₦airaland Forum

Jozibrainz100:
Omoo which kind person you be na

Are you not busy with work??

Truth be told , I barely read all your messages even before replying.

I only replied u with a laugh emoji. You are the one that turned it into a federal case!

zero8zero:
Tinubu the nightmare of ipob, Lol. You have been looking for his classmates, you have one now.

Like those bishops durring the campaign

But Chicago State Uni is an all black uni.

Or is he still trying to pretend he went to white U of Chicago

MaxInDHouse:
ọmọ it's obeisance and it could be done to anyone! Act 10:25

Here is what you quoted. Can you imagine Jesus saying this?

25 As Peter entered the house, Cornelius met him and fell at his feet in reverence. 26 But Peter made him get up. “Stand up,” he said, “I am only a man myself.”

Jozibrainz100:
How does that sound like “the school should be forced?
The way you keep quoting me unnecessarily over a simple write up you misinterpreted is kinda funny.

What is hilarious is you saying about a broke student who dropped out, the uni (in Nigeria!)"should be called to look into the matter and allow him to round up his program"

MaxInDHouse:
Guy don't worry yourself further it's not easy to agree since you have no definition for your own God i believe you already know where the problem is and that settles the issue.
We have a definition of God and we've all agreed upon that definition so it is WORKING for our faith {James 2:18} and yielding positive results in our midst! John 13:34-35

As for what you quoted this is what my own Bible says:

And when they went into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and falling down, they did obeisance to him. Matthew 2:11a

You read your Bible, right? Which other time do you see anybody do obeisance to child, talkless if one born in a manger where animals are kept?

MaxInDHouse:
I and my millions of my faithful brothers globally have agreed on the definition of our own God so there's no need crossing the lines if you don't have any definition for your own God!

Man (which includes you and your brothers) know almost nothing talkless of defining God. We only know Jesus is God from evidence NOT from our reasoning or logic. See below, same thing happened with Simeon the old man and Anna, the old widow:

Mathew 2:
The star they had seen when it rose went ahead of them. It finally stopped over the place where the child was. 10 When they saw the star, they were filled with joy. 11 The Wise Men went to the house. There they saw the child with his mother Mary. They bowed down and worshiped him.

MaxInDHouse:
So you have to keep what you know while i keep mine no wahala!

That's the thing - you don't know anything, neither do I. So we are in no position to be saying whether the Word of God can be God and at same time be with God. Just as we are in no position to say whether God can be in heaven and at same time be in each of us or is able to listen to a million prayers all at once, etc

MaxInDHouse:
Millions have written things like that when the person is no longer physically around!

"In the beginning was president Tinubu, and President Tinubu was with..."😆 Pure nonsense! NOBODY will write that, unless he was already president Tinubu!

Meanwhile that's not even the point if my post.
Here's the post again:

That's by human reasoning. Just as by human reasoning he can't be inside you, neither could the Father be inside him, etc. Isn't the word of God also God?? You have to know what we are trying to define here.
(I'll now cut and paste what I wrote before):

God has no definition in human terms.
See if you can wrap your mind around this:
There are over 2 trillion galaxies in our universe. AND possibly unlimited number of universes. Now, if you shrink our galaxy (which is just ONE of trillions of galaxies) to the size of the earth, our earth will be smaller than a grain of salt! Add to that, there are likely multiple dimensions. That's the God you're trying to say who can sit beside who!

MaxInDHouse:
The nonsense is when a translator says the word WAS God and with God, no one has seen God but people saw the word!
The person in question could be with anyone nah, the point of emphasis is that the word has been with God in the beginning that doesn't mean he became the word in the beginning.

I think you have a problem with language syntax.
"In the beginning was the president of Nigeria and the president of Nigeria was with..."
Who'd ever write that??

CanadaOrBust:
Couldn't care less
We no dey give shi shi

https://yout.be/mMq1OdVINQY?si=XEylH6N2cLV0

You totally miss the point

(This is just to complete the 40 characters!)

tanigororo:
Gay Doctor 💊 🏥
⠁⠁⠁⠁⠁⠁⠁⠁

How ya figure? Just because he wants a woman who wants him as husband to pay because you value what you pay for more than free stuff

MaxInDHouse:
John is talking about the origin of this one who later became the word of God.

It's like saying:
"The president of Nigeria WAS a student of St Peter Anglican church" that doesn't mean he has become the president as a student in primary school nah!

Ok, let's replace "word" with president and you'll see you're obviously wrong:

"In the beginning was the president, and the president was with..."
See the nonsense? You'd use the president's name: "In the beginning was John, and John was with..."

drehdinho:
Ridiculous is all I can say. If anyone needs to read the internet in and out on this that should be you not me.

I only wanted to see if I could guide you away from the misconceptions you have about lawyers.

But seems you know it all and I wish you luck with whatever that suits your narrative.

Bye mate.

Ok, I did the job 4 ya. At least lawyers beat out one profession

Jozibrainz100:
Go back and read what i wrote again??

Below is what you wrote verbatim

MaxInDHouse:
You can twist it anyhow you want but as it's written in God's word Bible Jesus was given a name after his earthly mission that name is the Word Of God.
Why?
Because he has been God's mouthpiece in heaven before all other angels himself being one of them but after he succeeded in making some humans God's children through his ministry and sacrificed his perfect human life to redeem them God gave him that name:

The Word Of God! Revelations 19:13

So the person given that name is totally different from the person who gave him that name!

So "the Word of God" is a proper name given after successful mission to earth. Who knew. Strange theology. So why did it say he was Word of God "in the beginning"?

drehdinho:
You’re getting it all wrong. If a lawyer is subjected to such question, it suggestive of the fact that the lawyer was the one directly involved in the matter.

In law, if the image you painted ever allowed, it amounts to hearsay.

Let me guide you a little on how the litigation system works.

In court, the judge gives room for both parties to say their side of the story. He must hear from both sides first .

Then, based the accounts of the parties, the two opposing lawyers will begin to present evidence supplied to them by their clients to support their arguments or claims.

Ok, here's a challenge: search the internet inside out and come up with a list of 10 most dishonest professions that doesn't include lawyers

drehdinho:
Many factors are considered before arriving at a conclusion in litigation.

Your question is like you asking me to walk you through the entire process of litigation.

One thing I want you to know is this: court’s verdict strictly follows a written law and particularly whether the requirements of the law relevant to the case have been fulfilled.


For instance if a particular law says stealing is a prohibited conduct or action. And the law defines and specifies what stealing is and further highlights what needs to be proved to establish stealing.

A lawyer whose client has been charged for stealing only needs to show with verifiable evidence and appropriate authority that the alleged act of stealing attributed to his client does not fall within the legal scope of stealing.

If based on the evidence and facts plus the authorities cited , the judge is convinced that the alleged act of stealing in question is truly not the one the written law defines , then the judgment would be in favour of the client. Otherwise, the client will be convicted and subjected to appropriate punishment prescribed by the same law.

This is just one out of many instances of how litigation works.

In litigation lawyers may state facts that are parallel line to the stated laws , and most often time the opposition party would raise objections. The court may on his own do same. This is because the primary purpose for establishing the court system is to uphold justice.

And all parties to a case must be allowed unrestricted freedom to defend their position and interest in accordance to the principle of natural justice( rule against bias)

Very simple, if asked point-blank "Yes or no, did your client do it?", what would the lawyer answer?

I saw this below. Good wrte-up though

Fifty characters

drehdinho:
What do you mean by “Typical lawyer?”
My advise: be open minded with life.

You may have had a bad experience with one; it doesn’t mean it would be the same with all.

Regardless, thanks for the correction.

Correct me if am wrong, a lawyer's job is to lie angrily and loudly that his client didn't rape and murder that woman even if he knows fully well he did. Right?

MaxInDHouse:
This is what my Bible says:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. This one was in the beginning with God.  All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence. John 1:1-3

The title GOD was misconstrued by trinitarians because Jesus can't be God and at the same time said to be with God!

That's by human reasoning. Just as by human reasoning he can't be inside you, neither could the Father be inside him, etc. Isn't the word of God also God?? You have to know what we are trying to define here.
(I'll now cut and paste what I wrote before):

God has no definition in human terms.
See if you can wrap your mind around this:
There are over 2 trillion galaxies in our universe. AND possibly unlimited number of universes. Now, if you shrink our galaxy (which is just ONE of trillions of galaxies) to the size of the earth, our earth will be smaller than a grain of salt! Add to that, there are likely multiple dimensions, and possibly infinite number of universes. That's the God you're trying to say who can sit beside who!

drehdinho:
“The beautiful ones are not yet born”- Chinua Achebe.

Typical Lawyer! That isn't by Achebe!😅

Ruke1990:
Maybe before spending heavily to upgrade a woman (girlfriend or wife), we may need to serve them agreement papers to ensure the marriage or relationship lasts atleast 5 to 10 years after sponsorship, otherwise they refund in full the entire cash spent plus 9$ per year interest before breakup/divorce can be served. Every woman must be made to sign such documents before they get a dime from their boyfriend/husband for their upgrade. Universities like ABUAD serve such paper before agreeing to sponsor their staff abroad for further studies. Companies abroad serve same paper before sponsoring a candidate to work abroad (especially those Nclex sponsoring agencies for nurses). Thesame idea must be brought home and applied to marriages. You mustn't confer blind trust on a woman. There is a difference between blind trust and earned trust

This is one area that underscore the lack of creativity amongst black race. The whites invented pre-nuptial to solve their own problems of being taken advantage of. Blacks sit idle, lament and are unable to do something creative to solve this sponsorship scam problem that pervades the nigerian society

How do you enforce such an agreement? You think it is that easy and people won't be doing it. You think you can just sign anything.
And agreement signed in another country too and under duress!

Oscarchims:
It's legit but less publicity, though for undergraduates alone

How come I don’t hear of it and I still hear people complain of school fees?

Jozibrainz100:
Dey play….

Nothing is impossible in Nigeria.

The school authorities should be forced to enroll him back without money. That's what you said😆

drehdinho:
When fraud taints lawyer’s professional conduct, it means he’s not fit and proper. Therefore, if the persons you mentioned were found guilty of this prohibited act, then they are not cool headed.

Over and above expertise of a lawyer is integrity.

A lawyer with integrity will act only in the sole interest of his client. And this includes keeping safe fund he’s holding in trust for his clients.

It’s not unusual to find few bad eggs in any profession and law is definitely not an exception in this regards. And this has nothing to do with the country. Bad people are abound everywhere even in religion centers.

Have been offered to hold a brief of a colleague who promised to pay my professional fees after the job. He asked me to share my bank details in the morning before stepping out.

I returned from court and sent him detailed reports of the proceedings; in fact they were two briefs I held for him.

If he’s going to pay me my professional fees till today. No calls or text from him to at least explain his reasons . And I still see his WhatsApp stories every now and then.

I didn’t bother to even ask for the money. I just moved on.

So, in summary , there are definitely bad players in the industry as well. And the disciplinary committee of the Nigerian legal profession are trying their best to ensure the industry is purged of these bad actors.

The way you're talking, if one didn't know better he'd think lawyers are saints!😅

Habib101:
Theirs no luck in this life bro, some people the luck comes to them easy while some it doesn't either ways work is still involved, what determines your luck is your hard work, persistent and the right mindset, then you can achieve your what ever goal you desire.

So it's not pure luck you were born into your family in Nigeria instead of to Bill Gates in US?

Konquest:
"He used his accounting to sell dope? Are you kidding?!" He did non of that.

The now President 'Bola Tinubu of Nigeria is a technocrat, chartered accountant and auditor who worked with Mobil Nigeria (now ExxonMobil) and rose to the senior rank of a treasurer with the same multinational oil company.

Second the United States Government has since 1993 and through the then Legal Attache, Michael Bonner of the United States Consulate in Lagos State in 2003 emphasized that Tinubu was NEVER a drug baron or has NEVER been a convicted person based off of the information in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) National Crime Information Center (NCIC) which is the central database of ALL arrests and convictions in the entire United States.

I couldn't attach the official document from the Legal Attache, Michael Bonner right BELOW for you to read. It's the highly paid ipob troll farms and other bigots that are spreading this massive disinformation of him being a "drug baron or druggie" to defame him or tarnish his political image and there will be severe consequences for them soon. Period.

People don't have multiple bamk accounts and forfeit $1.1m (in today's dollar) because they were NOT dealing drugs!

highchief1:
I made all my money abroad.make I come Dey see which person face.self made millionaires Dey give wahala too much.they are not loyal to anyone.na em be me.

Way to go!

MaxInDHouse:
Well i believe only the father is God just as Jesus himself taught his disciples:


Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. ‭John 17:3 NIV‬


Jesus taught us that there is only one true God and according to this verse that only true God is not Jesus!

Then also quote John 1:1,: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

AND
John 14:9 “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?

AND
Mathew 16
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

AND
John 20:28
28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”

AND
John 8
58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” 59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him... (for obviously claiming to be God)

AND
John 10:33,: "We are not stoning you for any good work," they replied, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God,"

AND
Mark 14,: Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?”
62 “I am,” said Jesus...
63 The high priest tore his clothes. “Why do we need any more witnesses?”
(Here again Jesus uses the divine "I am"}

So Mr Max, if you honestly study the Bible with an open heart, it will gradually dawn on you as it dawned on the apostles: This is God!

Chief2410:
if we are to agree on this then we are left with a bitter reality.This must be a prison.

Not at all. Infact it ought let you relax in the knowledge that things are unfolding as they must.
When did you choose to be born into your family? You could have been born to a pauper or Bill Gates or even never born at all (say your mum said she had a headache that day, a totally different person would have been born and you'd never know you were never born!)

SarkinYarki:
God bless president Trump , God bless the men of US Airforce 509th Global Strike Command for leading their glorious B2s over 7000 miles to deliver curtains to the the evil Iranian Nuclear Projects , God Bless Israel

We want God to bless Iran too. We just want them to stop enriching uranium

ALLNIGERIANSMAD:
IRAN regime is evil and, I only pity the innocent citizens not those ones shouting Allah war Ku boom oh

They really need to be taught a lesson
The women had a revolt not long ago