₦airaland Forum

faithyy:
I was given admission consideration by jamb to aau to study political science,with jamb score 221 bt went for screening on Monday and ma result is very low not up to 40%,since am nt up to 40,does that min I can't b admitted

brother go and prepare for sch..they aren't using that stuff. just formality, the fg has reiterated that schs are to admit only candidates sent to them by jamb and if they are to reject you, they must send you name back to jamb stating why you were denied and am sure they can't tell jamb it's because your screening result is poor besides jamb never told any school to attach score to screening...na oversabi dey worry them

like 5 of that point system topic made front page on that same day.i wonder why this info never reach front page.

STPEACE10:
don't be surprised that they will still misinterpret this guidelines, if you try to correct them they will tag you Mr ITK, that's their business though

i dey tell u bro.what surprised me was the way every website i visited paraded it. at a point i almost started doubting my stance o...

where are those that could not understand a simple admission sample model parading it as point system...but nairaland fall my hand sha. the mods in education section should have at least analyze that model rather than feeding us from sahara reporters who apparently posted their thoughts

Rilwon:
Funny enough, the mods are just placing those alleged calculation points on fp.. Like 5 of those threads are now on fp.

Lol.

Wizard second rule at work.

it surprises me how most people don't seem to understand this.. its so painful

from the image it was clearly seen that jamb faulted three of those five models... 1)screening of candidates before recommendation and provisional admission. 2)weighting of result grades using the point system as it put some candidate at a disadvantage 3)the amount charge. while jamb made no remark on the other two meaning they were ok i-e, 4)no exam conducted 5)verification of jamb results..now if you check the proposed model,you will notice that the parts above that were faulted by jamb were not included...here is the proposed model 1)screening of candidates shall be for those offered provisional admission only 2)no written examination to be conducted 3)verification of course requirements(o level and A level) it did not mention point system since it already faulted it. it said VERIFICATION because this is the part that got most people confused. 4)verification of jamb results

i am still at lost as to why some so called elite can't comprehend this simple model. jamb gave a case study using two university's model i-e the tawafa balewa and the IBB models. in the first picture below is a summary of the IBB model that has left so many confused.

kaysy:
And finally, the proposed model

thank you now dont you see that only the parts not faulted by jamb is in d prosposed model... screening of candidates b4 admission is not in it because it was faulted nd weighting of results is not here because it was faulted but d parts jamb said nothing like verification of jamb results nd no exam conducted appeared in the proposed model because they were not faulted..so you see bro...

kaysy:
Its always better to take your time and understand something first, then u're free to add your discretion (If any)

The first model advocated for a 5year life span of O'Level, you and i knows O'Level is an exam u write once and if u credit ur required subjects, u dont need to write again for life, hence this model cannot not work, i dnt need to be told it wont work before i know it. if i see a model that's likely to work out i'll know

listen to youself so you think weighting of results is what would work when jamb knows that waec is the most corupt exam in the country and those who wrote theirs at miracle centres would be an advantage..university of Ibadan knowing this had to stop using it as a model.. my brother as u clearly saw that weighting of results was faulted by jamb..you dont need a prophet to tell you that it wont be used

kaysy:
The first image below shows the summary of their conclusions

The second image below are observations and questions from their conclusion

THEY HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANSWERS YET

cant you see that jamb faulted 3 of the summary?no exam conducted(jamb said nothing about this cos it was ok) then verification of jamb results(jamb said nothing here cos it was ok) then d fee charged(jamb asked how much meaning they can charge buh it shouldn't be too expensive).then the point system(jamb said weighting of results put some candidates at a disadvantage meaning it's wrong) lastly they did screening b4 provisional admission(jamb faulted it saying screening should be done after provisional admission )so the parts faulted by jamb cannot be used as model for admission

kaysy:
I saw it, but this method is more likely to be adopted.

in tafawa balewa's model, jamb faulted their o level result life span of 5 years.. why dont you say they would use that one too

BahdXitixenn:
So, what happens to those who used "awaiting result"?

How will Jamb obtain their WAEC/NECO scores to calculate the points?

dont mind this people o...

kaysy:
I saw it, but this method is more likely to be adopted.

chai nigerians! oga abeg stop parading this thing biko... why would jamb fault it if they were going to use it.they clearly stated that it puts some candidates at a disadvantage and you are saying they will still use it.. haba

kaysy:
I think every other thing remains constant as usual.


Read more at www.jamb.gov.ng

baba in that pdf file from jamb did you not see where jamb made a remark that the point system puts some candidates at a disadvantage?did u not see it

Teempakguy:
I think I've lost my faith in nigerians.

The High amount of stupidity going on here is painful.

cc Elxandre

i tire o brother.even when jamb clearly faulted that point grading so many people still parade it...most of these people have not read from the raw file..this was how they paraded false news when the minister cancelled putme. some saying it's just a proposal,some said it's not this year.. i tire for Nigerians

If a school declares its cut off mark for Medicine as 90points and JAMB grants a candidate with 250 a provisional admission but his/her total points falls short of the 90 points, then he/she will lose the admission....................baba does this make any sense to you?

i dint seem to get why even some elite dont seem to understand this model?for goodness sake this point grade system was used by ibb which jamb clearly made remark on to be at a disadvantage to some candidates hence will not be used.. it was only a model sample just like the tafawa balewa's.

baba the website is f**king real... it has connection to jamb.org.ng.just click on print admission letter at the end and it tskes you to jamb main website(jamb.org.ng)

naso... that was how you people went about publishing rubbish when the minister cancelled putme.. this information is wrong and misleading

bayocute:
Nd aw are dey gonna do those of us dat wanted polythecnics?

the same procedure would be used

Mickael2:
I am not saying that you are not correct o. Ofcourse it happens each year, but when you are planning you plan for everything. What if miraculously everyone decided to check the brochure? That means schools will admit more than their usual capacity in a particular course. I do not know if u are getting what i mean?

yea maybe that is why jamb is solely responsible for given out admission this year so that universities wont go beyond their capacity... jamb would give admission solely based on jamb results before candidates can proceed for checking of o levels then any candideate who falls short of a requirement in terms of awaiting results or 2 sittings will be put in other courses or forwarded back to jamb for placement in other schs

emmijes3:
They r using verification of results yes....but think!!! In a department with over 3000 candidates,how r they gonna accept all,if they just verify their results..there definitely would be a way of dropping students..... Just to be sure,I even went ahead to ask senior lecturers here in delsu,since they r using the weighting system,,and they emphasising on d fact that awaiting students won't be considered,...just saying though.

admission is coming directly from jamb hence only people given provisional admission by jamb will go for screening and not the 3000 you quoted and there is nothing like weighting as jamb already faulted it

Mickael2:
when making plans, you do not plan in line with a possible accident. It is assumed that any candidate who registers for Jamb must have gone through the brochure, so it is assumed that all of them have the right subject combo, so you see?

Deficiency in O'level could mean choosing someone with an A over someone with a C, isn't that what they explained?

lol there are many secondary sch leavers who dont know their right from their left o let alone check brochures.. it affects many candidates each year.besides their are schs that dont accept waec results of the same year you wrote your jamb in Unizik for instance. secondly,some schs dont accept 2 sittings for a particular course delsu for instance does not accept 2 sittings for medicine.so a candidate given provisional admission by jamb but has 2 sittings for med may be usec to fill short changed courses

Mickael2:
so how will they decide which candidates they will use to fill the other courses that may be short-changed?

we all know that credit pass is the minimum requirements for admission into any course in tertiary institutions..no one will tell you that you must have an A in biology before you can study medicine..perhaps people with deficiency in their o level or incomplete results or wrong subjects combo would be used to fill courses that are short changed

it means that people with credit passes in their o level results and people with As but ve been offered provisional admission would be on a common footing as no points will be awarded to grades

Mickael2:
I doubt if you read what I said at all! I am just comparing what they said with what you said!

Go and check the page, the first of all posted the news, then they explained the news. They didn't say that what they explained there is exactly how it was written in the Jamb site! You didn't even bother to read their article before lambasting them! That is not true journalism.

So let me ask you a simple question. It will be based on O'level won't it? Now Jamb gave two examples there,one was based on admission without O'level and one was based on admission with O'level,they clearly pointed out their remarks that the screening was done before the provisional admission hence giving undue advantage to students with good grades, now after their long scenario investigation, they now said that the screening will be done after they must have been grnated a provisional admission(that was the first point in the real article) and that it will be based on checking the candidates O'level results. Now UI too does not write putme if I am correct, but they didn't use the UI model for emphasis, they used the IBB model,so does that not mean that the IBB model is the model without PUTME that they were considering in the first place? With that in mind, does that not mean that it is the method that schools will adopt?

So from your insane question, you are asking me where Jamb explained that the universities can still conduct a screening? Didn't you see the first point they made in their proposed model?

In their proposed model, did they blatantly explain how the screening will be done? What they said in point 3 is just a matter of verification hence it is easy to see that the verification mentioned is not thesame as the screening they pointed out in their first point(i am now talking about the real Jamb article), so what that means is that the proposed screening mode was not clarified by Jamb! Then since Jamb made it clear that the screening will be on checking of O'level result then isn't it safe to infer that they will adopt the model that they used in explaining the 'admission without putme' style?

They corrected just two stuffs in that model without putme, the fact that it was done before Jamb grants a provisional admission and the fact that it puts low scoring candidates at a disadvantage. Now in their two corrections they cleared that the screening will now be done after the provisional admission and there won't be a written exam, if there is no written exam, what then will be used? Or you know something that nobody else does?! I maintain that you did not even read the article from premium times before posting this nonsensical update that you just did,PATHETIC!

the IBB and tafewa balewa models were faulted by jamb not because they were conducted before provisional admission.from the summary of model 1(tafawa balewa)screening was done for only candidates recommended to jamb and given provisional admission so the screening was not done before provisional admission..but jamb did not fault this part.2nd summary was about life span of o'level results which jamb remarked on and faulted. now in summary of model 2 (ibb model)they screened candidates before provisional admission and jamb faulted it.they also weighted o level grades and jamb results which jamb faulted that it puts some candidates with low grades in o level at a disadvantage hence will not be used..hence after provisional admission,candidates will be screened by checking their o level results to make sure they have the right subjects combination and must have met with the course requirements and no weighting of results should be done as it would put some at a disadvantage.

Elxandre:
I've come to a conclusion that many Nigerians have a learning disability.

That point system model was specifically mentioned in the document as Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida university Lapai's model.

Theirs and university of Abuja's model was sampled to show how schools that traditionally do not conduct post utme managed their admission processes.

JAMB then stated clearly that the model wasn't beneficial because it puts candidates with weaker WAEC grades and awaiting results at a disadvantage.

JAMB then prescribed that students would be offered provisional admission, after which they may proceed for verification of their O'level and A'level certificates at their various institutions of admission.

This infers that Olevel would not be used as a determinant for admission, but most likely only JAMB results.

I knew this shocking platform for gross misinformation would come up.

If a learned person can't read, process and understand a simple 33 page document, what modicum of quality or intelligence is present in such person?

This is pathetic!

i think ur very wrong bro... or how else can u explain this.. this year, your points tally will decide your faith. The points are evenly spread out between your O'level and Jamb results to provide a level playing field for all.

well said buh this might be unilags own way of screening and not necessarily all other schools

hemartins:
Uniben, unilag, unilorin, unibadan, and nsuka would be the last Universities to cancel their post Ume.

dont be so sure o bros..
remember unilag was the 1st to raise it's cutoff mark to 250 last year following jamb's decision to redristibute candidates and unn also took the decision by conducting exams for only candidates giving to them by jamb buh later conducted another following the cancellation

Drdonzeez:
I do not know why the leaderships of the institution are no way different from illiterates outside there..The FG only made a suggestion and now they've turned it to breaking news.

i used to think it was just a suggestion until i read the full report.try doing same bro

nice post op.. there is actually no point writing two exams for the same purpose.however,i think what jamb is trying to do is to restore confidence nd credibility to the system and truth be told i cant see that happening with putme still in the picture hence the decision to scrape the putme but i will agree with you on the point that it shouldn't be this year owing to the circumstances that surrounded this year's conduct

i would suggest u weigh your options to see where u stand a better chance of getting admission(i-e,cutoff mark for your course in both sch,catchment nd admission quota .... buh in terms of infrastructure unizik dey learn 4 where unn dey