₦airaland Forum

Tessyama1:
From; Amagitesblog.com

A Nigerian man filmed himself crushing big brother Naija 2017 winner, Efe Ejeba's album.

This got actress, Tonto Dikeh livid and she has reacted and also reached out to Efe via her Instagram page.

Watch the video here; https://www.amagitesblog.com/2018/06/tonto-dikeh-livid-after-man-videos-himself-crushing-bbnaija-efes-album.html

EdificationBoss:
Nigerians really know how to show support and love for their own.

A total stranger sent ex-BBNaija housemate, Ifu Ennada a sum of one million naira to support her hair care business.

She shared with the caption:



http://newshelm.ng/photo-fan-sends-bbnaijas-ifu-1-million-naira-to-support-her-business/



https://newshelm.ng/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/img_1401.jpg
https://newshelm.ng/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/img_1402.jpg

post=68059802:
You're very dumb! And a bloody illiterate that many of your Jihadist fellow are and that's why you saw fanatics and still reply me. A responsible Muslim won't reply because he/she is not a fanatic. And that's why your empty brain will go ahead shedding blood because you cannot read, understand talk less of tolerating other religion.

Go back and read that post again, dummy!

maths1000:
Ah this kind of like deserves no forgiveness... How can this man be 23

post=68059575:
Go and join your bloody Jihadist in borno

post=68059575:
Go and join your bloody Jihadist in borno

post=68059435:
Another crazy fanatic spotted!

post=68052568:
That's how violent their god is. He punishes for merely breaking a fast. Bunch of crazy fanatics!

newsynews:
A Kuwait Islamic preacher, Mubarak al-Bathali has slammed Egyptian Liverpool player, Mohamed Salah, who got injured during the 2017/2018 UEFA Champions League final against Spanish giants, Real Madrid. Salah got himself injured during a tussle for the ball with Sergio Ramos leading to him sustaining a shoulder injury which ended his game in Kyiv.

Reacting to the incident, Mubarak al-Bathali claims Mohamed Salah suffered the blow due to him breaking his fast.

Muslim’s are allowed to break their fast for travel purposes, but the Kuwaiti preacher believes the highly rated player didn’t break his fast because of the journey from England to Ukraine but because of the match itself. He further claimed that ‘God punished him’ for eating before the match during Ramadan.

Mubarak al-Bathali wrote on Twitter:

“God punished him,”

“Unfortunately, [he will] bear the burden.

“Do not think the Muslim believes that life is managed by reason and effort, but life is the hand of God comes to whom he will, whether hard or not diligent.

“Perhaps the injury is good for you.

“Do not grieve, the door of repentance is open”.

The preacher also advised the player to consider his injury as a lesson and a reminder that everything happens by God’s will. “Preachers who said it is acceptable for him to break his fast have also permitted other things”, he said.

He also added that the star who is highly sorted by Real Madrid is considered an ambassador for Muslims who has changed the image of Muslims in the West. He also praised him for his other habits such as walking away when his teammates drink alcohol.

https://www.wotzup.ng/god-punished-mohamed-salah-fast/

cc lalasticlala

perez100:
Watch Buhari to send him to boko haram for more training. Islam produces more terrorists and they need Christ to have peace. Mohammed deceived them.

hammer6F:
THANK U O, MY SISTER, MAY GOD BLESS U.

THEY WANT TO KILL CHRISTIANS AND DONT WANT CHRISTIANS TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GETTING KILLED.

THAT IS THE HEIGHT OF WICKEDNESS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY, UNDER BUHARI.

Tracypacy:
If President Buhari pays you a surprise visit tomorrow Democracy Day and gives you the opportunity to ask for just ONE favour which must be GRANTED. What would you ask for ?

Tracypacy:
If President Buhari pays you a surprise visit tomorrow Democracy Day and gives you the opportunity to ask for just ONE favour which must be GRANTED. What would you ask for ?

AbuTwins:
Well, to you is your opinion! If you like believe Umar did an innovation by approving Tarawih in congregation, Na u sabi.

Umar will surely enter Jannah but whether you will get there is something no one is certain! I believe Umar meant Bidi'a in the linguistic sense and not the technical Shar'i sense!

As that is the case, they used to pray the qiyaam of Ramadan (i.e., Taraweeh) at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) both in congregation and individually. He said to them on the third or fourth night, when they gathered: “Nothing prevented me from coming out to join you except the fact that I would not like it to be made obligatory for you. So pray in your houses, for the best prayer a man can offer is in his house, except the prescribed obligatory prayers.”

So he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) explained the reason why he did not come out (to lead them in Taraweeh prayers), which was the fear that it might be made obligatory. Thus it is known that the reason for his coming out to join them was still valid, and that were it not for the fear of it being made obligatory, he would have come out to join them.

But at the time of ‘Umar’s caliphate, he (may Allah be pleased with him) united them behind a single reciter and put lamps in the mosque. This way of doing it – which was to gather in the mosque behind a single imam, with lamps in the mosque – was something that they had not done before, hence it was called an innovation, because it may be described as such in linguistic terms, but it was not an innovation in shar‘i terms, because the Sunnah indicates that it was a righteous deed, were it not for the fear that it might be made obligatory. Fear that it might be made obligatory ceased with the death of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), so there was no longer any reason not to do it.

End quote from Iqtida’ as-Siraat al-Mustaqeem (2/95-97)

Ibn Rajab (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

With regard to what was said by some of the earlier generations about regarding some innovations as good, that refers to innovation in the linguistic sense, not in the technical shar‘i sense. An example of that is what ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said, when he united the people in praying qiyaam in Ramadan behind a single imam in the mosque; when he came out and saw the people praying in that manner, he said: What a good innovation this is. And it was narrated from him that he said: If this is an innovation, then what a good innovation. What he meant was that this deed had not been done in this manner before this time, but it had a basis in Islamic teaching that may be referred to, such as the fact that the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) used to encourage and urge people to pray qiyaam in Ramadan. At his time, the people used to pray qiyaam in the mosque, in scattered groups and individually, and he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) led his companions in praying qiyaam in Ramadan for several nights. Then he stopped doing that, on the basis that he feared that it might be made obligatory for them, then they would be unable to do it, but there was no fear of that after he (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) died.

End quote from Jaami‘ al-‘Uloom wa’l-Hikam (2/783)

Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The scholars have explained that what ‘Umar meant by that was the linguistic sense, according to Arabic usage, because he (may Allah be pleased with him) united the people behind a single imam, whereas at the time of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and Abu Bakr as-Siddeeq they used to pray in scattered groups. During his time (may Allah be pleased with him), he united them behind a single imam; he passed by them one night as they were praying and said: What a good innovation this is, i.e., uniting them behind a single imam in an ongoing and organised fashion.

This has to do with the linguistic meaning according to Arabic usage; he did not mean that it was an innovations in the technical, shar‘i sense. It is not possible that he (may Allah be pleased with him) could have introduced or approved of (reprehensible) innovations.

End quote from Fataawa Noor ‘ala ad-Darb (3/33)

Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The words of ‘Umar, “What a good innovation this is”, do not refer to innovation in the technical shar‘i sense, which means introducing something into the religion with no precedent. Rather he was referring to innovation in a linguistic sense, which is something new that was not known before he introduced it. There can be no doubt that offering Taraweeh prayer in congregation behind a single imam was not known or practised during the caliphate of Abu Bakr and the first half of ‘Umar’s caliphate, so in that sense it was something new. But because it was in accordance with what the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) did, it is Sunnah and is not an innovation, and he only described it is good because of that.

End quote from Salaat at-Taraweeh (p. 50)

Empiree:
Not intend to cause any argument but I should tell you that Hadith posted by op, far as I'm concerned is questionable for a fact is appears to be in conflict with what nabi (saw) said or did regarding tarawih.




Rashduct4luv has quoted famous Hadith we all know. You can see they are contradicted. The Hadith posted by op is somehow making tarawih FARD. This is questionable. It doesn't matter who reported it, and it doesn't matter who graded it sahih.




It is also in conflict with another Hadith which recommended praying nawafil at home in isolation. So I see contradictions. It is absolutely not obligatory to offer all 20 or less rakat of tarawih behind imam.

trapQ:
Broke people always concerned about how rich people spend their money. Lol.

Otedola is worth over $1bn. If she decides to spend N1m everyday, that's N365m in a year which is just $1m. Stop worrying about her "falling DJ'ing career", her future is already secured. Is your own future secured?

IJOBA2:
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM A CERTIFICATELESS PROPHET OF ISLAM

Blackhawk03:
Call it whatever makes you happy, Sir. Those in question see beyond that.