₦airaland Forum

Fynestboi:
Here is the breakdown


1500: Screening Fee
5000: Result Checker (Like seriously )
350: Bank charges.

My concern then is, what result will the freshers be using 5000 to check?

am of the opinion that from next year,the minister will fix a non negotiable and uniform fee as a result they want to quickly make as much money this year....it's even worst that candidates not posted are still asked to participate in the exercise knowing fulll well that they won't be admitted

Angeldepedro:
This is the least expected of a school who presently has a lot to deal with, the candidates they admitted since last year are still at home while their counterparts in other schools are almost through with year one, No Vice- Chancellor, No governing council, they don't care about the students they sent home, all that they are interested in is the money to extort from admission seekers

imagin inviting candidates with 180 to register and be screened for medicine just so as to collect their money. i don't understand why they can't obey simple instruction i-e, screen only candidates recommended by jamb.

STPEACE:
so how will someone know that his/her name had been uploaded?

visit jamb.org.ng and type in your jamb reg number

blessedmarshal:
Delsu was 7200, I ended up paying 10000, Tasued 10, 200 I ended up paying 11500, have done both and have spent more than 30k sef

sorry bro.havent you been posted.

Batifeori:
You better find somewhere else to exhibit your gullibility and dumbness. Where were you when jamb debunk the above point system of a thing. Jamb only make use of it as a reference and said it will not favour most of the students and they jettisoned it

see me see gobe o..
where did he even originate from

McJane:
what about people that haven't been posted what will jamb do for them?

they will be posted by jamb to institutions that may take them for consideration

Jordi:
This is total rubbish from jamb and ministry of edu...so what is the essence of writing jamb and scoring above cutoff mark only not to be posted...by scoring above the cutoff mark we shld all be qualified for screening in the school of our choice that they themselves allowed us to choose wen filling the jamb form...it is only after screening and not being shortlisted by the institution that jamb has the right to post us somewhere else...even by that they shld post us to our second choice of institution

and you think everyone that scored above the cutoff mark of 180 will be admitted.u and i know that even with putme it's not possible

Jonwesley:
What are you saying please? You are confused! It's only those candidates that meet admission criteria that would be screened. Don't you get it? No body screens inadmissible candidates please.

Your thoughts is just like the university who in spite of knowing their admission carrying capacity, yet goes ahead demanding that every one that scores 180 even for a course like Medicine that had failed abnitio, should go to their online portal to fill form and pay money. It's simply extortion and wickedness.

I support the Government stand on this clarification please.

exactly...this is the case bro. they will just collect their money and in the end,they will admit only candidates posted by jamb

ademiD:
like seriously, they are just confusing the aspirant...

iyami eku sunday o...hope u were posted

nobsalis:
And IBBUL is busy collecting money from all candidates all in d name of screening...... Wen we all knw not all d candidates gonna get d admission.

that is the problem bro....some people will come here to blame it on jamb and the fg.jamb said only people posted should be invited for screening but these schools keep doing the opposite

dope234:
will they use the consideration list or not, the one jamb sent to them last week

they will be posted to other institutions by jamb since they were not posted to their chosen institutions

Flexherbal:
The system is confused!

dont agree with you on this bro. the system has been saying the same over again but these schools aren't listening.they are the people complicating issues.

harlehleh:
What about people that havent been posted to their schools but had above 200??

they will be posted to schools where they might be considered for admission

STPEACE:
it seems no more posting anymore

i think so,looking at number
10 of jambs admission guidelines,it was clearly stated that the screening list has been uploaded on jamb's website for prospective students so going by this statement,there might not be further posting.if not,jamb wouldn't have made such statement.my observation though and to those waiting for official statement from jamb, i think jamb already stated it as written above.

weezii:
I think this is the main information to be learnt.

It's simply translates to less money in the pockets of the universities and students who don't qualify gets to save their monies too unlike what is applicable before now.

no...not before now bro infact it's now worst or how can one explain how lasu charged 5k,delsu 5k, uniport 6500,oau 6850 from not only the candidates sent to them for consideration but also from every candidate that chose them and had 180 and above. perhaps they are using there last opportunity to make enough money.

Naijabams:

these institutions wont just listen. they are the ones complicating this whole thing. some are even still grading results and awarding screening scores even after jambs guidelines..i tire o

dayowunmi:
Yes in most cases sir, those who scored 290 are more intelligent than those who scored lower, it's obvious enough. There may be exceptions to the rule which may be due to distractions or unseriousness on the part of the 290 scorer or maybe the one who scored less than 290 didn't prepare well enough for jamb and now later buckled up after admission. But no way you will prove that someone with 250 is better than 290.

like u said bro there are exceptions.what if he is that exception plus for him to have chosen o.a.u knowing that he's from kaduna says alot. secondly, i have someone with 190 in jamb scoring 96 in unizik putme and was given medicine

dayowunmi:
Hmmm, they are not helping the guy at all. OAU insisting on 200 score to me is not essentially because they are wicked but if you can't score atleast 200 in both jamb and post jamb you simply most likely won't be able to cope academically in OAU. Talking from experience as a graduate of the school. This guy with 186 will have it rough in school when/if admitted.

so you think he wont cope because he had 186?what makes you so sure that he wouldn't have scored higher if there were putme or do you think people who 290 and above are more intelligent than those that scored lower

adebayour26:
They said d name was forwarded for consideration. Am quite sure OAU will not consider the candidate qualified for their admission
......
WATCH OUT!!!

no one is rejecting her, read the guidelines again. she can only be rejected if she has any deficiency in her o'level result. if non,then she's in or what reason will o.a.u give for rejecting her

jliusadura:
So, how can Nigeria develop when more qualified aspirants are denied admission because of the less qualified ones? Besides, all states now have universities unlike before when elds policy was formulated.

bros calm down,it has been like this since the outset.. and even with putme it was still the same. it has also affected me once but there's nothing we can do about it because even the universities are in support of it and they have been using this method all along but there's a fowl play.instead of admitting elds, they fill the spot up with candidates that pay for runs,that is why jamb is solely handling the process to see to it that the elds are also given priority

we shouldn't forget in a haste that jamb is using three criteria in posting candidates to these schools and the fact that kaduna has 5 institutions does not change the fact that it isn't an educationally less developed state. you and i know that the number of versities in a given state is not the criterion used to determine an ELDS. am of the opinion that since jamb is in charge of admission,any candidate who score 180 and above can be posted to any school for admission consideration since it's no more putme where cut off is set at 200. i have seen someone with 196 posted to unilag as well. it's 45% merit,35% catchment and 20% elds.it simply means that if there are 100 candidates for a particular course and 50 candidates have scores btw 250 and above .jamb will not admit the whole 50 because they have high have high score, it will only admit 45 and also choose candidates with lower scores perhaps even below 200 using catchment and elds.. so someone with 260 who does not get it on merit and not from catchment or elds does not mean one from elds but scored lower can't get it.

Angeldepedro:
That's not true, JAMB has already made made clear the official guidelines for admission without post utme, though i believe more names will still be posted. But the talk that JAMB is test running something is laughable, didn't your dad ask what it is they were test running by posting some names and leaving others behind, and no i don't think posting cost any money, it's just as good as uploading names on the internet in a specific school, this is not 1978 when JAMB used to deliver admission letters in your home address,so I don't think posting names via the internet cost money. Read below the guidelines given by the Minister of Education on 11/7/2016 again, though i believe the admission will be done in batches. Merit 45% catchment/locality 35% ELDS 20%

trust me bro people can imagine anything just to give themselves hope. this was how they spread that point system stuff btw how did this article get here in the first place

i read some comments and i become angry...this system was initiated before jamb started posting candidates because at that point the admission process was still vague.there shall be no cut off mark or why has eksu not release her own cutoff mark plus the process has to be uniform not some schools doing different things and others doing another. dont expect any cut off mark. i did screening at delsu and there was no screening scores given to anyone..the truth is if you have been posted by jamb and there's no deficiency in your 0'level results,go and start celebrating

faithyy:
I was given admission consideration by jamb to aau to study political science,with jamb score 221 bt went for screening on Monday and ma result is very low not up to 40%,since am nt up to 40,does that min I can't b admitted

brother go and prepare for sch..they aren't using that stuff. just formality, the fg has reiterated that schs are to admit only candidates sent to them by jamb and if they are to reject you, they must send you name back to jamb stating why you were denied and am sure they can't tell jamb it's because your screening result is poor besides jamb never told any school to attach score to screening...na oversabi dey worry them

like 5 of that point system topic made front page on that same day.i wonder why this info never reach front page.

STPEACE10:
don't be surprised that they will still misinterpret this guidelines, if you try to correct them they will tag you Mr ITK, that's their business though

i dey tell u bro.what surprised me was the way every website i visited paraded it. at a point i almost started doubting my stance o...

where are those that could not understand a simple admission sample model parading it as point system...but nairaland fall my hand sha. the mods in education section should have at least analyze that model rather than feeding us from sahara reporters who apparently posted their thoughts

Rilwon:
Funny enough, the mods are just placing those alleged calculation points on fp.. Like 5 of those threads are now on fp.

Lol.

Wizard second rule at work.

it surprises me how most people don't seem to understand this.. its so painful

from the image it was clearly seen that jamb faulted three of those five models... 1)screening of candidates before recommendation and provisional admission. 2)weighting of result grades using the point system as it put some candidate at a disadvantage 3)the amount charge. while jamb made no remark on the other two meaning they were ok i-e, 4)no exam conducted 5)verification of jamb results..now if you check the proposed model,you will notice that the parts above that were faulted by jamb were not included...here is the proposed model 1)screening of candidates shall be for those offered provisional admission only 2)no written examination to be conducted 3)verification of course requirements(o level and A level) it did not mention point system since it already faulted it. it said VERIFICATION because this is the part that got most people confused. 4)verification of jamb results

i am still at lost as to why some so called elite can't comprehend this simple model. jamb gave a case study using two university's model i-e the tawafa balewa and the IBB models. in the first picture below is a summary of the IBB model that has left so many confused.

kaysy:
And finally, the proposed model

thank you now dont you see that only the parts not faulted by jamb is in d prosposed model... screening of candidates b4 admission is not in it because it was faulted nd weighting of results is not here because it was faulted but d parts jamb said nothing like verification of jamb results nd no exam conducted appeared in the proposed model because they were not faulted..so you see bro...

kaysy:
Its always better to take your time and understand something first, then u're free to add your discretion (If any)

The first model advocated for a 5year life span of O'Level, you and i knows O'Level is an exam u write once and if u credit ur required subjects, u dont need to write again for life, hence this model cannot not work, i dnt need to be told it wont work before i know it. if i see a model that's likely to work out i'll know

listen to youself so you think weighting of results is what would work when jamb knows that waec is the most corupt exam in the country and those who wrote theirs at miracle centres would be an advantage..university of Ibadan knowing this had to stop using it as a model.. my brother as u clearly saw that weighting of results was faulted by jamb..you dont need a prophet to tell you that it wont be used