₦airaland Forum

Elumelu v. Okolie: When Tribunal Gave Judgment To A Meddlesome Interloper
By: Stephen Ubimago
On Monday, July 24, the National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Asaba, Delta State nullified the February 25 electoral victory of Honourable Ngozi Okolie, the Labour Party (LP) House of Representatives candidate for the Aniocha/Oshimili Federal Constituency. And in replacement, the Tribunal installed Ndudi Elumelu of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
Okolie, who won the election by a landslide having polled 53, 879 votes – trouncing Elumelu who polled 33, 466 votes and Tony Nwaka of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to the second and third places respectively – was not removed by the Tribunal because his victory was too emphatic to be credible. Neither was he removed because his win had K-leg (a pejorative idiom in pidgin for describing a feat tainted by irregularity or compromise).
In other words, Okolie’s victory was clean, unmarred by rigging, and untarnished by failure on his part to play by the ethical rules or by the rule of law as provided for in the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the Electoral Act 2022, or the Guidelines of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Rather, for the three-man panel of judges at the Tribunal led by Justice A.Z. Mussa, it made sense to sack Okolie of LP, by far the most popular candidate at the poll, and replace him with Elumelu of PDP, who came a distant second, merely because it agreed with Elumelu that Okolie was not validly nominated by the Labour Party to run on its platform, and because he was not qualified to contest in the election.
Stated differently, the Tribunal considered it wise to ground its judgment, which found for Elumelu, not on any proven case of electoral fraud or irregularity against the LP candidate notorious enough to deny Elumelu victory, but on the PDP candidate’s meddlesomeness in LP’s internal affairs, as his chief complaint was that Okolie was not validly nominated or sponsored by LP even when the Party has never denied, but had even affirmed, that the emergence of Okolie as its flag-bearer at the said poll was regular and in order.
Granted that in Petition No: EPT/DL/HR/06/2023, Elumelu did complain in paragraphs 14 (ii) and 14 (iii) of same that “The Election was not conducted in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines...” and that “The 3rd Respondent (Okolie) did not score the majority of lawful votes cast and was consequently unduly returned; he however quickly abandoned those grounds as he couldn’t possibly prove any claim arising from them.
Seeing he couldn’t at once maintain the above grounds and his prayers that the Tribunal should declare him the winner of the election, Elumelu in his Final Written Address would tactically rather latch onto the ground contained in paragraph 14 (i) to the effect that Okolie was not validly nominated or sponsored by LP and that he wasn’t qualified to contest in the election.
Be that as it may, not only did perusing and evaluating the brilliant arguments canvassed by Okolie in his Final Written Address as settled by his Counsel Chike George Onyemenam SAN leave one thoroughly impressed; but also weighing it against Elumelu’s arguments as settled by his Counsel, Ken Mozia SAN tended to leave one wondering what actually was going on in the minds of the learned trial judges of the Tribunal when they thought it wise to side with the Petitioner.
For one thing, Okolie led compelling evidence and canvassed arguments on point of law to easily vanquish Elumelu’s Petition. He showed that having graduated from the famous St. Patrick’s College, Asaba, he was, pursuant to the extant laws, academically qualified to contest in the election in contradiction of Elumelu’s crummy claim.
Okolie also led evidence to show that prior to his expression of interest to contest in the said election, he duly resigned his appointment as Senior Special Assistant to the immediate past Governor of Delta State, with proofs as well showing that he duly restituted all salaries he received in default of his resignation – all of which were in the Tribunal’s record.
This consequently leaves one with the feeling that either the trial judges of the Tribunal hurriedly delivered the said judgment without evaluating all the evidence before them as particularly led by Okolie, or the Judges felt at liberty to spurn the stare decisis principle according to which the decisions of appellate courts of record are binding on the lower courts.
In other words, the Tribunal found for Elumelu despite the bounteous references to binding judicial pronouncements as settled by Okolie’s counsels which required that where a Petitioner is grounding his Petition on meddlesomeness in the internal affairs of another political party, the petition of the Petitioner, who in this connection is wanting in locus standi, must be dismissed for lacking merit.
In one of the said cases referenced by Okolie, namely Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) V. INEC & Others, wherein the PDP sought to challenge the legality of the nomination process of Alhaji Kashim Shetima as the APC Vice Presidential candidate, the Supreme Court held inter alia that “The application of section 285(14)(c) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, does not extend to a Political Party poking into the affairs of another.
“The settled position of the Law remains that a Political Party cannot challenge the nomination of the candidate of another political party, and this does not change with the provisions of section 285(14)(c) of the Constitution.”
It was in light of same ratio establishing the non-justiciability of matters relating to the grant of waiver by a party or membership of a political party, and describing same as strictly the internal affairs of a Political Party that the Supreme Court in Enang v. Asuquo & Ors (2023) LPELR-60042 (SC) dismissed the appeal of the Appellant in the said matter.
In Echendu v. Ugonna & Ors (2002) LPELRE-58890 (CA), the Court of Appeal also reiterated the settled principle that questions relating to the membership of a political party is not for the courts to decide as such matters are within the exclusive preserve of the party concerned.
That being said, with the Labour Party moving quickly to appeal against the instant Tribunal judgment, it is hoped that justice will ultimately be served in order to forestall the ill-wind a curious judgment of this kind portends not only for the electoral fortunes of the Labour Party in particular, but also for Nigeria’s democracy in general.
 
Stephen Ubimago, a Lagos-based Legal Practitioner, wrote in from Lagos.

It was rumoured that the brothers bought the judges at the tribunal to give judgement in their favor.

Spread the information.

vastolord4:
Go to guo luxury bus.. tried it once

Will they make it by morning?

I have an interview by 9 am.

I am all in, just respond to my email. I'll give you all the necessary distraction plus I am young and fun.

Foreign rice no get made.

Hmmm

youngdave78:
I was wondering if it's a most to take your tithes to church?

Nobody has the right to label it right or wrong.
It is between you and your God.

Who is in any naughty group?

I really think the age of consent should be brought down to 15 or even 16

mcayomind:
In any situation of life, never aspire to acquire Maguire!!

let me add to it. It will backfire.

Maryliola:
Hey guys

I’m making this post because I don’t want to be judged and I can’t turn my on people in my real life because they may not understand. Well I’ve been married for 2 plus years I’m 27 with a son. I’m going to get personal so embrace yourself.

Myself and my husband have a good relationship, almost too good because I literally see him like my brother. This is to the point where our romantic/lover side of our relationship is kinda dead. I see him naked, it’s like looking at my brother naked. I don’t feel turned on, or excited. We talk and gist like friends, but romantically things are flat. Our sex life is mediocre I guess. He doesn’t do oralll sexxx and he ejaculates very fast. I’m talking 10 seconds, and it’s every single time despite taking different preventative measures. I know that I’m extremely clean as I’m very observant of myself and he also tells me all the time. Yet orall sexxx is disgusting to him and “dehumanising”. There’s no passion when we kiss, its forced most times.


Lately I’ve been finding myself fantasising about being touched by a man , almost every night . A man that will give me orall sexx a man that will turn me on and blow me away. I don’t want to be judged here, but this is genuinely how I’ve been feeling. I don’t want to put pressure on my husband as he has other things to worry about.
A man that will kiss me in all the right places and make me feel like a woman. Sometimes I believe I’m being delusional, or unrealistic. I’m trying to get rid of these thoughts, but I really don’t know how. I have never cheated on my husband and I don’t think I have the guts to do it. I really just want to know how married people cope when that spark is gone. When you begin to look at your spouse like a brother or sister, and romantically the vibes are not there.

Let me also say that I’ve addressed this to him many times, but he stands he’s not willing to compromise.

Help!

Mods, I need this on front page as I need help for people to see this.

Don't walk that line, but you can add me up for sexchats.

soso208:
Can i access Twitter freely with Tor browser?

Puff in browser will do

Where can one see forbidden resource.

Who remember sharemobile.ro

BENARI:
Kanu will walk free. The issue here is not the man. Its what he stands for. He's the embodiment of the Igbo struggle, and in fact all oppressed in nigeria. It clear now the problems will not cease even with killing Nnamdi Kanu, but may improve with his release and possibly negotiations with him and others like him.

Just shut up. What will you say about end sars protesters?

Interested.

Which skill will you recommend to someone to get them out of poverty

x full time

Any lady interested in a mind blowing sex should pm.

shesaiditsbig:
I cannot tell you exactly where to look into, you should rather look inwards and choose the skill that you really connect with based on your personal abilities.

You can search each of them on Google to know what they entail.

It’s best practice to choose a skill according to your interests, abilities and passion. Not just because of the renumeration for the skill ONLY.

I want to become financially independent, there's nothing I cannot accomplish at this point.