₦airaland Forum

Holla911:
Na clouth you dey chase. So far the dancers are not underage, forced or coaxed to dance naked.
Get your priorities right Mr.

Exactly

Rest In Your Greatness Michael Jackson


An Unregrettably Everlasting Line By Me

crows2ravens:
A time I took interest in Quantum physics, relativity and cognitive psychology. I arrived at a theory that African JuJu is advanced science. Some professor even argued that Yoruba ifa works through binary numbers (0s and 1s) and is also on a 4x4 matrix in mathematics, and the ifa rosary proves these.
But since we're highly secretive in afro-religions and don't have any written documentations, these things are hard to prove.

What is advanced scientifically about juju?

What is the essence of the secrecy if it's useful?


Shit can be written today if verifiable!

LordReed:
@ triplechoice

Question 1: this thing you say is energy, does it obey any of the laws of energy we use to describe the universe eg law of conservation of energy?

Question 2: why does your listening experience improve when you close your eyes or why do you meditate better in a silent and dark place? Why does your ability to utilise one sense increase the less input your brain is receiving?

It seems you enjoy empty conversations.


If that bastard can't see that he's confused,then .......


I mean I may not know certain things about myself but I know I am a combination that shows a specific way to exist.


Why was the source of aware energy not defined?


Called God is not enough.

What happens to the other forms of energy?


How can energy be aware?


Aware of what?


How does the energy demonstrate awareness outside a living cell or system?

dododawa1:
Everyone will received his or her own KAMA soon.

It's insincere bastards like budaatum and triplechoice that are ready to render the Nigerian Police and EFCC worse than Boko Haram by claiming to expose what's nothing but nonsense in the name of being detectives!


So,they define karma as you get what you deserve.


But that's just as a result of meaningless comparisons and analogies .....not leaving out empty attacks verbally.


Worst they can do is find a way to get along with the Nigerian Police or EFCC to perpetrate wickedness that Boko Haram can't stand.




Of course, this won't make sense to them but I have suffered enough in their hands already ....my family members have also been affected without knowing these bastards are involved.


If my brother dies, the blood stays on their heads.


I know budaatum will start posting what I have posted before to prove she's such a bitch!



The useless Nigerian Judiciary which would still find reasons to listen to bastards like them can't help matters.



So, there's need for death to be distributed well.... I never die regretting.

SouthSouth1914:
Black man’s life is all about sex. Shame

According to your baseless conclusion

TenQ:
Whenever System or a collection of Systems exist, their must be a builder of the system!

A system can never arise by accident as it is always a product of design.

Every system have a purpose!

Well,there are ageless possessors of surfaces necessary for the limitlessness of existence which is not something that started 14 billion years ago but something that has no beginning and no end.


Such possessors have no creator but their combination with one another in different ways coincide with different ways to exist or the creation or disintegration of certain ways to exist as a combination.

The purpose of a specific combination of ageless possessors is to show a specific way to exist as a combination for no reason.

The purpose of an ageless possessor of surface is to remain as a non-combination or combine with other ageless possessors of surface to form a combination.


You are a combination.

Whatever you create by yourself such as your speech or writing or something material also involves a combination of ageless possessors of surface.

But you can't create what you never started.


The development of belief is accidental since the exposure that precedes it had no intention or plan to start it.


The belief gets started by the chance of an exposure you can't avoid as a belief-starter.


It can only end by the chance of an exposure you can't avoid as a belief-stopper.


The ability to state how the exposure happens also depends on chance in the sense that you might not have the mental capacity to state how and at the same time you might have such capacity.

LordReed:
And where did I state that that was my goal?

Exactly... never worth attempting.

TenQ:
This simply means that the definition of Atheism as LACK of BELIEF in the existence of Deities is meaningless especially if their was no justifiable reason to take such a position

LordReed can't prove atheism is a position.

Before you even say there's no reason to believe in God, the atheism is already true.



Whatever you say or think against theism is a manifestation of an exposure not position that prevents belief.


The justification of this or that is the exposure that justifies it.....if you can prove it justifies it..... that's for both theists and atheists.


The exposure is not your assessment of the exposure ... the position is not the exposure.


The assessment is your position.


Your position is your assessment of the exposure that either allows or prevents the development of belief in God



You might think it's wonderful.

You might think it's a blessing.



You might think it's by chance.

You might think it's a choice.

But can you prove the exposure is by choice?


Did you choose to come across HellVictorinho4 when you guys never planned to meet such that it coincides with your belief disappearing...?.... imagine it has disappeared.


You might say you choose to believe but only a meaningless comparison of belief to other things supports that.



How do you know the baby is thinking?


It depends on what you mean by thinking.


If it's to have your mind accidentally focused on a particular case till you visualize, I won't ascribe it to babies.

But if it's to have an assessment or a consideration ,then I will.


An assessment is an activity that helps to assess something or the result of how you assess something.


It's demonstrated by moving or not moving literally certain parts of the body.

It starts from the brain but does not always end in the brain.

Visualization is an assessment that starts and ends in the brain.

An assessment determines the effect or outcome of an exposure on the exposed.

DropsMic:
Only a kid who knows next no nothing about life would say otherwise.

Still to you

DropsMic:
The Heart of the black man is beyond sick

To you

chigator2:
It has become evident that the core objective of holding public office in this country is to steal more than you need and funny enough it has become a competition where one has to steal more than his/her predecessor. They borrow to steal, indebting future generations and enriching themselves.

Makes me wonder where Nigeria will eventually be in the next 20 years. It leaves no room for optimism.

Exactly


Even INEC is not helping matters


Just shouting get your PVC up and down

LordReed:
Lack of belief is a state of mind.

I lack the belief that you have a dog but my opinion is there is a 50% chance that you do have a dog. My lack of belief informs my opinion on your chances of actually having a dog. If in my mind I insltead believed you don't have a dog then my opinion could be I am 100% certain you don't have a dog. In either case I could not say anything about whether you have a dog or not and thus express no opinion on the matter. You cannot know my state of mind until I express it.

More like lack of belief doesn't mean no state of mind at all


Silence can also be used to express your state of mind.


If you don't respond,it means something is restraining you from responding.......so your state of mind is "SOMETHING IS REsTRAINING ME FROM RESPONDING

LordReed:
I didn't say the lack of belief forms the opinion, I said it INFORMS it. Pay attention. The opinion "belief in a god(s) is not justified" is supported by the person being unable to form a belief from the information presented.

Is it a must to think belief in God is not justified to be an atheist?

So, it's no longer about lacking belief ..... it's about having something to say about it or what?



I think it's unnecessary to think it's not justified to have belief to be an atheist.


You're making theists seem invited to an argument.


Haven't you seen that the debate about God is meaningless?


We're talking about an accidental development in the human brain.

What you call reasons to believe or not believe doesn't help to make the debate meaningful.



At birth , there's no belief whether or not anyone is arguing about his belief being justified.



The belief happens by chance upon exposure to a certain environment



It can only leave as it came or by chance.


This talk of choosing to believe or not believe is just a manifestation of the experience of what leads to or prevents the belief.



TenQ

LordReed:
What do you call it? It is a view because it a person's conclusion that sufficient information doesn't exist to form the belief.

Sufficient information is meant to induce knowledge...or is knowledge same as belief?


I call it an accidental situation in which you are exposed to certain things that don't allow belief in any God or the lack of belief as a result of an accidental exposure that doesn't permit the development of a belief in any God .


This means the belief happens in the presence of an accidental exposure to certain things but not necessarily to the proof of God itself.... problem is that theists usually claim to have proof even as believers.


Some say existence is God but that's not possible because existence is beyond anything specific.


Existence itself has no beginning and end.

Yet it still boils down to exposure to certain things except a specific possessor such as God.



So, some see themselves as proofs but there's nothing wonderful about being a specific human being to the extent of proving God.


So, I am saying this because of my exposure to the same specific human being.

We might both see black but we don't get affected by the exposure to black the same way.


Babies feel something ..... they're alive at least..... though not having as much experience as LordReed.



At least,they feel but they might only be able to cry so you would know they feel.


It's not their doing neither is it yours even if you wrongly say it is for what they feel or what you have felt to obstruct the development of a belief as an occurrence in your brain.

LordReed:
It is. It is a person's view on the idea of god(s). Babies and animals cannot hold any opinions or views therefore they cannot be atheists.

How is the lack of belief in a person a view?

LordReed:
Opinions and views are not automatic.

Atheism is not an opinion or view.....is it?

How?

LordReed:
He can't be anything until he has had the time to decide, it's not automatic.

He is automatically without certain things.

LordReed:
Well I'll like to know how he is making the jump.

Maybe he's forgotten those things have human writers... that may not be sure.

Maynmann:
Hope you know what etymology means.

As reported

LordReed:
The question was how is it disbelief, you didn't answer the question.

The etymology as reported isn't enough to give a specific response to the questions here.

LordReed:
So how can you know he won't believe?

You can't know if he will believe or not.


You can say you think he will believe but you can't determine how it will happen.

LordReed:
How do you know he won't believe if he actually hears? So a person can believe in Jesus before they have heard of Jesus?

I didn't say he won't believe.


I said he has no belief before hearing.

Maynmann:
Ignorant !

To hell with your knowledge!

tctrills:
I am saying if you don't know it difference between facts and opinions, It would not be easy to have a conversation with you.

Do you know the difference?

Maynmann:
Atheist are not agnostic

Nonsense


Who told you atheists are always agnostics,?



Those writers are not the ones to teach me certain things.



If you just want to insult ,.....Bleep off!!!

Maynmann:
Yes, and that is called agnostic

Rubbish


I have stated the same thing before


But you kept repeating the line... what is your problem?

Maynmann:
Under types of ATHIESM.

This is getting dumb.

Athiest means godless.

Rubbish

Who is arguing godless with you?

Who said it's Godly?



You have started insulting later you will deny.

Maynmann:
They are called agnostics, example are babies, you can see babies in bracket.

Under some varieties of atheism

Underline

Maynmann:
They are called agnostics, example are babies, you can see babies in bracket.

Still under types of atheists

Underline the heading

Maynmann:
“Include”

Ok

Implicit soft atheists are babies and agnostics

Maynmann:
“Include”

Meaning referring to