IAmOged's Posts
Nairaland Forum › IAmOged's Profile › IAmOged's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (of 19 pages)
Masikay:
|
fluxbush:
|
purple3091:am bi-s
|
fluxbush:You are still not making sense unnie... though am not surprised-what could a brainwashed mooncalf like you come up with... ... its a lost race... ... you are better silent with your deluded mind than this your online shameless display of idiocy and “wereosis” .... Sleep on ma!...Its good for your health
|
Masikay:Eleeeribu
|
Masikay:Eleeeribu
|
fluxbush:You ve just proved and buttressed my points with your idioctic rants-you and your moronic moderntimes distortionists think is intelligence and hiked up foolishness u called high self-esteem....meww on sis.... your eyes go soon clear.. |
fluxbush:Nullify those valid realities points up there with more sane and unbiased points of yours .. or ... bow ur feminist head in shame... |
Jegede Vs Oke ... WHO should i vote? ... Jegede is my omo iya...my blood. ... Oke..symbolic of yoruba strong will against buhari and his northern cabal encroachment on the political space of d southwest... ... Who should we vote? ... uhmmmmn What is politics? ... politics is about taking and sharing ... What matters in Politics? ... Facts dont matter in politics-people care about their people,race,tribe,money,family,blood...etc ... EYITAYO JEGEDE-Central with d largest votes OLUSHOLA OKE-south... ... a recess to calculate and come out with the person whose gonna win d election.... ... |
Beamborla:From research sis... |
mukhcech:...About to in months time... ... |
mukhcech:Thanks so much sir..
|
Masikay:Why do u take me for a man? kweep qweit or else....
|
Masikay come mo settle our fight now-why would two sisters be fighting....huh?
...
biko... ... ...
|
TV01:
|
TV01:From korea~ Orabonia(older brother) is here. ... (Naori)Nemesis of the Feminist is here... ... |
Time and time again, be it a televised debate,Nairaland comments, a private argument or even in universities where the female IQ skews higher, I see little in the way of reason espoused by women. This does not mean women do not say correct or truthful things, but rather that they do not rationally deduce truth so much as they intuit it, intuition being the vague sensation that something feels or sounds right. ... Likewise women will hold untrue and irrational beliefs because said irrational thing feels good to believe. You should begin to see a pattern emerging here, whether a woman holds an opinion based in truth or an opinion that isn’t, this opinion is almost always held because it feels good to believe, or her peer group believes it and thus she adopts their view. Scarcely does she hold a view because she has rigorously investigated a topic with reason and come to a conclusion she believes to be true; this is not impossible but I believe it improbable. ... Often when the veracity of a woman’s viewpoint is being challenged, if she believes her opinion to be true out of no more than an intuitive emotional conviction, she feels the validity of her emotion is being disputed rather than the credibility of her reasoning. ... [color=#000055][b]When a woman's reasoning is disputed, she oft perceives this as the invalidation of her emotion, the deprivation of her "right to feel" because her opinion and its hasty conclusion is oft founded upon an instinct or feeling rather than a deduction or investigation. .. Women have a tendency to defensively double down on their position when they feel bad, employing Machiavellian fallacy such as shaming (eg: reductio ad absurdum) rather than opening themselves to greater scrutiny and taking the time to step back and re-evaluate their opinion. ... Essentially, women trust their emotions far too much, they act on their emotions almost entirely without restraint, and often fail to question, analyse, check and hold their emotions to account. For a woman if it feels right then it is right, a woman does not consider that perhaps although some things feel good to hear or believe, they may be logically unsound, false, outright incorrect or otherwise verifiably false.[/b][/color] One can make such discernments by comparing how men and women back up their arguments, for example, an incorrect man is generally able to devise a chain of reasoning to explain his thinking, whilst a woman is scarcely capable of producing any such evidence of reasoning. Why? Because even when a man is wrong he's thinking in a way that is logically congruent even should his conclusion prove to be false. A woman on the other hand merely felt the thing to be true, so has no cogent basis for communicating why she believes her opinion to be correct,"it just is"!. ... [color=#000000]Closing / Relevant Reading:[/color] It appears to me that women just hold opinions, and that they have these opinions because they feel intuitively correct, and if anybody presents them with evidence counter to what they feel to be correct, rather than accept the evidence presented to them and adopt a world view more aligned with reality, they lash out and refuse to internalise the uncomfortable truth. Women would appear prone to correcting emotional inconsistencies rather than logical ones, that is rather, women are better adapted to coping with things than understanding them. Of course woman can understand things, it would be idiotic to claim otherwise, but an underlying ability to understand does not always translate to a desire to understand. ... Generally, a woman won't even make the attempt to understand something if she believes the truthfulness pertaining to it will upset her emotionally. ... In accordance with A woman is a woman whether she is very hypergamous, or a little hypergamous, consciously Machiavellian, or subconsciously Machiavellian. theory, .. I believe this to be true of all women but to differing frequencies, that is to say, some women are like this most of the time, whilst others are only some of the time. I'm not saying men are infallible and do not do blunder or even indulge in the exact same ignorance either, I believe they do, just with less frequency, reckless abandon and fervour than do we women. with so much of my thought on this. expect me to explain how conformity, shame and female evolutionary psychology almost compel women into Machiavellian/emotive responses rather than honest or logical ones. ... CC:IM ... “The heart has its reasons which reason knows not” ― Blaise Pascal. |
Masikay:SMH ...
|
Time and time again, be it a televised debate,Nairaland comments, a private argument or even in universities where the female IQ skews higher, I see little in the way of reason espoused by women. This does not mean women do not say correct or truthful things, but rather that they do not rationally deduce truth so much as they intuit it, intuition being the vague sensation that something feels or sounds right. ... Likewise women will hold untrue and irrational beliefs because said irrational thing feels good to believe. You should begin to see a pattern emerging here, whether a woman holds an opinion based in truth or an opinion that isn’t, this opinion is almost always held because it feels good to believe, or her peer group believes it and thus she adopts their view. Scarcely does she hold a view because she has rigorously investigated a topic with reason and come to a conclusion she believes to be true; this is not impossible but I believe it improbable. ... Often when the veracity of a woman’s viewpoint is being challenged, if she believes her opinion to be true out of no more than an intuitive emotional conviction, she feels the validity of her emotion is being disputed rather than the credibility of her reasoning. ... [color=#000055][b]When a woman's reasoning is disputed, she oft perceives this as the invalidation of her emotion, the deprivation of her "right to feel" because her opinion and its hasty conclusion is oft founded upon an instinct or feeling rather than a deduction or investigation. .. Women have a tendency to defensively double down on their position when they feel bad, employing Machiavellian fallacy such as shaming (eg: reductio ad absurdum) rather than opening themselves to greater scrutiny and taking the time to step back and re-evaluate their opinion. ... Essentially, women trust their emotions far too much, they act on their emotions almost entirely without restraint, and often fail to question, analyse, check and hold their emotions to account. For a woman if it feels right then it is right, a woman does not consider that perhaps although some things feel good to hear or believe, they may be logically unsound, false, outright incorrect or otherwise verifiably false.[/b][/color] One can make such discernments by comparing how men and women back up their arguments, for example, an incorrect man is generally able to devise a chain of reasoning to explain his thinking, whilst a woman is scarcely capable of producing any such evidence of reasoning. Why? Because even when a man is wrong he's thinking in a way that is logically congruent even should his conclusion prove to be false. A woman on the other hand merely felt the thing to be true, so has no cogent basis for communicating why she believes her opinion to be correct,"it just is"!. ... [color=#000000]Closing / Relevant Reading:[/color] It appears to me that women just hold opinions, and that they have these opinions because they feel intuitively correct, and if anybody presents them with evidence counter to what they feel to be correct, rather than accept the evidence presented to them and adopt a world view more aligned with reality, they lash out and refuse to internalise the uncomfortable truth. Women would appear prone to correcting emotional inconsistencies rather than logical ones, that is rather, women are better adapted to coping with things than understanding them. Of course woman can understand things, it would be idiotic to claim otherwise, but an underlying ability to understand does not always translate to a desire to understand. ... Generally, a woman won't even make the attempt to understand something if she believes the truthfulness pertaining to it will upset her emotionally. ... In accordance with A woman is a woman whether she is very hypergamous, or a little hypergamous, consciously Machiavellian, or subconsciously Machiavellian. theory, .. I believe this to be true of all women but to differing frequencies, that is to say, some women are like this most of the time, whilst others are only some of the time. I'm not saying men are infallible and do not do blunder or even indulge in the exact same ignorance either, I believe they do, just with less frequency, reckless abandon and fervour than do we women. with so much of my thought on this. expect me to explain how conformity, shame and female evolutionary psychology almost compel women into Machiavellian/emotive responses rather than honest or logical ones. ... CC:IM ... “The heart has its reasons which reason knows not” ― Blaise Pascal. |
TV01:DARKREBEL...in proving his "BUGOGU BANGO" sissy lifestyle-gallery, he keeps on wallowing in his piggydirth he tried so hard to escape-always contradicting himself..... ... Sir TV i think its a waste of time answering and lecturing these subjectively flawed moderntimes distortionists... |
uppa:sir, abeg is bet9ja not awarding first time bonus as stated on their site again? |
Oops....NA should act quickly to free this missing soldiers ooo...make their case no go be like Chibok Girls own.... ... Meanwhile...am sure If our NA soldiers should dedicate medicum of unwarrantable gra gra/trampling they show us the civilian in the street...to the boko haram-am sure boko haram would have been long gone.. ... Na civilian dem go dey do shakara for ... NA needs to desist from their crude way of relating with civilians.. you guys are meant to treat us like Gold ...then we can both end dis menace called boko haram together |
... But she killed Yu sha. 
Lol... That's a man. A cave man at that. The only thing he talks about is the superiority of men. And yea... I know the next thing is for him to google up incoherent insults at me. Do your normal nonsense, But don't quote me biko.