₦airaland Forum

dinachi: As usual he side steps the salient point raised! I raised ten points why gay marriage is harmful you cannot even counter one. Get it into your thick skull you cannot legislate peoples beliefs! The baker was right on all counts! You cannot force me to accept a lifestyle I find despicable. YOU ARE THICK!

bunlizlaw: The only response I have for you is that God is not asleep.In fact he neither sleeps nor slumber(Ps 121:4).God is immortal.As for your other comments,I'll keep mum to avoid verbal exchanges.Pls read Psalm 14:1

sexymoma: it wont cost you a dime to type R.I.P haba

DICKtator:

Lilimax: How old are you ?

dahfweshdude69: u must b joking ...as long as he owns his business, he has every right to decline and accept any offer... Who he accepts or rejects is none of our business... and if he dislikes f.a.g.g.o.t.s , he has the right to dislike them as long as he doesn't violate their rights..in this case he simply refused an offer from them... When I say homo fools are mad.. I really mean it...do they think everyone likes them? hell no... no difference between them and animals.. animals don't do creepy stuffs like that...comparing them with animals is bad... animals are even better. :-|

dinachi: Answer the salient points raised or go and treat your bleeding anus, simple!
It is ignorance of the highest order to say that people do not choose who they work for. It is like you want to resign from a company citing your religious beliefs and they refuse your resignation and punish you for CHOOSING to terminate your services. Any good lawyer worth his salt will so make the baker look good that they will elect him for mayor!

As for your embarrassing naivety on what a marriage is..........

dahfweshdude69: pure madness...he won't bake a cake for them , So?..he owns his business and has every single right to decline a customers offer.. they are violating his right... how will a sane human wake up one morning and feel he/she is attracted to the same sex?, an act we can't see among animals.. every single homo a.s.s.h.o.l.e needs therapy... a whole year for deliverance... madness at the highest level... no single f.a.g should cross my path and yarn dust for my side... Nah die b dat

dinachi: As usual, you cant counter the points because your anus is bleeding!

Must you comment? You make no sense at all!

dinachi: 10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed


1. It Is Not Marriage

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.



2. It Violates Natural Law

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother

It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle

In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man's life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union

Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.
Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage

One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society

By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution

In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

"The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people's view of homosexuality."

10. It Offends God

This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

apoti: Picture

apoti: ******update********

Wow I can't believe this thread is on fron page.

My wife dilated to 10cm within 3 hours. And she push the baby out within the next 30 mins. My wife is sooooo incredible.

beryl04: My dear in SA is an everyday thing o. And apparently the managers of such places are d ones that gives such instructions claiming nigerians, albeit some straight ones claiming gay, only comes in to sell drugs to clients.
But they no born dem well to try it d next time sha cos a phone call to a certain chief judge in Johannesburg put paid to such nonsense.

beryl04: My dear in SA is an everyday thing o. And apparently the managers of such places are d ones that gives such instructions claiming nigerians, albeit some straight ones claiming gay, only comes in to sell drugs to clients.
But they no born dem well to try it d next time sha cos a phone call to a certain chief judge in Johannesburg put paid to such nonsense.

igbsam: We still dey wait o........I dey refresh this page every 5mins to hear say the pikin oopsss! sorry, the Issue don arrive.

I was wondering,

When Mary carried Jesus in her womb, did she ever know she was carry God in her womb ?

When Mary kissed the face of Jesus, Did she ever know she was kissing the face of God ?

When Mary scolded Jesus, did she ever know she was scolding God ?

When Mary Carried Jesus while he was an infant, Did she ever know she was carrying God ?

When Mary Bath Jesus, did she ever know she was bathing God ?

When Mary Sat with Jesus, holding his hands, Did she ever know she was Holding the hand of God ?

beryl04: Thanks so much for pointing that out b4 the squad decends with their holier than thou comments.
I almost cried d day I went to a club with my white friends in Johannesburg only to be told by the bouncers'sorry we don't allow nigerians and besides u don't look gay enuf' now how does that sound.I cudnt do anything cos I was a foreigner and to think that can happen in Africa and in a gay club makes the whole thing somehow unbearable.trust me,d next day I went to the management of d club and raised some dust.
Nobody should be discriminated against based on skin color,nationality or even sexual orientation!