₦airaland Forum

LegoxMetahuman:
yeah. just like firminho's armpit is offside.


Even you that a wide consensus regards as a complete joke is calling someone a dunderhead. how rich?

They have already used armpit to rule out Gabriel Jesus' in the first game of the season. Get with the program.

rationalmind:




That was you at game 1 and you think those writing off pep at game 12 are irrational. The joke is on you

You think I made that prediction because of game 1?

LOL.

Okay.

Unlimited22:
Someone just dug this out. This was you circa the beginning of the season, but you're slating people for giving the league to Liverpool after 12 games.

What a waawu.

You think CFC will finish 3rd?

LOL. Ok.

Hazardfan1:
Are you willing to bet $100, Man city do not win the 2019/2020 league.

I have already bet with someone else. Stop wasting my time. There is a $1000 Hazard bet. Why don't you take that one?

airmark:


Are you taking the bet on your Fraudiola winning ucl or like raumdeuter, have you settled for the 'local coach' tag placed on Fraudiola's forehead?

Fraudiola will still lose more matches in the league.

You've already lost your bet bro, even if rapture happens, you will pay in heaven or wire from hell.

Nobody can bet on any team. That is because the UCL can be won and lost via penalties that does not require skill.

I can bet on the league and I did. All those City will still lose games arguments are neither here nor there. Your hate for Pep won't let you people see this is just match day 12. I mean, this man has won the league with 100 and 98 Pts and people are still acting like it is mathematically impossible to get such numbers even this season lol.

Pep's first season in Barca he topped RM by 12 pts but before April, the lead shrunk to 4 with that game at Santiago Bernabeu. If Barca had lost that game the lead would have shrunk to 1. Please hate Pep but give him credit. 9 pts is too small for a league where 26 games are left and LFC will chop their own at Etihad. They could even amass injuries in December.

Not yet Uhuru!

LegoxMetahuman:
na that legit mane goal that they cancelled pained me pass.


it costs liverpool their 18th straight win and points and me some fpl points.


i called raunmdeuter out and he downplayed it like nothing happened.

now he is here wailing about 50:50 handball call


its not easy to defend a fraud.

Ok so that ball did not touch Mane's hand or what are you saying?

rationalmind:
What's the difficult call here? Stones leg clearly keeps salah onside.

Your problem is you are actually think you are rational. Lol.

You saw the refs pore over such decisions showing lines and reviews before making a decision. They did not do it. The line you keep looking at is not parallel. That line was drawn to make the decision look right. You foolish people argued that Llorente did not use his hand in the UCL only to accept it later when other views showed it clearly was.

Rest. I have never seen a league season being celebrated by game 12 but hatred for Pep can make people irrational.

airmark:
They are preparing the ground to place their excuses by May 2020.

Raumdeuter and eruditor, Guardiola won't win UCL this season. $100 each, game?

You are just insisting on what you want to say and you will flip as soon as you are wrong.

Now you are not talking about money. When Pep loses it is Pep. When he wins it is money. Be consistent.

I would think you who saw Lampard lose 4-0 to United and 2-1 again but still string wins in the EPL will be a little more reserved just in case you are wrong.

I will be here though. And the league will be decided in City's favor before May.

Thecassanova:
It’s the same side view from the VAR tv they look with there eyes. Maybe a camera from top view will work?

They did not use VAR. That was just EPL camera. VAR would have indicated that a check was being done and everyone would have stood still waiting.

But yes, an aerial view would have been better and then zoomed out like they always do.

larride:
VAR is useless in the EPL.

VAR rule in the EPL is different from the one UEFA uses that’s why in EPL VAR can give a goal for offside and the ref will overrule it. According to those useless FA, the ref has the final decision.

You are right.

I just wished they reviewed it for a while to clear doubts. Nobody would be arguing now.

Thecassanova:
One from opponent post, one within 18 yards out
I didn’t watch the Rashford game.

It was from Centre of the pitch in the United game.

The point is, VAR can go back as far as they want to stop any sequence. Na their rule be that.

Thecassanova:
True, the line looks not straight but it’s. object closer appears bigger than far object. Just look at the length of the grass downward, the length is shorter as we move up.

Camera angle from sides can’t tell the true picture.

Which is why we expected VAR to use that their own line to review it for a while. That is all that was expected.

obainojazz:
Clearly not offside

You still don't get it. That line is not parallel. Use the lines on the grass to compare. It looks like Salah and Stones are on the same line which is why people were saying the review should have been longer with those lines drawn.

Thecassanova:
At first Silva hand redirected the ball, should’ve been a free kick at that instance. From Hand ball to handball, Ref just made the game play along. A mistake by ref, but it was a long yard out before pool scored.

Lol.

Like Laporte's handball long before Gab Jesus dribbled 2 players before scoring that was still overturned?

Why were Liverpool asking the ref to over turn Rashford's goal against United if the so-called foul to Origi was long before the goal was scored?

BlueRayDick:
All these lines u people are drawing won't tell the full story, if it's not VAR e no fit be VAR.

Just look at that Lecesiter vs Tottenham match. Nobody would've ever thought there was an offside in that build up to Tottenham's goal.

I mean clearly VAR claimed the Tottenham player was offside because the part where his armpit joins with his chest is ahead of Johnny Evans' knee by the smallest SI unit of measuring distance.

That is exactly what VAR does. E get him own taperule.

The officiating could've just spared 30 seconds to have a look na

Atalanta vs City ref gave a penalty. VAR reviewed it and he changed it to a freekick. Ref is using VAR to be accurate.

In EPL ref makes a decision. Then his fellow frauds use VAR to justify him. That is how it is used in the EPL. To make the ref correct and only overturn when it is CLEAR and OBVIOUS.

Such baloney.

Thecassanova:
A difficult call. Maybe the leg of that guy beside Mane.

Use the blade of grass to compare if your line is parallel.

I am not arguing about the goal. I just thought they will review it for a while before coming to a conclusion.

raumdeuter:
If only the player fouled was named Mane, it would have been a foul and penalty

My only real anger was the shoving and pushing without yellow cards. It gave LFC players confidence to keep tackling so hard.

Nothing spoil though. Except we are talking about another season. This loss will work in Pep's favor.

Obere4u:
Why was Liverpool first goal not disallowed since it the hand ball that started the counter attack?

Don't be so loud. You will scare all the haters away.

Thecassanova:
How are these two scenes the same? Some analysts on NL sef.

Only one hand raised by Sissoko, TAA both hands by the side. Clear difference.

TAA shoulder is leaning forward. Lol.

He is trying to preempt the pain of the ball hitting his stomach or chest area. That was a handball that impeded with the play. Ref made a mistake. Liverpool have already won but you people should be objective.

BlueRayDick:
Oga once u make Ur Body bigger with Ur arms it's handball irrespective of where Ur hands are; whether in the air or on the floor.

Trent's hands obviously made his frame bigger than it actually is. Same as Sissoko's. They are both clear handball going by what FIFA tagged handball

I mean it is not that hard.

Ask them if the ball had deflected into the post whether or not the ref would have allowed the goal to stand.

BikeMan:
I saw the review afterwards with the line drawn. Salah was clearly ON.

They used that same view and drew the line from Stones. That was no VAR. That was the EPL showing a replay. I am not arguing for or against the goal but it was not VAR reviewed. If it was, they should have used alternate views to verify.

A40:
How are you in possession and you have to kick Mané before kicking the ball. I'm still not understanding this your logic. Him diving without contact would have made him look even more stupid. The ref rightly adjudged Aurier to have lost possession. That ball belonged to nobody at that point

No the 'double standards' is to avoid players working the system. Like Sterling was trying to do. Trent's hands did not leave his body, they were at his side. That discretion is so that players don't exploit loopholes in blanket rules

Aurier did not lose possession. He only made contact with Mane whilst kicking the ball. The videos are online. Nobody can argue that.

There is nothing about working the system. I asked a question: if the ball deflected off TAAs hands and got into the Liverpool post would the ref have cancelled the goal?

BlueRayDick:
Why wasn't this checked inch by inch like VAR did in Tottenham vs Leicester match?

Why dem no use the taperule dem use Dat day na?

Cc raumdeuter.

This was the view I saw and from this, he looks off. They did not review it.

Leyqute:
Alaye jor jor.

go and sit down jare. I don’t have time for your tears

Lol.

Fail.

A40:
How? How was Aurier in possession there? That was a 50/50 ball and all talk of protection flies out the window. Mané did not impede Aurier at all

Yes. TAA had no where to put his hands. Sterling literally aimed at his hands. That pass was from 2.5 yards out.

The ref may decide to cancel or not cancel the goal. We see refs ignore fouls on attacking players preceding a goal when a goal is eventually scored all the time.

Aurier was in possession. He controlled the ball. If he decided to dive instead of kicking the ball it would have been his foul. Refs choose when to use a rule and today the ref was wrong.

TAAs hands blocked the ball from going somewhere one of which could have been inside his own net. If the ref gave the penalty. He won't be wrong. That is why it is a double standard. Because he can pick and choose when to allow a rule.

BlueRayDick:
Instead of just accepting the ref waved it aside for reasons best known to him, they are claiming what I don't know sef.

Nothing hurts you if you hate Pep.

They can still say "Ref was wrong but I am happy apari lost" or something like that.

Not all these deliberate. Not deliberate. Lol

Leyqute:
Edakun why is this L paining this guy?

Just 2 sentences and you’re reciting long epistles of prophet Jeremiah, from the book of lamentations.

Relax man. You’ll just kill your self

Lol

I wish you could see who you are talking to.

You guys are diggers. Read up some of the posts made last season and how it ended.

City will win the league again and I will have to suffer through the 1B squad arguments.

BlueRayDick:
Pray tell, is this a deliberate handball?

Once you plan to hang your dog any thread will be good enough.

Today it is not deliberate. Tomorrow they will cry and I will remind them.

Leyqute:
LooL. Finally had Wetin? Stop crying Lruditor.

You guys are trying too hard.

Notice I post more when people expect me not to and keep quiet when things are going my way.

I am only here so people won't change mouth later to talk about money. Money did not matter today when they lost abi? So it should not matter when they win. Shikena.

raumdeuter:
That was Salahs goal

They never showed the replay. Only showed the side view and drew a line making it look like Salah was clear but they usually should review that goal for a while.

Anyways, this one is gone. Nothing anyone can do about it for now.

Unlimited22:
Lol. You FEEL very strongly that City will win, but blame us for wanting to Crown Liverpool Champions based on the same FEELINGS.

Also, we are still in November. No one has crowned anyone anything. Don't mistake trolling for stating fact.

Where did I say I feel City will win?

I don't mind that some people want LFC to win. How can I mind? But when people make it sound like the league has been won today that is why I laugh.

I always avoided talking about this game because Liverpool were home. You have to give them respect. But even if City were 9pts ahead I won't be here making noise about the league being over or even trying to troll.

raumdeuter:
Why wasn't lines drawn on the field for this goal

https://i.imgur.com/cpwdZrK.png

I can't see the image. Is that Salah's goal?

I wondered why they did not even waste time replaying the goal. Because I felt he was off from the aerial view.