₦airaland Forum

slivertongue:
am sure you know the supreme Court pronouncement on that - APC vs Obi. it's the business of LP on who to sponsor. Non party members litigating are Interlopers

No sir,obi matter was anchored on 77 EA and only register was tendered.kano is constitutional and compelling evidences were dropped

slivertongue:
Allia got no case to answer.

His deputy submitted a forged court affidavit

slivertongue:
What did NNPP tender? Did INEC also say he is an independent candidate? APC desperately trying to use disenchanted characters for forum shopping. No NNPP Guber candidate has a case against Abba Yusuf. APC lawyers are trying to mix nomination & sponsorship when caught they shift it to qualification to draw in the constitution & when asked what is qualification for candidates they cite mundane & irrelevant sections of the constitution. I don't blame them I blame some cash &carry judges.

The nnpp membership card tendered is fake,the register tendered does not have his name, the updated register they brought is misleading,no record of payment of dues,his nomination form was filed late.there is nothing to show that he is a member of any party

ValarDoharis:
One of two things will happen in the not too distant future. APC will kill Nigeria or Nigeria will kill APC. There'll be no middle ground

Why are you not looking at the merits? If you are clean,they will be no ground to remove you

ValarDoharis:
Is Bitrus a member of APC?

A pdp member who got that initial judgment that buried plateau APC

slivertongue:
What a circus!! Hear yourself; you ain't "challenging his membership but his qualifications and him not being a party member of any party". NNPP didn't deny sponsoring him neither did INEC say he is an independent candidate.

Evidence nnpp tendered shows he's not their member

ValarDoharis:
Your personal experience will eventually make you to stop supporting evil. Some people like personal experience to have an inflection point

Oga,I was an idealist but realism is the best.you just hate apc

ValarDoharis:
These are technicalities. The facts are same!

Nigeria judiciary is not one for justice but for technicalities. They know they cannot possibly remove Kabir with the 165k unsigned ballots because thats on INEC so the brought party membership at the appeal. Was party membership mentioned at the tribunal? Has NNPP said they did not sponsor him?

How is this different from Lawan, Akpabio,
and Umahi?

Why do you justify injustice?

Again, i like the judgement for two reasons

1. Kwankwaso had it coming! He was dining with the enemies and mocking Obi.

2. Kano uprising might be the needed catalyst to cause the overdue revolution

The problem is that you obidients always talk without facts,you speak on what you know not of.leace this matter,you don't know jack.
Go and read the judgment of the tribunal,the first ground of apc petition was his non membership.the tribunal ruled that he wasn't qualified but called for a rerun.it was the invalid ballots that sack him.
It is clear that you don't know what you are saying so keep shut

slivertongue:
If the Supreme Court barred Jegede from questioning the sponsorship of Akeredolu. APC PDP LP, NNPP et al are barred from interloping into matters of other political parties.

You are getting it wrong.jegede never inquired about apc membership or internal affairs directly.he said the constitution barred a governor from being a party chairman and that his signing of aketi nomination form nullifies his candidacy.177 was never invoked

ValarDoharis:
It is not same Supreme Court. Justice Dattijo said the Supreme court he met wasnt thesame as the one he left.

Even when a justice of the Supreme Court told you guys that the Supreme Court is corrupt and compromised and should be reformed,
your ignorance is insisting its the same!

Any evidence of the corruption? He was talking of lower courts

slivertongue:
Yes but no outsider can interfer because they ain't allowed to belong here & there. if allowed then multiparty democracy will collapse. In Amaechi and Omehia's the supreme Court settled that it's the political party contests election, same as in Bello and Faleke. Thus awarding victory to the party instead of the first runner since nomination was d issue & death occured before returning the winner.

There is no constitutional provision that stops a non party member from challenging such afterall you are all opponents in an election.as far as you can challenge his educational qualifications,you can challenge anything...
Nobody is inquiring into Kabir membership but his qualifications and him not being a party member of any party.that provision in the constitution is not a child's play or for fancy.it is open to all

ValarDoharis:
The facts are the same. What you're doing is bringing technicality to explain judiciary fraud.

The facts for Obi, Otti, Kabir, Kwankwaso are all same

Oga,apc in obi case came under the electoral.this case is coming under the constitution.these are pure legal provisions

slivertongue:
APC has come to end of falsehood. Supreme Court will either follow it's already laid down precedence as seen in Jegede Vs Akeredolu or do a u-turn &shame herself. This case is very simple to understand going by recent Supreme Court judgement.

Section 177 is in play.

slivertongue:
The Supreme Court has made it clear that there is NO room for independent candidate so any person contesting must come under the banner of a party as it's the party the sponsors a candidate and invariably contests an election in Nigeria. Therefore the parties are free to sponsor who pleases them suffices there is no Internal contestations. If rightly so as put forward by the Supreme Court then no non party member can challenge the event in another party.

Parties must sponsor candidates legally

Babinski:
The material facts of the cases are the same and apply to issues of membership of a Political Party. The argument was that Obi was not a member of LP as at the time of election due to failure to comply with Section 77(3) of the Electoral Act. Similarly in the Kano Governor Kabir Yusuf case, the argument was that he was not properly sponsored by the party due to issues with his membership in contravention of Section 177(c) of the Constitution. The material facts are the same and speak to issues relating to membership of a Political party.

It is decided point of law by the Supreme Court that issues as to membership of a Political Party are party affairs and the Court has no jurisdiction. Tha was the position on Peter Obi case.

Recall also that when PDP was trying to exploit irregularities on the nomination of Shettima in attempt to void Tinubu's victory, the Supreme Court called PDP meddlesome interlopers.

Trying to use membership of NNPP to remove Kabir Yusuf as done by the Tirbunal and Appeal Court are clearly contrary to the position of the Supreme Court and the established law in the country on such matters! This OP or Okoi Obono-Obla are both just trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with their crude attempt at sophistry.

Read these references:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2023/11/kano-nnpp-rejects-sack-of-gov-yusuf/amp/

https://www.thecable.ng/youre-a-meddlesome-interloper-supreme-court-reprimands-pdp-over-double-nomination-suit/amp

https://lawpavilion.com/blog/is-an-action-based-on-the-determination-of-membership-of-a-political-party-justiciable/

Guy,I like your argumentative style.you are civil and mature.let me commend you for that...
Attacking another party nominations process from the electoral act or section 77 or section 134 is vain as the electoral act already in sections 29-31 and section 84 has given locus to only aspirants of a primary to sue.infact,all matters that happened before and during primaries except constitutional matters are ore election matters open to only party member...

But any matter that is constitutional is open to all concerned parties whether parties,inec,candidates,aspirants and sometimes the citizens.there is no part of the constitution that says membership matters is only restricted to party members.
Apc is not questioning his membership or primaries but sayingthat based on established facts and evidences,he is not a member of any party and didn't participate in all stages of the elections.the evidences shows that Abba Kabir belongs to no party..
Additionally, section 177 has 4 conditions A,B,C and D.all have same force,strength and locus.C cannot be watered down by any lesser law or mere statement of the supreme court in the face of glaring facts,evidences.
Section C has two preconditions which is being a party member firstly and secondly being sponsored by that party.one can't substitute for the other,both must be satisfied at all times because of the punctuation mark there

Kukutente23:
Cretinous dunce

Ntin owo.up tinubu

KingOfAmebo:
Best economic team that is currently over seeing the record breaking fall of the naira, it's like your brain is paining you.

Did the fall of the naira start today

Kukutente23:
Daft lying agbadorian monkey

Dim witted dumbo

onuman:
APC did not obtain any relevant document from INEC to rule on this case.

Labour Party and PDP procured every relevant document to prove that Bola Tinubu was not qualified for presidential election.

PDP procured every relevant information that proved that Shettima was not legible to contest as VP to Tinubu.
Develop more sense: a governor in the SE region is in favour of Fulanization and Islamization of Nigeria through a one party system. So what difference has the APC candidate not being Fulani make in Buhari's one party desires?

Oga,apc obtained the register of nnpp from inec,his membership card,nomination form from inec via a court order and presented them.
All the documents lp brought against tinubu were irrelevant as it didn't show that tinubu wasn't qualified.
Atiku case against shettima was based on the electoral act and the electoral act says nomination is an internal matter.it is not a constitutional matter.besides,shettima submitted his resignation letter to apc before the deadline so you have no point.
You want to run and digress from the main point.the point you were making was that fulanis are dominating Kano and the north and it is not do.tinubu appointment is favouring northern christians more than Muslims.atiku that you prefer,is he not a Fulani? When pdp dominated SE from 1999-2015,was it not fulanization? Ikpeazu that allowed fulanis to have enclaves in abia,why haven't you attacked him? What of ugwuanyi that cries when fulanis attack Enugu? Sine hope came to power,where is the evidence that fulanis are dominating imo?
Oga,under tinubu,fulanis are powerless.is datti baba not a Fulani/arab? You have no point.better keep shut

Politicstoday:
david won his case in the tribunal, with good presentation in the Appeal court of justice, he will win his case too. Kanu Agabi SAN , David counsel present fantastic cross appeal in the appeal Court. Let’s keep our fingers crossed here

Oga,the good presentation at the tribunal was made by subpoenaed witnesses who are clearly illegal

slivertongue:
did he return to court? NO

The judgement is clear, kaze has no say in the enforcement of the judgement. Those holding such view are anarchical in thinking, moreover they forget that parties are abstract, SDP or Accord, etc will be an option not APC not LP not NNPP. PDP we move

Just expect a likely loss at the apex court

Kukutente23:
You're full of shit. Only the court or tribunal can order such documents to be released by INEC. INEC have no right to release documents without a court order. There's nothing like public document there.

Stupidity turned to childish stalking

Incredible128:
I will mark this you comment and remind you of it in a year's time God's willing; let's hope it comes to pass

If by 2026 nothing has improved economically,I'll withdraw my support

Politicstoday:
it was struck out in the tribunal. Bvas machines is the fulcrum of argument in the Appeal court of justice. Chief Kanu Agadi presents his cross appeal well in the Appeal court of justice. Let’s keep our fingers crossed.

What stupidity.oga,grow up.pdp evidences including the bvas were presented by subpoenaed witnesses that are invalid.cant you get it?

slivertongue:
don't mislead the public. Kaze didn't return to court after the second congress. APC mustn't kill fourth public with desperation.

Kaze hailed the judgment and even stated that mwadkom is excluded from the rerun

Politicstoday:
😂 wrong message from your WhatsApp group. Not true at all.

This is what happened on the hearing of APC Appeal and cross Appeal last week Wednesday. Maybe you should furnish your own details of the hearing here🌝🌝🌝

NASARAWA STATE GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION APPEAL
Today Wednesday 15th November 2023.
The court proceedings began.
The case began with the submission of Application by the lead Counsel of the Appellant(A A Sule) Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN)
Prior to that,the First/ second Respondent (Emmanuel David Ombugadu) and PDP Counsel CHIEF DR KANU GODWIN AGABI (SAN)called on the attention of the Appellant that he has tendered a motion on the 8th of November and chief Olanipekun raised an observation that they also file another motion on the 10th of November.
The chairman of the appeal panel ordered the respondent to read out the motion which the lead Counsel to the respondent stated it in his motion that,he is moving a motion for the panel to strike out the Appeal filed by the Appellant.And he stated that the motion is Also attached with the Written Address,and the counter Affidavits on the 13th November.He Also appeal to the panel to kindly grant his Appeal as it is worthy of merit.
The chairman of the panel stated that the motion and the counter motion is here by adjourned to the final Judgement.
The Appellant lead Counsel counsel tendered five different process list of Argument.
The Respondent lead Counsel also tendered three process of Counter Argument as to the one tendered by the Appellants.
However,the third, Respondent (INEC)and fourth Respondent (APC) did not file any list of process of Argument.
The Appellant,Were given 5 minutes to present their case on why should his Appeal be accepted and he stated that the Tribunal never followed due processes of addressing the matter at the lower court.And appealed that the Judgement of the Tribunal be set aside.
Also, another 5 minutes were given to the Respondents to present their case as to why the court should dismissed the Appeal filed by the Appellant.
Chief Agabi (SAN) stated as thus, that the polling units results of the elections were the basis for winning and losing elections and the tribunal extracted her judgement strictly on that basis.Also, he stated that the BVAS Machines gave a clear record that Emmanuel David Ombugadu of PDP has won and Tribunal affirm that and that record were never challenged by even the Appellants.We Urge you most respectfully my Lord to dismissed their Appeal and regard it as a struggle to impeach the truth.
NOW THE CROSS APPEAL.
Now the Lead counsel to the cross Appellant ( PDP and David Emmanuel Ombugadu) Chief Kanu Godwin Agabi
(SAN) He tendered the cross Appeal scheduled of documents and the cross Respondents both appealed to the court to kindly strike it out.
However,the court accepted and admitted the cross Appeal and stated that it's reserved for Judgement.
In response to the cross Appeal,the cross Respondents couldn't provides a substantial response to their defence rather they only duplicate what was contained in their previous Appeal that observations brought by chief Agabi.
After all,The chairman Justice Mrs Onyenyema Ugovhukwu has Adjourned the case to Judgement in a date to be communicated.

Do you know what subpoenaed witnesses mean? Are you aware that subpoenaed witnesses are to be filed within 21 days

Politicstoday:
let’s keep our fingers crossed now. Hopefully today or Wednesday, the panel will declare their judgement on the governor Sule Appeal and cross appeal of Pdp. Governor David Still has huge upper hand in the Appeal court of justice. Bvas machines is the fulcrum of argument and Pdp presented their case well.

Oga,remove your mind from nasarawa.it is dead.the pdp cases were presented by subpoenaed witnesses who were filed outside the 21 days which means they will be struck out

onuman:
NNPP failed to sponsor the candidate that won guber election?

How did the judges know that the NNPP did not sponsor the candidate?

Are courts allowed to probe political party affairs after election?

Fact is:
Buhari appointed judges to pave way to one party Oligarchic rule for Nigeria.
One party rule is the fastest route to Islamization and Fulanization of rest of Nigeria.

All documents submitted to inec by parties can be obtained after payment of fees.apc obtained all documents nnpp submitted to inec.it is public documents not secret sir.apc brought overwhelming evidence.
Where is the fulanization here? You prefer atiku a Fulani to tinubu and you still complain about fulanis? Are you aware that Kano governor Abba Kabir and kwankwaso are fulanis while gawuna of apc is Hausa? You see how you disgraced yourself childishly

Politicstoday:
David still has upper hand in the court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of justice too. Let’s keep our fingers crossed.

David has lost sir.didnt Fergie tell you that

Fiscus105:
We always find way to validate wrong doing in Nigeria, the APPEAL COURT, which is tribunal of PEPT, says the APC has no locust standing on inter affair of labour party to challenge Obi.

Why now APC has locust standing to challenge that NNPC doesn't properly sponsor Kabri? Is not internal affairs again?

Meanwhile, when we talk of judicial precedent, since it was APPEAL COURT THAT EARLIER RULED THAT, "APC DOESN'T HAVE LOCUS STANDING TO CHALLENGE LABOUR PARTY, WHILE APPEAL COURT OF KANO NOT FOLLOWING SIMILAR EARLIER JUDGMENT SINCE ITS SAME COORDINATE JURISDICTION ?

The matter at pepc was based on section 77 of the electoral act.apc in Kano came under 177 of the constitution.all constitutional matters can be sued by any aggrieved party

slivertongue:
The judgement is a joke. Most folks who comment know very little about the case. APC can't resurrect a settled exco matter &use it to challenge the governor. it's a joke taken to far. A PDP member went to court got a judgement against his party, PDP complied with the judgement. That member never went back to court to complain that PDP didn't comply with the judgement he got but APC want to continue where a PDP member stopped. The question is, is 'APC a member of PDP to continue or start a fresh case against PDP or question the membership of PDP exco? APC is a meddlesome interloper.

Bitrus kaze went to court to complain.

Truf:
Like I said you little imbec!le, you must be high on cow dung. M0r0n

Onye iberibe