HesInMe's Posts
Nairaland Forum › HesInMe's Profile › HesInMe's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 21 pages)
Read between the lines. I'm holding him to a higher analytical standard because I respect his intellect. He knows he's wrong on the numbers here; just won't accept it. handsomebolanle: |
Stop disgracing yourself in public na. You may be a stubborn he-goat but you can read numbers. Common sense and implied valuation vs Presco show that Ellah is clearly overpaying for the ARPN plantation -- with no synergies to make up for the upfront overpayment. By contrast, Presco probably does have the scale and market position to create value from the asset even if acquired at a premium. We go see how de tin goes. ositadima1: |
See? Unlike those other dreamers yonder, Presco's tested management states clear operational and strategic rationales for this acquisition: "Nsadop and Boki are strategically located estates that complement our existing operations and expand the scale required to power our mills and refineries at higher capacity,” the chief executive of Presco, Mr Reji George, said. “This move is not only about expanding land, it is about strengthening our leadership, securing long-term supply, and reinforcing our belief in the future of Nigeria’s agribusiness sector.” chimex38: |
I know... It hurts. You've been suckered by Chuka's slick marketing about a boundless future. Now you see the numbers in full colour. Take heart. Happens to all of us. ositadima1: |
Lol. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. ositadima1: |
Do we really need to go any further? I know if I show you a perfect woman, you'll still argue that her hips are rotated 0.2 degrees, but we can see the writing on the wall: ARPN is nominally valued at roughly the same price per hectare as Presco -- without Presco's significant yield expansion and unit margin differential. As Cathie Wood would say, Presco is riding on two colliding S curves. ARPN's valuation is like paying for Presco at today's valuation -- 10 years ago. ositadima1: |
Why you dey fall my hand? Presco has nearly double the plantation size you credit them for; has average maturity of 8-10 years vs. ARPN's ~4 years (so much higher yield); and makes 99% of sales from value-added crude oil and refined products, which are significantly more profitable, compared with ARPN's mostly fresh fruit sales. Knowing this, do you still think ARPN was good value? I'll just let your suggestion about Ellah's "operational depth" stand unaddressed. ositadima1: |
I like you. You think you're smart. Lol. I did not say one cannot create value via acquisition. I just noted that it is an important but unanswered question in Ellah's specific case, which has three characteristics that don't augur well for success. First, history is not on their side. The proposed acquisition is gargantuan relative to the size of Ellah's existing business. Even at well managed firms, large acquisitions typically fail. Ellah is run by a banker with no agric expertise. Second, Ellah is paying a high price for its main target: ARPN's oil palm plantation, which it values at N155bn. Publicly traded Presco and Okomu offer better comps than land in the bush for estimating the true market value of the plantation, measured on a price per planted hectare basis (adjusted for some yield metric, like average age). I'm confident you can do the math yourself. Finally, the combination does not enjoy any significant synergies. Ellah has no existing business of note to offer significant cost savings or revenue enhancements when combined with ARPN. It is such synergies that make value creation possible -- with prayer and pouring libations -- when you pay a premium for an asset. Honestly, the better way to see this deal is as a liquidity event for ARPN's owners, not value creation for Ellah's. ositadima1: |
So tell us na: How does Ellah intend to create value from an asset they buy at a premium? SonofElElyonRet: |
What's the point? Nobody ever asks him the fundamental question related to the proposed acquisition: How does Ellah intend to create value from an asset they buy at a premium? nosa2: |
Lol. Tell me na. I only buy small-small so I won't disturb your entry. nosa2: |
I don't know if it'll get to N19 or N25 in the short run. I just know that if it gets to N19, I'm going to double my position. Because if I look out 5-7 years, I see the African consumer rising, and trade, payments, and wealth management alongside, and few Nigerian banks are better positioned to ride that tsunami than Access. But if one's horizon is shorter, the disappointment is understandable. nosa2: |
Lol. No disrespect -- I acknowledge your initiative -- but look how far you've evolved conceptually. Before: Think of market fragility like checking if a bridge is about to collapse (outcome)... If you see all 5 problems at once, your market is about to collapse! (outcome)... This model catches those signals before the crash happens, like a smoke detector before the fire (outcomes). Now: It's just "descriptive." ositadima1: |
You're getting defensive nah. I get its probabilistic nature, but isn't there, almost by definition, a sense of imminence associated with fragility? I was only trying to nudge you to put some numbers behind that imminence. As you previously wrote: Market fragility Model - Simple Explanation Think of market fragility like checking if a bridge is about to collapse. You don't wait for it to fall, you look for warning signs like cracks, rust, and stress points. If it takes 10 years for most bridges to collapse after major cracks and stress points appear (fragility score >90), what use are those observations? ositadima1: |
So if your score hits 90, you expect an imminent market collapse, say 20+% in a week? And if this doesn't happen, you'll know it's a dud? ositadima1: |
Honest question (don't get defensive): How will you know that this score is useful? ositadima1: |
Come on. The planned use of funds is published in their offer prospectus as per usual. Whatever one thinks of Ellah's potential, we should all be compulsively fact-focused as investors. Neither blind haters nor effusive bootlickers welcome. SonofElElyonRet: |
I wish them much success, but the more interesting question is what happens if Ellah falls far short of the N155bn it needs to buy the oil palm plantation it is betting on to "arrive." |
You're making my point. It's not a serious investment strategy. It's like buying a lottery ticket: If it works, awesome; if not, whatever. ositadima1: |
Someone tell me about MANSARD abeg. |
They also don't talk about their losses (and opportunity costs). That's the problem. ositadima1: |
It's mostly dumb luck. All these feel-good, find-the-needle-in-the-haystack investment stories don't acknowledge how poorly the strategy works on the average -- those stocks where the strategy fails, and fails badly. Most investors are better off just buying the index. ositadima1: |
https://punchng.com/fg-begins-50-oil-blocks-bid-round-eyes-10bn/ Do these move oil exploration company stocks (Aradel, Oando, Seplat)? |
No worry. My bonds and CPs are earning 23+% while I siddon look. Agbalowomeri: |
Gladly. If anything, the problem I'm having is that the downturn has not been more violent. I like it when the gamblers are flushed out and blood is on the street. Agbalowomeri: |
For those of us betting on Naija's long term fundamentals, some red is good. Bleeding begets life. Agbalowomeri: |
They're just taking up their rights issue, right? Siat owns ~60% of Presco; $100mn/N237bn = ~60%. mallamOmonile1: |
You can apply either directly at NGX Invest online or through one of the authorized brokers (most brokers are) and banks. If you apply through your broker, you pay the money to them (they may charge a fee, see below). Per the Rights Circular: "Existing Shareholders can participate in the Rights Issue through any of the electronic application channels: NGX Invest Platform. The NGX Invest Platform can be accessed at https://invest.ngxgroup.com/ and is available to all shareholders to participate in the Rights Issue and authorized Receiving Agents listed on page 54 of this Rights Circular to submit applications on behalf of shareholders. Details of your allotment are set out on all the electronic application channels and also on the Rights Application Form provided on pages 55 to 56 of the Rights Circular. Shareholders who elect to complete a Rights Application Form can submit same to a Receiving Agent who will be required to submit an electronic application on the behalf of the existing Shareholders. "Application Forms may be obtained free of charge from banks, stockbrokers, post offices, local government authorities and other designated distribution outlets. Completed Application Forms must be submitted to any of the under listed Receiving Agents duly registered as capital market operators by the SEC and to whom brokerage will be paid at the rate of ₦0.20 per ₦100 worth of shares allotted in respect of the Application Forms bearing their official stamps.... "The Company and Issuing Houses cannot accept responsibility for the conduct of any of the [Receiving Agents] listed below. Investors are therefore advised to conduct their own enquiries before choosing an agent to act on their behalf. Evidence of lodgement of funds at any of the Receiving Agents listed below, in the absence of corresponding evidence of receipt by the Issuing Houses, cannot give rise to a liability on the part of the Issuing Houses under any circumstances." gabscity: |
Last comment on this: You're missing the forest for the trees. It's not just the outcome (whether the land rights are revoked or not) that matters; the process (what looked like a military-style asset appropriation by executive order) too is an important signal for investors. People who hold high office ought to know how the modern economy works. Maintaining investor confidence can be just as important, even more so, than getting the policy right. Bad optics raise the equity risk premium investors demand and depress asset values (share prices) for all of us -- even those that do not own the target company. Even if the government ultimately decides the land is better used for oil exploration, due process requires it to use a transparent administrative review to make that decision, perhaps including good-faith negotiations with, and the right of fair judicial review by, the asset holder. Such respect for property rights and institutions is what makes modern economies different from banana republics. SonofElElyonRet: |
Quit this nonsense. I don't own a single Presco stock (though I wish I did). But we all have a stake in Nigeria's attractiveness as a destination for private investment. These sorts of actions, which I'm glad to see the Edo government distancing itself from, hurt investor confidence and affect all of us -- shareholders or not. A rising tide lifts all boats. SonofElElyonRet: |


Happy to know it ain't but full compensation, allocation of another suitable/similar parcel of land and enough time to harvest and relocate is what would've been fair . Not a country foregoing 2 oil wells!