Pidgin2:



Granddaughter, you no get respect, what type of upbringing did you have abi you no dey fear elderly people? If I see any more insult from you eh, you will use an alternate moniker, be warned.

Ederly My Poo Poo...
...


No elder woman who have seen what life/relationship entails dey argue like you dey do...
...
I resemble your mate ni.....
...
ban abi? try am now.....
....
dem tell u say i carry mat come sleep for here...huh?...
....

....
...
Go sleep jor Mama Arugbo

Pidgin2:


Granddaughter, is low self-esteem your only antidote for failed marriages, is your brain or any part of you less developed than males, how come they are superior to you? I feel sorry for your female offspring

I never heard God say men are superior, only some online key board champion calling herself a lesser being

No dey argue without fact...
....
Wetin concern or bring ma offspring for dis marra now.....you dey mad?
....
you go just dey argue blindly after u don drink ur feminism concortion finish....
....
that one change reality? ....everyone na sexist...make we all know our weak points and strengths and leverage on that...hypocrite.
...
that one resemble low self esteem/oppression/dehumanisation for your face
....
not the head2head authority una want with ya husband....

...

No just dey front ya mouth for online here...
...
if you are married or in a serious relationship....enh....

...
if you dey vex or wan prove ur opinions...go sit down ur husband and talk about it....biko

Masikay:


Nah.. Actually I haven't. Because the person hasn't answered me. Are you saying males are superior to females in all ramifications or just Christianity and marriage?

pheww...
...

pls Take a stroll back to page one ..then...
...

read and digest forward, comments to comments..
...
by the time you get here back
...
your curiosity should have been half-solved...if not all ma

Masikay:


Ey.. Don't go all dictionary words on me. I was asking a question because I was a little bit confused. And someone has answered me, you can chill now.

Gud to hear you ve grasp these truths ma...

Masikay:


So your bible quote is confusing me. Clarify something for me please, if a woman holds a higher position than a man, has this woman somehow commited a sin? Or lets say, a female leader in the church, has this woman commited a sin by preaching to men?

am sorry ma, if you couldnt even grasp the simple truth in dose sacred words den even an explaination in 7folls thesis wouldnt help either...

...

cos you are deep embroiled in your own subjective opinions which doesnt change d truth and d reality....

lets

Pidgin2:
..

You need deliverance from low self-esteem

This is no low self-esteem grandma....this is not dehumanizing atall.......
...

its reckoning with the natural order...
....so stop being an hypocrite online here...we have had enough of failed marriage or relationship rampant all around us this modern times....


meanwhile....

awayeyebundle:
Mimio is traitor everybody in PDP knows that is agenda is known in all crane and corner of Ondo state..sir Justice of our federation it is not right if the governor bends our constitution for his selfish agenda..for jegede...that is not up to 2years in PDP to be governor of Ondo whhere someone who has been financially supporting the party and morally and technically are distabilise in Nigeria is unfair and injustice to allow central district rule or governor for another 8+8 to 16years....sir law of the land stand

you better keepwiet
your painment no be here oo...

TV01:
Bukatyne you won't greet me before you rain queries on my head


I do not believe OP is and I certainly do not. However, best clarify with OP. Who by the way has agreed with my original rejoinder.


Cultures - not necessarily religion - supported polygyny for many reasons. High mortality, family labour, yes, even prestige, and even the libido differential between men and women. Even then, numbers alone (approx. 106 men to 100 women) meant that not all men could have many wives, and it was men at the lower end who would be the biggest losers, having no-one. Typically lower status, they would be doomed to live short-brutish, servile lives.

Beatings happened, but I don't know of a culture that upheld it as normal & desirable. I would imagine in most, it was actionable by the women.


And that is what Feminism and progressive liberal ideology seeks to do. The biggest two are the removal of biological reality and the casting off of moral restraint.


I only mentioned "higher responsibilities", which covers all nature of forms of male/female relationships. Do girlfriends customarily support their boyfriends financially .

In terms of achievements, accomplishment, being established, education, social level, and of course finances. Where money is not such a driver, other more cosmetic things may come into play.

Yes. Yes I am. It's evidenced even here on NL. More than an unfaithful man, perhaps even more than an abusive man, women reserve the most opprobrium and anger for "irresponsible men" - not taking ownership & responsibility for the welfare of their families. Are you seriously saying you cannot see that?

Building a home in that sense is more about giving your husband the support he needs to carry out his role. Not being un-submissive or antagonistic, or dragging headship. It's not about turning sole provider, or even major provider. I appreciate economic dynamics and some individual situation may change things, but a man should always be responsible in this regard. Whilst it should never be more than optional/situational for women.

Women typically go for dominant, leadership type traits. Evidence of ambition, drive and success. It's even noted physically in the typical desire for "taller men" like. Note conversely that for most men the main - and sometimes the only - driver - is physical attractiveness. Followed by femininity, nurture.

Many guys don't get why the girls are attracted to the loud, flashily dressed guys in their circles, when they know them to be lousy. But women are viscerally drawn by sight as well, just not so much to physical appearance, but appearance of status.

It's why women are always confused as to why their accomplishments don't impress men. Or deem them scared of successful women. Men typically are not checking for that. It's more of a selling point when things are hard or the man is impecunious to a degree. But all things being equal, highly accomplished but unattractive women, will always be behind beautiful and/or young women.

well said sir!

Pidgin2:

Are you liking you ur own posts?

mtcheeww......

dingbang:
bite me sexy

No be only bite.....na eat i go even eat you cutehector....
but before that.....

dingbang:
u dey fear my prick ?

huh?...

TV01:
With a few slight modifications – which are mostly semantic –I can’t say I see very much wrong with the OP.

I stand to be corrected, but I don’t see that OP is saying men are of more worth, or value than women, or even children. What is being said is that in bearing burdens and taking ownership, the greater responsibility and hence authority rests on men.

This history of mankind has not simply been one long uninterrupted timeline of “men oppressing women”, it has been an accord between them– even if imperfect – based with their complimentary differences in mind.

And if it evolves over time, it cannot do so beneficially, if we attempt to do so by ignoring, or trying to override as “constructs”, the hard wired and different, but complimentary natures.

This is clearly borne out by the dynamics of the interaction between the sexes. And first and foremost, and without gainsaying, women are the ones who most stridently push for, and would suffer most, if men despised this mantle.

Most especially in the interpersonal relationships (most notably marriage) between them. Women want men of higher status, men they can look up to and feel secure with.

The push for equality serves to masculinise women and feminise men. Women don’t want men who they don’t perceive as “superior” in status, either in a relative or absolute sense.

Women find it hard to respect – and hence maintain attraction for – men that they see as “equal” or slightly lower in status. Fact. Women don’t want the men that equality produces. Duh!

Likewise. Women taking on overly masculine traits is typically a turn-off for most men. Equality in the terms it is being presented is a lose, lose. Indeed, it’s a lose-lose-lose, as our children will also suffer, not just us.

Under the guise of "equality", most are seeking to wrest away the authority, without sharing the burden. Not that it would work for the best even if they did.

Any woman here that is with a man of equal or slightly inferior status to her should let us know. Along with those who bear the burden equally and in the same way with their men.


TV

Dont mind dem sir...
they are just been hypocrite....

and some sissy men disputing this fact in order not be erroneously lashed with "misogyny thingy" by all dis confused women pepementring up and down....

dingbang:
taaa mechionu ebaa..

Eleeeribu!
you are looking for who to.do this with abi?

dingbang:
taaa mechionu ebaa..

Eleeeribu!

dingbang:
Iamoged let us discuss romance

e be like say bullet dey hungry you chop...abi?

AdexHo:


Arrant nonsense
You have no solid backup over your writeup
All i see is a he or she or whatever you're
Who doesn't know what superiority means
SMH
WISE UP

[b]what is superiority in your own term? pls tell me sir
its a natural order that has prevailed against all odds from this yeye feminism crusaders, i who doest noth dispute the natural hierarchy of men being above women.
you might made reference to women being ruler and attaining mighty posts which are identical to men....but we all know that even these women powers and success come from background gameplays of interests by d men...]so no woman attain any power/success height without d power play of men.
my post though might looks controversial to dem single who has never and are in obvious denial of dis truth...

But that doest not change d truth....
above all we are all sexists, there is nothing wrong being a sexist cos everybody or gender should reckon and leverage their hegde points...but not at distorting d natural order which is more establish in marriage or "some" relationships....Bible which is d book of truth supported it, our tradition supported/ our cultures does too...
obvious denial of dis is just a mere subjective opinion which is bound to fail or cause disturbance.

But my main agitation is the alarming rate at which guys of nowadays are being raised weak and sissy....which is wrong....[/b]

DarkRebel101:


My bad. I'm finishing up on some office work and should hit the bed sheets in no time.

Goodnight.

For someone who spent half of his lifestime, wasting away on NL....
office work indeed...

QueenSuccubus:




Hahahhahahaah!

All these e-wars are like gold medals.. This is the thing they want to achieve since they have nothing outside NL.. It's very obvious some kiddos make loud empty noises so disparately juz to get a little attention..


Oh yes u may be right, not a lot of Nigerians are not fond of love and being loved... After all one person can run 5-8 monikers at the same time in one thread.

5-8? acct
for what?...on this bashing thing?
that way too much...

and den how did u know? i suspected you also anchor a group or in a leaque cos of ur siggy....



well you just said they dont have work.......thread softly....who knows...dem E- backstab you like dey do oo

QueenSuccubus:



Or they should add another section just for Dissing and Bashing...

Sometimes, romance section is aint romantic anymore.. It become a graveyard for those who want to kill someone online or simply bcoz a lot of Nigerians are not fond of love and being loved as they spit nothing but hatred...

Yes ooo.....all i see these days are different monickers with kill dis...kill dat....you will see monics like drivekiller....jiggerkiller...killersnake...tractorkiller....killergun....bombkiller...even suicidebomberkiller....whats dis all about? is dat d latest terrorists gimmicks in town now?....Mods should even start investigating each monics......

and less i forget....

pls comot dat "alot".of nigerians from dre.....

WHAT IS ROMANCE? :
romance/rə(ʊ)ˈmans,ˈrəʊmans/
noun
1. a feeling of excitement and mystery associated with love.
2. a quality or feeling of mystery, excitement, and remoteness from everyday

WHAT IS ROMANCE SECTION?:

[b]Romance section : Discuss dating, courtship, and romance in marriage.

But whats going on here right now-all i see is
DISSING/BASHING up and down.....its no longer romance section where our romantic skills and knowledges should have being developed

Pls the Mods should Renamed this polluted Romance section to DISSING/BASHING/WAR ZONE SECTION.....or on extreme "aequum"- kukumally brand here "NAIRALANDERS GONE WILD" SECTION -a themed broad passway to total WEREISM propono on here.

Everyone now thinks untill you bash or diss; you aint making sense or being in d league.
Naso one boy dey abusive me untop say we dey argue Men Superiority or not.....instead of being civil with corrections or chipins...Na bash he dey bash me....
Infact all d leaguez and groups on this forum are nothing but warring Nazis and axis allies....not trust worthy, betrayer against doctrines of being brothers keeper....Now tell me whats their usefulness?....Naso one nigga dey complain gimme say his contacts and offline life was leaked to rival group...abeg isnt dat a backstab?so many backstabs.... [/b]

Respect to D Great artistic wordicians on here; likes of TSOM, LEZZ,POSTMAN, Joseph and so who has been blessed with topnortch skill in wordsforging.....
abeg....kiddos here are emulating you guys in a bad way and as d patrons of good lexical "shashamoras"....
i think you need to set d record straight and flush all dis misplaced upcoming dissers- selfdubbed 4 star wordsmith rating who cannot diss without involving sombori progeny....wetin sef......


Wey dem mods...
Pls inaugurate "DISSES SERVERs PROSECUTOR"DSP.....with fast military alacrity to tackle all dis progeny bashing flying up and down.....Na God i take beg una...