₦airaland Forum

For context:

Stephen Curry’s top five basketball players (in order): MJ, Wilt, LeBron, Shaq & Magic.

No KD.

So why call him an all-time great since to the same Curry, he is not the greatest basketball player ever?

Because Curry knows what Melyvn11, Swissh and Eruditor know that Airmark does not know.

airmark:
You that could type 500,000 words to prove that tallness is a talent, wouldn't find it difficult to even change what was emboldened by the dictionary itself. Sorry, argue with yourself.

I have always known you to be incorrigible.

Do a full snap-shot of what cambridge is defining and prove they were not defining just "all-time".

Stephen Curry:

I know the reality of the situation in terms of we lost a guy like Kevin Durant, who's an all-time great basketball player,

Therefore Steph Curry was saying KD is the best basketballer ever - Airmark.

LOL

airmark:
Mumu, since you are not conversant with terms used in weather forecast, sports, stocks etc, it would be cumbersome for you to figure out the error.

I won't call you names because...well...I will let your own posts do that to you.

You hear people say CR7 is a GOAT. Maradona is a GOAT but Messi is the GOAT. They know the difference and that is the sort of subtle nuance that is expected to fly-over you like... bridges.

airmark:
That was how you were disgracing yourself with tallness is talent nonsense. Instead of you to let it slide, you are back here disgracing yourself again.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/all-time

I will engage you further just to show you the peak of your understanding is some people's trough.

Cambridge was defining "all-time" for you and not the phrase "an all-time" or "the all-time" or "off all times". I know you don't know but they are not all the same.

When a British person says "an all-time great" they mean that person was the best in a particular time. Mike Tyson is an all-time great boxer. Kobe Bryant is an all-time great basketballer.

But when they say "the all-time great" they mean, the best there has ever been. Michael Jordan is the all-time great basketballer.

Swissh:
AirFart has come again . Melvyn said pep is "an all time great" which means among the great coaches in history. He never said Pep is the greatest coach of all time.

Don't be casting your pearls to swine brother.

He Googled "all-time" and thought he was coming here to teach anybody anything.

Some things I read here and laugh.

airmark:
You guys can confidently type rubbish. That was how you disgraced yourself with ''tallness is talent'' nonsense.

Melvyn was actually wrong with that usage of ''all time great'', since he claimed that Mou was greater than Fraudiola.

When you use ''all time'', it means nothing surpasses it. Leyqute was actually right, he should be the one mocking both of you, while you run to Dayo for the next move.

Swissh already beat me to it: "an" all-time great is indefinite in English. "The" all-time great is definite.

If you think I would re-post articles of researchers validating what I said, you are on a long thing.

Sometimes just keep your conversations limited to Hensben and Hensben only. I won't tell you why.

Melvyn11:
I see no need in exchanging insults on a faceless forum so I just let it slide.

That is why I said you are blessed.

I aspire to your inspiration(s).

Unlimited22:
Oh God.

Mr 'Being Tall is a talent' Is back.

A boy, if 9 people don't like this post. Edit it and put my name so they will. We have to help each other out. Telling them you finished primary school in your mother's womb to gain clout ain't working so we have to be more creative.

Melvyn11:
Just to clarify Pep put a gun to Joachim loew head and said if you dont play possession based football I will kill you. What a devil

The funny thing is..when Germany won the WC and Raumdeuter asked if Pep's influence in Germany led to them winning the WC since most of his players were in the team, these same people said he had no influence on the team and that it was all Loew.

See how Loew they will go to rubbish the same man.

raumdeuter:
The only big trophy Klopp has won was 1 CL title, Just like Dimatteo

If Klopp buys players to win, it is fine.

If Pep buys players to win, he is a fraud.

Pep's wonderfully inherited squad is Iniesta the eunuch. Pedro who is now alleged a fraud in England. Busquets the biscuit. Pique the weak link etc etc.

But Naby Keita was showing promise before his injury and a manager who has one UCL title to his name and 4 in 18 years is better than the other who has 2 UCLs - 27 or 28 trophies in total in 11 years as a coach.

hensben:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/2806608-manchester-citys-pep-guardiola-blamed-for-germanys-international-struggles.amp.html

When I said it here that pep style of play affected German team seeing that most of the national team players are from Bayern which is the biggest club on the land but raumdeuter nor go understand cos he think about stat only in football.


Click the link to see what I am talking about.

About Thomas muller, I said pep destroyed that guy with his philosophy seeing that Muller is a direct player.

It's worth pointing out the national team's slide started after Guardiola left the Bundesliga and that the Germans built their 2014 World Cup-winning team around a core of Bayern (seven) and Borussia Dortmund (four) players. Thomas Muller, Toni Kroos and Philipp Lahm were among the top standouts in that tournament.

Do you know what your post means?

biomustry:
Haters gonna hate, potatoes gon potate, even if he goes on to win the ucl with city, i swear these haters will still come up with another rubbish. They wish their team is as good as city's team b but but cheque book

Don't let them waylay you into having UCL arguments brother. Pep Guardiola has won 2 UCL titles. He was asked to prove himself in England finish. Imagine if Neymar comes to England, wins the PFA player of the year, scores the most goals, wins the league etc and people start telling him to prove he is better than Hazard he has to win the UCL as well. Something he has already won before coming to England. Lol

Expensive Left back. The one Alonso is better than. The one who has barely mopped up 30 games in almost 3 seasons. The one Delph and Zinchenko replaced and still won league. So people should forgive some of us if Robertson being a natural left-back came cheap and is doing well. Some other inferior managers have used Centre midfielders to play LB en route to winning 100 and 98 points.

raumdeuter:
The same way Moyes Benitez and AVB said. Once they have resources they will dominate Europe.

Liverpool wanted the league. They did everything possible to win the EPL. They have coveted that trophy for something close to 29 years. It takes 38 games and 10 gruelling months to win it. They did not win it. Someone else who is inferior has won it back to back. The person who won it back to back is a fraud even when he won it without his best player. The other one who did not win it and is better did not lose his best players. Led by 7 points and lost only one game. It feels like odds were stacked against the inferior manager and somehow he still came out tops.

raumdeuter:
So how did you know the amount Danilo was valued at?

How did you know the amount City put up Danilo for? How are we sure City did not value Danilo at 2M while Juve valued Cancelo at 29M? to arrive at a net 27M

Because Klopp inherited his squad but Pep bought Sterling, KDB, Aguero, Silva, Otamendi, Fernandinho whose improved values played a role in the estimation of the worth of the City team.

Melvyn11,

How did you let someone who did not know the difference between "an all-time great" and "the greatest of all time" call you a simpleton?

You guys (you and swissh) are blessed. I stan.

You are blessed swissh.

donjazet:
When civil men discuss, decorum should usually be expected, there is no need to throw insults when exchanging opposing ideas.

However, you should not be surprised when the odd arrogant buffoon decides that his view is superior and pulls you in towards an inevitable slug or fight because he believes that the only way to keep up an image on a faceless forum is by e-fights.

Wise words from a decent man.

iPopAlomo:
No be coach but the player oga... Stop chatting shittt... It's not like your team is fairing any better... Take several seats at the back...

kokaneprodigy:
No, Guen is better than Ozil, he recycled possession.

This was a winnable game for you guys.

Mhki was über-useless.

johnjunior39:
Clubs play to their players strength, ozil is not a bad player per say but here the are eager to send him out, you got celballos yet you still don't understand how to play him.

Ceballos cannot do what this game demands. One pass to open it up. He is good dribbler, but Tottenham will play on the counter all through the second half so your dribbler will put you in trouble.

I always laugh at the people that say "this coach" is good because he bought players. LMAO. Look at your coach.

Anyways, Arsenal deserved a penalty before Laca's goal and yet VAR did not review a clear handball.

The use of VAR has been spoken about recently but it is getting worse off by the day.

You guys need Ozil in for Guendozi in this game. Ozil will open this game up and Arsenal will win.

kokaneprodigy:
We got the better deal has been loaned to inter and Magas will still cough out over 200k for him to play there weekly.

Haters will say it’s bad business,

Kimbeast:
Those fans of other clubs who are relishing the anger and frustration of some people should remember that one day, VAR will screw your team over.
And when it does, you’ll know how we feel.
And you won’t be laughing.

I will be here for this.

diggz:
You'll always support rubbish! Donjazet have no business taking shots in that post.

You are doing what he spoke about. Attacking me because what I support does not line up with yours.

I quoted that post because he was right in the sense that people can disagree without throwing insulting words around.

donjazet:
When civil men discuss, decorum should usually be expected, there is no need to throw insults when exchanging opposing ideas.

However, you should not be surprised when the odd arrogant buffoon decides that his view is superior and pulls you in towards an inevitable slug or fight because he believes that the only way to keep up an image on a faceless forum is by e-fights.

Hmmm.

Wisdom.

raumdeuter:
What Hitzfeld said was that if a transfer was that close, the coach shouldn't play the player. And also said Sane should have spoken up

And he is right.

1. Because the transfer was not close. Bayern had never made any offer to City and Sané never said anything to his teammates as reported. It was the consensus from even Pep all along yet the media kept reporting something else.

2. Pep had maintained that Sané was very close to re-signing with City a few weeks before the transfer deadline but held back when Bayern offered crazy wages. City were never going to match those wages because of their wage structure so the only thing left was for Bayern to meet City's valuation of the player.

3. Bayern were hoping the agreement with Sané will spur him to force a move thus crashing his value but City were never going to budge that way. And all the Kovac talk and fake news that kept brewing from the Bayern camp only meant that City were going to sell the player at that exact amount they were quoting - which Bayern were never willing to pay.

Which is why I concluded that the news was pure zobo.

raumdeuter:
Its beyond the zobo level I think the chances of it happening is like 60% now and can move very quick to completion

Have you read what Ottmar Hitzfeld said about the Sané saga?

That is why I was of the opinion that all the things the media were saying were wrong.

Is Dembele in this game?

Greatihex:
thank you. gradually we will get to, "he will need angels to play for him"

Like we got to "positives from the game"? "United were lucky"?
"Liverpool were lucky". "City only scored 6 goals because we made 6 mistakes" "If Hazard was playing we would bla bla"

It will come to that. Denial is stage one. Don't forget.

thorrvik55:
@ the bolded, I remember sir Ramadateur asking u to forward account details.

U can still stake ur hand again this season if u are so sure that Chelsea will finish 6th. Come the end of the season, I'm very sure u will be rewarded handsomely if u were right...

Because he wanted me to be right, made a promise and kept his promise.

I have asked a question, what will I gain by staking? Will I gain anything If I stake that Messi will score at least 5 goals this season?

You stake when the odds are stacked against you so you can get a windfall if you win. Not when only 2 or 3 delusional people are making wishy-washy statements. The people who are actually intelligent CFC fans are not making any such claims because they have already seen the writings on the wall.

popizaino:
Liverpool are not unbeatable. This is a game in a neutral ground which can go either way. With what we played against man united despite the humiliating result the future is bright for us if we keep faith in lampard.We don't want managers that will perform abracadabra and win carabo Cup in his first season and cart away with millions of pounds the following season when his replicate his previous success.


I stand with lampard.

LOL.