Joseph1013's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Joseph1013's Profile › Joseph1013's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 (of 184 pages)
ramonchang:I think a more fundamental reason is the need to know. All tribes start off as being primitive in nature and therefore do not have a good knowledge of their natural environment. Their inability to explain some phenomena led them into the god-of-the-gap fallacy. |
frank317:Thanks boss. |
[b]THERE IS TETRAGRAMMATON OH! According to a Jewish tradition, the Jewish/Christian god’s divine name, the Tetragrammaton can be written but is too holy to be vocalized. Consequently, over the centuries, various substitutes mainly from the Hebrew orthography known as Niqqud (a system of diacritical signs used to represent vowels) were used to replace the divine name wherever יְהֹוָה appears in text form. Noted for coining a number of those replacement names were the Masoretes, a group of Jewish scribe-scholars who worked between the 6th and 10th centuries. The fear of vocalizing Tetragrammaton led to the Masoretes substituting the name with the now often used YHWH, (Yahweh), Adonai (“Lord” or “My Lord”) and Elohim (now define as "God" . The Masoretes subsequently inserted the Hebrew vowel points of Adonai to the Tetragrammaton, and the resulting form was transliterated (essentially a Latinization) around the 12th century as “Yehowah” and popularized as “Jehovah” in William Tyndale’s translation of the bible. Though the etymology of the word “God” is largely disputed, some ascribe it to ancient Teutonic pagan origin, however legend has it that Tyndale sought a word that captures the ruler of a vast expanse of land, the closest English equivalent being “Lord”…thus he coined “God” as a corruption of ‘Lord”. It is said that Tyndale’s work was probably made easier because, he was “so skilled in eight languages – Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Spanish, French, Italian, English, and German, that whichever he speaks, you might think it his native tongue!” Though this skill was sufficient to help in the translation, it was the advent of Gutenberg’s movable-type press that made printing of several copies of the newly translated bible possible. Of course, the Church considered Tyndale’s actions heretical and for his efforts, his translation of the bible (which has since become the root of all translations and to which we owe a number of English words) was banned on the orders of King Henry VIII and the Anglican Church. Tyndale was subsequently tried for heresy and treason, convicted, and on October 6, 1536 strangled and burnt at the stake in the prison yard. Thank Tetragrammaton for William Tyndale. There is Tetragrammaton oh![/b] |
An atheist worth $53Billion who is from a foreign country walked the streets of Lagos without armed bodyguards, but your Pastors who bathe and drink "blood" of Jesus, Yahweh, Peter and Paul daily, cant walk 3 streets in their own nation without mobile Police with guns and koboko as escorts. |
[b]TOUCH NOT MY ANOINTED The problem with translating a text from one language to another is that some words and phrases can never have an equivalent word or phrase in the other language. Most of the time, we are left with the translators bias or understanding of what he is translating. Now imagine the bible which has been translated over and over again through many languages before it got to English. Imagine the time span and the fact that some phrases which may make sense in a specific time and culture will not make sense in another time and therefore the translators will have no idea how to make it make sense in their time etc etc. There is also the context of politics too. Compilers and translators may have an agenda to promote and this certainly showed in the compilation of the New Testament.... Well, I'll just focus on CONTEXT right now and I will pick one example Touch not mine Anointed. This is the favourite phrase for Pastors who want to stifle criticism and their followers always deploy it with great effect. But, is this a case of taking a verse out of context? Let us see what the bible passage says... Psalms 105: 1-15 (NKJV)As can be seen clearly from the beginning of the Chapter, this verse is about Israel as a Nation and NOT about any individual person. The Psalmist here was praising Yahweh for keeping the Nation of Israel safe as per the covenant he made with the forefathers of the Israelites. Now this phrase has been taken out of context to suit the bias of shady pastors who want to stifle any criticism of their actions and words, and trust their followers to repeat after them like demented parrots. When religious people say that sceptics like to take passages of the bible out of context, I usually laugh because even they, most of time, have no idea what the right context of what they parrot is supposed to be. LOL![/b] |
PrinceAbinibi:Who is the first? |
Icon4s:Chai...we don tey for this site o. LOL |
[b]MY FAVOURITE BOOK IN THE BIBLE Contrary to what many of you think, atheists and sceptics don't think the bible has nothing good about it. There are some good stuff intermixed with all the other horrible stuff. Personally, the book of Ecclesiastics is my favourite bible book. Pretty much all its 12 chapters are personal favourites of mine. I can hardly find anything to criticise about the book, except well, King Solomon didn't actually write it. Going by the bible's own genealogy, it was written long after Solomon must have died. This book reads like the contemplation of an ancient philosopher. Someone who doesn't believe in the afterlife and who believes that this life is the one, the only one. Sounds familiar? Hehe. It is also interesting to note that in the whole of the Hebrew Scriptures(Old Testament), there is virtually no mention of the afterlife. God's wrath was swift and immediate. You f**k up, you get murdered on the spot. No delay, no afterlife punishment. No wonder Jews right till this time in Palestine and everywhere in the world don't believe in Hellfire. It was gentle Jesus meek and mild that introduced the concept of an eternity of afterlife reward or punishment in the New Testament. Ironic, isn't it? Anyway, back to the good stuff. In the last 2 verses of the last chapter there was a passage that tries to make it about God, which in my opinion sounds much like an afterthought. It said: "13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments, For this is man’s all. 14 For God will bring every work into judgment, Including every secret thing, Whether good or evil." Apart from this and the beginnings of the Book, this book gets an A+ from me.[/b] |
[b]AN ABSURDITY IN THE BIBLE Genesis 11:1-9 NKJVThe bible contains many instances of absurdities but the Towel of Babel story is my personal favourite In the biblical account of it, it started abruptly as is usual with most of the Genesis stories, without any idea who was telling the story, no situation in time, and no context in which to place the events surrounding the story. If I say this is another written oral folklore now, some people will get annoyed. Anyway, moving on... Why this story always make me laugh is two fold. 1) It says that Humans of that era decided to build a tower that will reach Heaven using Bricks and Asphalt! Apparently, people of that era thought that Heaven was just up there in the clouds and that a building made of only bricks could reach it. LOL! 2) Even more ridiculous is the fact that God saw their efforts and instead of ROTHFL(Rolling On The Heaven Floor Laughing), He(?) actually became concerned and decided to “Come down and see.” Take a moment to digest that… God came down to see the city. And what did he do next? He now said “Come, let us go...(who’s Us?)” E sah, it apyars God was talking to other gods in verse 7 o! Anyway, They went down and confused the language of the people so that they wouldn't build a city reaching heaven. Oh well, I'm sure since then Humans have never attempted to go beyond the skies again. God wouldn't allow that.... Oh wait! Seriously though, as a historical account of anything, this story is all shades of ridiculous. An omnipotent god wouldn't be so ‘un-omnipotent’, petty and insecure that he would have to “Come down and see….” Eeeeish! Besides, if you try to put this story in a chronological context, you would see that in Chapter 10 of Genesis, there was already an account of people speaking different languages. This story then would not even make sense as an explanation for why humans have diverse languages. The only way this story can make sense is if it is admitted that it was just a copied folktale that was just inserted randomly into the bible and only serves to give an account of Jewish Traditions. This explanation fits in well because a variation of this story appears in the Jewish Tanakh and also in other ancient manuscripts of that era. Clearly, it was a folk story from the culture of that era much like the ones we have here of how the Tortoise broke his back.[/b] |
These guys are just wicked. They even forcefully took over the official vehicle from his wife. This is no way to treat a national coach. |
TheGoodJoe:Please share a link. |
Some of the stuff I was reading about the Olympics and Nigeria's exploits in the golden years and spoke with you about yesterday, pastoraio. The current situation makes my heart bleed. spacyzuma, you may be interested in this. |
[b] A Typical Day in Nigeria[/b] |
PastorAIO:Some of these quotes are quite witty. Napoleon is lucky he wasn't born in the era of Genghis Khan, the terror. |
PastorAIO:[b]There is absolutely no questions about that. Luck has played a great role in the life of every successful person. During the Olympics, I was reading about Sprints and the winners. I learnt that genes play a great role. Countries whose indigenes are of West African origins are the only ones that can compete well in the 100m, 200m and 400m dashes. Those ones have won the genetic lottery. Those countries are LUCKY. As you can see, a country like Nigeria is there. In fact, in our golden years, we regularly feature in the finals of those dashes. The difference right now is how much we have exalted mediocrity to the detriment of hard work. I saw the Minister of Sport calling for Nigerians to pray for the athletes to succeed. Athletes he made no provisions for. Athletes that had to go online begging for funds to travel to Rio. He asked that we ask that God favours us and grant us victory. How absurd! Jamaica is lucky yet it has a national program centered around athletics in its secondary schools. People would be dazed at how much the government spend on those programmes. In summary, people who are consistently successful don't rely on luck. They are known for strategies bordering on hardwork. The more hardwork, the more luck. This 'luck' and 'hope' mentality is seen in all spheres of our national life. Merit has been subdued, it's all about favour, which is another word for Grace, which is another word for Luck. [/b] |
THE EXALTATION OF MEDIOCRITY "What else can I do to prove I am the greatest? I'm trying to be one of the greatest... "I have made the sport exciting, I have made people want to see the sport. I have put the sport on a different level." ~ Usain Bolt. This is not pride. This is not arrogance. This is honesty. This is self-confidence. This is him telling you that only YOU are responsible for your success and failure. Contrast the above to the average Nigerian mediocre response: "My brother, it's God ooo. In fact, I don't even know how the thing take happen. Na only God's grace ooo". This is not humility. It is exaltation of mediocrity. |
BascoVanVeli:It was a very scary sight. I first thought he had a heart attack with his movement and how the Romanian tried a mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. Glad it's not as serious...but I think it's a hamstring. Gutted! |
CHARLOE:This was one of your first statements: I've learnt a lot from atheists on nl, but just can't understand y u prefer throwing out d baby & d bbath water, even wen its obvious there's a baby in d bath water.I can argue that you are the one with the closed mind. You believe there is an intelligent designer. You didn't provide evidence. I stated u shld assume d creator is not perfect cos I no u wld 1 2 harp on a perfect god making imperfect things. Who told u he/she/it is perfect? Same religious books filled wit lies n half truths.Who told you the creator is not perfect? Can I see some evidence? Can u 4get d bible, quoran n any religious book n whatever dey say for a moment n look around u, observe ur body, nature; can u sincerely say there's no intelligent design n order in nature?No...nature does not suggest an intelligent designer. Those who say it have yet to provide evidence. We know that evolution is responsible for a great deal of what we see in nature. We have a great deal of knowledge about the formation of rocks, seas, land, clouds etc. They do not suggest intelligent design. If you say they do, please provide evidence. The human body is the ultimate proof of an unintelligent design. I said man has not bin able to, n u say am wrong n went on to say man cld in future, so hw am I wrong?That is the wrong coinage...you cannot infer that Man has not been able to do what he is actively in the process of doing. At best, you should say we are moving close to doing. An uninitiated mind would infer that we have tried and failed and have given up. This is clearly not the case. Did d scientists make/create d cell dat was cloned? Did they put d genes n all d components of d cell in it? Cloning is not creation, its building on an intelligent design. Call me when scientists develop a cell from scratch.Keep a close eye on a guy called Craig Venter. He is on the leading edge of artificial genomics research. He has already created an artificial genome that worked quite happily inside a natural cell. Like I said, you are impatient. Am sure u get d point i was trying to make wit d car.I have told you that your analogy is flawed. If anyone asks how a car came to being, we can point it to him/her. Can you point me the designer of the human body? We know Evolution is responsible for our development. We know that for a FACT. I've bin a xtian all my life but don't c myself as 1 anymore, am more of an agnostic theist or whichever way u 1 2 describe me, but def not atheist, ur argument against intelligent design n order is very weak n flawed.I'm really not interested in labels at this point. There are atheists who don't agree with evolution. That's their business. It's like saying Nigeria is not a country in Africa. Saying the argument is weak and flawed is merely your opinion. The proof for evolution is more than the proof for the cell theory or germ theory. I don't see theists try to argue about those two theories. |
goldfish80:You're the one mixing it up. You are the one confusing good for great. Perhaps it's just because your standards are ridiculously low. Ibrahimovic is a great player, he is also a legend. Thierry Henry was a great player...he is also a legend. Suarez is a great player...he is not a legend YET. See the difference? Griezman is good...not great. Stop throwing it around anyhow. |
[b]DID MOSES WRITE THE PENTATEUCH? The Pentateuch is the first five (5) books of the bible comprising Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy. It is popularly attributed to Moses as the author of them all but today I'd show how Moses couldn't have possibly been the author of those books and why a book that has an unknown author can't possibly lay claim to being divinely inspired. First of all, it is known among Scholars, Historians and Religious apologists that the writers of the Pentateuch were unknown and were at least 4 different people nicknamed the Jahwist, the Elohist, the Deuteronomist, and the Priestly source and that the books were compiled over many centuries. But, even though many christians would want to disregard this and still hold on to their belief that Moses wrote those books, I'll show from the bible itself that Moses could not have written them. First, the style of writing. Almost all the references concerning Moses were always in the third person. It's either “And the Lord spake unto Moses” or “Moses spoke to the people” “or the people spoke to Moses…” Contrast that with the letters of Paul to all the people he wrote to and how he addressed them. Also, nowhere in all the five books did Moses actually claim to have written the words contained in the books. The argument can be made that Moses could have written it himself in the third person as some writers do. Although that is a valid argument, it is not enough to establish with any certainty that it was so. It is merely a logical speculation and speculation alone is insufficient to establish the authorship of a supposedly divine work. In Numbers 12:3, it said “Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.” Now, there's no way Moses as an author will call himself the humblest man in the world. The mere mention of that fact disproves the idea that he was humble. No humble man says he's the humblest man in whole world. It's either he isn't humble or someone else wrote it. Another example is Deut. 34:5 “So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. 6 And He buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, opposite Beth Peor; but no one knows his grave to this day.” The last line of verse 6 actually says “no one knows his grave to this day” this can only mean that this was written long after Moses had died. It's like saying no one to this day knows the grave of Nnamdi Azikiwe. Azikiwe himself can't write about his own death and that no one can find his grave up until today. There are numerous examples I could give from the books themselves to show that these works could not have been written by Moses but I think these 2 examples can do. Now, why is this important? It is important because these passages supposedly contain direct messages from God and if what we are left with are reported accounts of things that may or may not happened many years after the fact, how then are we to say that they are true? Who wrote down these things? How do we know such a man called Moses ever walked the earth and actually did or said those things that were attributed to him? How do we know this anonymous narrator of the life of Moses didn't simply make up these stories? For example, there's no evidence of the Red Sea crossing anywhere in history. What else was made up to make the Hebrews look good? The book of Genesis actually reads like a written down version of long held Oral traditions. It begins abruptly “In the beginning…” which in today's vocabulary will sound like “once upon a time…” it had no narrator, no identification of the author and certainly no indication that this was even a divinely inspired narrative. How is this different from the Yoruba creation mythology? I could do this for many other Old Testament books, even the New Testament Gospels. They all bear the marks of anonymous, unknown authors. Sometimes more than one, like the book of Psalms and Isaiah. Right there inside these books are enough evidence that these are nothing more than written down Jewish Traditions. Again, as a divinely inspired book, the bible doesn't come close BUT as literature, it gives great insight into Ancient Jewish Culture.[/b] |
stephenmorris:I promise...when I get tired of this place... |
goldfish80:And the bolded is exactly is my point. At this stage, he is not fit to tie the laces of the shoes of Ronaldo, the Phenomenon, nor look into the face of the mercurial Zidane. At the moment, he is a good player, not a great player. When he is well into his 30s, we can compare notes. Stop disrespecting the word, 'Great'. It's reserved for proper legends. SMH |
BascoVanVeli:While a like for like comparison is foolishness, I believe you can compare their overall play and see who has had more impact. Buffon and Obafemi Martins do not play in the same position, but it's visible to the blind that Buffon has made a greater impact on the game. Therefore for a man to say Iniesta, who led Spain to dominate Europe and the World, and was a very pivot engine of the all-conquering Barcelona team, is inferior to Zlatan is travesty. I can't continue that kind of ridiculous discussion. |
goldfish80:You're trying too hard to be funny. If I don't think Aguero is great, wtf is Griezman. You lots use the word 'great' anyhow. Let me give you samples of great players in the game. Ronaldo, the Phenomenon, is great. Henry Thierry is great. Raul Gonzalez is great, Del Piero is great. Buffon is great. Pirlo is great. Roberto Carlos is great. Kanu Nwankwo is great. Show me how Griezman got on that list. Your standard indeed is quite low. I should have known from the moment you said Griezman is better than Aguero. |
goldfish80:One or two seasons of wonders does not a great player make, else Vardy and Kane would be great players. 'Great' has been roundly overused. May be not average, may be good. Not great! |
TheGoodJoe:This is where the discussion will end. I cannot continue with someone who thinks Iniesta's overall play is inferior to that of Zlatan. I cannot! I just can't. Bye sir! |
TheGoodJoe:You're the first person who I see mentions Zlatan in the same breath as Messi and Ronaldo. You are comparing them with him? Are you joking? Joking sturvs? |
TheGoodJoe:The reason is simple...he is not in the top 3 players in the world. He's not as good as Messi. He's not as good as Ronaldo. He was not as good as Iniesta. He was not as good as Ronaldinho. He was not as good as Xavi. So what's your point? |
goldfish80:The modern era does not have too many great strikers. Even players you rate above Aguero like Griezman are average strikers. I even rate Aguero more than Griezman and Lewan. But at best, they are all good players, nothing great about them. Others include Higuain. For modern great strikers, I only know about Zlatan and Suarez, and maybe Muller. |
TheGoodJoe:[b]That means you don't know Zlatan. Please, please...please. Don't compare Zlatan with Kun. Ever! Zlatan scores goals...incredible goals. And wins awards. Take a look: FIFA FIFPro World XI : 2013 UEFA Team of the Year: 2007, 2009 , 2013, 2014 Golden Foot: 2012 UEFA Euro Team of the Tournament : 2012 UEFA Champions League Most assists: 2012–13 UEFA Champions League Team of the Season : 2013–14 ESM Team of the Year: 2006–07, 2007–08 , 2012–13 , 2013–14 Serie A Footballer of the Year: 2008, 2009, 2011 Serie A Top Scorer: 2009, 2012 Serie A Foreign Footballer of the Year: 2005, 2008, 2009 Serie A Team of the Year: 2010–11, 2011–12 Ligue 1 Player of the Year: 2012– 13 , 2013–14, 2015–16 Ligue 1 Team of the Year: 2012–13, 2013–14, 2014–15, 2015–16 Swedish Male Athlete of the Year: 2008, 2010, 2013, 2015 UEFA Ultimate Team of the Year Can you remind me again about Kun's records compared to this? Ibrahimovic is one of the greatest strikers and his awards prove it. He'd have been top 3 except for the beasts of Messi and CR7. Choose another player please. [/b] |
TheGoodJoe:Aguero would not play in the first team at Barcelona. He is not as good as Messi, Suarez or Neymar, except he wants to get converted to the midfield. He would struggle to play at Madrid. Ronaldo, Bale and Benzema are better than him. Remember that the Higuain who regularly benches him at the Argentine setup was sold for Benzema. Aguero is a good player. He is not a great player. |
TheGoodJoe: We know that people are great through awards. How do we know Messi is great? How do we know Ronaldo is great? How do we know THierry Henry is great? Personal awards. Unless you say that the widely-read, widely-travelled, incredibly knowledgeable football analysts and statisticians are idi.ots. You speak about Kane. When did Kane get to the league? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 (of 184 pages)
. The Masoretes subsequently inserted the Hebrew vowel points of Adonai to the Tetragrammaton, and the resulting form was transliterated (essentially a Latinization) around the 12th century as “Yehowah” and popularized as “Jehovah” in William Tyndale’s translation of the bible.