Well said... “Electricity is not a luxury,” Oseni said. “It is the backbone of economic productivity, job creation, and national development. Nigerians were promised improvement. Where are we now?”
Media personality Rufai Oseni has criticized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over what he described as the administration’s failure to deliver consistent electricity to Nigerians, a key promise made during the campaign period.
Speaking Oseni questioned the pace and direction of reforms in Nigeria’s power sector, arguing that stable electricity remains one of the most urgent needs of citizens and businesses across the country.
“Electricity is not a luxury,” Oseni said. “It is the backbone of economic productivity, job creation, and national development. Nigerians were promised improvement. Where are we now?”
Media personality Rufai Oseni has criticized President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over what he described as the administration’s failure to deliver consistent electricity to Nigerians, a key promise made during the campaign period.
Speaking Oseni questioned the pace and direction of reforms in Nigeria’s power sector, arguing that stable electricity remains one of the most urgent needs of citizens and businesses across the country.
“Electricity is not a luxury,” Oseni said. “It is the backbone of economic productivity, job creation, and national development. Nigerians were promised improvement. Where are we now?”
Tension flared in Abuja on Tuesday after police fired teargas to disperse a crowd of protesters demanding the protection of real-time electronic transmission of election results, triggering a chaotic confrontation in the city center.
The protesters — made up of civil society activists, youth groups, and political supporters — had gathered to voice opposition to proposed electoral changes they fear could weaken transparency in future elections. Witnesses said the rally began peacefully, with demonstrators carrying placards and chanting slogans calling for electoral accountability.
The situation escalated when security operatives moved to restrict the crowd’s movement, citing public safety concerns. Moments later, teargas canisters were deployed, sending protesters scrambling for safety and prompting angry reactions from sections of the crowd. Some demonstrators regrouped, accusing authorities of attempting to silence lawful civic expression...
HmmmBamidele Salam (PDP- Ede North/Ede South/Egbedore/Ejigbo Federal Constituency) moves a motion to remove the proviso, seconded by Kingsley Chinda (PDP - Obi-Akpor), it fails with majority 'nays'.
fergie001: Earlier, there was a rowdy session in the House of Representatives as Hon. Francis Ejiroghene Waive (APC - Ughelli North/Ughelli South/Udu Federal Constituency) had moved a motion for the rescission of the earlier passed Electoral Amendment Bill 2026.
Recall that the House of Representatives earlier passed the Bill on 23rd December 2025, backing Article 60(3): mandatory real-time transmission of results through the IReV portal, a move the Senate passed with a proviso (manual voting when network fails).
Calls by Hon. Waive to recall the Bill caused an uproar in the green chamber prompting an Executive session (behind closed doors).
Returning to resume plenary, the House dissolved into a Committee of the whole chaired by the Deputy Speaker, Benjamin Okezie Kalu. The Bende-born lawmaker however chose to carry the clauses in 10s (Clause 40-50, Clause 50-60), and hitting the gavel continuously with lawmakers in complete disarray.
Majority lawmakers called for a clause-by-clause review which the Deputy Speaker acceded to. Nonetheless, he however hit the gavel on Clause 60 with a proviso as passed by the Senate (manual transmission where network fails), causing chaos and protest from lawmakers who are demanding he turns down amendments to Clause 60.
They are standing and protesting. An unidentified Reps member shouting 'Ole' into the microphone....there is chaos in the green chamber.
Bamidele Salam (PDP- Ede North/Ede South/Egbedore/Ejigbo Federal Constituency) moves a motion to remove the proviso, seconded by Kingsley Chinda (PDP - Obi-Akpor), it fails with majority 'nays'.
Ugochinyere Ikenga (Imo) moves a motion for an amendment that results transmitted to IReV if successful must tally with Form EC8A, seconded by Ginger Onwusibe (Abia), amendment fails with majority 'nays'.
An unidentified member shouts into the microphone "they have collected money", and members stage walkout.
Minority caucus of the House of Representatives have stage a walkout chanting "APC OLE"
The House subsequently passed the manual and electronic transmission of results.
otrasane: Watch full video 👆 BREAKING: Fresh tension at the National Assembly as Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is reportedly involved in another confrontation at the office of Senator Titus Zam, where her aide allegedly assaulted the senator’s secretary
Protesters returned to the National Assembly on Monday, demanding that real-time electronic transmission of election results be made mandatory in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill, 2026.
Demonstrators, including civil society groups like Situation Room and Action Aid, insisted that manual collation be completely eliminated to prevent manipulation during the collation of results.
The protest comes after a five-day break from the National Assembly, following assurances from the last Tuesday sitting.
Security operatives reportedly barricaded the entrances to the complex, forcing the crowd to hold their demonstration outside the gates.
He concluded: “I will go to them. I have nothing to hide. But I will not submit to being abducted. There is a difference between lawful process and political intimidation.”
Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has accused the Federal Government of orchestrating what he described as an attempted “abduction” at the Abuja International Airport, alleging that security agencies are being deployed for political ends against opposition figures.
Speaking in an interview on ARISE News on Friday, El-Rufai insisted that operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) tried to detain him without a warrant upon his return from Cairo, despite prior communication with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
“It wasn’t the EFCC,” he said. “It was the DSS. But the DSS were procured to abduct me by the ICPC that has never communicated with me ever.”
Recounting the airport incident, the former governor said he was approached by a DSS operative shortly after disembarking.
“Well, I came out of the plane, and a young man that is well dressed with a nice suit came to me and said, ‘I am from the DSS, Department of State Services. I would like to meet with you in our office.’ I said, ‘That’s fine. Where is the letter of invitation?’ He said, ‘My bosses have it. I will escort you to them.’ I said, ‘I’m going through immigration. Just get me the letter.’”
El-Rufai claimed more operatives emerged as he proceeded towards immigration.
“Apparently, they had moved about 50 DSS operatives to the airport with the specific instructions that I should be detained, I should be abducted and detained,” he alleged.
According to him, he refused to accompany the officers without a formal letter.
“They said, ‘We are from the DSS, sir, we are going this way. We need to go to your office.’ I said, ‘I’m not going to your office. I’m not going anywhere until you show me a letter of invitation.’”
He added: “I said, ‘Even the president cannot tell me I have to do anything. It’s a free country, it’s a democratic country, and I don’t have to do anything that I do not wish to do. So you are just a middle-level or senior civil servant. The president cannot tell me what to do. Don’t say I have to. It’s inappropriate language.’”
El-Rufai said he proceeded through immigration, had his passport stamped and exited the airport, alleging that operatives later assaulted one of his aides and seized the passport.
“That’s the aide that got beaten up and they seized the passport from him. If I had the passport with me, I would not be talking this,” he said.
He added that he was “quite touched” by what he described as spontaneous resistance from other passengers.
“Once people begin to lose confidence in the neutrality of such institutions, we are on our way to anarchy,” he warned.
Clarifying earlier statements by his lawyers, El-Rufai said the EFCC had formally written to him while he was abroad and that he had responded through his lawyers.
“The EFCC had written to me while I was away and said, ‘We would like to have a chat with you over certain issues.’ And my lawyers replied that I’m not in the country, I’m on my annual vacation. Once I know the date of return, I will let you know. We have written to the EFCC to say I will come and see you at 10am on the 16th of February.”
He alleged that the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) was instead behind the airport episode.
“Subsequently, we found out that it was the ICPC that procured the DSS to abduct me and then hand over to them. And this is a modus operandi of the ICPC that increasingly has become a personal tool of Nuhu Ribadu. Nuhu made the call and made the order that I must be in custody yesterday.”
When challenged on how he knew this, he replied: “He made the call because we listened to their calls. The government thinks that they are the only ones that listen to calls. But we also have our ways.”
El-Rufai said the ICPC later delivered a letter inviting him for questioning.
“Yesterday around 5pm, the ICPC finally did the right thing by bringing a letter to my house to say we want to see you on Friday the 13th. My lawyer wrote back to say my client is not an idle person that has no programme. We’ve received your letter. We will honour the invitation. But on Monday we are going to the EFCC that has written before. After the EFCC, we will go to the ICPC.”
The former governor described the investigations as politically motivated.
“In civilised countries, you don’t start investigation by abducting a person or even arresting a person and keeping him while you’re investigating. It’s violation of human rights. You do your investigation.”
Pressed on whether political motives were at play, he responded: “Absolutely.”
“Some of the professionals in these institutions feel very bad that they are being compelled. When some of my people face them, they tell them, ‘Look, we’re sorry, but this is all political. Why don’t you guys go and settle with them?’ Settling with them means what? Submit to be a member of APC, agree that Tinubu will have a second term.”
El-Rufai defended his record in office, challenging anyone to produce evidence of wrongdoing.
“I have 16 years’ record of public service and I have challenged every Nigerian that has worked with me or knows me to come forward and expose me if I’ve ever taken a bribe or demanded a bribe or done anything unlawful in the course of my duties. I have said that on national television — there are 250 million Nigerians — to come forward and prove me wrong.”
He referenced previous investigations under former President Goodluck Jonathan, saying they yielded no convictions.
“They investigated me at length and found nothing. In the end, I was charged to court for one alleged offence — that in my tenure as Minister of the FCT, one of 27,000 plots was allocated to my wife. They lost. The judge warned the EFCC not to do things like that.”
On ongoing scrutiny of his tenure in Kaduna, he said: “They have investigated me since June 2023 in Kaduna and have come up with nothing. They have arrested my former chief of staff, my commissioner of finance, my commissioner of local government, virtually all our senior officials. Most of the charges are frivolous and I’m quite confident they will lose.”
He added: “I’m not afraid of scrutiny, but I am suspicious of malicious scrutiny.”
Responding to allegations that his administration paid armed groups, El-Rufai was categorical.
“I am probably one of the few governors that from day one took the position on the advice of my security council that we must never negotiate with cattle rustlers, with bandits. The position of the Kaduna State Government when I was governor is the only repentant bandit is a dead one. We never negotiated. We never paid any group for kidnapping anyone.”
He acknowledged that security funds were disbursed through established channels.
“The commissioner of internal security brings me proposals for security spending. There is a standing order every month. If there is any special emergency, he brings it and I approve. He decides what he does with it. If he chooses on his own to go and give money to armed groups, I don’t know about that. But to the best of my knowledge, the position of our government is that we don’t negotiate with bandits. We don’t pay them.”
On accusations that dissenting voices were harassed under his watch, he defended his record.
“Our security strategy in the state was two-pronged. We inherited communal violence and tribal intolerance. We developed a strategy of zero tolerance to any nonsense from any group that thinks it can advance its interest through violence. I was very hard on that.”
He said that when individuals published what his government considered inflammatory falsehoods, the Attorney General would petition the police.
“Anyone that does something that we think is likely to cause criminal violence, from previous history, the Attorney General writes to the police and says, ‘Look, this person has published A, B, C. We’ve asked him to retract. He has refused to retract. Please investigate him for injurious falsehood, incitement, under the Penal Code.’ That’s what happened.”
El-Rufai maintained that what occurred at the airport did not amount to a lawful arrest.
“Arrest has a legal meaning. Arrest means a lawful activity with a warrant. The police have, under the Police Act, the power to arrest without a warrant. But every other agency must go to a judge and show cause. So when you try to take a person without a valid order, it’s not an arrest, it’s an abduction.”
He concluded: “I will go to them. I have nothing to hide. But I will not submit to being abducted. There is a difference between lawful process and political intimidation.”
Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has accused the Federal Government of orchestrating what he described as an attempted “abduction” at the Abuja International Airport, alleging that security agencies are being deployed for political ends against opposition figures.
Speaking in an interview on ARISE News on Friday, El-Rufai insisted that operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) tried to detain him without a warrant upon his return from Cairo, despite prior communication with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
“It wasn’t the EFCC,” he said. “It was the DSS. But the DSS were procured to abduct me by the ICPC that has never communicated with me ever.”
Recounting the airport incident, the former governor said he was approached by a DSS operative shortly after disembarking.
“Well, I came out of the plane, and a young man that is well dressed with a nice suit came to me and said, ‘I am from the DSS, Department of State Services. I would like to meet with you in our office.’ I said, ‘That’s fine. Where is the letter of invitation?’ He said, ‘My bosses have it. I will escort you to them.’ I said, ‘I’m going through immigration. Just get me the letter.’”
El-Rufai claimed more operatives emerged as he proceeded towards immigration.
“Apparently, they had moved about 50 DSS operatives to the airport with the specific instructions that I should be detained, I should be abducted and detained,” he alleged.
According to him, he refused to accompany the officers without a formal letter.
“They said, ‘We are from the DSS, sir, we are going this way. We need to go to your office.’ I said, ‘I’m not going to your office. I’m not going anywhere until you show me a letter of invitation.’”
He added: “I said, ‘Even the president cannot tell me I have to do anything. It’s a free country, it’s a democratic country, and I don’t have to do anything that I do not wish to do. So you are just a middle-level or senior civil servant. The president cannot tell me what to do. Don’t say I have to. It’s inappropriate language.’”
El-Rufai said he proceeded through immigration, had his passport stamped and exited the airport, alleging that operatives later assaulted one of his aides and seized the passport.
“That’s the aide that got beaten up and they seized the passport from him. If I had the passport with me, I would not be talking this,” he said.
He added that he was “quite touched” by what he described as spontaneous resistance from other passengers.
“Once people begin to lose confidence in the neutrality of such institutions, we are on our way to anarchy,” he warned.
Clarifying earlier statements by his lawyers, El-Rufai said the EFCC had formally written to him while he was abroad and that he had responded through his lawyers.
“The EFCC had written to me while I was away and said, ‘We would like to have a chat with you over certain issues.’ And my lawyers replied that I’m not in the country, I’m on my annual vacation. Once I know the date of return, I will let you know. We have written to the EFCC to say I will come and see you at 10am on the 16th of February.”
He alleged that the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) was instead behind the airport episode.
“Subsequently, we found out that it was the ICPC that procured the DSS to abduct me and then hand over to them. And this is a modus operandi of the ICPC that increasingly has become a personal tool of Nuhu Ribadu. Nuhu made the call and made the order that I must be in custody yesterday.”
When challenged on how he knew this, he replied: “He made the call because we listened to their calls. The government thinks that they are the only ones that listen to calls. But we also have our ways.”
El-Rufai said the ICPC later delivered a letter inviting him for questioning.
“Yesterday around 5pm, the ICPC finally did the right thing by bringing a letter to my house to say we want to see you on Friday the 13th. My lawyer wrote back to say my client is not an idle person that has no programme. We’ve received your letter. We will honour the invitation. But on Monday we are going to the EFCC that has written before. After the EFCC, we will go to the ICPC.”
The former governor described the investigations as politically motivated.
“In civilised countries, you don’t start investigation by abducting a person or even arresting a person and keeping him while you’re investigating. It’s violation of human rights. You do your investigation.”
Pressed on whether political motives were at play, he responded: “Absolutely.”
“Some of the professionals in these institutions feel very bad that they are being compelled. When some of my people face them, they tell them, ‘Look, we’re sorry, but this is all political. Why don’t you guys go and settle with them?’ Settling with them means what? Submit to be a member of APC, agree that Tinubu will have a second term.”
El-Rufai defended his record in office, challenging anyone to produce evidence of wrongdoing.
“I have 16 years’ record of public service and I have challenged every Nigerian that has worked with me or knows me to come forward and expose me if I’ve ever taken a bribe or demanded a bribe or done anything unlawful in the course of my duties. I have said that on national television — there are 250 million Nigerians — to come forward and prove me wrong.”
He referenced previous investigations under former President Goodluck Jonathan, saying they yielded no convictions.
“They investigated me at length and found nothing. In the end, I was charged to court for one alleged offence — that in my tenure as Minister of the FCT, one of 27,000 plots was allocated to my wife. They lost. The judge warned the EFCC not to do things like that.”
On ongoing scrutiny of his tenure in Kaduna, he said: “They have investigated me since June 2023 in Kaduna and have come up with nothing. They have arrested my former chief of staff, my commissioner of finance, my commissioner of local government, virtually all our senior officials. Most of the charges are frivolous and I’m quite confident they will lose.”
He added: “I’m not afraid of scrutiny, but I am suspicious of malicious scrutiny.”
Responding to allegations that his administration paid armed groups, El-Rufai was categorical.
“I am probably one of the few governors that from day one took the position on the advice of my security council that we must never negotiate with cattle rustlers, with bandits. The position of the Kaduna State Government when I was governor is the only repentant bandit is a dead one. We never negotiated. We never paid any group for kidnapping anyone.”
He acknowledged that security funds were disbursed through established channels.
“The commissioner of internal security brings me proposals for security spending. There is a standing order every month. If there is any special emergency, he brings it and I approve. He decides what he does with it. If he chooses on his own to go and give money to armed groups, I don’t know about that. But to the best of my knowledge, the position of our government is that we don’t negotiate with bandits. We don’t pay them.”
On accusations that dissenting voices were harassed under his watch, he defended his record.
“Our security strategy in the state was two-pronged. We inherited communal violence and tribal intolerance. We developed a strategy of zero tolerance to any nonsense from any group that thinks it can advance its interest through violence. I was very hard on that.”
He said that when individuals published what his government considered inflammatory falsehoods, the Attorney General would petition the police.
“Anyone that does something that we think is likely to cause criminal violence, from previous history, the Attorney General writes to the police and says, ‘Look, this person has published A, B, C. We’ve asked him to retract. He has refused to retract. Please investigate him for injurious falsehood, incitement, under the Penal Code.’ That’s what happened.”
El-Rufai maintained that what occurred at the airport did not amount to a lawful arrest.
“Arrest has a legal meaning. Arrest means a lawful activity with a warrant. The police have, under the Police Act, the power to arrest without a warrant. But every other agency must go to a judge and show cause. So when you try to take a person without a valid order, it’s not an arrest, it’s an abduction.”
He concluded: “I will go to them. I have nothing to hide. But I will not submit to being abducted. There is a difference between lawful process and political intimidation.”
Torh...He dismissed claims that poor network coverage in some parts of the country justifies the retention of manual collation of results, describing the argument as a mere excuse.
Human rights activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, has claimed that the vast majority of federal lawmakers and other elected officials in Nigeria would not retain their seats if elections were conducted transparently.
Sowore made the assertion while reacting to the controversy surrounding proposed amendments to the Electoral Act, particularly provisions relating to the electronic transmission of election results.
According to him, many lawmakers are hesitant to pass reforms that would entrench full electoral transparency because such measures could jeopardize their political futures.
He dismissed claims that poor network coverage in some parts of the country justifies the retention of manual collation of results, describing the argument as a mere excuse.
“This excuse that there is no network in some states is just another balloon air on the part of these guys. They don’t want transparent elections because if elections are transparent, 90 per cent of them will not make it to the National Assembly — and of course the presidency and other elected positions, they know that,” Sowore said.
The activist further described the Senate’s decision to retain manual collation of election results as “clever by half.”
He argued that the provision was deliberately inserted to create room for what he termed a return to the “hardcoded way of reporting elections,” a system he claimed has eroded public trust in Nigeria’s electoral process.
The debate over the Electoral Act amendment has continued to generate public reactions, with political stakeholders and civil society groups divided over the implications of electronic transmission and the integrity of future elections.
Human rights activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, has claimed that the vast majority of federal lawmakers and other elected officials in Nigeria would not retain their seats if elections were conducted transparently.
Sowore made the assertion while reacting to the controversy surrounding proposed amendments to the Electoral Act, particularly provisions relating to the electronic transmission of election results.
According to him, many lawmakers are hesitant to pass reforms that would entrench full electoral transparency because such measures could jeopardize their political futures.
He dismissed claims that poor network coverage in some parts of the country justifies the retention of manual collation of results, describing the argument as a mere excuse.
“This excuse that there is no network in some states is just another balloon air on the part of these guys. They don’t want transparent elections because if elections are transparent, 90 per cent of them will not make it to the National Assembly — and of course the presidency and other elected positions, they know that,” Sowore said.
The activist further described the Senate’s decision to retain manual collation of election results as “clever by half.”
He argued that the provision was deliberately inserted to create room for what he termed a return to the “hardcoded way of reporting elections,” a system he claimed has eroded public trust in Nigeria’s electoral process.
The debate over the Electoral Act amendment has continued to generate public reactions, with political stakeholders and civil society groups divided over the implications of electronic transmission and the integrity of future elections.
While a significant number of Nigerians support making electronic transmission compulsory, some lawmakers have expressed reservations, citing logistical and infrastructural challenges. The Senate has repeatedly denied claims that it rejected the clause, issuing clarifications to counter what it described as misinformation.
Giftimoni: Former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, on Tuesday joined protesters at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja, demanding the mandatory inclusion of real-time electronic transmission of election results in the proposed Electoral Act amendment.
Amaechi was seen alongside demonstrators as they pressed lawmakers to explicitly include the provision in the bill, arguing that it is critical to safeguarding electoral integrity ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The protest is part of a growing pushback against aspects of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, particularly concerns over whether the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should be compelled to transmit election results electronically and in real time from polling units.
On Monday, former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, also joined the protesters, amplifying calls for transparency and credibility in Nigeria’s electoral process.
The demonstration attracted widespread attention after protesters were seen carrying mattresses and pillows to the National Assembly, a symbolic gesture many interpreted as a sign of their resolve to remain until their demands are met.
The protesters, drawn from civil society organisations, youth groups and concerned citizens, insist that the bill must clearly state “real-time electronic transmission” to eliminate any ambiguity that could be exploited to undermine election outcomes.
While a significant number of Nigerians support making electronic transmission compulsory, some lawmakers have expressed reservations, citing logistical and infrastructural challenges. The Senate has repeatedly denied claims that it rejected the clause, issuing clarifications to counter what it described as misinformation.
Despite these assurances, protesters have remained firm, arguing that only clear and mandatory language in the law can prevent manipulation and ensure that INEC does not have discretionary powers over the transmission of election results.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEuI3k9RhO0 Former Rivers State Governor and ex-Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, on Tuesday joined protesters at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja, demanding the mandatory inclusion of real-time electronic transmission of election results in the proposed Electoral Act amendment.
Amaechi was seen alongside demonstrators as they pressed lawmakers to explicitly include the provision in the bill, arguing that it is critical to safeguarding electoral integrity ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The protest is part of a growing pushback against aspects of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, particularly concerns over whether the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) should be compelled to transmit election results electronically and in real time from polling units.
On Monday, former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, also joined the protesters, amplifying calls for transparency and credibility in Nigeria’s electoral process.
The demonstration attracted widespread attention after protesters were seen carrying mattresses and pillows to the National Assembly, a symbolic gesture many interpreted as a sign of their resolve to remain until their demands are met.
The protesters, drawn from civil society organisations, youth groups and concerned citizens, insist that the bill must clearly state “real-time electronic transmission” to eliminate any ambiguity that could be exploited to undermine election outcomes.
While a significant number of Nigerians support making electronic transmission compulsory, some lawmakers have expressed reservations, citing logistical and infrastructural challenges. The Senate has repeatedly denied claims that it rejected the clause, issuing clarifications to counter what it described as misinformation.
Despite these assurances, protesters have remained firm, arguing that only clear and mandatory language in the law can prevent manipulation and ensure that INEC does not have discretionary powers over the transmission of election results.
“The danger was clear. We have suffered the danger. That’s what we have suffered before. We don’t want any glitch again. This is finished. We want things to come back to normal. No more glitch,” the former Anambra governor said.
Peter Obi Addressing journalists at the protest ground, Obi condemned what he described as the steady erosion of democratic gains in the country, warning that credible elections remain the foundation of national stability and development.
“We must dismantle this criminality and prove that we are now a nation that shows light in Africa,” he charged.
He urged the National Assembly to enact laws mandating electronic transmission of election results.
“The danger was clear. We have suffered the danger. That’s what we have suffered before. We don’t want any glitch again. This is finished. We want things to come back to normal. No more glitch,” the former Anambra governor said.
Obi’s appearance at the protest further galvanised the crowd, many of whom view him as a symbol of the 2023 youth-driven political awakening that challenged Nigeria’s traditional political order.
The National Coordinator of the Obidient Movement Worldwide, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, said the agitation would continue until the National Assembly explicitly restores real-time electronic transmission of results in the amended law.
“If there is no electronic transmission of results, there will be no election. Our elections must be credible,” he said.
Tanko argued that past elections had been marred by manual interference during result collation, a problem electronic transmission was meant to address following reforms introduced after the 2011 and 2015 elections.
Peter Obi Addressing journalists at the protest ground, Obi condemned what he described as the steady erosion of democratic gains in the country, warning that credible elections remain the foundation of national stability and development.
“We must dismantle this criminality and prove that we are now a nation that shows light in Africa,” he charged.
He urged the National Assembly to enact laws mandating electronic transmission of election results.
“The danger was clear. We have suffered the danger. That’s what we have suffered before. We don’t want any glitch again. This is finished. We want things to come back to normal. No more glitch,” the former Anambra governor said.
Obi’s appearance at the protest further galvanised the crowd, many of whom view him as a symbol of the 2023 youth-driven political awakening that challenged Nigeria’s traditional political order.
The National Coordinator of the Obidient Movement Worldwide, Dr. Yunusa Tanko, said the agitation would continue until the National Assembly explicitly restores real-time electronic transmission of results in the amended law.
“If there is no electronic transmission of results, there will be no election. Our elections must be credible,” he said.
Tanko argued that past elections had been marred by manual interference during result collation, a problem electronic transmission was meant to address following reforms introduced after the 2011 and 2015 elections.
Onanuga expressed outrage over the alleged vandalism and hinted at harsh punitive measures as a deterrent, a remark that quickly attracted attention and triggered mixed reactions online. While some users supported a tough stance against infrastructure sabotage, others criticised the tone of the comment, arguing that it appeared excessive and inappropriate for a senior presidential aide.
A comment by Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser on Information and Strategy to President Bola Tinubu, has stirred reactions on social media after he suggested extreme measures against vandals allegedly sabotaging the Ibadan–Ilesa/Ife federal highway project.
Onanuga was reacting to a post by an X (formerly Twitter) user who accused vandals of cutting and carting away starter bars and shoulder rods from the ongoing reconstruction of the highway. The post claimed that the actions were undermining the quality and pace of work on the project.
In his response, Onanuga expressed outrage over the alleged vandalism and hinted at harsh punitive measures as a deterrent, a remark that quickly attracted attention and triggered mixed reactions online. While some users supported a tough stance against infrastructure sabotage, others criticised the tone of the comment, arguing that it appeared excessive and inappropriate for a senior presidential aide.
The Ibadan–Ilesa/Ife highway, which links Oyo and Osun states, is a major federal corridor and a critical economic route connecting parts of the South-West. It is currently undergoing reconstruction as part of the Federal Government’s broader road rehabilitation and infrastructure renewal programme.
The project is seen as vital to improving road safety, reducing travel time, and boosting commercial activities between the two states. However, repeated cases of vandalism and theft of construction materials have posed challenges to contractors and raised concerns about increased costs and project delays.
As debate continues online, some commentators have called for strengthened security around federal infrastructure projects and stricter enforcement of existing laws, rather than inflammatory rhetoric, to address vandalism and protect public assets.
A comment by Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser on Information and Strategy to President Bola Tinubu, has stirred reactions on social media after he suggested extreme measures against vandals allegedly sabotaging the Ibadan–Ilesa/Ife federal highway project.
Onanuga was reacting to a post by an X (formerly Twitter) user who accused vandals of cutting and carting away starter bars and shoulder rods from the ongoing reconstruction of the highway. The post claimed that the actions were undermining the quality and pace of work on the project.
In his response, Onanuga expressed outrage over the alleged vandalism and hinted at harsh punitive measures as a deterrent, a remark that quickly attracted attention and triggered mixed reactions online. While some users supported a tough stance against infrastructure sabotage, others criticised the tone of the comment, arguing that it appeared excessive and inappropriate for a senior presidential aide.
The Ibadan–Ilesa/Ife highway, which links Oyo and Osun states, is a major federal corridor and a critical economic route connecting parts of the South-West. It is currently undergoing reconstruction as part of the Federal Government’s broader road rehabilitation and infrastructure renewal programme.
The project is seen as vital to improving road safety, reducing travel time, and boosting commercial activities between the two states. However, repeated cases of vandalism and theft of construction materials have posed challenges to contractors and raised concerns about increased costs and project delays.
As debate continues online, some commentators have called for strengthened security around federal infrastructure projects and stricter enforcement of existing laws, rather than inflammatory rhetoric, to address vandalism and protect public assets.
Hmmm...Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general election, has called on Nigerians to pray for their political leaders, admitting that politicians bear responsibility for the country’s challenges.
Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general election, has called on Nigerians to pray for their political leaders, admitting that politicians bear responsibility for the country’s challenges.
Obi made the appeal while speaking at a thanksgiving service held to mark Oyo State’s 50th anniversary at the Cathedral of St. Peter Anglican Church, Aremo, Ibadan, the state capital.
Addressing the congregation, the former Anambra State governor said Nigeria’s difficulties are not a result of a lack of resources but of poor leadership and governance.
“I want to make a request from Nigerians. Do remember us politicians in your prayers. We are the problem of Nigeria, no other person,” Obi said.
He stressed that the country is richly endowed but has failed to translate its resources into prosperity for its citizens due to mismanagement of public funds.
“Nigeria is not a poor country, it is poorly governed. Remember us in your prayers that God should touch our hearts to use public money for public good. That is what is required,” he added.
Obi’s remarks drew attention to the role of leadership accountability and ethical governance in addressing Nigeria’s socio-economic challenges, as he urged leaders to place national interest above personal gain.
Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) in the 2023 general election, has called on Nigerians to pray for their political leaders, admitting that politicians bear responsibility for the country’s challenges.
Obi made the appeal while speaking at a thanksgiving service held to mark Oyo State’s 50th anniversary at the Cathedral of St. Peter Anglican Church, Aremo, Ibadan, the state capital.
Addressing the congregation, the former Anambra State governor said Nigeria’s difficulties are not a result of a lack of resources but of poor leadership and governance.
“I want to make a request from Nigerians. Do remember us politicians in your prayers. We are the problem of Nigeria, no other person,” Obi said.
He stressed that the country is richly endowed but has failed to translate its resources into prosperity for its citizens due to mismanagement of public funds.
“Nigeria is not a poor country, it is poorly governed. Remember us in your prayers that God should touch our hearts to use public money for public good. That is what is required,” he added.
Obi’s remarks drew attention to the role of leadership accountability and ethical governance in addressing Nigeria’s socio-economic challenges, as he urged leaders to place national interest above personal gain.
Popular Nigerian hypeman, Slimcase, was overjoyed as he dished out priceless reaction after famous singer, D'banj gifts him a brand new SUV worth N65Million.
Slimcase, who was overwhelmed with joy, took to his official Instagram page today, January 30th, 202,6 to share the video of the brand new automobile as he becomes a brand ambassador of D'banj CREAM platform.
In the video, Slimcase, who was not expecting the brand new luxurious car after becoming the CREAM platform loses his steeze and composure completely.
“Disobeying the law has consequences. From tomorrow, any worker who refuses to resume work will face disciplinary action. Anyone who attempts to block government facilities will face the full weight of the law,” he said, insisting that engagement with labour unions remained ongoing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzzkO0h2RPg The minister acknowledged workers’ right to protest in a democracy but stressed that strike action should be a last resort, especially when government had addressed most of the demands presented by labour unions.
“This is a democracy. Everyone has the right to protest. But if workers made 14 demands and government addressed like 10, there should be room for understanding and patience,” he added.
Drawing from his experience as a former governor and local government chairman, Wike said government does not deny legitimate entitlements but cautioned against expectations that all demands can be met at once.
He also dismissed reports that he was chased out of office during the strike, describing them as false and politically motivated.
“I was in my office, went to the airport to see Mr President, travelled to Turkey, and returned. These stories are deliberate misinformation,” he said.
Following the court order suspending the strike, Wike warned that any worker who fails to resume duties would face disciplinary action.
“Disobeying the law has consequences. From tomorrow, any worker who refuses to resume work will face disciplinary action. Anyone who attempts to block government facilities will face the full weight of the law,” he said, insisting that engagement with labour unions remained ongoing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzzkO0h2RPg The minister acknowledged workers’ right to protest in a democracy but stressed that strike action should be a last resort, especially when government had addressed most of the demands presented by labour unions.
“This is a democracy. Everyone has the right to protest. But if workers made 14 demands and government addressed like 10, there should be room for understanding and patience,” he added.
Drawing from his experience as a former governor and local government chairman, Wike said government does not deny legitimate entitlements but cautioned against expectations that all demands can be met at once.
He also dismissed reports that he was chased out of office during the strike, describing them as false and politically motivated.
“I was in my office, went to the airport to see Mr President, travelled to Turkey, and returned. These stories are deliberate misinformation,” he said.
Following the court order suspending the strike, Wike warned that any worker who fails to resume duties would face disciplinary action.
“Disobeying the law has consequences. From tomorrow, any worker who refuses to resume work will face disciplinary action. Anyone who attempts to block government facilities will face the full weight of the law,” he said, insisting that engagement with labour unions remained ongoing.
Onitsha Main Market, regarded as one of the largest commercial centres in West Africa, has been a focal point in the state government’s campaign to end the long-standing Monday sit-at-home tradition in the Southeast.
Correct...“The government cannot stand by while a few individuals willfully undermine public safety and disregard official directives meant to restore normalcy,” Soludo said. “This is plain economic sabotage.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6hj2voxLEs Anambra State Governor, Professor Chukwuma Soludo, has ordered the closure of the Onitsha Main Market for one week following traders’ failure to comply with the state government’s directive to disregard the Monday sit-at-home order.
The directive was issued on Monday during an on-site visit to the market by the governor, accompanied by senior government officials and security personnel.
Governor Soludo warned that the closure could be extended if traders continue to defy government instructions, noting that security agencies have already sealed the market to enforce compliance.
Describing the action as part of a broader effort to reclaim economic activities in the South-East, the governor said the continued observance of the sit-at-home order undermines public safety, economic stability, and government authority.
Despite repeated assurances of improved security and sustained appeals by the state government for traders to resume normal business activities on Mondays, Soludo expressed disappointment that many shop owners at the major commercial hub once again kept their stalls locked.
According to the governor, the widespread absence of traders amounted to a quiet but significant resistance, reflecting the persistent atmosphere of fear affecting economic life in the region.
“The government cannot stand by while a few individuals willfully undermine public safety and disregard official directives meant to restore normalcy,” Soludo said. “This is plain economic sabotage.”
He stressed that the state government remains committed to protecting lives and property and will continue to take firm measures to ensure full restoration of lawful economic activities across Anambra State.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6hj2voxLEs Anambra State Governor, Professor Chukwuma Soludo, has ordered the closure of the Onitsha Main Market for one week following traders’ failure to comply with the state government’s directive to disregard the Monday sit-at-home order.
The directive was issued on Monday during an on-site visit to the market by the governor, accompanied by senior government officials and security personnel.
Governor Soludo warned that the closure could be extended if traders continue to defy government instructions, noting that security agencies have already sealed the market to enforce compliance.
Describing the action as part of a broader effort to reclaim economic activities in the South-East, the governor said the continued observance of the sit-at-home order undermines public safety, economic stability, and government authority.
Despite repeated assurances of improved security and sustained appeals by the state government for traders to resume normal business activities on Mondays, Soludo expressed disappointment that many shop owners at the major commercial hub once again kept their stalls locked.
According to the governor, the widespread absence of traders amounted to a quiet but significant resistance, reflecting the persistent atmosphere of fear affecting economic life in the region.
“The government cannot stand by while a few individuals willfully undermine public safety and disregard official directives meant to restore normalcy,” Soludo said. “This is plain economic sabotage.”
He stressed that the state government remains committed to protecting lives and property and will continue to take firm measures to ensure full restoration of lawful economic activities across Anambra State.
The Federal Government said yesterday that its security collaboration with the United States(US) has strengthened counter-terrorism operations, especially in the Northeast, Northwest and Northcentral.
The government reiterated its commitment to strengthening cooperation to better protect lives and property across the country.
National Security Adviser (NSA) Nuhu Ribadu and Information and National Orientation Minister Mohammed Idris stated that Nigeria was delighted that the security tie respects ‘’our country’s’’ sovereignty and prioritises accountability and civilian protection.
Former National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Adams Oshiomhole, has said recent economic reforms introduced by President Bola Tinubu are yielding positive results, arguing that food prices across the country are beginning to decline.
Oshiomhole made the assertion while responding to questions about what the President would present as key achievements ahead of a possible re-election bid. According to him, the impact of the reforms is already evident in the food market, where prices are reportedly easing after months of sharp increases.
“There are Nigerians now who are saying food is becoming too cheap,” Oshiomhole stated, noting that the development itself has generated fresh political arguments.
He added that some opposition figures have accused the federal government of deliberately manipulating food prices to force them down, a claim he described as proof that the reforms are working. “I even heard some opposition members saying the President is manipulating food prices to crash. So they are angry that the food prices are down,” he said.
The former Edo State governor maintained that the Tinubu administration’s policies, though initially difficult, were designed to stabilise the economy and improve living conditions for Nigerians in the long term.
Oshiomhole’s comments have sparked renewed debate, with supporters of the government citing improved market trends as evidence of progress, while critics argue that food affordability remains a challenge for many households.
“She said, ‘My mum or I do not run the account. The account is run by Kemi Olunloyo, with whom we cut ties years ago. We have reached out to her several times to stop posting anything about Anu.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWQQ6gAIp1Q The father of Afrobeats star Davido, Adedeji Adeleke, has dismissed renewed paternity claims linking his son to a minor, Anuoluwapo Michelle Adeleke, alleging that controversial journalist Kemi Olunloyo is behind what he described as a prolonged campaign of impersonation and defamation.
At the centre of Mr Adeleke’s claims is an allegation that Ms Olunloyo impersonated the minor online to attack Davido.
The 68-year-old billionaire read a message he said was sent by Anu’s aunt, denying ownership of a social media account allegedly used to post statements attributed to the child.
“She said, ‘My mum or I do not run the account. The account is run by Kemi Olunloyo, with whom we cut ties years ago. We have reached out to her several times to stop posting anything about Anu.”
The singer’s dad questioned the legality of impersonating a minor and accused Ms Olunloyo of persistently targeting his son.
“This Kemi Olunloyo has been after my son David for many years. Everything she says about David is always negative,” he said.
Reacting to claims allegedly made by Ms Olunloyo about his wife, he added, “How can this Kemi say that she drove my wife to the hospital? The woman is a lunatic.”
Mr Adeleke said the family is considering legal action over what he described as sustained defamation.
“We are going to consider suing her,” he said, adding that the allegations had become excessive and damaging.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWQQ6gAIp1Q The father of Afrobeats star Davido, Adedeji Adeleke, has dismissed renewed paternity claims linking his son to a minor, Anuoluwapo Michelle Adeleke, alleging that controversial journalist Kemi Olunloyo is behind what he described as a prolonged campaign of impersonation and defamation.
At the centre of Mr Adeleke’s claims is an allegation that Ms Olunloyo impersonated the minor online to attack Davido.
The 68-year-old billionaire read a message he said was sent by Anu’s aunt, denying ownership of a social media account allegedly used to post statements attributed to the child.
“She said, ‘My mum or I do not run the account. The account is run by Kemi Olunloyo, with whom we cut ties years ago. We have reached out to her several times to stop posting anything about Anu.”
The singer’s dad questioned the legality of impersonating a minor and accused Ms Olunloyo of persistently targeting his son.
“This Kemi Olunloyo has been after my son David for many years. Everything she says about David is always negative,” he said.
Reacting to claims allegedly made by Ms Olunloyo about his wife, he added, “How can this Kemi say that she drove my wife to the hospital? The woman is a lunatic.”
Mr Adeleke said the family is considering legal action over what he described as sustained defamation.
“We are going to consider suing her,” he said, adding that the allegations had become excessive and damaging.
Lol...In journalism, you must KNOW a subject before coming on air to discuss it. Even before bringing a guest for an interview, you must RESEARCH into his or her background. That's the rule.
Na like this this Lawyer take turn Arise News studio to lecture room for Mr Empirical Facts and Oga Reuben Abati.
Dem come dey look like lukumon 😂😂😂😂😂.
In journalism, you must KNOW a subject before coming on air to discuss it. Even before bringing a guest for an interview, you must RESEARCH into his or her background. That's the rule.
Gbam...In journalism, you must KNOW a subject before coming on air to discuss it. Even before bringing a guest for an interview, you must RESEARCH into his or her background. That's the rule.
Na like this this Lawyer take turn Arise News studio to lecture room for Mr Empirical Facts and Oga Reuben Abati.
Dem come dey look like lukumon 😂😂😂😂😂.
In journalism, you must KNOW a subject before coming on air to discuss it. Even before bringing a guest for an interview, you must RESEARCH into his or her background. That's the rule.
Na like this this Lawyer take turn Arise News studio to lecture room for Mr Empirical Facts and Oga Reuben Abati.
Dem come dey look like lukumon 😂😂😂😂😂.
In journalism, you must KNOW a subject before coming on air to discuss it. Even before bringing a guest for an interview, you must RESEARCH into his or her background. That's the rule.