₦airaland Forum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K5x8dhMeq0

The political battle ahead of Nigeria's 2027 presidential election is gaining momentum, with the emerging alliance between former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi and former Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso facing questions over its ability to challenge President Bola Tinubu's political strength in Northern Nigeria.

The development follows reports that Obi and Kwankwaso have formalised a one-term power-sharing arrangement ahead of the 2027 election. Under the reported agreement, Obi would serve a single four-year term if elected, after which the presidency would return to the North.

The arrangement is seen as an attempt to combine Obi's support base, particularly in the South-East and parts of the South-South and North-Central, with Kwankwaso's political influence in Kano and other parts of the North.

The alliance could significantly reshape the opposition landscape, especially following the decision by both politicians to join the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC). The party subsequently zoned its 2027 presidential ticket to the South, with the North expected to produce its candidate in 2031.

However, the emerging partnership has already come under scrutiny from former Kano State Governor and former All Progressives Congress (APC) National Chairman Abdullahi Ganduje.

Ganduje reportedly dismissed the chances of Obi and former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar in Northern Nigeria, arguing that the opposition figures lack the political structures required to defeat President Bola Tinubu.

His position highlights one of the biggest challenges facing the opposition ahead of 2027: converting individual popularity into a coordinated nationwide electoral machine.

The North remains a critical battleground in Nigeria's presidential elections, with candidates requiring broad national support to secure victory.

The Obi-Kwankwaso partnership is therefore being watched closely because it brings together two politicians who contested separately in the 2023 presidential election.

Obi emerged as a major force in the 2023 election, securing substantial support among younger voters and winning several states, while Kwankwaso maintained strong influence in Kano, where he secured victory.

The two politicians have since moved to formalise their partnership, with Obi naming Kwankwaso as his running mate and promising an administration in which the vice-president would function as a governing partner rather than a ceremonial deputy.

The alliance, however, still faces questions about whether the two political camps can successfully merge their support bases.

While Kwankwaso brings significant political influence in Kano and parts of the North, Obi's political strength is concentrated in other regions. The challenge will be whether the alliance can translate these regional advantages into a broader national coalition.

The opposition's ability to unite will also be critical.

Atiku remains a major political figure in Northern Nigeria and has declared his intention to contest the 2027 presidential election. The existence of multiple opposition figures could potentially divide votes against the ruling APC, unless the opposition succeeds in reaching a consensus around a single candidate.

For the APC, the emerging opposition alliance presents a potential threat but also an opportunity.

If Obi and Kwankwaso succeed in building a strong national coalition, the 2027 contest could become significantly more competitive. But if regional interests, leadership ambitions and competing opposition structures prevent consolidation, the ruling party could benefit from a divided opposition.

Ultimately, the 2027 presidential race is likely to be determined not only by individual popularity but also by political organisation, regional alliances, voter turnout and the ability of competing parties to build a credible national coalition.

With the election still ahead, the latest political developments suggest that the battle for 2027 is already entering a crucial phase — and the struggle for Northern votes could prove decisive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amk26fGQVio

Glimpsetv:
During the World Cup final, IShowSpeed was in the stands livestreaming when someone from Seyi Tinubu's VIP group called his attention. Seyi Tinubu, son of Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, was there with his children and had sent someone to request a quick selfie/photo with the kids.

Speed immediately turned around, enthusiastically invited the children over, and posed for the photo with them. Right after the picture, in his typical chaotic style, he told the kids:

“Tell your dad to get me a Nigerian passport.”

The children looked at him with pure confusion, as if wondering what he just said.

The man who had initially approached Speed then beckoned him again and properly introduced him to Seyi Tinubu. The two shook hands, and Speed followed up directly:

“Hey man, I gotta get my passport.”

Seyi responded with a gesture and words that sounded like “I will get it done.”

Speed smiled, clearly amused, and immediately turned back to continue his livestream.

It was a light-hearted, funny moment — Speed turning a simple fan photo request into a viral joke about getting Nigerian citizenship straight from the president’s son. The clip has been blowing up because of how bold and random the exchange was.

Cc: Nlfpmod


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUEP9zrcQf8?si=A3ZYDdWlDHyehU1n

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amk26fGQVio

A chance meeting between Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Tinubu, his children, and American streaming sensation IShowSpeed at the FIFA World Cup final has gone viral, drawing widespread attention across social media.

Videos circulating online show the popular YouTuber greeting Seyi Tinubu and interacting warmly with his children inside the stadium's VIP area. During the exchange, IShowSpeed, known for his energetic personality and humorous livestreams, joked about wanting a Nigerian passport, prompting laughter from those nearby.

The brief interaction quickly gained traction online, with thousands of users sharing clips and debating the significance of the meeting.

The encounter comes months after IShowSpeed's widely publicized visit to Nigeria, where he livestreamed his experiences across several locations, introducing millions of international viewers to Nigerian culture, music, and everyday life. His visit generated global interest and was widely praised for showcasing a different side of the country.

Observers say the World Cup meeting reflects the increasing intersection of politics, sports, and the creator economy. Digital influencers now command audiences comparable to traditional media, making even casual interactions with public figures newsworthy.

While many social media users viewed the exchange as a light-hearted moment, others described it as another example of Nigeria's growing visibility on the global stage through entertainment and digital media.

As online creators continue to shape conversations beyond national borders, moments like this demonstrate how sporting events have evolved into platforms where culture, politics, and social media influence often converge.

The viral encounter has continued to generate reactions online, with fans praising the friendly interaction and highlighting the role of digital creators in projecting countries and cultures to global audiences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQC3ObZIlN0

Islie:
https://dailypost.ng/2026/07/17/moment-arise-tvs-oseni-rufai-broke-down-wept-over-nigerias-economy-video/

Moment Rufai Oseni of Arise News cried on live TV over the state of the economy in the 70s and today and miss-management and looting of resources by politicians.

Lol 😆 pic.twitter.com/L2qAlJahhu

— Emma ik Umeh (Tcee )🇳🇬 (@emmaikumeh) July 17, 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQC3ObZIlN0
The United States House of Representatives has approved legislation seeking to suspend U.S. foreign assistance to Nigeria over concerns about the persecution of Christians, a decision that has coincided with renewed domestic debate over corruption and the country's economic decline.

According to reports by Premium Times and The PUNCH, the bill proposes withholding U.S. assistance to Nigeria unless the U.S. Secretary of State certifies that the Nigerian government is taking meaningful steps to protect religious freedom and prosecute those responsible for attacks on religious communities.

The legislation, however, has not yet become law. It must still pass through additional stages in the U.S. legislative process before taking effect.

If eventually enacted, the measure could affect several U.S.-funded programmes in Nigeria, including health, humanitarian support, governance initiatives, education, and security cooperation.

The House vote comes as Nigeria continues to grapple with economic challenges, rising public debt, inflation, and efforts to attract foreign investment.

The development has also reignited discussions about governance following emotional remarks by Arise News broadcaster Rufai Oseni during a live television programme.

Oseni questioned how Nigeria, once regarded as one of Africa's strongest economies, has become increasingly dependent on external borrowing.

Referring to Nigeria's historical engagement with the World Bank, he noted that the country was financially strong enough in the 1970s to contribute approximately $240 million to the institution's reserves under a long-term agreement. He contrasted that period with the country's current reliance on loans from multilateral institutions and foreign partners.

The broadcaster also cited recent asset forfeiture cases involving former Attorney General Abubakar Malami and businesswoman Aisha Achimugu, arguing that corruption has significantly undermined Nigeria's economic development.

His remarks quickly gained traction on social media, where many Nigerians echoed concerns over corruption, public accountability, and declining economic conditions.

However, analysts note that Nigeria's current economic challenges stem from a combination of factors beyond corruption alone. These include declining oil revenues, foreign exchange volatility, insecurity, rapid population growth, infrastructure deficits, subsidy reforms, and global economic pressures.

The U.S. House vote also underscores growing international scrutiny of Nigeria's human rights record. While supporters of the bill argue that stronger measures are needed to address religious violence, critics caution that reducing foreign assistance could affect vulnerable communities that depend on donor-funded health and humanitarian programmes.

For Nigeria, the proposed aid restrictions represent more than a diplomatic challenge. They come at a time when the country is seeking to restore investor confidence, deepen economic reforms, and strengthen partnerships with international development institutions.

As debate continues both in Washington and Abuja, the developments have once again placed governance, accountability, and economic reform at the centre of Nigeria's national conversation.

The FCT Minister has remained one of President Tinubu's strongest political allies despite his membership of the opposition People's Democratic Party (PDP), frequently praising the administration's efforts in infrastructure and governance.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihusVnCzZsI

Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike has defended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's leadership, saying that governing Nigeria is far more demanding than critics often acknowledge.

Speaking during the commissioning of completed projects across the Federal Capital Territory, Wike declared that "to become President of Nigeria no be cho cho cho," a popular Nigerian expression meaning leadership requires far more than speeches or political promises.

The minister made the remarks while announcing that the FCT Administration has officially commissioned 50 projects, with another 10 projects scheduled for completion.

According to Wike, the completed infrastructure projects reflect the Tinubu administration's commitment to delivering tangible development despite the country's economic and governance challenges.

He argued that Nigerians should assess governments based on measurable performance rather than political rhetoric.

Wike's comments also appeared to carry a broader political message directed at opposition figures, suggesting that those seeking power should recognize the enormous responsibility attached to governing Africa's largest economy.

His remarks come at a time when President Tinubu continues to face criticism over inflation, rising living costs, and the impact of ongoing economic reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies and foreign exchange reforms.

Supporters of the administration argue that the reforms are laying the foundation for long-term economic stability, while critics contend that many Nigerians are yet to feel their benefits.

Wike, however, maintained that the administration's infrastructure drive demonstrates that governance extends beyond campaign promises.

The FCT Minister has remained one of President Tinubu's strongest political allies despite his membership of the opposition People's Democratic Party (PDP), frequently praising the administration's efforts in infrastructure and governance.

His latest remarks are expected to fuel further political debate as discussions continue over the Tinubu administration's performance ahead of future electoral contests.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihusVnCzZsI

Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike has defended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's leadership, saying that governing Nigeria is far more demanding than critics often acknowledge.

Speaking during the commissioning of completed projects across the Federal Capital Territory, Wike declared that "to become President of Nigeria no be cho cho cho," a popular Nigerian expression meaning leadership requires far more than speeches or political promises.

The minister made the remarks while announcing that the FCT Administration has officially commissioned 50 projects, with another 10 projects scheduled for completion.

According to Wike, the completed infrastructure projects reflect the Tinubu administration's commitment to delivering tangible development despite the country's economic and governance challenges.

He argued that Nigerians should assess governments based on measurable performance rather than political rhetoric.

Wike's comments also appeared to carry a broader political message directed at opposition figures, suggesting that those seeking power should recognize the enormous responsibility attached to governing Africa's largest economy.

His remarks come at a time when President Tinubu continues to face criticism over inflation, rising living costs, and the impact of ongoing economic reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies and foreign exchange reforms.

Supporters of the administration argue that the reforms are laying the foundation for long-term economic stability, while critics contend that many Nigerians are yet to feel their benefits.

Wike, however, maintained that the administration's infrastructure drive demonstrates that governance extends beyond campaign promises.

The FCT Minister has remained one of President Tinubu's strongest political allies despite his membership of the opposition People's Democratic Party (PDP), frequently praising the administration's efforts in infrastructure and governance.

His latest remarks are expected to fuel further political debate as discussions continue over the Tinubu administration's performance ahead of future electoral contests.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1RLik-ewis
Speaking after receiving the rescued victims, Makinde said the incident raised critical questions that deserved an impartial review. According to the governor, an independent investigation would help establish the facts surrounding the abduction, determine whether any institutional lapses contributed to the prolonged captivity, and strengthen public confidence in Nigeria's security architecture.

Giftimoni:
The Nigerian Senate has asked Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde to withdraw his call for the United Nations to investigate the abduction of schoolchildren in Ogbomoso, arguing that Nigeria's security institutions are capable of handling the matter without foreign intervention.

The development follows Governor Makinde's appeal for an independent international inquiry into the kidnapping of pupils and teachers from schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State. The victims, who spent 56 days in captivity before being rescued through a joint security operation, were reunited with their families earlier this month.

Speaking after receiving the rescued victims, Makinde said the incident raised critical questions that deserved an impartial review. According to the governor, an independent investigation would help establish the facts surrounding the abduction, determine whether any institutional lapses contributed to the prolonged captivity, and strengthen public confidence in Nigeria's security architecture.

"I believe there should be a thorough investigation into what happened. If necessary, international bodies such as the United Nations should be invited to examine the circumstances so that Nigerians can have confidence in the findings," Makinde said.

However, the proposal has drawn strong criticism from both the National Assembly and the Presidency.

During plenary, the Senate cautioned the governor against internationalizing what lawmakers described as a domestic security issue. Senators commended the efforts of the military, police, intelligence agencies, Amotekun Corps, local hunters, and vigilante groups whose coordinated operation eventually secured the victims' release.

Lawmakers argued that inviting the United Nations to investigate the incident could undermine confidence in Nigeria's security institutions at a time when they continue to confront complex security challenges across the country.

The Presidency also rejected Makinde's position.

Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga described the governor's request as unnecessary, maintaining that Nigerian security agencies had already demonstrated professionalism in rescuing the victims despite the operational risks involved.

Onanuga noted that several security personnel reportedly paid the ultimate price during the rescue operation, stressing that suggestions of institutional complicity or deliberate delay lacked supporting evidence.

According to the Presidency, Nigeria possesses established constitutional and legal mechanisms for investigating security incidents and should rely on those institutions rather than seeking external intervention.

The exchange has sparked wider conversations among legal experts, security analysts, and civil society organizations about the balance between accountability and national sovereignty.

Supporters of Makinde's position argue that independent investigations often enhance public trust, particularly in high-profile security incidents involving children. They contend that transparency should not be viewed as an indictment of state institutions but as an opportunity to identify operational gaps and strengthen future responses.

Critics, however, insist that involving international organizations in domestic security matters risks portraying Nigeria as incapable of managing its own affairs. They argue that existing institutions—including the National Human Rights Commission, legislative oversight committees, and judicial mechanisms—already provide avenues for accountability.

Beyond the political disagreements, the incident has once again highlighted Nigeria's persistent security challenges, particularly attacks targeting schools and vulnerable communities. Although the successful rescue brought relief to affected families, many Nigerians continue to demand answers about how the kidnapping occurred, why it lasted nearly two months, and what reforms are required to prevent similar incidents.

As public debate continues, the controversy underscores a broader national conversation about transparency, institutional trust, and the role of international organizations in addressing domestic security concerns.

Whether Governor Makinde's proposal gains further support or fades amid political opposition, the questions raised by the Oyo school abduction are likely to remain central to discussions on Nigeria's security governance in the months ahead.

https://breakingnews9ja.com/senate-cautions-makinde-over-un-probe-demand-in-oyo-abduction-saga/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1RLik-ewis
The Nigerian Senate has asked Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde to withdraw his call for the United Nations to investigate the abduction of schoolchildren in Ogbomoso, arguing that Nigeria's security institutions are capable of handling the matter without foreign intervention.

The development follows Governor Makinde's appeal for an independent international inquiry into the kidnapping of pupils and teachers from schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State. The victims, who spent 56 days in captivity before being rescued through a joint security operation, were reunited with their families earlier this month.

Speaking after receiving the rescued victims, Makinde said the incident raised critical questions that deserved an impartial review. According to the governor, an independent investigation would help establish the facts surrounding the abduction, determine whether any institutional lapses contributed to the prolonged captivity, and strengthen public confidence in Nigeria's security architecture.

"I believe there should be a thorough investigation into what happened. If necessary, international bodies such as the United Nations should be invited to examine the circumstances so that Nigerians can have confidence in the findings," Makinde said.

However, the proposal has drawn strong criticism from both the National Assembly and the Presidency.

During plenary, the Senate cautioned the governor against internationalizing what lawmakers described as a domestic security issue. Senators commended the efforts of the military, police, intelligence agencies, Amotekun Corps, local hunters, and vigilante groups whose coordinated operation eventually secured the victims' release.

Lawmakers argued that inviting the United Nations to investigate the incident could undermine confidence in Nigeria's security institutions at a time when they continue to confront complex security challenges across the country.

The Presidency also rejected Makinde's position.

Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga described the governor's request as unnecessary, maintaining that Nigerian security agencies had already demonstrated professionalism in rescuing the victims despite the operational risks involved.

Onanuga noted that several security personnel reportedly paid the ultimate price during the rescue operation, stressing that suggestions of institutional complicity or deliberate delay lacked supporting evidence.

According to the Presidency, Nigeria possesses established constitutional and legal mechanisms for investigating security incidents and should rely on those institutions rather than seeking external intervention.

The exchange has sparked wider conversations among legal experts, security analysts, and civil society organizations about the balance between accountability and national sovereignty.

Supporters of Makinde's position argue that independent investigations often enhance public trust, particularly in high-profile security incidents involving children. They contend that transparency should not be viewed as an indictment of state institutions but as an opportunity to identify operational gaps and strengthen future responses.

Critics, however, insist that involving international organizations in domestic security matters risks portraying Nigeria as incapable of managing its own affairs. They argue that existing institutions—including the National Human Rights Commission, legislative oversight committees, and judicial mechanisms—already provide avenues for accountability.

Beyond the political disagreements, the incident has once again highlighted Nigeria's persistent security challenges, particularly attacks targeting schools and vulnerable communities. Although the successful rescue brought relief to affected families, many Nigerians continue to demand answers about how the kidnapping occurred, why it lasted nearly two months, and what reforms are required to prevent similar incidents.

As public debate continues, the controversy underscores a broader national conversation about transparency, institutional trust, and the role of international organizations in addressing domestic security concerns.

Whether Governor Makinde's proposal gains further support or fades amid political opposition, the questions raised by the Oyo school abduction are likely to remain central to discussions on Nigeria's security governance in the months ahead.

https://breakingnews9ja.com/senate-cautions-makinde-over-un-probe-demand-in-oyo-abduction-saga/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJnUP1y9kfI

Veteran broadcaster Rufai Oseni has criticised the release of CCTV footage by the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, describing the move as unnecessary amid the growing controversy over the clamping of former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi's vehicle at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

Speaking on the unfolding dispute, Oseni argued that while airport authorities have the right to enforce regulations, publicly releasing surveillance footage to defend the government's position was excessive and risked deepening political tensions.

"The CCTV footage Keyamo released was unnecessary," Oseni said, adding that the issue could have been resolved through established administrative procedures rather than escalating into a public confrontation.

His remarks come as the disagreement between Obi and Keyamo continues to generate widespread debate across Nigeria.

The controversy began after Obi alleged that the clamping of his vehicle amounted to political harassment. In response, Keyamo insisted that airport officials merely enforced existing regulations, citing an internal review and CCTV footage which, according to the ministry, showed the vehicle being left unattended in a restricted drop-off zone.

The minister subsequently challenged Obi to publicly apologise and pay the prescribed parking fine within seven days, maintaining that the incident had no political undertones.

Obi, however, rejected that position, insisting that his concerns were about fairness, equal treatment, and the selective application of public rules. Members of the Obidient Movement have also questioned the completeness and authenticity of the CCTV footage released by the ministry.

Oseni's intervention has added another dimension to the conversation, with many Nigerians debating whether the public release of the footage was a necessary act of transparency or an avoidable step that further politicised what could have remained an administrative matter.

The broader controversy has reignited discussions about the relationship between government officials and opposition figures, with supporters of Obi arguing that repeated incidents involving the former Anambra State governor point to a pattern of political hostility. Others maintain that public office holders and political leaders should be subject to the same rules governing all citizens, regardless of status.

As reactions continue to pour in, neither Obi nor Keyamo has indicated any willingness to soften their positions, leaving the airport incident firmly in the national conversation.

The ₦1.3 Billion 'Ghost Agency' Scandal What Real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ51QXp4QBk

Metrix147:
Source: https://abntv.com.ng/news/i-was-a-victim-too-deputy-speaker-kalu-speaks-on-alleged-fake-presidential-council-video/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJ51QXp4QBk

This story is still developing, and more facts are expected to emerge as investigations continue.

truthera:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/07/pfipc-scandal-how-sgfs-office-cleared-adeyemi-for-canada-summit/

The nickname appeared to reference the public debate that followed the First Lady's recent advice to beneficiaries of an empowerment programme to consider businesses such as selling akara, roasted corn and kuli-kuli with grants rather than relying on loans. Her remarks generated mixed reactions, with some Nigerians applauding the emphasis on entrepreneurship while others argued the comments did not adequately reflect the country's economic realities.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzJtYOjOYdI

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has stirred fresh conversations after playfully referring to First Lady Oluremi Tinubu as "Iya Alakara" during the maiden State House Media Corps Presidential Dinner in Abuja.

The light-hearted remark drew laughter from guests and quickly attracted attention because it echoed a phrase that recently gained traction on social media following the First Lady's comments on small-scale entrepreneurship.

While introducing dignitaries at the event, President Tinubu smiled as he addressed his wife as "My dear wife, the First Lady... Iya Alakara," prompting laughter from the audience.

The nickname appeared to reference the public debate that followed the First Lady's recent advice to beneficiaries of an empowerment programme to consider businesses such as selling akara, roasted corn and kuli-kuli with grants rather than relying on loans. Her remarks generated mixed reactions, with some Nigerians applauding the emphasis on entrepreneurship while others argued the comments did not adequately reflect the country's economic realities.

By jokingly adopting the now-viral phrase, President Tinubu appeared to acknowledge that the conversation had resonated widely across the country.

Political observers say leaders often use humour to demonstrate awareness of public discourse, soften criticism or create moments of connection with citizens. Whether the President intended to send a broader message or simply entertain guests, the remark underscored that discussions taking place online can quickly find their way into official events.

The moment has since generated widespread reactions across social media, with many Nigerians interpreting the joke as evidence that the Presidency is closely following public conversations.

Although opinions remain divided over the significance of the remark, the episode has become one of the most talked-about highlights of the State House dinner, reinforcing the influence of social media narratives on Nigeria's political landscape.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzJtYOjOYdI

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has stirred fresh conversations after playfully referring to First Lady Oluremi Tinubu as "Iya Alakara" during the maiden State House Media Corps Presidential Dinner in Abuja.

The light-hearted remark drew laughter from guests and quickly attracted attention because it echoed a phrase that recently gained traction on social media following the First Lady's comments on small-scale entrepreneurship.

While introducing dignitaries at the event, President Tinubu smiled as he addressed his wife as "My dear wife, the First Lady... Iya Alakara," prompting laughter from the audience.

The nickname appeared to reference the public debate that followed the First Lady's recent advice to beneficiaries of an empowerment programme to consider businesses such as selling akara, roasted corn and kuli-kuli with grants rather than relying on loans. Her remarks generated mixed reactions, with some Nigerians applauding the emphasis on entrepreneurship while others argued the comments did not adequately reflect the country's economic realities.

By jokingly adopting the now-viral phrase, President Tinubu appeared to acknowledge that the conversation had resonated widely across the country.

Political observers say leaders often use humour to demonstrate awareness of public discourse, soften criticism or create moments of connection with citizens. Whether the President intended to send a broader message or simply entertain guests, the remark underscored that discussions taking place online can quickly find their way into official events.

The moment has since generated widespread reactions across social media, with many Nigerians interpreting the joke as evidence that the Presidency is closely following public conversations.

Although opinions remain divided over the significance of the remark, the episode has become one of the most talked-about highlights of the State House dinner, reinforcing the influence of social media narratives on Nigeria's political landscape.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKRS-3bjRCI

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKRS-3bjRCI

The recent exchange between former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the Minister of Works, David Umahi, has reignited public debate over Nigeria's infrastructure priorities and the role of opposition politics in a democratic society.

The controversy began after Obi criticized the Federal Government's approach to road development, arguing that priority should be given to rehabilitating existing highways before embarking on new road construction projects.

Using the Asaba–Benin Road as an example, Obi described the highway as one of Nigeria's most strategic transport corridors, connecting several states in the South-South, South-East, and parts of the North-Central to Lagos.

According to him, the deplorable condition of the road has become a major source of hardship for commuters, transporters, and businesses.

"There is a pertinent reason I have consistently advocated that we should refrain from initiating new road construction projects until we have thoroughly rehabilitated and maintained our existing road network," Obi said.

He argued that many of Nigeria's existing highways remain in poor condition despite their economic importance and urged the government to focus on repairing critical infrastructure before announcing additional road projects.

Umahi Defends Government's Strategy

Responding to the criticism, Minister of Works David Umahi defended the Federal Government's infrastructure policy, insisting that Nigeria cannot afford to suspend new road construction simply because existing roads require repairs.

Umahi maintained that the administration's strategy is to simultaneously rehabilitate aging infrastructure while expanding the country's road network to meet growing economic and population demands.

Supporters of the government pointed to several recently approved infrastructure projects, including road rehabilitation works and new highway developments across multiple states, arguing that addressing Nigeria's decades-long infrastructure deficit requires a multi-pronged approach rather than an either-or strategy.

Broader Debate on Infrastructure Priorities

The exchange has generated mixed reactions among Nigerians.

Some observers agree with Obi's position, arguing that fixing heavily used federal highways should take precedence over launching new projects.

Others believe that limiting government to rehabilitation alone could delay development in underserved communities that have long lacked quality road infrastructure.

Analysts note that Nigeria's infrastructure challenges are extensive, with many federal roads requiring urgent maintenance while numerous regions continue to demand new transport links to stimulate economic growth.

Opposition Politics Under the Spotlight

Beyond the disagreement over road construction, the exchange has also sparked wider conversations about the nature of opposition politics in Nigeria.

Political analysts argue that effective opposition plays a crucial role in democratic governance by scrutinizing government policies, identifying shortcomings, and proposing alternative solutions.

They note that constructive criticism can strengthen public accountability while encouraging better policy implementation.

Similarly, they emphasize that governments should respond to criticism with facts, transparency, and measurable progress rather than political rhetoric.

Calls for Accountability

Experts say the focus should ultimately remain on ensuring that infrastructure projects are completed on schedule, delivered within budget, and built to acceptable engineering standards.

They argue that regardless of political affiliation, Nigerians stand to benefit when government performance is measured by tangible outcomes, including safer highways, reduced travel times, and improved economic connectivity.

As discussions continue, the exchange between Obi and Umahi has highlighted broader questions about infrastructure development, public accountability, and the responsibilities of both government and opposition in strengthening Nigeria's democracy.

Whether the priority should be repairing existing roads first or pursuing rehabilitation alongside new construction remains a subject of public debate, but many observers agree that sustained investment, transparency, and effective execution will be key to addressing Nigeria's longstanding infrastructure challenges.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKRS-3bjRCI

The recent exchange between former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the Minister of Works, David Umahi, has reignited public debate over Nigeria's infrastructure priorities and the role of opposition politics in a democratic society.

The controversy began after Obi criticized the Federal Government's approach to road development, arguing that priority should be given to rehabilitating existing highways before embarking on new road construction projects.

Using the Asaba–Benin Road as an example, Obi described the highway as one of Nigeria's most strategic transport corridors, connecting several states in the South-South, South-East, and parts of the North-Central to Lagos.

According to him, the deplorable condition of the road has become a major source of hardship for commuters, transporters, and businesses.

"There is a pertinent reason I have consistently advocated that we should refrain from initiating new road construction projects until we have thoroughly rehabilitated and maintained our existing road network," Obi said.

He argued that many of Nigeria's existing highways remain in poor condition despite their economic importance and urged the government to focus on repairing critical infrastructure before announcing additional road projects.

Umahi Defends Government's Strategy

Responding to the criticism, Minister of Works David Umahi defended the Federal Government's infrastructure policy, insisting that Nigeria cannot afford to suspend new road construction simply because existing roads require repairs.

Umahi maintained that the administration's strategy is to simultaneously rehabilitate aging infrastructure while expanding the country's road network to meet growing economic and population demands.

Supporters of the government pointed to several recently approved infrastructure projects, including road rehabilitation works and new highway developments across multiple states, arguing that addressing Nigeria's decades-long infrastructure deficit requires a multi-pronged approach rather than an either-or strategy.

Broader Debate on Infrastructure Priorities

The exchange has generated mixed reactions among Nigerians.

Some observers agree with Obi's position, arguing that fixing heavily used federal highways should take precedence over launching new projects.

Others believe that limiting government to rehabilitation alone could delay development in underserved communities that have long lacked quality road infrastructure.

Analysts note that Nigeria's infrastructure challenges are extensive, with many federal roads requiring urgent maintenance while numerous regions continue to demand new transport links to stimulate economic growth.

Opposition Politics Under the Spotlight

Beyond the disagreement over road construction, the exchange has also sparked wider conversations about the nature of opposition politics in Nigeria.

Political analysts argue that effective opposition plays a crucial role in democratic governance by scrutinizing government policies, identifying shortcomings, and proposing alternative solutions.

They note that constructive criticism can strengthen public accountability while encouraging better policy implementation.

Similarly, they emphasize that governments should respond to criticism with facts, transparency, and measurable progress rather than political rhetoric.

Calls for Accountability

Experts say the focus should ultimately remain on ensuring that infrastructure projects are completed on schedule, delivered within budget, and built to acceptable engineering standards.

They argue that regardless of political affiliation, Nigerians stand to benefit when government performance is measured by tangible outcomes, including safer highways, reduced travel times, and improved economic connectivity.

As discussions continue, the exchange between Obi and Umahi has highlighted broader questions about infrastructure development, public accountability, and the responsibilities of both government and opposition in strengthening Nigeria's democracy.

Whether the priority should be repairing existing roads first or pursuing rehabilitation alongside new construction remains a subject of public debate, but many observers agree that sustained investment, transparency, and effective execution will be key to addressing Nigeria's longstanding infrastructure challenges.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ax3OwGxKf3w
Tinubu Aide's Comment on Hunger Sparks Fresh Debate Over Nigeria's Economic Reality

A comment by Presidential Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, that he does not personally see the level of hunger many Nigerians complain about has ignited fresh debate over the state of the country's economy and the impact of ongoing reforms under President Bola Tinubu's administration.

Onanuga, while defending the government's economic policies, reportedly argued that several initiatives introduced by the administration are beginning to yield results and improve economic conditions. He cited ongoing infrastructure development, student loan programmes, and access to credit facilities as examples of efforts aimed at supporting citizens and stimulating growth.

His remarks, however, drew swift reactions from Nigerians on social media and among opposition voices, many of whom contend that rising food prices, transportation costs, and inflation continue to place significant pressure on households across the country.

The controversy underscores the widening gap between government assessments of economic performance and the experiences of many citizens grappling with the high cost of living.

Since assuming office in May 2023, the Tinubu administration has implemented a series of economic reforms, including the removal of fuel subsidies and the unification of foreign exchange windows. Government officials have consistently maintained that the measures, though difficult in the short term, are necessary to stabilize the economy and attract investment.

Supporters of the administration argue that the reforms are beginning to produce positive outcomes, pointing to improvements in public finances, infrastructure investments, and efforts to expand social intervention programmes.

Critics, however, insist that the benefits have yet to reach a large segment of the population. They argue that the rising cost of essential goods and services remains a major challenge for many Nigerians, particularly low-income households.

Political analysts say the differing views reflect a broader national conversation about how economic progress should be measured.

While government officials often focus on macroeconomic indicators such as investment flows, fiscal reforms, and infrastructure development, citizens are more likely to judge economic performance based on everyday realities such as food affordability, transportation expenses, employment opportunities, and household purchasing power.

The latest exchange is expected to fuel further discussions about the effectiveness of current economic policies and whether government interventions are adequately addressing the concerns of ordinary Nigerians.

As the debate continues, many observers say the ultimate test of the administration's reforms will be whether citizens experience tangible improvements in their living standards in the months and years ahead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kFAFrKOoeg
A media aide to Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom Wike, is facing public backlash over allegations that he accessed and shared sensitive voter information obtained from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) administrative system.

The controversy centres on Lere Olayinka, who was accused by critics of posting screenshots containing voter registration details reportedly drawn from a restricted INEC web interface.

According to the report by Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ), the shared information appeared to include details of a voter’s registration transfer application, sparking concerns that the data may have originated from an internal INEC portal not meant for public access.

The incident gained attention after Olayinka shared the material while commenting on a voter transfer linked to actor and politician Emeka Ike, who is reportedly involved in political activities ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The post immediately triggered reactions on social media, with users questioning how a political aide could have access to what they described as confidential electoral data. Some users alleged that the information suggested possible exposure of INEC’s backend or administrative systems, raising fears over voter privacy and data security.

Critics online have called for an investigation by security agencies, including the Department of State Services (DSS), to determine whether there was unauthorized access to the electoral body’s systems and whether any laws governing data protection were breached.

As of the time of reporting, neither Olayinka nor INEC has issued an official response to the allegations.

The development has added to ongoing public scrutiny of Nigeria’s electoral systems, particularly concerns around digital security and the protection of voter information ahead of future elections.

https://youtube.com/live/j8a2pbUuClM?feature=share

Join Day 1 of The Faithful God — a powerful live programme with William Folorunso Kumuyi (W.F. Kumuyi). Experience inspiring worship, deep Bible teaching, fervent prayers, and life-transforming messages centered on God’s unfailing faithfulness.

No matter the challenges you are facing, God remains faithful to His promises. This special Day 1 broadcast will strengthen your faith, renew your hope, and draw you closer to God.

🔥 In this live stream:

Powerful Bible teaching by Pastor W.F. Kumuyi
Spirit-filled prayers and encouragement
Messages on God’s faithfulness and victory
Healing, salvation, restoration, and breakthrough prayers

📖 “Great is thy faithfulness.” — Lamentations 3:23

Be blessed as you connect live and invite your family and friends to join this life-changing programme.

👍 Like
🔔 Subscribe
📤 Share the stream with others
💬 Drop your prayer requests and testimonies in the comments

#TheFaithfulGod #WFKumuyi #LiveService #Day1 #GCK #ChristianLiveStream #Prayer #BibleStudy #Faith #Revival #HealingPrayer #JesusChrist

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday granted bail to former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, in the sum of N100 million over alleged violations of national security laws.

El-Rufai is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS) following comments he allegedly made during a national television interview in which he claimed to have wiretapped the communication of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.

Delivering ruling on the bail application, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik imposed a series of stringent conditions that must be met before the former governor can perfect his bail.

According to the court, the surety must reside in either Maitama or Asokoro districts of Abuja and must provide the original Certificate of Occupancy of a landed property to the court registry.

The court further directed that the surety must be a federal civil servant on Grade Level 17 or above and must submit evidence of salary payments for at least the last three months, alongside a bank authentication letter from the branch manager within the court’s jurisdiction.

Other requirements include a sworn affidavit of means, a signed bail bond, a recent passport photograph, a verification letter from the surety’s department, and a tax clearance certificate covering the last six months.

Justice Abdulmalik also ordered El-Rufai to surrender all valid passports to the court and report to the DSS headquarters on the last Friday of every month at 10 a.m. pending the determination of the case.

The judge warned that any breach of the bail conditions would result in immediate revocation.

In addition, the court directed the former governor to submit a letter of attestation from the Chairman of the Kaduna State Traditional Council.

The court subsequently ordered an accelerated hearing of the matter.

Tension, however, erupted outside the court premises shortly after proceedings ended, as supporters linked to activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore reportedly clashed with security personnel while El-Rufai exited the complex.

Eyewitnesses described scenes of shouting and commotion as security operatives attempted to control the crowd and maintain order around the courthouse.

The case has continued to generate widespread political and legal reactions, with analysts closely watching its implications for national security discourse and Nigeria’s evolving political landscape.

https://voicenews.com.ng/court-grants-el-rufai-n100m-bail-over-alleged-national-security-breach/

https://youtube.com/live/ebigO7WYodE?feature=share

Join us for a powerful time of worship, revival, prayer, and life-transforming teaching at the Special Revival Service || May 14, 2026 with W.F. Kumuyi.

Come expect renewed strength, deeper faith, healing, salvation, and a fresh encounter through God’s Word. This special service is a moment to reconnect spiritually, receive divine direction, and experience the power of revival.

Invite your family and friends to be part of this impactful broadcast.

📖 Theme: Special Revival
🗓 Date: May 14, 2026
🔔 Don’t forget to Like, Share, Subscribe, and Turn On Notifications.

Aliko Dangote has rejected an attempt by the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited to increase its stake in the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, saying the company wants more Nigerians to participate in its planned public listing.

Dangote disclosed this during an interview, explaining that the state oil company sought to acquire additional shares beyond its existing 7.25 per cent stake in the $20 billion refinery.

According to him, the request was declined because the refinery plans to go public, allowing broader ownership participation from Nigerian investors.

The NNPC had initially acquired a 7.25 per cent stake in the refinery for $1 billion in 2021, with an option to purchase an additional 12.75 per cent stake by June 2024. However, the company later reduced its planned ownership from 20 per cent and did not exercise the remaining option.

The refinery, located in Lekki, Lagos, currently has a refining capacity of 650,000 barrels per day and is considered Africa’s largest refinery. Dangote has also announced plans to expand the facility’s capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day in the coming years.

Dangote noted that recent geopolitical tensions involving the United States and Iran had boosted demand for the refinery’s refined petroleum exports amid disruptions in the global oil market.

https://voicenews.com.ng/dangote-rejects-nnpc-bid-to-increase-refinery-stake-ahead-of-public-listing/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzdYT0PxqTw
Fresh conversations about a possible 2027 presidential bid by former President Goodluck Jonathan have triggered renewed political debate across Nigeria.

Public calls urging Jonathan to return to the presidential race have grown in recent days, but broadcaster Rufai Oseni has raised a question that is resonating widely in political circles.

Speaking during a recent analysis, Rufai noted that many of the people now encouraging Jonathan to contest in 2027 were among those who opposed him during the 2015 general election.

His remarks have reopened discussion about whether the renewed support reflects a genuine shift in public sentiment or a broader political realignment ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Rufai also linked the growing conversation to Nigeria’s worsening economic conditions. Rising living costs, pressure on households and increasing public dissatisfaction have continued to shape national political discourse, with many citizens closely watching potential alternatives ahead of 2027.

The discussion further touched on the political calculations surrounding Peter Obi, as analysts assess how opposition dynamics and voter expectations could influence the coming election.

Another major issue remains the constitutional debate over Jonathan’s eligibility to contest again. Legal analysts and political observers remain divided, with some arguing that constitutional interpretation could allow another bid, while others insist existing provisions may prevent it.

Rufai ended his commentary with a line that quickly gained attention online: “Mr President… can you do it?”

https://voicenews.com.ng/rufai-oseni-speaks-strong-warning-to-jonathan-on-2027-ambition/

Wike named former Senate President Adolphus Wabara, Seyi Makinde and former minister Tanimu Turaki, alleging that some leaders were attempting to create what he described as illegitimate party structures while disregarding existing court rulings. He argued that the moves amounted to political fraud and questioned the credibility of those driving the latest internal arrangements.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrK_VVBvwGc


A fresh rift has widened within the opposition Peoples Democratic Party after Nyesom Wike accused senior party figures of fraud and political deception during a media briefing in Abuja on Wednesday.

Wike named former Senate President Adolphus Wabara, Seyi Makinde and former minister Tanimu Turaki, alleging that some leaders were attempting to create what he described as illegitimate party structures while disregarding existing court rulings. He argued that the moves amounted to political fraud and questioned the credibility of those driving the latest internal arrangements.

The latest confrontation comes amid a widening leadership battle inside the PDP following recent disputes over control of the party’s national structure. Rival camps have disagreed over the legitimacy of meetings, caretaker arrangements and the interpretation of court decisions, deepening uncertainty over who currently holds recognised authority within the party.

Wike also challenged party leaders to account for internal financial matters, including funds he said should be publicly explained. His remarks add fresh pressure to an already fragile opposition party as political actors begin positioning ahead of the 2027 electoral cycle.

Analysts say the dispute highlights how unresolved legal and political battles inside the PDP could further complicate efforts to rebuild cohesion before the next general election.

https://voicenews.com.ng/wike-accuses-wabara-makinde-of-fraudulent-practices/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrK_VVBvwGc


A fresh rift has widened within the opposition Peoples Democratic Party after Nyesom Wike accused senior party figures of fraud and political deception during a media briefing in Abuja on Wednesday.

Wike named former Senate President Adolphus Wabara, Seyi Makinde and former minister Tanimu Turaki, alleging that some leaders were attempting to create what he described as illegitimate party structures while disregarding existing court rulings. He argued that the moves amounted to political fraud and questioned the credibility of those driving the latest internal arrangements.

The latest confrontation comes amid a widening leadership battle inside the PDP following recent disputes over control of the party’s national structure. Rival camps have disagreed over the legitimacy of meetings, caretaker arrangements and the interpretation of court decisions, deepening uncertainty over who currently holds recognised authority within the party.

Wike also challenged party leaders to account for internal financial matters, including funds he said should be publicly explained. His remarks add fresh pressure to an already fragile opposition party as political actors begin positioning ahead of the 2027 electoral cycle.

Analysts say the dispute highlights how unresolved legal and political battles inside the PDP could further complicate efforts to rebuild cohesion before the next general election.

https://voicenews.com.ng/wike-accuses-wabara-makinde-of-fraudulent-practices/

An Obi and Kwankwaso alliance under the NDC could significantly reshape electoral calculations, combining South-east loyalty with Kano's formidable political machinery, though analysts warn the coalition would still face serious hurdles including national spread, funding, and elite compromise.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMjjvhUGTek
Adding fresh fuel to the fire, popular journalist Rufai Oseni dropped a bombshell on Arise TV this morning, dismissing claims that Peter Obi abandoned the ADC over court cases. According to Oseni, Obi left because former Vice President Atiku Abubakar had effectively hijacked the party. In the explosive revelation, Oseni argued that the internal power dynamics, not the litigation, were the real reason behind the Peter Obi and Kwankwaso mass defections from the ADC. This aligns with reports that the ADC's internal structure was seen as increasingly skewed in favour of rival aspirants, with competing blocs backing either an Obi/Kwankwaso ticket or an Atiku/Makinde arrangement.

An Obi and Kwankwaso alliance under the NDC could significantly reshape electoral calculations, combining South-east loyalty with Kano's formidable political machinery, though analysts warn the coalition would still face serious hurdles including national spread, funding, and elite compromise.

Nigeria's 2027 race is no longer a slow build. It has begun.

https://voicenews.com.ng/peter-obi-and-kwankwaso-lead-mass-defections-as-inecs-may-10-deadline-shakes-nigerias-opposition-to-its-core/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMjjvhUGTek
Adding fresh fuel to the fire, popular journalist Rufai Oseni dropped a bombshell on Arise TV this morning, dismissing claims that Peter Obi abandoned the ADC over court cases. According to Oseni, Obi left because former Vice President Atiku Abubakar had effectively hijacked the party. In the explosive revelation, Oseni argued that the internal power dynamics, not the litigation, were the real reason behind the Peter Obi and Kwankwaso mass defections from the ADC. This aligns with reports that the ADC's internal structure was seen as increasingly skewed in favour of rival aspirants, with competing blocs backing either an Obi/Kwankwaso ticket or an Atiku/Makinde arrangement.

An Obi and Kwankwaso alliance under the NDC could significantly reshape electoral calculations, combining South-east loyalty with Kano's formidable political machinery, though analysts warn the coalition would still face serious hurdles including national spread, funding, and elite compromise.

Nigeria's 2027 race is no longer a slow build. It has begun.

https://voicenews.com.ng/peter-obi-and-kwankwaso-lead-mass-defections-as-inecs-may-10-deadline-shakes-nigerias-opposition-to-its-core/

Wike urged party members to align with the court’s decision and operate within the framework of the law, warning against actions that could destabilize the party again.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WglUyDjqq1o

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has stated that the recent judgment by the Supreme Court of Nigeria has effectively brought an end to the prolonged leadership crisis within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Speaking shortly after the ruling in Abuja, Wike said the apex court’s decision has resolved all disputes over parallel leadership structures in the party, affirming that there is now only one recognized PDP.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging earlier rulings on the controversial 2025 national convention held in Ibadan, which had produced a rival leadership faction. The court upheld decisions from lower courts that invalidated the convention, describing it as having been conducted in violation of existing court orders.

According to Wike, the judgment confirms the legitimacy of the current party leadership and nullifies claims by any opposing groups. He emphasized that the era of factional divisions within the PDP is over, stressing that “there is no more faction—only one united party.”

The ruling is seen as a major turning point for the opposition party, which has been embroiled in internal disputes for months. The crisis stemmed from disagreements over the conduct of the Ibadan convention and competing claims to the party’s leadership.

Wike urged party members to align with the court’s decision and operate within the framework of the law, warning against actions that could destabilize the party again.

With the verdict, the PDP is expected to refocus its efforts on rebuilding unity and strengthening its position ahead of future political contests.

https://voicenews.com.ng/supreme-court-ruling-ends-pdp-factional-crisis-wike/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WglUyDjqq1o

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has stated that the recent judgment by the Supreme Court of Nigeria has effectively brought an end to the prolonged leadership crisis within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

Speaking shortly after the ruling in Abuja, Wike said the apex court’s decision has resolved all disputes over parallel leadership structures in the party, affirming that there is now only one recognized PDP.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging earlier rulings on the controversial 2025 national convention held in Ibadan, which had produced a rival leadership faction. The court upheld decisions from lower courts that invalidated the convention, describing it as having been conducted in violation of existing court orders.

According to Wike, the judgment confirms the legitimacy of the current party leadership and nullifies claims by any opposing groups. He emphasized that the era of factional divisions within the PDP is over, stressing that “there is no more faction—only one united party.”

The ruling is seen as a major turning point for the opposition party, which has been embroiled in internal disputes for months. The crisis stemmed from disagreements over the conduct of the Ibadan convention and competing claims to the party’s leadership.

Wike urged party members to align with the court’s decision and operate within the framework of the law, warning against actions that could destabilize the party again.

With the verdict, the PDP is expected to refocus its efforts on rebuilding unity and strengthening its position ahead of future political contests.

https://voicenews.com.ng/supreme-court-ruling-ends-pdp-factional-crisis-wike/

According to him, the unusual transactions raised suspicions, prompting the anti-graft agency to launch a full probe into the pastor’s finances and ministry records. He explained that the EFCC acts based on intelligence reports and formal petitions.

Giftimoni:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Rx7fPGvQlw

Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, has revealed that Pastor Jerry Eze of Streams of Joy International was once investigated for six months over allegations of money laundering.

Speaking at the Jerry Eze Foundation Business Grant Award Ceremony in Abuja on Wednesday, Olukoyede said the investigation began after authorities noticed large foreign currency inflows into a domiciliary account from several countries, including Colombia, the United States, Sri Lanka, and Togo.

According to him, the unusual transactions raised suspicions, prompting the anti-graft agency to launch a full probe into the pastor’s finances and ministry records. He explained that the EFCC acts based on intelligence reports and formal petitions.

Olukoyede said investigators reviewed the financial records and later invited Pastor Eze for questioning. However, after months of scrutiny, no wrongdoing was established.

The EFCC boss made the disclosure while praising Pastor Eze’s philanthropic efforts, suggesting the investigation eventually cleared the cleric of the allegations.

https://voicenews.com.ng/i-investigated-pastor-jerry-eze-for-six-months-for-alleged-money-laundering-efcc-chair/

Olukoyede said investigators reviewed the financial records and later invited Pastor Eze for questioning. However, after months of scrutiny, no wrongdoing was established.

Giftimoni:
Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, has revealed that Pastor Jerry Eze of Streams of Joy International was once investigated for six months over allegations of money laundering.

Speaking at the Jerry Eze Foundation Business Grant Award Ceremony in Abuja on Wednesday, Olukoyede said the investigation began after authorities noticed large foreign currency inflows into a domiciliary account from several countries, including Colombia, the United States, Sri Lanka, and Togo.

According to him, the unusual transactions raised suspicions, prompting the anti-graft agency to launch a full probe into the pastor’s finances and ministry records. He explained that the EFCC acts based on intelligence reports and formal petitions.

Olukoyede said investigators reviewed the financial records and later invited Pastor Eze for questioning. However, after months of scrutiny, no wrongdoing was established.

The EFCC boss made the disclosure while praising Pastor Eze’s philanthropic efforts, suggesting the investigation eventually cleared the cleric of the allegations.

https://voicenews.com.ng/i-investigated-pastor-jerry-eze-for-six-months-for-alleged-money-laundering-efcc-chair/