RIP TO THE DEAD

THESE GUYS ARE TURNING CHURCHES INTO CIRCUS THIS DAYS. CHURCH IS NO MORE SACRED, IT HAS BEEN DEFILE BY WORE-MONGERS MAGICIANS,AND GREEDY INDIVIDUAL AFTER THEIR STOMACH. THEY ARE NOT WORTHY TO BE CALLED PASTORS

jahsharon:
Buhari does not have money to bribe Senators into passing bills like Obasanjo, YAr'Adua and GEJ did. So, dear corrupt Senators, get used to living withing your Salary, there is no bribe to support your reckless living anymore.

BUT HE IS BLACKMAILING SARAKI: ANYTIME HE NEED SOMETHING CONTROVERSIAL FROM THE SENATE, HE WILL GO AND BRING UP SARAKI CASE FILE:

NgeneUkwenu:
Mimiko's handiwork.....I thought his puppet had won at the arranged Appeal Court Ruling?

What else does he want?

Why is he afraid of facing the electorates??

the truth: He want to buy time by scaring the INEC STAFFS, SO that INEC will have no other choice but to postpone the election like one week.
Pending the out come of the appeal court ruling. Now the ruling is in his favor, i dont know what he will do next

CREAM WAN KILL THIS ONE;

THE OUTSOURCE COMPANIES DEDUCT TAX FROM YOUR SALARY EVERY MONTH WITHOUT REMITTING IT TO THE GOVERNMENT. EVERYBODY IS AFRAID TO COMPLAIN. THERE IS A SERIOUS RACKET GOING ON BETWEEN THE OUTSOURCED COMPANIES AND THE HUAWEI HR

slurryeye:


A blind Osu goat like you won't know that Anambra, Abia, Imo, Ebonyi and Enugu were all included in the list......Not surprised, typical of Osu

ENUGU IS NOT THERE

ENUGU IS DOING WELL FOR HIMSELF. THE GOOD THING IS THAT THEY DONT MAKE NOISE LIKE OTHERS. I HOPE THE NEW GOVT WILL KEEP IT RUNNING.

i hope will not denied later

UnknownT:
The worst is that they are not leaving but rather changing their workers to Indians in our soil

THIS IS NOT GOING TO WORK. ERICSSON WILL LOOSE AGAIN, THEY TRIED IT WITH AIRTEL SOME YEARS BACK, WHEN AIRTEL FOUND OUT THAT IT IS AFFECTING THEIR NETWORK,THEY JETTISON ERICSSON FOR HUAWEI. I KNOW MTN WILL WILL SOON FOUND OUT.

WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DO IS TO MOVE THEIR NOC(NETWORK OPERATIONS CENTER) GNOC TO NDIA, NIGERIANS WILL BE SACKED WHILE MTN NIGERIA WILL BE MONITORED FROM INDIA BY INDIANS. IF THEY SUCCEED IT WILL AFFECTED CLOSE TO 100 NIGERIA NOC ENGINEERS

very happy for Trump

okowande:
E don tey wey Donald duck dey gum fake hair for hin bald head. LWKMD!

TRUMP HAIR IS NOT FAKE, IT HAS BEEN LIKE THAT SINCE BIRTH

TRUMP NA FINE MAN

TRUMP WANT TO ENSURE HIS WIFE IS NOT VOTING FOR CLINTON

PDP HATE AMAECHI SO MUCH, THEY WANT TO IMPLICATE HIM BY ALL MEANS.

MUMU REP

SUPPORTED

NIGER DELTA LIKE OGOGORO DIE

BiafraudExposed:
Omenka, Time manager , APCsupporter.
I can't do this alone I need your help, every body help this might work.

I reported that post of a helicopter on Radio Biafra London as a war threat. Luckily Facebook took it down... I learnt that the people taking down this post from Radio Biafra are Facebook moderators. And my reports aren't getting to Mark.

I want our plea and our expostulations to get to Mark Zuckerberg. This is what we need to do.

Instead of reporting to the moderators on Facebook. Mark doesn't see it. Let's go on he's profile and post that photo of Biafra armoured tank. Let's post this is a war threat, we are not feeling safe. Let's post it on he's comment that, they are planning a war against Nigeria through Facebook.And we need the group shut down. And really that armoured tank post is a war threat.. Let's occupy all the comment box, let's complain this war threat is making us feel unsafe. So when he sees it he will feel. Radio Biafra London group is just a national threat...

Please with this other people from other countries will urge him to take them down...

Download the picture below...
**Or join the group and screenshot the picture from the Radio Biafra London. So it doesn't seem like its one person. With opera mini and the same date doing it.

. Copy the facebook link of the armoured tanker about to wage war here.
https://mobile./222919287822515?view=permalink&id=1167157580065343&refid=18&ref=opera_speed_dial&_ft_=qid.6345035464857775251%3Amf_story_key.1167157580065343%3Atl_objid.1167157580065343



Write something pitiful that they are planning a war for Nigeria through that group and we are scared...

Post that picture and link on Mark's wall. And complain pitifully. Please guys help me. The people I mentioned their names please. Let's do it now...

That is a war threat and let's make Mark feel Radio Biafra is all about war threat. Lets see if this works.

Complain very pitifully on all Mark's post that this is a war group and we Nigerians are afraid. So that group will be closed down.

FOOLISHNESS

BUT OGA DURING UR CAMPAIGNING MANY OF THEM ENDORSED YOU.

samtee37:
Who dey record dem self... For battle field

IN MODERN WARS, THERE IS ALWAYS VIDEO RECORDING BY EITHER ONE THE SOLDIERS,USE OF DRONE OR EVEN PRESS GUYS. WATCH IRAQ FIGHTING ISIS IN MOSUL.

ITS EVERY WHERE, NOT ONLY IN THE NORTH. HYPOCRITES, IN THEIR PRESENCE THERE IF U DRINK BEER THEY WILL BUTCHER U.

ARE U NOT PART OF THEM?

Hillary Clinton has faced a steady drip of revelations about her use of a private email server while secretary of state. What's it all about?

Eleven days before the election, the news has broken that the FBI is reopening its investigation since it was first revealed in the winter of 2015.
It could be nothing. It could be everything. And it almost certainly won't be resolved before Americans head to the polls but it will energise her enemies and put her allies on the defensive.
Her preferred email system was one the State Department inspector general found was not approved and did not comply with government rules.
An FBI investigation initially concluded that no "reasonable prosecutor" would bring a criminal case against Mrs Clinton, but that she and her aides were "extremely careless" in their handling of classified information.
Now it says there is new evidence. So how did we get here?

What's the deal with Hillary Clinton's emails?
Shortly before she was sworn in as secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton set up an email server at her home in Chappaqua, New York. She then relied on this server, home to the email address hdr22@clintonemail.com, for all her electronic correspondence - both work-related and personal - during her four years in office.
She also reportedly set up email addresses on the server for her long-time aide, Huma Abedin, and State Department Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.
She did not use, or even activate, a state.gov email account, which would have been hosted on servers owned and managed by the US government.
Mrs Clinton's email system became a national story the first week of March 2015, when the New York Times ran a front-page article on the subject. The article said that the system "may have violated federal requirements" and was "alarming" to current and former government archive officials.
Why did she do it?

According to Mrs Clinton, the primary reason she set up her own email was for "convenience". During a press conference at the UN, she said that she preferred to carry only one smartphone with one email address, rather than have two devices - one for work and one for personal affairs.
At the time, according to reports, government-issued Blackberry phones were unable to access multiple email accounts.
"I thought using one device would be simpler, and obviously, it hasn't worked out that way," she said.

Sceptics have countered that the real reason Mrs Clinton established her own email system was because it gave her total control over her correspondence.
With her email setup, she became the sole arbiter of what should and shouldn't be provided to the government, made public via freedom of information requests or turned over to interested parties, such as the congressional committee investigating the 2012 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.
According to the State Department inspector general report, in 2010 Mrs Clinton told her deputy chief of staff that one of her concerns with email is that she did not "want any risk of the personal being accessible". An FBI investigation found that Mrs Clinton used "numerous personal devices" while in office and relied on several email servers. Clinton staffers told the FBI that they destroyed some of the replaced devices with a hammer while they could not account for others.
Was this against the law?
Probably not. Mrs Clinton's email system existed in a grey area of the law - and one that has been changed several times since she left office.
When she became secretary of state, the controlling interpretation of the 1950 Federal Records Act was that officials using personal email accounts must ensure that official correspondence is turned over to the government. Ten months after she took office, a new regulation allowed the use of private emails only if federal records were "preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system".
Mrs Clinton maintains that this requirement was satisfied because most of her emails from her personal account went to, or were forwarded to, people with government accounts, so they were automatically archived. Any other emails were turned over to State Department officials when they issued a request to her - and several of her predecessors - in October 2014.
She said it is the responsibility of the government employee "to determine what's personal and what's work-related" and that she's gone "above and beyond" what she was asked to do.
In November 2014 President Barack Obama signed the Presidential and Federal Records Act Amendments, which require government officials to forward any official correspondence to the government within 20 days. Even under this new law, however, the penalties are only administrative, not criminal.
The State Department inspector general report, released in May 2016, found that Mrs Clinton's email system violated government policy and that she did not receive permission prior to instituting it - approval that would not have been granted had she asked. Such transgressions, however, do not constitute criminal conduct.
FBI director James Comey announced the results of a separate FBI investigation on 5 July and concluded that that while "there is evidence of potential violations" of criminal statues covering the mishandling of classified information, "our judgement is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". It referred the matter to the Justice Department, which closed the case against Mrs Clinton and her aides with no charges.
The State Department has since resumed its investigation into whether Mrs Clinton or her aides violated government policy in their handling of classified information. If it determines that they did, the punishment could include a formal letter of reprimand or loss of security clearance.
How many emails are we talking about?
According to Mrs Clinton, she sent or received 62,320 emails during her time as secretary of state. She, or her lawyers, have determined about half of those - 30,490, roughly 55,000 pages, were official and have been turned over to the State Department.
Mrs Clinton said the other emails are private - relating to topics like her daughter's wedding, her mother's funeral and "yoga routines".
On Hillary Clinton's request, the State Department released the first set of emails sent on her private account in May 2015, with many relating to the 2012 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi,.
In early August 2015, she signed an affidavit swearing she had turned over all copies of government records from her time in office.
The FBI found "several thousand" work-related emails that were not turned over to the State Department, although it concluded that the emails were deleted prior to 2014 and were not intentionally removed "in an effort to conceal them".
About 3,000 emails are expected to be released in the run-up to election day, but many more will not be processed until after 8 November.
So why is this a controversy?

This has become a big deal in large part because Mrs Clinton is asking the US public to trust that she is complying with both the "letter and the spirit of the rules", in the words of her spokesperson, Nick Merrill.
The New York Times story was prompted by information provided to the paper by the congressional Benghazi committee, and conservative critics allege that there is no way to prove that she is being forthcoming in providing their investigation with all the relevant material.
Her "convenience" explanation has been difficult for some to swallow, given that as secretary of state she travelled with an extensive entourage capable of carrying her additional phone. And in February 2015, she told a television interviewer that she now carries multiple devices - an iPhone and a Blackberry, as well as an iPad and an iPad mini.
In addition, critics on both the left and the right have expressed concern that her reliance on a "homebrew" email system made her communications more susceptible to hackers and foreign intelligence services.
Could Clinton emails shake up the 2016 race?

Exactly how secure was her email?
During her press conference, Mrs Clinton said that that there "were no security breaches" of her server and that robust protections put in place "proved to be effective and secure".
Independent cybersecurity analysts have said that expert hackers can break into email servers without leaving any evidence, however. And commercially available security systems are no match for government-protected systems - but even those aren't invulnerable, as a November 2014 intrusion into the State Department's email system proved.
She has repeatedly said that no classified material was transmitted via her email account and that she sent only one email to a foreign official - in the UK.
But in July 2015, the inspector general of the US intelligence community, Charles McCullough, told Congress she had sent at least four messages that contained information derived from classified material. A month later, Mr McCullough revealed that two of the emails contained information deemed "top secret" - the highest classification level.
Responding to building pressure, Clinton finally agreed in August 2015 to hand over the private server she used for a preliminary FBI investigation into the security of classified information contained among her emails. She also said she would hand over memory sticks containing copies of the emails.
By the time the final batch of Clinton emails were released in March 2016, the total number of emails receiving an after-the-fact classified designation had surpassed 2,000.
In May 2016 the Romanian hacker Guccifer, in US prison on felony hacking charges, told Fox News that he had successfully accessed Mrs Clinton's email server several times - an assertion the Clinton campaign denies and the State Department has said there is no evidence supporting.
The July 2016 FBI report found no "direct evidence" of unauthorised access to her email servers, according to James Comey, but that the lack of robust security meant that "it is possible that hostile actors gained access".
Clinton sent emails that have since been deemed to contain classified information

What about the new twist?
The FBI announced at the end of October that it had discovered new emails "in connection with an unrelated case... that appear to be pertinent to the investigation".
Director James Comey said investigators would determine whether the emails contain classified information.
The letter from Mr Comey to Congress is frustratingly vague. There's no information on what the "unrelated case" is that led to a re-opening of its investigation into Hillary Clinton's server, for instance, or how many emails are in question. That will only fuel the rampant speculation already breaking out, with leaks from "government sources" in the coming days sure to fan the flames.
Mrs Clinton's critics will go on the attack, using the latest news to support their claims that the former secretary of state engaged in malfeasance. Her supporters will spend the next few days in a defensive crouch, trying to assess how bad the damage could be
What's certain, however, is that whether this turns out to be a big deal or not, it places the spotlight on all the wrong places for the Clinton campaign. It all but guarantees that even if she wins White House, the early days of her presidency will be dogged by this long-running political imbroglio.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31806907

I THINK HE WILL NEED THEM SOON

awa:
The conversation in Aso Rock now go be like:

Buhari: Which party is this SAN working for?

EFCC: He is one of the Saints working for APC your Excellency

Buhari: Close the case as we have investigated and no corruption found.

EFCC: Yes Sir.

EFCC to their Zombies: Sahara Reporters are nuisances to this regime, there is no case to investigate there.

APC Zombies: Buhari is fighting genuine corruption.

Wailers: Babu is not fighting any corruption at all.

Market Woman: A cup of rice is now 500 naira only.

God help Nigeria please. Oluwa, I know we inflicted these pains on ourselves but for the sake of the Children starving to death every day help us. Abeg God.

FOR WAILERS: SAHARAREPORTERS ARE WORKING FOR APC

MUSIWA

Funnicator:


Nwa Abakaliki, Ndi Wawa, Dust of the Nation.

Where did those derogatory terms come from.

#EbonyiMustDetachFromSE.

IT CAME FROM OTU NNE GI

trippla01:
why not show us d full compound because d 1st pix show a new building .... it maybe an abandon building in d school premises

TRUE I OBSERVED A NEW BUILDING IN THE FRONT. THIS ONE IS SURELY AN ABANDON OLD MBAKWE SCHOOL

WHEN THE COMMON MAN IS NOT MOTIVATED CORRUPTION CREEPS IN.

OP IS RIGHT. HOW CAN YOU BE PROBING THE MINISTERS WITHOUT THE THE MAIN MAN ISSUING ORDERS, i THINK WHAT THE PRESENT GOVT IS DOING IS TO HARASS THIS GUYS COLLECT THE REMAINING LOOTED FUNDS THEY CAN LAY HANDS ON,CONFISCATE SOME PROPERTIES AND THAT ALL. NON OF THEM WILL BE CONVICTED WITHOUT GEJ STANDING IN THE DUCK AS ACCOMPLICE OR INSIDE A WITNESS BOX TESTIFYING AGAINST THEM.