Hero10001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Hero10001's Profile › Hero10001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 75 pages)
Drdaps:Walahi fah. Or if you sabi big pple like Jagaban, na manager straight. My cert just dey waste for house. |
Allahu Akbar! |
Corolla rocks, the Avensis interior is too plastic. |
icebeatz:Yea, they truly deserve medals for taking out 3 police men, they've got balls. the poor gal was caught in the shoot-out, it maybe a police bullet that hit her though. These four forgot rule number 2."Don't get caugh" Justice is certain. |
Samad805:pic? |
Orisirisi |
Issokay. |
Make them kukuma divide this artificial country o.
Enough foreigners grazing our resources in SW. |
(NYSC Tourism week) Trekking like a cow from Kagoro, Kaura Lg to Plateau, Jos via Kagoro hills. We ran out of water and foods. The gals cried so much and were embittered. The real palaver came when we met some canabis farmer in the wilderness.. .. They got no water but canabis-soaked palmwine did the job. We just gushed it down our throats to quench the thirst not minding the dangers. Some went in trans, some fainted, others were just laughing, i felt like a hungry lion.. It was maddening! All thanks to my NYSC Jungle Boot. It tranpled on anything. |
#TeamBigButts.
Click like.
B-) |
Terry69:Are you for real?! You keep posting this s.hit in every thread. Why not keep it and become rich instead?! |
Ti won ti ba won niyen. Mostly moslem countries.. Anyways, i rep Naija for life, for better for worse, in plenty and scarcity, in Gej and Gmb, till death do us part. |
Eníyan ko lé wa l'aye kí tire ma ba. |
Eníyan ko lé wa l'aye kí tire ma ba. |
Not when i can get the baddest 2015 model for 6m with plenty add ons awoofs! |
Hoggs an holls for real?
Lwkmd! |
MKO4ever:Still easy cos orgasm won't last 2 mins. And thats why i'm of the opinion that God was right not to equate the periods of Orgasms with Hangovers. |
ignis:He'll tell em he had a fvck gone bad. |
Don't do those s.hits.
I'm a cappy. |
olajumoke12:Must he call on u your btday? Go apologise jor. |
olajumoke12: |
T'ie ba e. |
I was there when he landed in this bird @ Dairy farm school complex, agege in 1985. Can anyone attest to this? |
KingEbukasBlog:Why the lols?! I am not confused and didn't refute your post at any point, we're trying to clear the air on the misconceptions. Digest this; Most Christians have a big problem here understanding the first two verses of the Bible! God created the earth, a beautiful home, for His children. He created it perfect, as He always does with everything He creates, and He created it to be inhabited. Listen to Him: Isaiah 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. Let there be no doubt about who is speaking here. It is the Creator God of Genesis 1:1. This is extremely important because He says that He did not create the earth in "vain", but He formed it to be inhabited, and it was habitable. The word "vain" used here is the Hebrew word "tohu" and it means desolation, utter waste. God did not create the earth as a desolation, a wasteland. It certainly makes sense, for even man doesn't create things "tohu". Now let us return to Genesis 1 and read verse 2. [2] And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Uh, oh! We have a big problem. We just read in Gen 1:1 that God created the heaven and the earth and now it says that the earth was without "form" and void, which is the exact same word, "tohu", used in Isa. 45:18. In fact the phrase "tohu va bohu", without form and void, means totally and utterly desolate and wasted. Look it up in Strong's concordance. Remember, don't take man's word for it, document it! The apparent contradiction (of which there is none, and there never is) lies in the improper translation of the verb "to be" which is translated "was" in verse two, instead of "became". It is exactly the same word translated "became" in Gen. 2:7"and man 'became' a living soul". Check it out! You will also find that some translations have it correct. In fact, if you have access to an NIV translation, you will note that they suggest "or became" in place of "was". Therefore, Isa. 45:18 is correct. God created the earth beautiful and perfect, to be inhabited. That could have been millions or billions or trillions of years ago. But then, in verse two, something must have happened because the earth became "tohu va bohu". The beautiful earth that our Father made to be inhabited was destroyed. And guess what? You can see evidence of it everywhere, in the geological layers of the earth's crust, in the fossils pressed between the rocks, in the bones of the dinosaurs, in the tilt of the earth's axis, etc., etc., etc. So was there a "Lost City of Atlantis"? Was there a "Lost World", a "World That Then Was"? The Bible gives us the answers in detail! To study the Bible is the noblest of all pursuits; to understand it, the highest of all goals. I pray that with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, you accomplish both. |
Question: "Is the concept of Lucifer's Flood
biblical?"
Answer: There have been attempts by some
Christians to reinvent the Genesis account of the
creation in order to make it compatible with the
theories of modern geology and evolution. Of
these attempts, there are three that are most
popular: theistic evolution, progressive creation,
and the gap theory, from which the term
Lucifer’s flood, also known as the Luciferian
flood, is derived.
There is only one reason why
Christians attempt to compromise God’s Word in
this manner—they have accepted the claims of
modern geologists and evolutionists that the
earth is millions, if not billions, of years old, and
they look for ways to squeeze these unfounded
millions of years into the Genesis account.
Basically, the gap theory, which for some
incorporates the so-called Lucifer’s flood,
teaches that many millions of years ago God
created a perfect heaven and earth ( Genesis 1:1)
.
At that time, Satan was ruler of the earth, which
was inhabited by a race of men without any
souls. Satan rebelled, and sin entered the
universe after Satan’s rebellion and fall from
heaven and brought God’s judgment in the form
of a flood named for him—Lucifer’s flood. All the
plant, animal and human fossils upon the earth
today were caused by this flood and do not bear
any genetic relationship with the plants, animals
and humans living today. This flood is said to
have occurred between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, and
it was this Luciferian flood that reduced the
world to a state described as “without form and
void” in Genesis 1:2. The gap theory claims that the earth is very old, possibly millions of years, based on the observation that rock layers form very slowly today. The gap theorists claim to believe in a six- day creation and insist that they are against evolution. However, the same geologic evidence is used as proof for millions of years by evolutionists. For that reason, the gap theorists must now “play” with the Scriptures. They must propose that God literally reshaped the earth and re-created all life in six literal days, but not until after a Luciferian flood which produced the fossils we see today. But there are some serious problems with this compromise with the Scriptures. First of all, the gap theory forces millions of years into the “gap” between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2 without any regard for biblical and scientific accuracy, and then claims to hold to a literal Genesis. This, in turn, brings up the question of the meaning of the term “literal.” “Literal” means “word-for-word accuracy.” Either God’s Word is literally true, or it is interpreted. It is impossible to have a literal interpretation; that would be an oxymoron because the two terms are mutually exclusive. If one’s interpretation of the Bible is contradicted by another verse in the Bible, that interpretation cannot be correct if we hold to a literal Genesis account of creation. If God created a perfect heaven and earth, then all life on earth must also be perfect. If this “perfect life” was the source of the fossils buried by Lucifer’s flood, and sin entered this world by Satan’s rebellion, why do these same fossils show abundant evidence for disease and deformities by modern scientific analysis? The presence of disease and deformities in fossils proves that all things could not have been perfect and sin was already present before the flood that buried them. If sin was present before God’s judgment of Satan, then either the Bible is wrong or the gap theory is flawed. If Lucifer’s flood was God’s judgment against Satan, and the earth was destroyed to such a state that it was without form and void, why did this flood not destroy the fossil record as well? What about Noah’s flood? Gap theorists must assume it had no significance. If Noah’s flood was not significant, why is the story of Noah used throughout the Bible to show God’s judgment on man, while Lucifer’s flood is never mentioned once? How can someone believe that Noah’s flood was insignificant and then believe in a literal Genesis? The truth is that even the Bible shows the problem with the gap theory. Though the Bible doesn’t reveal all the details of God’s creation in modern scientific terms, to believe modern geologists and evolutionists and their unfounded millions and billions of years is nothing less than believing the words of man (science) instead of the Word of God. Does it really matter whether we accept a “literal” interpretation of the Creation? The answer is “yes!” The gap theorists with their concept of the Luciferian flood believe that there was death before Adam, but the Bible declares unequivocally the opposite to be true. Romans 5:12 states that “sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin,” so to accept the concept of death before the time of Adam is to destroy the foundational message of the cross: “For just as through the disobedience of the one man [Adam] the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man [Jesus Christ] the many will be made righteous” ( Romans 5:19). To advocate the concept of death before Adam sinned is diametrically opposed to Scripture’s explanation that death came after Adam sinned and became the necessity for man’s redemption. Genesis records a catastrophe responsible for destroying everything that had the “breath of life” in them, except for those preserved in the ark. Christ refers to the global flood in Noah’s day in Matthew 24:37-39, and Peter writes that just as there was once a worldwide judgment of mankind by water, so there will be another worldwide judgment, this time by fire ( 2 Peter 3). The theory of Lucifer's flood is completely without scriptural evidence and must be rejected. www.gotquestions.org/Lucifers-flood.html www.creation.mobi/from-the-beginning-of-the-creation |
Some pple will be reading this while self-servicing! |
Thought they collected N50m or N500m bail from bankole?! |
Guys need other items like, a 3quarter shorts, stockings, boxers, singlets, colognes, caps, scarfs, basketball top, sketcher, trekker, etc |
Some ppl sha?! Whenever the read news like this, they start shouting Castrate him! Castrate him!! While they know nada bout Castration. |
Teebashy:Are you saying you're; Practical and prudent Ambitious and disciplined Patient and careful Humourous and reserved Pessimistic and fatalistic Miserly and grudging? Then, let's find out! You got whatsapp? |
Go to computer village na. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 (of 75 pages)
For sure and guaranteed fixed match of 35odds and 900odds +,,, NOTE: high stakers only...and this fixed matches aren't free! Welcome