₦airaland Forum

etidy:
I believe Lebron + Kwahi and a rapidly improving kuzma and Ingram can dethrone the warriors in two years. The warriors will have to lose one star after next season, so things will even out.

They won't.

And GSW move to San Francisco 2019/20 which will be a money maker. They will keep the core if KD stays after his two years.

If Kawhi goes to Philly though, they could be good. But for now, Boston Celtics is the team to look at.

SAMPAOLI and nothing else.

Argentina will get to the semi finals at least and Messi will be instrumental.

You heard it here first.

No need for the premature celebrations. Argentina are not out yet.

They needed Sane to stretch Mexico as they could not pass their way into dangerous positions.

That being said, Brandt was good and Reus was a no show.

NictisZorander:
LOL but thesis by definition must be defended like you said. Milestone reports, Turnitin and these other measures have nothing to do with defense like he said. iIt has to be oral. You are acquainted with the US system and now the Australian system thanks to that guy who you obviously know more than and therefore you're qualified to speak on every system in the world. All I'm saying is you've been right all along.


Can we put this ridiculous argument to bed since you're right?

But it is defended just not orally, did you miss that part? I am tired abeg and I am the one who liked this your post just so you don't get it twisted. lol

NictisZorander:
Every thesis must be defended as is the standard of Nigerian universities and hence the standard of all universities in the world no matter how archaic and outdated that concept is.

You are silly. Australian PhD theses are defended just not orally. That is the take away. So the feed back mechanism could mean the degree will be conferred after months if the thesis itself or conclusions therein need revising. The difference with this in the US is, the feedback is given immediately somewhat because it is orally done in the presence of the independent auditors/experts and the thesis itself is not as gruelly assessed because US mandates 5-6 papers published in peer-reviewed journals before graduation.

osayi90:
You are absolutely free to disagree. Let me try once more to convince you. A PhD is the highest academic degree one can attain; hence, it is
difficult to scam the system, especially in a first-rate university; so many processes are involved before you contribute to knowledge, you cannot just magically write a thesis- meaning you will have to go through mile stones (annual progress reports plus interviews). Most importantly you will have a supervisor (who you meet perhaps every week or less so), you may have collaborators you work with (if your work is multidisciplinary), you may have published in peer review journals, etc. After these, there will be no way anyone in the world will be able to write a thesis for you. From experience, your supervisors usually know when what you have done is enough to get you a PhD, he then tells you to write-up your results. So you see my friend if you had the mindset to scam the system, the self-organized structure of the program would have fished you out or you would have fished yourself out.

Like I said most top universities in Australia adopt this model (no thesis defense is require).....If you are still in doubt, do a quick search on google and you just may satisfy your curiosity.

Cheers!

Your explanation is convincing and I have actually read up on the norm in Australia. Essentially, the quality of the thesis (written form) determines the award of the PhD, in the US it is starkly variant. From what I have gleaned, it is similar to getting oneself published in a peer-review seeing that the examiners assume that everything leading to their assessment of the work was above-board. I understand most Australian schools avoid the financial aspect and time zone differences involved in flying in revered experts in the field to do the type of oral defense that obtains in the US so they adopted the method above. Interesting.

NictisZorander:
Stop trying to twist narratives you shameless donkey. The first thing he attacked is my age based on his assumptions which i quickly dispelled.



So why am i "defending" a statement i never made in the first place, why should i have to be at fault because these two knuckleheads only think masters and phds have a thesis. LMAO You little small fries are not even serious.


LOL and what do your "friends" have to do with my household or the rules that govern them?

Again i wonder, does this guy understand english or is he just plain stupid?

A thesis is a thesis end even Nigerians are subjected to a thesis defense. Speaks to the glorified secondary school you went to where turnitin and examiners are measures to curtail falsification, fabrication and plagiarism in "research".

Your household decided to restrain this precocious talent BECAUSE of memorizing the quran and arabic that even the most liberal muslim homes already start at a young age yet yours did not realise you could have learnt and mastered it when you were busy wasting your time on Ruski?

NictisZorander:
Here you go you demented lying son of a manky w.hore



LOL You brought up and disproved an equation out of nowhere i had nothing to do with out of ignorance and somehow you're attributing it to me. Means you're a shameless plonker!

LMAO Now hes turning this about use of IQ tests, hes lost the friggin plot the wa.nker




No i wasnt, i was talking about the simple concept of intelligence, you googled it, stumbled into something else and like the idiot you are found something and assumed thats what i was talking about, even copied some bogus equation out of cluelessness




LMAO Basic reasoning maybe for dolts or lack there of. How far is this kid above the mean intelligence for kids his age and how far is the professor? A kid with a intelligence higher than 95% of kids his age is smarter than an adult with intelligence considered 80% higher than adults his age.



Dumb statement, dumb analogy, you're either smart or you're not. Reasoning and intelligence isnt epileptic like shooting and only a nitwit like you will even bring up this as an example



Simple. Because i'm better than them and i know it.




LMAO can you now see how disingenuous you are and why i say you're a shameless liar?

Did you not question whether i wrote a thesis or not, did you not question whether or not an undergraduate thesis is a thesis even after looking at a course similar to ours?




But you're the first person to bring it up to say you graduated from a five year degree at 21, may be your brain is degenerating afterall.



AHA! I remember saying putting all my accolades aside, my results which are way above average are indicative of my intellect. See i remember everything.


These were the exact words i used.




Naah small fry, the conclusions you're drawing from simple straight forward self explanatory statements are scary. If you're not dumb, you simply may not just understand english.

BarthramLestat:
Me being in passive mode and embracing a more humble approach to things I considered what you posted. I discarded my plethora of accolades and searched within myself. Could he be right? Do I have an over inflated ego? Could it be? Am I a deluded narcissist? Right at that moment I checked into my university's online portal and glanced the first entry of my final results and mark me, all that self doubt flew right out of the window. Forget the tests, forget the aforementioned accolades, my brain functions at a level that makes me question if I'm really even human. I see things, know things ordinary people like you can never understand. So keep grasping at straws eruditor, while the legend of my prodigious genius grows.

This is why I find you amusing:

so what are the aforementioned accolades that are plethora in number or your prodigious genius?

You have one laughably passable report you wanted to magnify into a thesis.
You are achieving things at the same rate of the average person your age.
YOU are often caught in one lie or gaffe and the mortals around you on Nl are quick to spot and a times eviscerate you.

There is nothing to who you are. Not your mannerism, the insularity with which you pass of cliches. Not your childish rantings, your base reasoning, your constant search for validation, your lies...nothing. There is nothing celebratory or vaunted about your so-called accolades which are summarised into being 21 and memorizing the Quran.

You are a shameless portrayal of academic chicanery. A bad case of impostor syndrome. If you are anything related to being freakishly intelligent then I am God the creator of Heaven and earth.

NictisZorander:
Because you stupid idiot, every chapter you write has to be within the guidelines given to you and have to consult with your supervisor after which he will question you on everything you wrote and why before he can approve you writing a milestone report and this is before you submit. Once you submit if there is any strong plagiarism that indicates intent then you repeat the academic year.

Your supervisor is not your examiner. He cannot verify that you wrote those things yourself. I could have been getting my mercenary do it for me chapter by chapter and my Supervisor would not have a clue. That is why it is apposite to subject you to other examiners whose duty is to do primarily that.

Plagiarism cannot be checked by a defense for the umpteenth time. What you submitted is a report. They may call it thesis in your circle to make you feel you are in an academic environment but nobody in the US will honour it as a thesis. This is most likely a UK setting where they even have professional PhD programs. lol

In your life (which is mostly god-forsaken), don't ever bring up academics again. You are a bottom-scrubber.

usbcable:

Ask him. The guy is a sham. Glory-hunting footballing who.re.

donlittle25:
I saw it and I saw the schools that end their term in may.

You said you speak russian meaning you hava some knowledge of the Russian language if I remember correctly.

That means you are based out of Eastern Europe.

About every school on that list in Eastern Europe ends their semester around October or September.

Brutal.

NictisZorander:
If that is what you got out of all that i think every neutral person here can see the sort of idiot i am dealing with

Let us assume you got paid by me to do my whole report. Then I "turnitin". How do the examiners ascertain that I did it myself?

Remember, it will pass the plagiarism test because I want to assume you did a good job of not citing any work or ideas without proper referencing (which is plagiarism) etc. So tell me how the examiners can verify beyond reasonable doubts that I, Eruditor, did it.

NictisZorander:
LMAO! Where did i ever say it was a big deal my God? why do you keep creating these narratives that i have nothing to do with and then go on to blame me for your stupidity. Your man brought my thesis out of nowhere and the idiot just like you assumed thesis were for postgraduates and created some timeline which i never stated myself. So i should defend why Donlittle25 is a mo.ron and a midget because his assumptions scammed you not me. This is someone stupid enough to use his name and handle here what else do i have to say about his stupidity?

Ohh and mind you in my noble household one is required to memorize a certain holy book and learn a certain semitic language and is required to be at least 18 years of age before leaving the country for studies.

He taunted you about your PhD thesis you had to turn in. I echoed the sentiment. You did not refute the PhD aspect but defended thesis. Then he used your age accounts to negate the PhD position and you sought to engage him. When you were trapped, you denied ever being a PhD. Then I swooped in to contravene the same argument even if it were extended to Masters (involving research). You tried to make a case but as soon as you were trapped, you denied ever being in a masters program. I have now asked you what is special about submitting a report following your undergrad program.

As for the latter part of your rubbish post, I have a ton of muslim friends. 2 of them even went to Florida to study the same course you did. They were 16 when they left Nigeria and they were taught Arabic (+french) even as they memorised the koran growing up. Find another excuse abeg.

NictisZorander:
Shut up you fool, very essence of the word? LOL Admit you were wrong you stupid mo.ron.

When you report and explain every milestone you made and how you came by it and your work is tested for plagiarism without passing both criteria how can you have someone else do everything for you? This guy is a certified dummy!

Plagiarism means someone wrote for you?
Reporting every milestone means the examiners can verify that you did the reporting?

NictisZorander:
SMH, go and check your first post about the essence of a research and the process and where you first foolishly claimed all thesis must be defended.

Stop with the marlakey. Provide this:

But you claimed a research or conclusion is incomplete without theoretical conclusions LMAO! FOH Dumbass!

LMAO Mr Amnesia, i never brought up that equation, you did. i just forgot to put it in a quote and you're too stupid to remember what you wrote.

Pointless. What does this even mean?

WTF is wrong with this guy? you just said something was disproved and then said i didnt mention it because i dont know anything?

The use of IQ tests in general as a determinant of intelligence has waned. But you who mouths off IQ at every point did not know that was the formula relating mental age and actual age that I was mocking earlier. You are excrutiatingly asinine.

First up he brings up mental age and some equation which i never brought up, says its disproved and now i'm ignorant for not bringing it up

Dullardino you were talking mental age....Nah NVM. Won't suffer your dunderhead further.

Now kids cant be smarter than adults

They can. For a kid to be smarter than the adult, they will need to be able to reason higher than the level of that adult at their present state. So a 5 year old kid who knows some calculus is not smarter than a college maths professor simply because the college professor did not know calculus at the same age. The kid is smarter than the professor was at age 5 and that is all. That same kid may grow up not knowing more calculus than the prof does now. Basic reasoning.

LMAO. Above average intelligence but thinks like a retar.d, do you know how intelligence works?

"average" meaning there were days of brainfarts and days of sound reasoning of which when a mean was taken, you landed just above it. Those who are highly intelligent have way more days of sound reasoning with outlier moments of clunkers. Think of Steph and Korver. The "best 3pt shooter" was 1/22 over 4 games and the other who made 22 3s still had a very bad game where he went 1/10.

You know more than i do at 21 when every stupid comment you've mad i've proven to be untrue. Going by your statements here you dont know anything man LMAO

Delusion is bliss. Why do you think people jeer at you?

First i had no thesis at all then thesis are for post grads, then all thesis must be defended then its only stem degrees.

Provide just 1 place where any of these statements were made against you.

If this is what you know now, i am scared to find out how much you knew at 16, or is your brain degenerating?

I knew that graduating aged 16 meant fvckall. Imagine seeing someone now boast about it?

WTF? When did i ever bring it up as an achievement? LOL These donkeys put words into my mouth and then claim they've disproved what i said, again where did i ever bring my academic level as an achievement? SMH The little insecure midget out of nowhere decided to create a story out of misconceptions i never subscribed to and how is that my fault.

This is the you who said you wondered if you were boastful etc but when you logged into your academic portal and saw your results and all your achievements you realised people bla bla bla. Now you are denying the achievements you thought you had.

And where did i call being 21 an achievement, i called it a privilege, clearly stated it. When re.tards lose arguments they begin to create dumb ones or create and attack narratives that dont exist to hide their obvious failure.

LOL

Wait, maybe this bonehead just doesnt understand english? Man i'm dead

This is rich, coming from you.

MoR2:
one thing makes your post silly, the other makes it stupid

1. the fact you added benitez
2. that lruditor supports it

Mo.ron Squared, I only feel for the RM fans who think you are one of them.

Chelsea-supporting-former-Barca-fan- Madridista.

Miremoses1:
so because zizou isn't our coach, that means the next coach won't achieve what he has. Lame talk from you.

The next coach will take us to greater heights, more than zizou did.

Next season will also be a good one for Madrid.

Adios Lruditor

Okay. Okay. Faith talk.

We shall see.

osayi90:
I should predicate what I'm about to write with, I am not picking sides. I just want to clear something untrue, which is "a thesis must be defended"- this is not true, I repeat it is not true. In some Universities, once a PhD thesis has been submitted, the external examiners (mostly 3 of them) go through it and write their report on the said thesis(i.e. if there is any contribution to knowledge), after this phase, if at least 2 of the 3 examiners reports are favorable then the student is giving a PhD otherwise the student will be giving an M.Phil or may be asked to withdraw---this is the particular model used in universities in Australia.

This depends on what they call thesis. Some people use the term interchangeably to refer to projects, papers, essays and so on - it is a present day misnomer. But if thesis is being used as thesis in the very essence of the word, then I disagree with your explanation. I mean disagree totally.

What I have observed academically in some UK and to some degree Australian schools is that they have some “coursework” PhDs which is basically like an undergrad degree. But for research-laden Academic milieus like US, you cannot just submit a report that is reviewed independent of their assessment of your “thesis”. Because someone somewhere else could have been contracted to do everything for you which is the unforgivable crime in academia.

donlittle25:
You don’t know what a STEM degree is?

You are actually more foolish than I thought.

This son of a gun said he has dedicated his life to making lives better and I honestly thought he was doing research in engineering field or the medical field. This piece of shit is studying economics or agriculture and honestly has the audacity to say he has dedicated his life to make others life better.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

In fact, I was actually giving him some respect thinking he was some 21 year old PhD. Not knowing the guy was just an undergrad. That is why I was perplexed like, why do you think graduating from your first degree aged 21 is a big deal? It is the norm which is even less than it when you consider he did a 3-year undergrad degree.

Fool graduated secondary school aged 16 and still used 2 years to get into a Uni in UK OR Ukraine. How is that an achievement? I can't even deal. I feel scammed.

donlittle25:
Almost everyone of us in naija finished high school at 16 but our guy here think he is special.

Exactly what I tried to tell the fool.

NictisZorander:
Please dont retract another blunt statement you made, go and re read what you typed

Just provide where it was said.

Now this is interesting.



Mental age/Actual age × 100= IQ

You were always hurrying to mention IQ without studying its history and the controversies surrounding its use. You are even dumber than I thought.

I never proposed any such equation that is just a conclusion you condensed from hot air

You never proposed it because you are not Alfred Binet nor do you know anything about everything that you make noise about.

Originally, the differences between mental age and chronological age were used to compute the intelligence quotient, or IQ. This was computed using the ratio method, with the following formula:

mental age ÷ Physical age × 100 = IQ
No matter what the child's chronological age, if the mental age is the same as the chronological age, then the IQ will equal 100.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_age

Its a simple straight forward concept, a kid knowing as much as an average adult of a certain makes him smarter than most his peers and smarter than the adult as well but not more learned. The extent to which must not necessarily correlate to any given correlation but the standards and averages used

I keep getting surprised by the quantity of twaddle that this fool spews. I am not even going to lecture you on this. Keep deluding yourself with "smarter than the adult" LOL.

LOL Achievement does not necessarily equate to intelligence and thats why i told you i dont gauge my intellect based on them. A lot of people achieved a lot more than einstein at certain earlier stages of his life, doesnt make them smarter than him.

Remove achievements, you are still not as intelligent as you think. I am generous, you are slightly above the mean. You still reason as a retard, speak out of turn, cannot sustain intelligent conversations and lie to makeup for mental deficiencies. And we would have been softer with you if you did not start with all that MENSA nonsense.

The very fact that you think the little man can run circles around a goat let alone me or the very fact that you think you saying that riles me up or gives it any credibility is why i keep telling you that you're just plain dumb!

I stated it because it is a fact.

So i'm guessing you're in your late twenties, possibly 29 to be more precise and getting your arse handed to you by someone who just became old enough to drink

I was not born in the 80s. How about that? And I did my NYSC before leaving Nigeria. lol. Keep it real with you, I knew more as a 16 year old than you ever could as a 21 year old and I don't even think I am that much better than my peers let alone those above me. Now imagine me suffering to read someone boast about things I did better than him even at the same age.

Where did i ever claim that i achieved anything? LOL I'm such saying i am smarter than you and better than you in every way possible

Good thing you are now denying talking about achievements. I interact with 23 year old (Nigerian)PhDs in MIT, Stanford, Austin etc. and I know how they respect me. Then someone on NL, that cannot think himself out of a toilet seat, in some tachere European school where Theses are graded without being defended thinks because he was born some years after I was born is smarter than me.

In fact, it says a lot about you when you think being 21 is an achievement. Fool, anybody above 21 in age was once 21 before. If it was not an achievement to them then, why do you think it is to you except you are a retardino?

NictisZorander:
But you claimed a research or conclusion is incomplete without theoretical conclusions LMAO! FOH Dumbass!

Provide where I said this.

Young age is not an accomplishment but its definitely a privilege. Let me explain something to you small fry, age is important when discussing intellect because a kid having a genius level IQ isnt necessarily more skilled than an adult, it just means he has an IQ much higher than the mean of his age. But it does make him smarter, thats why i brought up your old age and stupidity or lack of knowledge and skill that accompanied it in your case.

Let me show you how stupid you are.

Mental age/Actual age × 100= IQ

So if a child is 2 actually but thinks like a 4year old the child's IQ is 200 or that the child is 2 times smarter than the mean. Ok so when the child is 40 does it mean they think like 80 year olds? That is why the theory Alfred Binet proposed on this has been upturned by more seasoned psychologists.

I can tell you free of charge that you are at best a little above average. Your achievements for your age are just above the mean ever so slightly. Even on this thread, it is the same thing. So when you think you are in some top 2 percentile...ask yourself if you have done anything beyond 98% of the people in the world. The answer is a resounding NO.

LOL! I didnt bring up a PHD as an accomplishment nor did i ever use it for the basis of my superior intellect ever before in this forum. Being a member of MENSA though and recording an IQ of 147, i say thats way above most people my age.

LOL. Imagine all the people who have run circles around you on this thread, many of which don't even see themselves as some high IQ confraternity. If your IQ is anything to go by, Donlittle is neatly a 294 IQ. FACTS.

I speak of age because i am more learned at my age than you at your old age and i count that as an accomplishment and a testament to the time and effort ive dedicated to improving myself as a human being in addition to my natural talents.

LOL. How many years do you really think I have on you? I am not even up to 30 and I have celebrated my birthday this year. I don't want to talk too much abeg. I told you to just learn to shut up. You have achieved nothing. Diddly squat. And you certainly won't even do much because you over-celebrate meaningless things.

NictisZorander:
First i'm lying about writing a thesis, then all thesis must be defended, then an undergraduate thesis isnt a thesis, then a non STEM thesis isnt a thesis now he only said all of that to prove i wasnt a PHD holder, where did i ever claim that i was? LMAO By God, this clown wont kill me.

If I can reduce it to absurdities perhaps people will not see I was exposed.

NictisZorander:
No you mor.on! In an analytical research the data is definite, its either pippen had higher stats or not. Its either pippens points were higher without jordan or not. A recommendation is necessary is some thesis but speculations arent compulsory as long as you answer your research questions, thats why abstracts dont contain theories you friggin dolt!

If everyone would come to the same conclusion based on fixed set of data then why is it research? You are trying to sound smart but you are just making a fool of yourself. Lol

LOL, But when you started your argument you knew we were talking about a non STEM course and still made those foolish comments. Even if you didnt you didnt make that distinction nor did you entertain the possibility. Now you're bringing up excuses to move the goal post! Just FOH you shameless brainless fool! Again what does your stupid analogy have to do with the fact that you botched the method and aim of an academic research?

You are slow of thought. Non-STEM behind is because you are making unidrectionally nitwitted statements like data is definite. Of course it is..but are conclusions and propositions from data definite?

No you mo.ron, age and intellect is definite, its either you're old or not, its either you're stupid in comparison to the standard for your age or not. You are old and way too stupid for your age small fry. If someone like you can live as long as you have and if intellect was the only variable that determines age, i'd take my chances to live a very long and fruitful life knucklehead.

You still have not learnt even when you have just done what I have been teaching you. Age is fixed data but you are choosing to theorize about it in a way that may vary from a more sensible person. Yes, I was born before you so I am older than you. It is not an achievement to be older or younger. But I can tell you free of charge that you are at best above average. So your younger age means nothing.

If you had a PhD or some grandiose achievement which most people your age do not have, that may have made a case for you but you have none. To think that what you thought was a sure-fire sign you were smart is the same thing other people did and still felt like it was nothing. This shows where you really are.

BTW You are still talking about an age you hope to get to. I am already there. Which means you might not get to the point I am already living behind. Your false bravado and misplaced megalomania cracks me up.

NictisZorander:
Why are you calling it high school? you graduated from a nigerian secondary school, so did i, its called secondary school, no need trying to impress people with that?

I didnt start a discussion on academics, you and the midget did, i'm just defending my honor (even though i shouldnt care what pillocks like you think) and in the process educating you?

Of course my intellectual prowess will irk someone like you, its called envy and jealously witless m.oron!

Slowly, humility is filtering through.

NictisZorander:
You asked for PHD and masters and didnt entertain another possibility meaning your tiny little brain has exhausted the breadth of possible options and you also stipulated as if after masters and phds there arent other options for dissertations. You posted a link to an undergraduate program and claimed its not a masters program as if that invalidates it from being a thesis.

And how many times does someone have to tell you not all thesis' requires defense you friggin doltish ape

Like i said, dangers of being limited to a nigerian university.

LOL. Your use of "as if", just shows you are trying to draw false conclusions.

You knew announcing you were in an undergrad prog will taint the showboating and boasting you had been doing here so you preferred to sell the relative young age with this false aura of being a PhD to legitimize this Dougie-Howser impression you had been trying to sell. When the PhD act was knocked off, you tried to couch under the Msc one and it too was knocked off. That is the main throwaway from this exchange.

I have consistently mentioned that a thesis must be defended and even capitalized the word THESIS to demonstrate the major point of emphasis. Attempting to hide under "undergraduate" just makes you look stupid because I never even attached any tertiary level to my explanation on the word. We only brought up the PhD and MSc aspects to expose you as a liar who was pretending to be a 20 year old PhD.

NictisZorander:
You just caught caught charlatan! There are descriptive researches that dont require data analysis. LMAO!

I only have one question: When you type these foolish things, do you hope it will hide your very glaring naivety?

When did i ask for all of this rubbish? what does STEM degree have to do with this? This slowpoke claims a persons conclusion is his theory LMAO

You are so simple. It is funny. Skip was arguing GOAT status with Shannon. Shannon tried to water down MJs other aspects besides scoring by stating that Pippen posed better assists than Jordan. To counter this, Skip argues that Pippen's assist numbers were high because most were to Jordan who was a prime scorer. 2 men, using the same data with both having varying conclusions but Skip presented a theory (to explain the data).

Standard researches have research hypothesis which your data either supports or disproves and your conclusion based on that is definite, you dont create theories from conclusions like you claimed you stupid mo.ron

This is shallow and dumb. Research could begin from a hypothesis but it is not necessary. That is why I have told your Non-STEM behind to STFU. For instance, Skip could expound on his conclusion about Pippen and theorise that high assists signify having good team-mates therefore any high-assisting player (like Lebron) cannot propose bad players as an excuse for losing.

That is an example of drawing a theory from a conclusion. Alexander Fleming did that too with Penicillin (by theorising from his conclusion what it could be used for after disproving his own hypothesis).

Your comment is redundant seeing it is just reiterating what the question asked, stupid old foool!

Being old is relative. And with your foolishness, you may not live to become my present age.

You finished High School aged 16?

Every one of my siblings (yours truly included) did same. It is not an achievement. That is why I have told you to just STFU.

If this was a session of boasting about academic achievements, you will run. And I don't even think I have done anything.

Now you see why all that shameless gloating about IQ and age was irking me. You won't measure up. You don't.

NictisZorander:
Maybe I do have a split personality but didn't this idiot just claim only masters, PhD and other post graduate courses require a dissertation and deduced I was either doing a master's or PhD?

I don't care which sh.it hole school you went to or what you studied, my issue here is with you calling me a liar or claiming a thesis must be defended in order to be validated because that's the only thing you're used to or you've heard of. FOH ignoramus!

And for the record, I graduated from secondary school when I was 16 knucklehead.

I claimed ONLY masters and PhDs required dissertation?

Provide where I said it.

Fool, when you backed out of the PhD talk, I went further to propound that even if you were in masters program, the thesis will still need to be defended just as it will be if it was an undergraduate thesis.

The key word there being THESIS.

NictisZorander:
LMAO this guy is dumber than I thought.

First of all I spoke of Turnitin and other protocols like milestone reports, research justification that eliminate the need for defense

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Secondly you don't just get data and deduce, my research is analytical and required using correlation and regression models with SPSS after which you reduce your result from there

What is this baloney? Is there any research that is not analytical? You actually think you know anything? LOL

You don't create theories from your conclusion m.oron, you use them to justify the basis of researching the variables to begin with.

What you draw from your data analysis is conclusions and recommendations.

I see. I was wasting my time. Typical non-STEM degree carrying academic mountebank. In STEM degrees, your conclusion is the theory you are putting out. That is why a colloquial synonym for thesis is also proposition or claim. Or you think conclusion implies that you have resolved the issue? Fool. Your conclusion simply implies that is YOUR own interpretation of the data you have collated. Someone else can have a different interpretation from yours. That is why you are mandated to defend that conclusion in front of the experts and colleagues alike. You should return the cert of participation your school gave you. You are a quack.

My God, the stupidity and ignorance percolating out of this idiot and he has the cohones to question my intellect or credibility. SMH. Just FOH you're embarrassing yourself!

I did not question your intellect or credibility. I cannot question what does not exist.

SmooshCHN:
Where did he say he was doing masters

LOL