₦airaland Forum

OdefaGirl:
What's Obidients business with your messed system? You think we care about the Senate tussle

Yes you do care.
If you don't personally, your fellow obidients does. No denying that now.

So, Kalu didn't eventually get the courage to contest, or was he bought eventually? Unfortunately, he has positioned himself as an antagonist to BAT, and trust Bola, he'll reward him in due time, he can ask Hon. Lasun from Osun State and Sen. Bukola from Kwara State.

Okwyjesus:
You didn't even know there Hope Uzodinma broker deal and got all SE voters yesterday evening to Akpabio where Orji Uzoh and Izunaso accepted.

Stop causing problem here and there. Read...

Escuses, Escuses, Escuses!!!
Before election, it was "If INEC do rubbish, Nigeria go burn." Election came and gone, nothing happened.

Then "He won't be sworn in on May 29th." He was sworn in and nothing happened.

And then this again, they are already rejoicing over the tribunal case too and making mouth, we go see how that will end, last last, na Escuses, Escuses, Escuses.

Another blow to obidients, they keep falling back to back. We told them BAT no be GMB, BAT knows exactly where he's going and he's ready to pursue it with all his might, unlike GMB that accepts anything as long as he's not affected.

Finally, that Uzor Kalu go learn, he was never a Tinubu supporter, he no just get choice.

And to think that these obidients are against Akpabio just to spite Tinubu, the same way they supported Emefiele on the cashless policy just to spite their sworn enemy. And they were vehemently against M-M ticket, but here they are, supporting another Muslim. They just want to have the privilege of saying, "We no tell you before? That's their plan all along to have Nigeria's number 1 to number 4 man as a Muslim." Thank God it didn't work.

H

Praxis758:
And this Makinde will be hoping to plant his successor in 2027. It is by then that he will reap all the evil he’s doing to his party.

Federal might will be used against him.

You know nothing about Makinde oga, so please don't say what you don't know, the whole of Oyo state is solidly behind Gov. Makinde in all he's doings. It's only election with small margin that can be rigged, go and look at the margin with which he led his APC opponent in the last election, then you will know he's a man of the people.

H

DesChyko:
NB: If a thief steals your car, you do not because he attempts to maintain it, decide that he keeps it. 🤞

NB: Unfortunately, Nigeria is nobody's car and neither is Nigeria presidency.

H

freshkpomo:

Woman when suppose spend 2k carry agabado from her farm end up spending 8k because of fuel hike and you expect her to listen to your FX speech when she dey tear customers bill?

That is not how the economy works but it's okay if that's the opinion you choose to stand with.

Peace!!!

freshkpomo:

Inflation knocking. Abeg, I dey go start my agbado far. All others na wants.!!

This would hopefully be cushioned by the unified FX rate eventually.

enemyofprogress:
both of them na the same jare

No they aren't, at least, one of them knows what he wants and he's making the decision, the other guy would have kept mute and leave everyone wondering wetin dey happen sef.

No matter the price of transportation, Nigerians are better off without the subsidy, my own take is that, they should remove it completely, not that tomorrow, they will come back again to say they want to remove subsidy.

enemyofprogress:
Things are now very expenses, everythings have gone up. Baba Seyi no try o. This is not why I voted for you o

No be Baba Seyi do am, na Sai Baba

This was a long time coming, it's better to remove the subsidy now since there's no provision for it in the budget. Enough of thieves carrying our PMS to neighboring country to sell for maximum profit. Last last, na wetin I buy I go take charge clients.

H

arantess:
As a foolish person I knew you wouldn't make reference to the maps

Look at the map again

So sorry for your case o, as you didn't disappoint in displaying your foolishness.

The topic is about your IPOB enclave, so if you don't have anything reasonable to say than to display your foolishness and show how pained you are by my comment, just waka pass.

Earthquakes:
However you want to see it, security is the responsibility of the president. Do you say the same thing to people of Kaduna or Platueu or Benue when they get attacked??

The difference is that the people of Kaduna, Platueu and Benue has always been speaking out against the attackers from inception while those once have been encouraging IPOB.

Confusion indeed.

By now, they would have become totally aggressive against the May 29th swearing-in, but they are so confused they do not even know what next they should do to salvage their party.

LP, Obi and Obidients are all in for a long thing, you want to change a system using the same method that established the system.
Dey play o

H

The cash redesign policy was never for the good of the people, it's just a political move.

If Obi is really the winner, he should not be cheated, my issue is some people believing that he and only him must be the winner.

DMerciful:
Baseless argument. Have a nice day!

Call it whatever pleases you sir.
Peace!!!

DMerciful:
You have not answered the question. Is it unconstitutional to televise it, yes or no? Do Nigerians want it televise, yes or no?

And I'm also asking you if the constitution says it must be televised?
I can say Nigerian want it televised and I can say they don't want it televised, why? Because there's no way of measuring if people want it televised or not, so asking me if Nigerians want it televised is a question I can't answer because I don't know how you want me to know the mind of all Nigerians.

DMerciful:
So you're saying its unconstitutional to televise the proceedings?

I'm saying the constitution did not say a proceeding must be televised. If it were to be outrightly constitutional, the PDP wouldn't have had to ask for it and all of Atiku's cases in the past would have been televised too. The court would have to look at the Pros and Cons of televising the preceding before reaching a conclusion and if the court decides that it is best not to televise, then it does not mean APC has anything to hide or that PDP is the saint.

DMerciful:
Thats why I said only thieves operate in the dark. So if APC says no, the rest of Nigerians cannot view it? How many members of the public can go there, 0.00000000001%?

As long as the constitution do not mandate it that it must be televised, APC has a right to defend not itself but the constitution. How many court proceedings have been televised in the past? If not to sway court of public sympathy, why claim that this particular one should be televised? If anyone is interested in seeing the case, they might as well go to the court, of course not everyone will make time out to go, not because there's no room for them but because they have other things to do. Thus, APC has the right to say no, that doesn't make them anything you like to call, it's just defending the rule of law.

DMerciful:
Only thieves operate in the dark. The Nigerian constitution says court proceedings should be public and because the court cannot accommodate enough people who are interested, it make sense to broadcast it

Relax oga, why are you guys always in a rush to make it look like someone is against you. Did I say they should not grant PDP's prayer? All I'm saying is they can't just grant it without hearing from other interested party, don't forget that this is not a criminal case.

The court is still open for the public, but televising the hearing would have to be agreed upon by all involved parties, since previous cases are not televised, so why would this be different? You don't just force things on people because you feel that's the right thing.

DMerciful:
So why not grant it? Why waiting for Tinubu/APC response?

Is it only PDP that is involved in the case? They gave a reason why they wanted live transmission, other parties would also speak in support of it or against it with reasons. That's how it works.