₦airaland Forum

CapitalCee:
Chai!!!! Chelsea

Odunharry:
Chaii.. i don't want to argue abt Villa and Chekpe.

I quoted Donjazet to correct him when he said Villa dont have a UCL.

Go and meet capitacee and argue Villa and Chekpe.

Odunharry:
I believe you closed your eyes and type when u mention Villa don't have the UCL.
Aston villa has won UCL sAme as Chekpe fc but haven't clinched the EPL title before.

Now who's misyarning or saying what he doesn't know?

PietroRico:
at least, you haven't forgotten your level

If you like wax stronger from now till my first great Grand son is old enough father children, you still won't be a big as either United or Madrid

dopeJemi:
answer my question

if rigging tactics was that easy, why are you fools stuck on 6 pl titles and 1 CL

CapitalCee:
My friend what are your criteria? Man United is bigger than Madrid in terms of wealth, global reach and acceptance, most viewers, newspapers and sports sites want to publish news about them because it generates more clicks and downloads, United fans globally is bigger than that of Madrid, and Bayern combined. And have won a competitive number of trophies highest in a big football league like England, Hence a bigger club. The only criterion Madrid thumps United is in trophies, which is important though but putting Chelsea and Aston Villa in perspective you should rearrange your philosophy

Lana1:
United and Madrid fans are talking Chelsea fans sef want put mouth. Nigga shíft and go and find ur mates to argue with.

dopeJemi:
we "rigged tactics" to win 13 epl trophies, 3 Champions League, 12 fa cup? and we were never for caught?

if "rigging tactics" was that easy, why are you fools stuck on 6 pl titles and 1 Champions League? or was it Russian referees that officiated your games?

you talk like half of your skull is missing

Lana1:
Yes na. Madrid has the most UCL titles, most LaLiga titles, they are the 2nd wealthiest club in the world. Plus they ve been constantly competing at the highest stage every year. Not to mention they just did back to back UCLs. Abi how are they not the greatest club in the world right now?? If not them, then who??

P.S. I no like Madrid. Only support them from time to time to piss in Barca's face

cc christinec

joeace2020:
Senseless fowl. Team bonding you people don't have. No wonder your manager can't stand up face to face to Costa and tell him his mind, instead he hid behind a phone like a pus$$y that you all are and was acting like a warrior. Classic case of show me your club and i will tell you what you are.

timbros:
Danilol

Hahahahaha

Meanwhile I prefer Danilo at 31m to Sandro at 60m...

Oasis007:
Training Pics

Odunharry:
Clubs with most intl trophies.
Madrid 24..
Barcelona 22
Al alhy 22




Club with most trophies
Rangers Fc Scotland Top flight

Then if we go on again we have linfield who won 7trophies twice.(More than 150trophies ).

Lol.

diggz:
It was actually this point I was making when we got linked to rudiger. While most of us agreed we needed to upgrade Cahills position last season,one will expect any player coming in will be strictly for that purpose but it ain't the case.

We have a utility player who I don't see dislodging moses or Azpi from their positions and definitely can't play Cahills position. This begs the qxn,why did we sell Ake who looked comfortable enough playing as a LCB to buy a player who is not comfortable enough playing as a LCB?

airmark:
So, did buying rudiger solve our lcb issue? It means we will continue to use cahill as lcb, which i am not comfortable with, against the big guns. Thats the point.

CapitalCee:
Mr man man shu t up who told you his team is the greatest in the world as it stands? By the way what brought you to this thread to come and sulk here?

airmark:
Azpi will be even better as rcb next season so i dont know how rudiger will dislodge him. Van dijk is probably going to liverpool. Arsenal is showing interest too. I doubt if chelsea will pay his fee, after getting rudiger for 35m and we still have a striker to buy and bakayoko lurking around. As regards manolas, it's not a country thingy, the same epl that van persie made his name, is the same league his countryman, depay got thrown away after flopping. It's about individual player. I remember telling manure fans that depay wouldnt make it in epl, when they signed him. Just like this rudiger issue, they called me names, now the rest is history. I pray for rudiger to prove me wrong and even if he wont, his blunders should not wreck chelsea before we make adjustments.

airmark:
Some people will criticise hazard for a whole season for not tracking bellerin, but they wont want us to criticise a defender defending stupidly. If it was cahill that gave eriksen that free goal, against denmark, some of us would be on that story till next year. A defender showing vulnerability is not the one to rely on, for ucl. He might be good few seasons ago, but at present i cant see anything spectacular in him.



I respect your soccer analysis. But telling me manolas is another benatia and that he is not an upgrade to cahill, is a joke. Manolas is a blend of both old-school and modern day cb. He can match a swift attacker with speed and can compete with a bullying striker. Every defender make mistakes, but this rudiger will be more exposed in epl, trust me. The question you guys have not answered is, who will this guy bench?

airmark:
Let me tell you how some stuffs work. Most players before agreeing to join a club have their terms which interested clubs must meet. Before joining roma, juve and arsenal wanted him, but he ignored them. Players join teams that are ready to agree with their terms. Barca is with umtiti and pique, whose contractual terms may shut out manolas. Thats why some clubs would agree with a player and the deal wont be sealed until some players are flushed out for the incoming one. So transfer is not just adding 1+1. Thats how hulk went to zenith when bigger clubs were chasing him. He is now in china. Fact is, manolas is a better cb than rudiger and i am not a greek. Still expecting a cb, cos for now we just signed a right back who can play other positions.

Rossikki:
You are wrong. Women will never stop and give a lift to a man, even if the man is a cripple. It has nothing to do with fear. Even their fellow women they cannot give a lift. How many times have you seen a woman give money to a beggar on the street?

Miggs:
Women really only "submit" to men when they are getting something from him.If the river from the man runs dry,they begin to act up.The only women that can truly love a man are maybe his daughter and sometimes his mother.Women dont really love men.They only love the idea of a man.There is no need to speak too much about this issue.For instance,online,look at Nland for example and see how males always "like' the photos on females dps and see how many "likes" females give to men.Offline,how many women offer males 'lifts' in their vehicles and how many men offer women?You see ...no comparison

Maxvasia:
If by "Christian", u mean those who rely on ready made opinion of pastors without being able to think, weigh and examine issues for themselves cos of indolence of the spirit, then No sir, i am not. If you are, then i am sorry, u cannot be helped.

Maxvasia:
You and OP hqve the same issues. I really do not know wer to start to untie u too from. Too many wrong and childish assumptions.

Maxvasia:
Don't worry, experience will teach u otherwise soon. The whole write up is so full of childlike melancholy that i do not even know where to start to untie u from. Let me just give u a small hint: Just know from today onwards that the only reason that percentage is that way is that divorce almost ALWAYS favours the woman just as the society does and the women know it. So they use it as a weapon to slay men and destroy their lives which wer in order before the crept into it. Womn are very destructive and the earlier u realise that, the better for u. My advice to any guy who wishes to live long: Never ever do court wedding. These ladies lure u into it as a trap. Only fools do court wedding nowadays and many never live to be smarter. Having said this, i would also say that the only statement i will agree with in ur write up is that women are not capable of loving as everything is selfish from the moment they set their eyes on u. But NO, dey wer not created that way. They wer created to love but they have made demselves into beasts of the Nether regions. God created them and God is Love and out of Love cannot come a lack of Love. Cos of the free will man possesses, they made themselves into what dey are today. Be very careful, mate and keep a safe distance from these creatures. U will see how right i am by the time they start to quote me. Just sip tea and observe.

lordfalcao:
forget what papers carry, I never believe the club will sell matic. We are competing in 4 trophies

lordfalcao:
the deal will happen, unless you are ready to become a DM for Chelsea.

lordfalcao:
http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/10944120/chelsea-close-on-tiemoue-bakayoko-transfer

Ibime:
Nope, Manolas is technically more gifted. Bear in mind, we are thinking about a back 3 that needs technically accomplished players. In a back 4, Kurt Zouma is a great defender. In a back 3, he is trash.

The technique that would be required for a back 3 is what makes Manolas more desirable than Rudiger.

Chelsea fans have to realise that Azpilicueta made the highest no of passes in the league last season bar none. That means the job of a back 3 defender is to help the midfield dominate possession as we play with only 2 midfielders.

In terms of just defending, I probably rate them similar. Technique is the differential.

PietroRico:
you don't want belotti, you don't want Lukaku, you don't want lacazette, you don't want icardi, you don't even want aubameyang, I think.


But you want Fernando llorente.. You must be moyes' distant relative