HesInMe's Posts
Nairaland Forum › HesInMe's Profile › HesInMe's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 21 pages)
Did you sleep through the last 60 years of Nigeria's economic history? And even if you think oil is the more profitable use for the land, this arbitrary process -- revoking by fiat -- is not the way to go about this. SonofElElyonRet: |
What does that even mean? If your property rights depend on who wins elections, who in their right mind would invest in any long-dated physical asset? In a country that desperately needs long-term, private investments in roads, airports, housing, energy, and yes, large-scale agrobusinesses, this is like shooting yourself in the head. This stupid, short-sighted governor should immediately reverse. toyeoye: |
I don't understand this logic. N200bn, or about 86%, of the net proceeds will be used to acquire ARPN's agrobusiness, most of it for the oil palm plantation. Do you imagine that ARPN is selling its plantation at a discount to fair value, or is it more likely that Ellah will be paying a premium to get this valuable asset? And, if they're buying at a premium, i.e., overpaying, how then will Ellah create value for shareholders? Acquisitions only make sense if 1) you're buying an asset at a discount, or 2) you pay fair value or a premium but exploit synergies post-combination with your existing business to extract value. But Ellah has no significant existing business. Stockhunter: |
Bruh. What's up with this "disgraced" matter that you keep flogging in every post nowadays? Streetinvestor2: |
It's okay to be negative on the market. Markets rise and fall all the time. People can make serious money shorting the market (or more likely, selling and parking your money in fixed income). The problem here is that people are directing negative energy about other matters to this forum. And I agree: that's not very helpful. kintus: |
Market price-to-earnings ratios don't predict the likelihood of a market crash at all? You're rewriting all of modern finance. If you're right, you'll earn the Nobel in economics. Don't bet on it. ositadima1: |
No need for the drama. I said it was a gut check, not a PhD thesis. It's more useful than you'd think. Let's think through this. Define the "risk" that you're trying to "gauge"? ositadima1: |
There's an easier, first-order gut check: the current (or, even better, forward) market price-to-earnings ratio compared to historical trends. That's the total market cap of the All-Share Index divided by the total earnings of the listed companies. Does anyone have that metric calculated by an analyst? According to Simply Wall Street (take with a grain of salt): 3-year average market PE: 9.2x Current PE: 8.2x ositadima1: |
Commercial papers are discounted instruments: the interest is baked into the price of the CP. The difference between the discounted purchase price and the face value repaid at maturity is the investor's profit, or interest earned. The discount rate relates to the annualized discount on the face value: Discount = 10M face value * 18.34% over 365 days tenor = 1.834M So you actually invest 10-1.834 = 8.166M cash But at maturity, the issuer should pay you 10M face value (ignoring taxes and fees). The implied yield is the annualized interest rate you're earning on cash invested. It's just the simple interest rate (i.e., interest/principal, expressed as a percentage): So you'll earn 1.843M interest on principal of 8.166M invested over 365 days tenor Or 1.834/8.166 * 100 = 22.46% per annum. You use the implied yield to compare across different investment options. Note: The calculated implied yield may be slightly different than your 22.5% because some don't count holidays as interest-earning days. eziokwunwoko: |
Calling a market bottom is a fool's errand. By the time you see a clear bottom, the uptrend is well on its way. Agbalowomeri: |
Without question. The regulations will mandate broker reporting of client information, including valuation and capital gains. Happens everywhere capital gains are taxed. mikeapollo: |
The SEC's role is to protect investors, but not from themselves. All a company needs to do is to make sure that the proposed security is legitimate on its face (the company is registered, financials have been audited, capital raise has shareholder/regulator approval, etc.), and that appropriate disclosures have been made before offering it to investors. So, for instance, Ellah is legit (if you ignore their invisible financial report); secured shareholder approval at AGM; and it has to disclose in the offer prospectus that it'll dramatically be expanding its shares outstanding and that dilution of investors is a risk. If people decide to be mugu and invest, that's not SEC's ruwa. The proposed "Dangote Foods" merger was denied because Dangote Sugar is publicly listed (so under SEC's oversight) and Dangote Rice was not operational at the time they submitted the merger deal for SEC review. So it did not pass the "on-its-face" test. yMcy56: |
That's not the role of the SEC when it registers new securities (like new public offers). The primary reason for registration of securities is to ensure that investors are given all the relevant information to guide them to make a realistic evaluation of the merits of the securities and to decide whether or not to buy and at what price. Approval of listings is mostly a check-the-box function. Whatever you think of Ellah Lake's prospects, you should definitely not read from the SEC's approval of the offer that the company can attract the desired funding. yMcy56: |
It's not a bad word. It's just a proxy for young eyeballs engaged in the digital era. I bet there's a correlation between porn viewership and future explosive growth in the digital economy. PhD thesis for a curious economist. Agbalowomeri: |
Or just look out 5-10 years, and realize this will likely be a forgotten blip in the grand trend. Demography is destiny. For all our problems, we're privileged to have front row seats to an evolving economy of 150+ million people, median age of 18 years, with an unquenchable appetite for food, drink, data, electricity, homes, roads, airports, payment solutions, loans, insurance, and pornography. Close eye and BUY the best positioned companies a little at a time. ogawisdom: |
How will you know when the "free fall" ends? ogawisdom: |
What investment period are you looking at? 3-6 months? I've said it before: We're too short-term focused. In the short term, the market is a voting machine; in the long run, it is a weighing machine. Try looking out 3-5 years. If you truly believe that an upstart ositadima1: |
What witchcraft financial mathematics be this? aj8: |
So Agro-Allied Resources and Processing Nigeria Limited (ARPN) -- the company Ellah wants to buy -- is going public at a huge premium to its intrinsic value? That public offer prospectus will be fire. If it'll be clear enough to read, that is. Divineability: |
Not to rub it in, but let's not forget how some were flogging this 22% gross margin "tech" business as the next Moniepoint unicorn. They know themselves. ogawisdom: |
We have an oligopoly here in the cement market that is difficulty to disrupt given high costs of entry and distribution. They will fix the price as much as they want. GeeKudi: awesomeJ: |
Great insight! I read somewhere that investors underestimate just how much state and local governments, flush with cash following devaluation and subsidy removal, are investing in new infrastructure requiring cement. This industry has tremendous tailwinds ahead. awesomeJ: |
The industry is more like an elephant (Dangote), a leopard (BUA), and a cheetah (Lafarge). The cheetah is outrunning the others on asset efficiency and profitability, but the leopard is not dulling, and you know you can't ignore the mighty elephant. thebargainhunte: |
Lol. It's not that bad na. Let's say they make N13 EPS this year, which is conservative. Even if you slap PE of 1.5x, which is low, that's N19.5. Although that's 20+% down from current levels sha... It's the relative underperformance on a grand scale vs. GTCO that is shocking. It's like man vs. machine. Access should be firing its entire board and senior management if they had any shame. Mpeace: |
What a mess. 50% drop in EPS. I remember when people were arguing that recapitalization wouldn't meaningfully impact EPS because banks are money machines. Not so. Can't defy gravity forever. bovali: |
I don't know. Sorry to disappoint. But since we're talking long term, current valuation is less of an issue, so let's consider the businesses. Maybe then you can decide. FCMB is an established national bank that makes roughly 60% of revenue from interest from loans, 25% from securities trading, and 15% from fees. They are making a big push to increase fee income through digital services. VFD is an upstart investment firm that makes 95% of revenue from investments, including illiquid private businesses, and 5% from fees. Knowing this, which one do you think is more likely to be around in 10 years? Which could flourish more? Which would you prefer to own? Redoil: |
Over what investment period? Redoil: |
It's beyond shameful that Nigeria's biggest bank is acting so unprofessionally. And they wonder why they trade at deep discount to GTCO. vacanci: |
What legal process? They paid ~$1 billion to buy 80+% of the company. You think they're not going to control the Board? lexy2lexy: |
Beautiful. WAPCO is a N200 stock by any reasonable measure. dapix: |
I admire your enthusiasm about the company. It is not shared. By recurring earnings, I mean monie-for-hand, predictable earnings. Like the ones Nestle makes when you buy Nido. UCAP is a good comparator, but at least UCAP makes roughly 50% of its revenue from brokerage fees and commissions, the rest from investments. Risky, but waaay better than VFD, which earns less than 5% as fee income. I'm sure VFD will be fine in bull markets. A rising tide lifts all the canoes. But when things go south, unless you have Gospel-like faith in management, look out below. courage89: |
Thanks. The question was a little tongue-in-cheek. I'm not sure most people understand what VFD does and, unless one is a very long-term investor, why one should invest in the stock. How, for instance, do they generate recurring revenues and profits with all these illiquid non-public holdings? courage89: |


