league was 34 matches.

We gave you criteria of comparing top 18 teams in Germany vs top 18 teams in England. . . you accepted the criteria and fücked up the JSS 2 mathematics in front of you.

In order to wiggle out, you started adding "if" City had beat Utd just to cover the fact you mishandled some simple problem solving.

Now you have open more ifs to escape. . . "if" Crystal Palace was in the bottom two. . . if Swansea were bottom. . .bla bla bla

If I ask you now to revert and show working of how you boldly claimed City would be 15 points ahead by GW29 if we excluded West Brom and Stoke, you would start shaking like a fish. You did not mention Palace and Swansea then, only now you have been caught, you want obfuscate.



And don't think you will escape your faux-pas by reverting back to the original argument of Bundesliga being more competetive than EPL just to escape your poor mathematics.

Even at that, Bundesliga is a yearly cakewalk for Bayern while EPL has changed hands every year since 2009. Even the last bastion of Bundesliga resistance aka UEFA COEFFICIENT has fallen into the hands of EPL.

We're not interested in that argument anymore, we only want to see your workings to finish the league in GW29 by excluding West Brom and Stoke.

SIRcumalot:
the LeBron hate to they much for here sometimes.
one would think zeusthrill zealot like defence of the king would balance it out but no. this is still a bron hate fest.

Ibime:
If, if, if

Ibime:
This is how you would keep mêssing up. How many points are available in 5 games and does 14 points gap finish a league with 5 games left?

Ibime:
You are a disgrace.

As at today:

City - Played 33.........87 points
Utd - Played 33..........71 points

If you exclude the 4 games they each played against Stoke and West Brom, the table will read:

City - Played 29..........75 points
United - Played 29......64 points

There will be 5 games left with 11 points gap and the league will still be alive.

I saw you trying to cover your goof later with some silly twist of logic. Don't try it nigga.



The above is a case of a nigga that can't quickly solve a problem when presented with one. In your attempt to remove Stoke and West Brom, you started calculating Tottenham, Chelsea, Arsenal, Burnley and Newcastle. You for kuku add Blackburn Rovers.

A smart brain will quickly focus on exceptions but you decided to travel around the country adding and subtracting scores entangling yourself in a 19 node problem instead of focussing on a 2 node problem (Stoke and West Brom). No wonder you were boldly claiming City would still be 15 points ahead . . . cos you had not solved the problem.

The league table has already calculated all the other results and relationships for you, all you simply needed to do was substract West Brom and Stoke results.

You are the type that will prepare a powerpoint presentation and erudite for one hour without hitting on one key point of strategy, process or solution.

And when you were caught, you tried to come up with an excuse that makes no sense about timing of result. . . which is still inaccurate.


Airmark already tried to warn you below to simply remove Stoke and West Brom results as you promised, you were busy calculating results against Sheffield Wednesday, Wolves and Sunderland.

Eruditor:
We are past that type of argument because time of losing will make points diff to flunctuate.

airmark:
When you finish your Bball, come back and erase the stupid line i highlighted. It would have been better not to reply at all.

You are so forgetful or maybe trying to start another senseless argument, where there is none. They have all played 33matches, remove 4, you get 29.

You have problems handling numbers. We have resolved everything involving stoke city and west brom, the highest is 11 points not 14. I even conceded west brom's match today as you suggested.

Oga, just face your basketball and stop disturbing me with your shameless attempts.

airmark:
If we even dance to your tune, you should look for your maths teacher, and do the needful.

United's 71 points - 7 points = 64 points

City = 75 points

United = 64 points

Where is your mysterious 15 or 14 points lead you were shouting about? We can now see the stupid person between me and you now.

Ibime please ask Raumdeuter to come and carry this shameless eLLLLLruditor. He is terrible.

airmark:
We are at wk33, If you remove points gained from the 4 matches ( wba and stc) from city and united's total points, you get the points at week 29 I.e four weeks matches deducted.

At week 29:

city = 87 - 12 = 75points

United = 71- 4 = 67points

Where did that your mysterious 15 points lead, come from? Even if you remove today's match, the gap is still 11points.

Only God can save you from getting disgraced subsequently.

airmark:
Chai, instead of you to check and make neccessary deductions like an intelligent person, you base your conclusion on if, if, if like Davido.

I'm done.

Greatihex:
try to be understanding people's post before you quote them. I don't want to have headache this night.

airmark:
If you remove west brom and stoke, you stated that city would be leading with at least 15points by game 29. Did your brain inform you that you need to check who would be the biggest loser of this removal, by checking how many points gained and lost by city and united from these two, before jumping into that horrible conclusion?

Greatihex:
which club did he win treble consistently?

I hope you are not talking about trophies. Enrique won in all his seasons.

airmark:
You are very poor in handling numbers. I see holes in your posts but i refuse to be dragged into a wasteful back and forth again.