₦airaland Forum

The Root Of It All

The title may mislead if misunderstood.

Enemies of Christ's True Church have abounded since its

beginning, even from within. Indeed the Church has even suffered the existence

of Anti-popes (unlawful claimants to the papacy), but never before

had the entire uooer structure of the Church been completely

hijacked.

Which is what occurred on the night of October 26, 1958 -
the false election of Antipope John XXIII.



The details.

- According to tradition, the signal that a pope has been successfully
elected is the release of white smoke from atop the Vatican. On this
Sunday night(26/6/1958) white smoke billowed from the Vatican for a full
five minutes.

- This is a matter of historical record. Vatican radio (as well as news
media worldwide) reported the election of a new pope. Vatican officials,
including the Palatine Guard, were assuming their positions for the
announcement of the new pope's name when they were turned back.

- Confusion reigned, the Vatican exchange was flooded with press inquiries
and no clarification came.

- Two days later Angelo Roncalli was to the world as John XXIII.
After the conclave should have been over John kept the cardinals
another night for a mysterious multi-hour post-conclave meeting.

- So secret,in fact that when Vatican Secretary of State Tardini tried
to enter, believing the conclave over, he was excommunicated on the spot
by France's Cardinal Tisserant.

The mystery may have ended there, if not for one man: a Signor Scortesco.
Scortesco was cousin to the President of the Noble Guard, responsible for
preventing any communication between the conclave (voting area) and the
outside.(in 1958 and also in 1963). Such communications are strictly
forbidden.

- Scortesco revealed in a published letter -



- Not long after Scortesco was found burned alive.

- Scortesco's letter reveals that Cardinal Tedeschini was elected pope
but forced to step down for Roncalli. And that in 1963 Cardinal Siri
suffered was forced to step down for Cardinal Montini( Paul VI).
Both times by 'outside forces'.





- Former FBI consultant Paul L. Williams (non-catholic, at least then)
has gone on record citing declassified US intelligence documents
showing the Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected Pope Gregory XVII

- He asserts that US interest was piqued by 'pro-Communist sympathies'
of Roncalli and other Vatican liberals.



The entire succession from John XXIII to the present have been been
false popes.
Since the mid-20th century they have flooded the ranks of the church
with their ilk.
Through Vatican II they have corrupted clerical,lay and popular
understanding of the Catholic Faith, for the purpose of ensnaring the unwary
in the bottomless pit.


(d. 1202)





Flee the Novus Ordo mass.

Flee the Vatican II doctrine.

Flee the Vatican II Antichurch.

Important Information for Catholics



And when you shall see theabomination of desolation,
standing where it ought not: he that readeth let him understand:...

- Mark 13:14 (Douay-Rheims)
"Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist."

- The Message of Our lady of La Salette

---

There can be little doubt to anyone with an ounce of truth in his heart

that something is very wrong within the Roman Church.

There is no need to waste words or speak in uncertain tones over this

subject. The events foretold by the Prophet Daniel and Our Lady, have

come to pass.

---

---

---

---

Listen carefully.

You are deceived, most of you.

As Our Lord's Blessed Mother has warned us, Satan now rules from the Vatican.

A cult of Freemasonic Diabolists have seized control of our buildings

and vestments. They have erected a new altar, established a New Mass,

and preach a new doctrine.

---

---

Dissociate yourself from the Novus Ordo church.

Avoid the new mass under all circumstances.

Profess and obey the true Dogma of the Church in its entirety.

And pray (the Rosary).

Crucial Information For All ( Especially Catholics)

---

And when you shall see theabomination of desolation,
standing where it ought not: he that readeth let him understand:...

- Mark 13:14 (Douay-Rheims)
"Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist."

- The Message of Our lady of La Salette

---

There can be little doubt to anyone with an ounce of truth in his heart

that something is very wrong within the Roman Church.

There is no need to waste words or speak in uncertain tones over this

subject. The events foretold by the Prophet Daniel and Our Lady, have

come to pass.

---

---

---

---

Listen carefully.

You are deceived, most of you.

As Our Lord's Blessed Mother has warned us, Satan now rules from the Vatican.

A cult of Freemasonic Diabolists have seized control of our buildings

and vestments. They have erected a new altar, established a New Mass,

and preach a new doctrine.

---

---

Dissociate yourself from the Novus Ordo church.

Avoid the new mass under all circumstances.

Profess and obey the true Dogma of the Church in its entirety.

And pray (the Rosary).

---

Even those who do not subscribe to the Faith can see clearly that a coup

of sorts has taken place within the Catholic Church.

Be advised: This coup is worldwide, in every major political, financial,

and religious institution.

You are living in the Great Apostasy.

And when you shall see the abomination of desolation,
standing where it ought not: he that readeth let him understand:...

- Mark 13:14
(Douay-Rheims)

"Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist."

- The Message of Our lady of La Salette
France, 1846


There can be little doubt to anyone with an ounce of truth in his heart

that something is very wrong within the Roman Church.

There is no need to waste words or speak in uncertain tones over this

subject. The events foretold by the Prophet Daniel and Our Lady, have

come to pass.

---

---

---

---

Listen carefully.

You are quite likely deceived.

As Our Lord's Blessed Mother has warned us, Satan now rules from the Vatican.

A cult of Freemasonic Diabolists have seized control of our buildings

and vestments. They have erected a new altar, established a New Mass,

and preach a new doctrine.

---

---

---

Dissociate yourself from the Novus Ordo church.

Avoid the new mass under all circumstances.

Profess and obey the true Dogma of the Church in its entirety.

And pray (the Rosary).

akintom:
"Remember that these events took place at the beginning of the world, and so it was these ancestors of your 3 000 000 species which were rescued from the flood"

The above are your exact words. Do you mean that the modest 3 million species we have today EVOLVED from the species preserved in Noah's ark?

Are you by any means saying, for example, that one specie of a flying bird, evolved into many species of flying birds?

Perhaps one original pair into many.

Perhaps a few original pairs into many more.

The point is it is an unfolding of[b] inherent complexity[/b] and not a sequence of errors.

Think on how just 8 character spaces...

Just 8...

Contain enough inherent complexity to compose all the motor vehicle number plates in a country.

Maybe that'll help.

AgentOfAllah:
Mathematics is the language with which physical phenomena can be precisely communicated, tested and predicted.

If you still don't grasp the importance of this relationship, then I don't wish to pursue this line of conversation any further.

Hahaha. Really?

AgentOfAllah:
You may be more intelligent and insightful than I am. I really don't know you, but I can give you one guarantee:...you'll win a Nobel prize on top of that. This is for sure!
Let me just say on the side: If such a theory is cooking up in your head, I wanna work with you so we can both develop it. I have a decent physics background, and I might be able to help with the mathematical formalisms too! It would be an achievement of a lifetime if I am identified as the guy who co-authored the groundbreaking work that upstaged and rendered obsolete, the Big Bang theory!
.

A page ago we were going to win the Nobel Prize together.... truly the mob is a fickle beast.

Why? Because I told you to read slow? Don't be girlish.

(And let this be a lesson to all. They may smile at you today and squint tomorrow, so just speak your mind and leave it.)

AgentOfAllah:
...then I don't wish to pursue this line of conversation any further.

Your decision to appear was not my concern. You'll find me of similar attitude towards your decision to depart.

My concern is:

AgentOfAllah:
As for light, do you have any example(s) in nature that suggest its speed has ever been altered in time?

1. You asked for evidence of lightspeed variation.

2. I provided it, from mainstream publications.

3. You suddenly decided you didn't 'wish to pursue this line of conversation any further'.

So, off you go.

Take homework -

https://www.amazon.com/Higgs-Fake-Particle-Physicists-Committee/dp/1492176249

The Higgs Fake: How Particle Physicists Fooled the Nobel Committee
-Alexander Unzicker

_{Dr. Alexander Unzicker is a German theoretical physicist. He has degrees in both physics and law and a PhD in neuroscience from Munich University. Unzicker published papers on Einstein's unified theory and on a cosmology with a variable speed of light. His current field of research is Mach's principle and tests of gravity. Unzicker became known for his popular science book....the book was awarded “Science Book of the Year” by leading science journalists in Germany.}

akintom:
From the above statement from you, it does appear you believe in evolution by natural selection. But the problem here now with your position, is that bible rejects evolution in its entirety.

Pls clarify this, before i proceed with you.

Thanks.

Not the way you think.

Here is the difference.

Evolutionists

believe that lifeless chemical compounds organized themselves into living creatures. These creatures then replicate.

There are mistakes (mutations) in the replication process. These mistakes may coincidentally confer survival advantage.

The survivors replicate. The mistake persists as a desirable trait.

Creationists

believe that God made creatures and made them able to reproduce 'after their own kind. These creatures possess

within themselves the information to produce variety[b] within that kind[/b]. Demonstrated as follows:

Humans have 20 687 protein-coding base pairs.

Humans have an average heterozygosity of 6.7%. (This means 67 out of every thousand gene pairs 67 have different

alleles.)

Thus gives us 1340 heterozygous pair locations, called loci (singular- locus).

Thus every human can produce a vast number of different sperm or egg cells.

2¹³⁴⁰in fact.

That's Creationist variation. An unfolding of inherent complexity, inbuilt by God, and restricted within kinds.

Evolutionism teaches a series of mistakes and lucky breaks, completely unrestricted between kinds (fish evolve into

apes, apes into people, etc.)

akintom:
You theists will make a better debate on religion, if only you base your argument on the claims of your Bible, with rational and empirical facts.

Than doing a copy and paste of some works (most of which failed scientific standards) of scientists who are sympathetic to religious beliefs.

I made reference to Nature and Scientific American

Nature

is a British interdisciplinary scientific journal, first published on 4 November 1869. It was ranked the world's most cited scientific journal by the Science Edition of the 2010 Journal Citation Reports, is ascribed an impact factor of approximately 38.1, and is widely regarded as one of the few remaining academic journals that publishes original research across a wide range of scientific fields.



Scientific American

(informally abbreviated SciAm) is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles in the past 170 years. It is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States.

akintom:
On your big bang question, i advise that you contact AgentofAllah.
But if you want to engage me, outside astral(?) physics, be my guest.

You really need to stay in your lane.

I fear you may not be properly equipped for conversation at this level.

akintom:
I hope you will keep it civil too.



If you believe that the bible is literarily true, then you must believe the account of Noah and the ark.

Pls consider the following carefully:

Noah's ark measurements;
Length - 134cm
Width - 22.25m
Height - 13.1m
= 3,9089.7sqm

3,000,000 species on earth (low estimate by scientists) ×2 of each one + Noah's family of 4 = 6,000,004.
3,9089.7÷ 6,000,004 = 0.0065 = 6.5sqmm of space to roam.

This 6.5sqmm is like a dot of your pen that can't be visible to your naked eyes.

So, how TRUE is the Noah's ark? Since no physical animal can be contained in a space less than a dot of pen?

Now, if you believe that the bible is LITERARILY TRUE, how do you explain this?

300 x 50 x 30 cubits =

140 × 23 × 13.5 metres =

43,500 m³ (1.54 million cubic feet).

I believe that's equivalent to 522 standard American livestock cars ( for train transportation)

each of which holds up to 240 sheep.


Species belong to larger biological groups called 'genera' ( singular - 'genus')

This is similar to the meaning of 'kinds'.

E.g. Horses, donkeys, zebras and giraffes all have a common equine ancestor.

Coyotes, jackals, wolves, and all dogs have a common canine ancestor.

Remember that these events took place at the beginning of the world, and so it

was these ancestors of your 3 000 000 species which were rescued from the flood.

Remember also that there was no need to take sea creatures (obviously).

Redo the maths and you'll find it fits - with more than enough room for food and drinking water.

AgentOfAllah:
You should be wary of sensational headlines!

For pity's sake.

AgentOfAllah:
...the court concluded that the constitution only identifies penetration as an act of bestiality...

Therefore. Any non-penetrative bestial act is firmly within each Canadian's Constitutional rights. QED.

As for the bill 'protecting animals' we'll see how that goes. You should know the drill by now. People will gradually be

'sensitized' to bestiality, and it will become a 'human rights' campaign. Films portraying the practice are already receiving positive

reviews at prestigious festivals.

It is already legal in Texas, Japan, Finland, Hawaii among others. It is officially banned in Germany, but that country's main bestiality

website has 1.2 million members. 1.2 million. On a single subject.

You need a telescope to see what I see.

This is the result of your 'superior law'.

AgentOfAllah:
This statement is patently false!

Easy there, Social Justice Warrior.

If one believes that homosexuality is to be despised, and is forced to 'marry' a homosexual couple who believe

their 'union' is good, is he not coerced into practising another's beliefs?

If one believes 'that male and female He created them, and is compelled by law by to call men women and

vice versa, is he not coerced into endorsing contrary beliefs to his own?

AgentOfAllah:
...I now prefer to replace it with the generic term "Liberalism"...

Humanism is Socialism-lite.

And Liberalism is Satanism-lite.

AgentOfAllah:
The ultimate goal of liberalism is ... to allow everyone espouse
what ever values they believe in

'Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.'

- Aleister Crowley.
'The Book of the Law'

You will always practise someone's religion.

AgentOfAllah:
So I'll settle for a committee.

You'll live to regret that.

Oh, and yes, the more liberal societies are the more laws they eventually need. USA has the world's largest prison population.

Keep dreaming.

AgentOfAllah:
As for CMB, do you have any other suggestions/ideas as to what kind of radiation it can be?

As for light, do you have any example(s) in nature that suggest its speed has ever been altered in time?

Preamble.

Inductive reasoning

is a logical process in which multiple premises, all believed true or found true most of the time, are combined to obtain a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is often used in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or behavior.

From the above, then, if the premise is false, the theory inducehall add notes for those who may not know the basics.

AgentOfAllah:
As for light, do you have any example(s) in nature that suggest its speed has ever been altered in time?

This is an excellent place to begin.

A basic premise upon which the theory rests is the immutability of natural constants.

[ Note - Natural constants are certain phenomena assumed to be constant throughout nature and presumably throughout the history

of Creation. Examples are the speed of light in a vacuum, the weight of an electron, the gravitational constant, something called

'alpha' (another mathematical value). These numerical values and expressions are the basis of all the magic maths of the Big Bangers.

These calculations rely on these values being immutable (unchangeable) and universal (true at every point in space).

Let's see if it is so. And let's see if some of these constants are accurate to begin with.

Remember, if they fail to hold, so does the theory.]

On light.

- As far back as the 17th century, Olaf Roemer (Denmark) observed decay in the speed of light over time.

- Trevor Norman and Barry Setterfield (Stanford Research Institute, 1987), postulated speed of light decay.

- In 1987 Dr. V. S. Troitskii (Radio-physical Research Institute, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia), postulated that a huge decay
in the speed of light had occurred over time. See British journal Astrophysics and Space Science 139 (1987) 389-411
"Physical Constants and Evolution of the Universe."

- In the February 18 1999 edition of Nature, a scientific paper was published that detailed an experiment in which the speed of light
was reduced to 17 meters per second. The experiment was conducted by the Lene V. Hau and an international team from Harvard and
Stanford Universities. They sent light through a sodium vapor that had been cooled to an nanokelvin temperature.


On alpha

Formally known as the 'Fine-Structure Constant'. Defined as

‘The strength of the electromagnetic force that governs how electrically charged elementary particles (e.g., electrons, muons) and
light (photons) interact.’


- “By doing so, they have found evidence that one of the constants of nature, which are never ever supposed to vary,
was smaller billions of years ago than it is today. The quantity that was measured, known as alpha, wasn’t smaller by much
- less than 1 part in 100,000 - but the finding has sent tremors through physics and astronomy."



- ". . . although changes in the fine-structure constant [alpha] do not affect the expansion of the universe significantly, the expansion
affects alpha. . . . About six billion years ago dark energy took over and accelerated the expansion, making it difficult for all
physical influences to propagate through space. So alpha became nearly constant again.”



These examples are by no means exhaustive. I'm trying to keep this short.

You have not heard about this because Big Bangers do a good job keeping it out of mainstream media

and because you have been trained to be pliant and incurious, because the information is out there.

In a subsequent post I shall treat CMB simultaneously with Big Bang Theory's total failure to pass the

test of Occam's Razor. The two subjects go together quite well, as you shall see.

AgentOfAllah:
Thanks for the lesson in definitions. However, I fail to see your point.

Oh, boy.

You may want to read this real slow.

I mean, really, really, slow.

Mathematics is the study of abstractions.

Physics is the study of actual physical objects.

Mathematical abstractions are proved by mathematical proofs i.e. equations written on pieces of paper.

Physical objects and phenomena are proved by physical experiments. i.e. actual actions in a lab.

One may not prove abstractions with physical objects.

One may not prove physical objects with abstractions.

Whether we apply inductive or deductive reasoning is irrelevant, as long as it is grounded in physical objects.

i.e A stone which makes sound when thrown in the dark, proves the presence of a wall ahead, even if the wall is not seen.

But our deduction is grounded upon the actual objects and actual phenomena i.e. the stone, and the sound.

There is no object, no interaction between objects and no phenomena that prove the Big Bang Theory. Period.

Therefore it is not Physics. Period.

It is, at best, a kind of inductive speculation.

This is my general philosophical opposition to your position.

In a subsequent post I will treat your points one by one, as well as obliterate any notion of a purely inductive

basis for the Big Bang.

AgentOfAllah:
As has every society that has willfully pursued religion as a policy!! By definition, trying to impose ideologies on any society would necessitate descension into dictatorship. Think about it. The most inclusive system is secularism (i.e. an ideologically apathetic society)!

Secularism is a dream.

Talk realpolitik.

Someone must make the rules.

The rules will come from Divine Revelation, or the will come from a man or a committee.

And what else will that man or committee enshrine, other than that which pleases himself/themselves?

Why do you think the Canada Supreme Court recently upheld bestiality as a constitutional right?

You will always practise someone's religion.

AgentOfAllah:
Hi Gaellic,...

Hello. And I applaud you for your cordial tone.

AgentOfAllah:
To fully appreciate why the big bang remains unfalsified,...

'Falsifiability means 'can be/is able to be proven wrong'. In other words, it has to be testable.

E.g. When Ferrarri boast, "our car can hit 300km/h", thulations as evidence (and neither would we accept them).

They give a test-driver the keys. And everyone can watch. This is what falsifiability means.

AgentOfAllah:
you'll need to understand a few more things, including: Black body
radiation and cosmic microwave background. If you understand these things...

Name one piece of direct evidence for the Big Bang. Direct. Yes, you can measure CMB, but we are required to presume

that it is relic radiation. Yes, redshift, but again we are required to assume the speed of light has been constant since Creation. And so

forth. And Olber's paradox? Who empirically determined there exists an 'impenetrable event horizon?'

In truth, I'd have to go backwards from this point before I could go forward. Before you begin to bring up Lorentz transformations and

dark matter, I'd have to explain to you why the entire structure on which you stand, beginning from Newton, is all manifestly wrong.

AgentOfAllah:
...the simplest explanation is always often the right explanation...

Modern physics is not simple.

It is a weird arcana of crazy mathematicians who draw daydreams in the air and produce equations as

evidence. This is what Science has been reduced to.

akintom:
Human experience is built on intellectually established truth (essential and existential evidence) upon which we build our lives (because we can respect and trust the derived knowledge, without which existence would have been impossible).

No, it is not. Not entirely.

Right now, in some places, you are required (by law) to refer to a transsexual man by his preferred pronoun. Even though the cells in his

body still carry XY chromosomes. This is the precise opposite of 'intellectually established truth'.

So you see, human experience may also rest on dementia and wishful thinking. And scientists are not immune.

akintom:
How the recognition of the above, constitute worship is what you will have to explain.

Even if you assert worship of intellect, by which means are the rituals done? Eg praying?, anointing oil?, exorcism?, etc.

1. You assume that worship must involve ritual. It need not. Certain Buddhists are not required to 'do' anything.

2. Let us agree that religion is

'Any strongly held belief, absent empirical evidence'. (I think that covers all bases)

Since your strong belief in the non-existence of a Creator lacks any empirical support, is it not a religious one?

akintom:
Don't dig this further brother.

I'll dig as I please, thanks. There's much that needs burying.

akintom:
But if you want to engage me, outside astral physics, be my guest.

I'm somewhat leery of engaging someone who thinks I was discussing 'astral physics(?)', to be frank.

But if you can keep it civil, perhaps we can give it a go.

Please note that I represent traditional Catholicism, so please do not require me to defend or explain

antics of Protestant stage-performers.

akintom:
Do you hold the view that the bible is literarily true?

Yes. Bearing in mind

'The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation'.

E,g. If I say, "it's raining cats and dogs", the literal meaning does not refer to animals falling from the sky.

I could go further but I trust you get my drift.

akintom:
My point is that, with the atheists, there's no OBJECT OR SUBJECT OF WORSHIP.

Unlike religious groups that worships Gods.

Worship

is an act of religious devotion usually directed towards a deity

The word is derived from the Old English weorþscipe, meaning worship, honour shown to an object, which has been etymologised as "worthiness or worth-ship"—to give, at its simplest, worth to something.


From the above, it is obvious, etymologically, that Atheists may be said to worship the intellect, science or human knowledge.

Readers may also notice the word is Old English in its origin.

Incidentally, the actual word translated as 'worship' from the original Greek (into English) is 'proskuneo'

which means, 'to bow down', 'to show obesiance', 'to prostrate oneself' or even 'to kiss (a ring)'.

Further,

this 'worship of the intellect' or 'worship of knowledge' and its resultant apostasy correlates well

with the Serpent's promise of knowledge to Eve,



and her (and humanity's) resultant estrangement from God.


Truly, apples do not fall far from the tree.

akintom:
Am humanist (go check up Humanism first), i can confirm to you that your lies don't apply 0.000%.

Humanism -

A philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over acceptance of dogma or superstition.

An outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than divine or supernatural matters. Humanist beliefs stress the potential value and goodness of human beings, emphasize common human netional ways of solving human problems.

Let me show why the above is long-winded, articulate nonsense.

The question is, 'After cutting religion out of the affairs of men, what next?'

In this brave, new, non-religious world, someone must still decide 'what-is-good-and-what-is-evil', 'what-is legal-versus-what-is-illegal'.

This is far from a straightforward matter. There is no universal, enduring non-religious standard for anything.

As such, these rulings must be made on the whim of the individual(s) in power.

This is why every single society that has wilfully pursued an Atheist policy has descended straight into dictatorship.

There is no need to fantasize about a world without religion. That experiment's been run several times.

Cambodia, the USSR, Cuba, Myanmar, Mao's China, Nazi Germany, Poland, Ceausescu's Romania - the list goes on.

At a cost of millions of lives - which puts to flight the wicked accusation that Christianity is the source of bloodshed in the world.

This, then, is humanism. It is Socialism-lite, which itself is Communism-lite, which is death.

And yet the half-bright, half-baked, half-wit sponsors of such discredited philosophies bridle when justly told they

merit the Second Death.

akintom:
Your question has exhaustively been answered by different scientists, in each of science specialty that propounded the different theories you referred to.

From the same people who call the Eternal Existence of God illogical:

"Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist."


In which classroom is that called 'an exhaustive explanation?'

You all are liars - like your spiritual father below.

akintom:
scientists affirmed, nothing is or can be known to exist in human experience, except it's first established by OVERWHELMING EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES that MUST have PASS the TEST of VERIFICATION and REPRODUCIBILITY.

Please provide one falsifiable and reproducible experiment that is evidence for the 'big bang'.

Or you could just try to be an honest man (I know it's asking a lot)...and admit there isn't one.

akintom:
"These group of individuals have a gathering point just like the religious people, they preach against God just as we preach the goodness of God, they testify against God just as we testify God's goodness"

The above is your exact words unedited.
You're so soon becoming a victim of the panicky counsel you just gave your fellows.

May i help you add this to your list of commandments....

*when you decide to engage atheist, avoid being twisty and dodgy, you get strangled that way.

Ignore this lie, all.

Atheists have celebrity speakers, movements, conventions, rallies, parades and even hire air time and billboards.

Their is no group in the history of earth that has devoted such time and resources to proclaiming

that they don't believe in something.

KingEbukasBlog:
We also have Sir Isaac Newton who spoke against atheism and defended his belief in God .

Newton was a Cabalist.

Be very careful about endorsing people who make vague reference to a supreme being.

Many of them are referring to someone very different from Christ.

When rappers clown around glorifying violence, hedonism and drug wealth while surrounded by whores, reciting lines involving gratitude to god,

you don't seriously imagine they are referring to the True God, do you?

honourhim:
Dear brethren in Christ,

we all know that atheism simply means unbelief in God. Taking a critical look at the activities of certain individuals in this forum who parade themselves as atheists, it is obvious that they actually can be referred to as anti-Christian cult.

Correction.

Observers will discover,

that while atheists claim to disdain religion in general

they hardly ever target their polemics at Judaism, Buddhism, Wicca, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism and others. When they do it is usually

tempered, and with the insinuation that these practices are somehow purer, nobler and more honest than 'organized religion'.

Organized religion is, of course, merely a euphemism for Christianity.

They hit Islam from time to time, but there's no doubt that their very worst, and most blasphemous invectives are reserved for Christians.

Christ is the Truth. They know it and their master knows it too.

FelixCulpa:
One World government.....Lukatew.....so you actually believe one person could rule the earth apart from Jesus? Continue in your delusion.....

Is it not Christ Himself that teaches so?
You are a strange sort of believer if this is news to you.




All earthly authority will enter into the hands of the Evil One.

When 'national sovereignty' is subordinate to 'international best practice' and 'UN resolutions'...
When Governments back right of perversion over right of religion...
When every resistance meets jail, sanctions and war...

Better believe this scripture does not speak of what is to come, but what is.

World politics is already centralized.
World finance is already centralized.
World health is already centralized.

'Global Terrorism' is the pretext for the ongoing centralization of military power.
(US military bases will soon be coming to neighbourhood near you.)

At that point all that is left will be to give it a name.

And then, perhaps, we shall see who lives in delusion.



When the rulers of the earth are united in the promotion of vice...
When the man in the Vatican welcomes sodomy and fornication...
When even your neighbours casually blaspheme, and ministers of Antichrist peddle their filth even here...

Better believe this scripture does not speak of what is to come, but what is.



Damnation shall not find us all. So what will?

The rule of Satan upon this earth.

FelixCulpa:
So what happened to the Brexit experts or those who were expecting Jonathan to declare victory and cause war in Nigeria

Do you know that US marines were stationed in Ghana during the elections? Had Jonathan dragged his feet, he would have been made

a second Laurent Gbagbo.

Pro-Bremain analyses blindsided people to the pound's crash. A lot of money was made that way, and has been for a while.

However, Britain is going nowhere. One World Government is fait accompli. Britain will remain, it will be made to happen.

FelixCulpa:
So what happened to the Brexit experts or those who were expecting Jonathan to declare victory and cause war in Nigeria

Do you know that US marines were stationed in Ghana during the elections? Had Jonathan dragged his feet, he would have been made

a second Laurent Gbagbo.

Pro-Bremain analyses blindsided people to the pound's crash. A lot of money was made that way, and has been for a while.

However, Britain is going nowhere. One World Government is fait accompli. Britain will remain, it will be made to happen.

FelixCulpa:
Expert ko expert ni.
So you man the system has been rigged....same point I've been making. Thanks for the confirmation.

You know what exit polls are?

'Experts' claim to be able to predict Election Day results by interviewing people who exit the polling booths.

Based on these interviews results are 'called' by CNN et al long before actual votes are counted.

This is done with as little as 1% of the actual vote counted.

CNN declared Obama winner with less than 1% of votes counted, via 'exit polling'.

i.e. CNN actually declared results for,say, a 10 million voter state by 'exit-polling' less than 100 000 people.

This is mathematically impossible. Take it anywhere.

FelixCulpa:
Come back here November 9th.

You may be only half-awake to the game.

Who wins come November is already known right now, by the the very anchors/pundits/experts you see on TV.

FelixCulpa:
The same force that ushered in Buhari is the same force that will usher in trump.

What force do you think this is?

What force do you think makes an archaic, Islamic, ex-military, dictator the sudden darling of the West?

Think hard.

FelixCulpa:
She's bought and paid for.

It's troubling that so many so-called adults don't know that anyone with a 'real chance' at the White House

will have been bought and sold long before during their career. Long before.





.

PaperLace:
Nobody can move into my house on permanent basis...nobody.

PaperLace:

'but this isn't cast on stone_ it's in fact a very flexible rule. If push comes to shove, I can/will compromise.

Now that's what you call a tactical retreat.

Loisemm:
The wife told me the mama never wanted her first son to marry and would have preferred he continues to bear children outside wedlock.

Sincerely, I can't undastand the rationale behind a mother moving into her son's house without invitation or permission.

Note -she has a married daughter o.

Wherefore a man shall leave
father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one flesh.

Genesis 2:24 (Douay-Rheims)

A lot of men seem to find this commandment a huge difficulty.

Africans more than most maybe.

GooseBaba:
Guy shift.... You dey smell...

Talk your gutter talk all night long. Facts remain.

You'd forsake your own blood, your own child,

to flee responsibility, to be seen as 'modern', for 'convenience', to please some girl.

You're a coward, and a cheap man.

GooseBaba:
I will take you serious when you literally get pregnant..

Ha. A coward's response.

I'll take you serious when you stand to lose your own life the next time an abortion takes place.

GooseBaba:
Comparing a woman rights to choose with what is best for her, her body, her life. With sniffing Cocaine is ridiculous. That's the best your debate skills get you.

Actually his argument is more than valid.

GooseBaba:
a woman rights to choose with what is best for her, her body, her life.

To all abortionists.

Tattoing, piercing, casual intercourse, drinking, skydiving etc. all constitute 'doing what she wants with her own body'.

Terminating a child's life constitutes 'doing what you want with a child's body'.

GooseBaba:
Christains in America can no longer force their "truth" down the throat of others.

No. But atheists, pagans and every breed of pervert can force theirs down yours. To your delight, I'm sure.

GooseBaba:
No one is shouting to legalise abortion in Nigeria..

Somehow I doubt its illegal status will have stopped the likes of you. Guilty conscience gnawing, perhaps?