₦airaland Forum

WHO ARE THE SHIA?
By Professor Hassanain Rajabali:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOHDyU0nz_k

WHY IMAM ALI (as) DID NOT TAKE OVER FADAK DURING HIS REIGN?:

http://islamquest.net/QuestionArchive/5580.aspx

Imam Ali (as)'s position on Fadak:

http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/fadak/en/chap5.php

The wisdom behind not reclaiming Fadak

We read in Sahih al Bukhari, Book of Knowledge Volume 1, Book 3, Number 128:

Narrated Aswad:
Ibn Az-Zubair said to me, "Ayesha used to tell you secretly a number of things. What did she tell you about the Ka'ba?" I replied, "She told me that once the Prophet said, 'O 'Ayesha! Had not your people been still close to the pre-Islamic period of ignorance (infidelity)! I would have dismantled the Ka'ba and would have made two doors in it; one for entrance and the other for exit." Later on Ibn Az-Zubair did the same.


Was it incumbent on Rasulullah (s) to re-design the Ka'aba, Yes or No? If it was not then why did Rasulullah (s) say 'Had not your people been still close to the pre-Islamic period of ignorance (infidelity)! I would have dismantled the Ka'ba and would have made two doors in it'. If it was compulsory then why did Rasulullah (s) fail to carry out this religious duty on account of his fear of the reaction by the newly converted Sahaba?

In his commentary of the above Hadeeth (destruction of the Ka'aba) Allamah Badr'adeen A'ini in his commentary of Sahih al Bukhari Umdah thul Qari Volume 1 page 615, Bab al Ilm makes an interesting comment:

"Ibn Bathil said that the following principle is established from the above Hadeeth, if 'Amr bil Maroof' (a good act is carried out), but the fear of Fitnah and anger from the people shall lead to its opposition, then the decision to order such a pious act should be abandoned".

Comment

According to this "Sunni principle" Imam Ali (as) not taking back Fadak was Amr bil Maroof (enjoining good), and if a good act (taking back Fadak)creates a fear of inciting anger and Fitnah (upheaval;strife) amongst the people leading to chaos in the society then it is permissible to abandon its implementation. Based on the facts, Imam 'Ali  (as) was in a difficult situation when it came to getting back Fadak, he knew that doing so would lead to open hatred and opposition from the followers of the first three Khalifas. It was this fear that led Imam 'Ali (as )to prefer to adhere to the Sunnah of Rasulullah (s) and maintain silence.

we do good for Allah's sake.if anyone is grateful,gratefulness to man is a sign of gratefulness to God who provides everything for man.

@Vedaxcool

TAQIYYAH IN THE HOLY QURAN (SIX QURANIC VERSES AS EVIDENCE):

the verses are:
-Surah 16 Verse 106
-Surah 3   Verse  28
-Surah 40 Verse  28
-Surah 18 Verse 19
-Surah  28 Verses 10-12
-Surah  12 Verses 4-5

WATCH "THE ARRIVALS" PART 1 TO 53 AND LEARN ALL ABOUT THE ILLUMINATI AND MIND CONTROL SYSTEMS:

PART 1 (INTRO):


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le_ySMrOkFU

PART 1:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaqybvymYIE&feature=related

Sweetnecta:
As sSalaamuaaykum, wa Rahmatullah [ikhwata iman wa Ukkta iman], let stop going after each other's throat, because of what divide us.

Lets concentrate on what unite us which are many; our Rabb, our deen, our kitab, our nabiyUlah karim [as], our qibla, etc, our destiny [jannah] and even greater than that; the Gazing to the Face of AlRahman, not what the hypocrites will have for the shortest time possible, but for what the mumin, mumina will have which is much much longer Gaze.

it is noble gesture if you allow a person to have the last word, even when it is clear to you that you are in the right.


please lets stop this unnecessary discuss. unity will make us strong, while division will make us easy picking for our enemy who has a singular agenda; the disunity of the muslims.

i ask the AlWadud to put love of one another in our hearts. Amin.

you sound good but unfortunately when someone is raising too many lies and confusion especially in issues related to religion,it is only normal that those lies and confusion be explained and clarified so that others would not repeat them.from my experience here,the same issues have being repeated over and over and i have responded to the same issues over and over.the simple fact is people are stereotypical and do not want to read and worse,they dont want to change or find it difficult to.

PLEASE THE MODS SHOULD FIX MY POST (WHICH DISAPPEARED) UNDER "LAGOSSHIA" WHICH IS A REPLY TO THE LAST POST OF "VEDAXCOOL" IMMEDIATELY BEFORE "SWEETNECTA'S".OR VEDAXCOOL SHOULD PLZ HAVE THE STRAIN OF GOING THROUGH MY PROFILE POSTS TO READ MY REPLY SO THAT ISSUES OF CONFUSION ON RELIGION PARTICULARLY WOULD BE CLARIFIED (REGARDLESS OUR DIFFERENCES ON POLITICAL ISSUES).

MESSAGE OF APPEAL (IN ENGLISH):


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXT_VCx3Xqo&feature=player_embedded#at=21

@hymen,

i deliberately posted that image for all to see because you have being spreading lies against innocent bahraini protesters asking for their rights.you have even gone as far as describing them and their leader "Mushaima" as "extremists".that is very unfair of you.

there is no "truth" you can show me from the weblink you posted above.the protesters started by peaceful protesting in the pearl roundabout in the thousands.it was the government forces that attacked and killed them every time.the people also have a right to defend themselves and rebel.if you're truly in bahrain and witnesses what happened you would not be spreading such propaganda here.or is it just biase? i for one have always advised my bahraini brothers that if they want to overthrow the monarchy and have a democracy,they cannot do that with peaceful protests.they need to take up arms to fight for their rights.there is a government in place who sees the shia asking for their rights as undeserving.they view the shia as not worthy of their human and citizen rights.many if not most of those security forces are not bahrainis but foreigners from majority sunni countries like india and pakistan who were naturalized and now stand pointing their guns against the bahraini shia.what is happening in bahrain is the peak of injustice and human rights abuse.you dont blame these innocent people if they take up guns to fight against those spraying them with bullets.dont blame them for that.

i replied to you earlier but my posts disappeared.you can go to my profile,check my posts and see the replies.then you can copy and answer to them.

@bilms

Undisputed Sunni References acknowledging that Imam Ali was the first to believe in the Prophet’s message:


Ibn Abi Shaybah and Ibn Asakir recorded on the authority of Salim Ibn Abi Jaad that he said: I asked of Muhammad Ibn Hanifah, "was Abu Bakr the first of the people to adopt Islam?" He replied: "No".

i still cannot post my replies.please a moderator should do something.

please a moderator should kindly restore my posts in response to "bilms".the spambot has deleted my posts.its me "LagosShia".

so now here is the [size=16pt]CHALLENGE[/size] for Mr. Abuzola! to explain to us the following SUNNI hadiths on the issue of the Quran:

1.)Sahih Bukari, Part VIII Page 208
published by Maktabul Jamhooriyyatul Arabiyyah, Cairo 1311AH

also found in
>>Itqan by Jalaluddin Suyuti
>>Muwatta by Imam Malik
>>Musnad of Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal ( 3 narrations on the same topic )

It is narrated that Umar said "if i had not feared that people would Accuse that umar has made an addition to the book of Allah, I would have written this in the quran, because a verse was revealed as follows "" When old men and women commit adultery, surely you stone them to death. This is a punishment from god and god is a severe punisher"".

so does Umar believe the Quran is missing or was altered?



2.) Tafseer e durre Manthur by Allamah Jalaluddeen Suyuti
>> also in Itqan
>>also in Mahazerat by Allamah Raghib Isfani

Ibne Anbari and Ibne Marduyah narrate that Ummul Momeneen Ayesha Said that "there were 200 verses in sura e ahzaab during the time of the prophet (saws). When Uthman wrote the quran more than this could not be FOUND "

so doesn't these sunni "sahih" sources show that the heroes of Abuzola! (like Aisha and Umar and the authors of the sunni so called "sahih" books of hadiths)actually believed in the alteration of the Quran and that it was changed?while the Shia he was baselessly pointing fingers against are the ones defending the authenticity of the Quran and its total protection from alteration!!!

SEE BELOW JUST A VERY FEW SHIA SOURCES AND SCHOLARS DEFEND AND PROPAGATE THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE QURAN AND ITS TOTAL PROTECTION FROM ANY ALTERATION:

1.)Authenticity of the Quran by Shaikh Muslim Bhanji:

http://www.al-islam.org/authen_of_the_quran/

2.)The Qur'an:Its Protection from Alteration by Sayyid Sa'eed Akhtar Rizvi:

http://www.al-islam.org/protection/

3.)The Qur'an in Islam by Sayyid Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i:

http://www.al-islam.org/quraninislam/index.htm

1.Why does shia accept temporary marriage?

Answer: the Prophet and the companions deemed it legal and Islam permits it.temporary marriage is called “nikah muta” or simply mut’a.it is recored that mut’a was performed even after the Prophet’s death and right into the time of Abu Bakr’s rule.it was during Umar’s rule that he banned.

2.)do you think it benefits the woman and man equally?

Answer:when practiced properly and for the right reasons and with the good intention and fear of God,yes it serves them equally.ofcourse no one will force anyone to do mut’a and there are conditions for such a marriage to be conducted and permitted.if those conditions are not met,then the marriage is void.the conditions are to protect the individuals involved.

3.)Is it being discouraged or is it growing?

Answer:it cannot be discouraged.accordingly,discouraging mut’a would be like discouraging any other act that is permitted in Islam like salat.we cannot discourage what the religion has allowed.ofcourse in the case of mut’a,it is not obligatory to perform it.but if you decide to do,there is no sin in it and it is allowed but must be performed properly and for the right reasons and caution must be taken.

On the question if it is growing,I do not honestly know because I don’t have facts and figures.

4.) What kind of people are more likely to practise it?

Answer:anyone can perform mut’a.widows,the youth and the divorced are more likely to perform mut’a and more reasonable if they do.

You can read more about mut’a marriage,here:

http://www.al-islam.org/search.php?selected_tab=&having=950604&cat=0&sid=858479772

Sweetnecta:
@LagosShia: « #119 on: Today at 12:01:27 PM »Which is greater and when wrong it is the Party that can punish; Allah or the Ahlul Bayt? If Allah says all sins are forgiven, then why are you not letting down on the Ahlul Bayt? Even the sin of Shirk is forgiven when a person repents. I dont understand how it is possible to carry Ahlul Bayt beyond shirk? May Allah guide all of us. Amin. He even said He forgave the messenger (AS). Now tell me what sin the messenger committed which he was forgiven by that verse? Tell me which sin[s] the Muhajiruun and and Ansaru (RA) committed needing the same verse to forgive them? Please be specific. At least I can talk to you because we are at least muslims, though your iman is much greater than mine. Perchance, I will learn alot from you. By the way, Allah also cleanse the muslims by mere collection of zakat. It is not the ahlul bayt alone that were cleansed. A man who forgives everyone that offended him before retired to bed was reported to be a man that is in Paradise by Muhammad (AS). Bilal bin Rabah (RA), according to you was not on the side of Ali bin Abi Talib (RA). But Muhammad in his Isra wa Miraj said he say Bilal Rabah in Paradise. This and many others refute placing blames on those who do not support Ali and making the disagreement worthy of hellfire against those who were not on the side of Ali. I wonder why you will even accept that the wife of your prophet will end up in hell? May Allah guide our hearts. Amin.

Please let me first start by telling you that I don’t think my iman is greater than yours because Allah knows best.there is no human barometer for iman.only Allah knows what is in our hearts.

I have explained earlier on to you that there are types of sins which Allah Himself will not forgive because they are not committed against him but men commit those sins against fellow men.it is therefore part of the justice of Allah that only fellow men forgive fellow men.

For example if a good person commit a sin against a bad person,the hasanat (blessings/good deeds) of the good person would be taken and given to the bad person to compensate him on the judgement day.if a bad person commit a sin against a good person and that bad person has no hasanat,then the sayyiaat (bad deeds) of the good person would be erased and added to that of the bad person.as muslims,we believe in the mizan (the scale).we believe in the book that would be handed over to us on judgement day.

Therefore,when a man commit a sin against Allah,Allah has set criteria for them to repent and be forgiven.as in the case of Abu Bakr,the sin they committed was not only limited to disobey of Allah and the order of the Messenger.they inflicted pain on the Ahlul-Bayt and took away their right.if Allah wants to forive Abu Bakr,who am I to tell Allah no?!!!that is not my decision.what is between Allah and His servant,no other servant has the right to pass judgement of heaven and hell.

As for the crimes commited against the Ahlul-Bayt,we should know that we as muslims,it is our duty to promote good and forbid evil as the Quran orders us.therefore,when the family of the Prophet are being maltreated and victimized and their right bestowed by Allah upon them is taken,it is our duty to denounce those who have done them harm.in this case,for the crimes committed against the Ahlul-Bayt,it is the members of the Ahlul-Bayt that will decide on Qiyama whether to tell Allah that they have forgiven those who did harm to them or whether Allah should punish them for what they did to the family of the Prophet.however in this world,if we still go on and say we love those criminals who hurt the family of the Prophet,then we are supporting the criminals and ignoring the pain of the Ahlul-Bayt.that is beyond us and it is a sin for us to do.that is why you see me and the shia stand up and say we love the Ahlul-Bayt and therefore we cannot also love those who harm them.whatever judgement is passed on the Qiyama,we have to do what is right presently.

As for the issue of repentance,there is no greater lesson of repentance that can be learnt and forgiveness that can be emulated than from the battle of Karbala.the commander of Yazeed who cut the road on Imam Hussain and besieged him,later on changed sides and switch mind and rushed to the side of Imam Hussain.he asked Imam Hussain to forgive him and repented.the Imam did and this commander in the name of Hur was the first to be killed fighting for Imam Hussain,the man he besieged.he died fighting for Imam Hussain against the forces he led just a matter of hours before.that is the spirit of islam and that is the spirit of the Ahlul-Bayt and that is what Allah taught us in the Quran.

As for the case of abu bakr and the others who hurt the Ahlul-Bayt,we cannot decide anyone’s fate but we can stand with good and shun evil or at least speak our against it.if they will be forgiven,that is on Qiyama.but in this world,we know what they did was bad and we dislike that and we love the Ahlul-Bayt and dislike those who hurt them.we also learn from the Quran that those who die without repentance will not be forgive.in the case of abu bakr,Fatima,the Prophet’s daughter died and she was buried at night.the Prophet said “anyone who hurt Fatima has hurt me and who hurts me has hurt Allah”.Fatima was buried at night because she was hurt and angry from abu bakr.she died with a grudge against him.she said she will always curse him.also,abu bakr died while the caliphate was not returned to its rightful owner,i.e. Imam Ali.i will not decide on his fate but definitely I am against anyone who hurt the Ahlul-Bayt.i am innocent of anyone who hurts the Ahlul-Bayt.i disassociate myself from anyone who hurts the Ahlul-Bayt.i hate those who hated the Ahlul-Bayt and send the curse upon those who were opponents and enemies of the Ahlul-Bayt.i believe this is straightforward and islamic and justified and logical.and every muslim must do the same.dont you sent blessings upong the Ahlul-Bayt when you pray?dont you say “Allahumma Salli Ala Muhammad Wa Alli Muhammad” (may Alllah bless Muhammad and the Family of Muhammad) in your prayer?that is the prayer known as salat al-Ibrahimiyya.

As for the Prophet being forgiven his past and future sins,those verses were revealed to vindicate the Prophet from th mouths of the pagans.the pagans used to ascribe abomination to the Prophet for standing against their gods.they deemed the Prophet evil for standing up to idolatry and the tradition of their forefathers.also the Prophet led wars against the kuffar.therefore Allah is telling them and everyone that Muhammad (sa) never committed a sin.otherwise how can it make sense by telling someone his future sins are forgiven when they have not being committed?is that a blank cheque to sin?no!!!!that is to tell you that the Prophet is sinless.in shia islam we believe in the complete sinlessness of the Prophets and the 12 imams.we believe they don’t commit sin.they are not robots but they have knowledge and are purified from sin.from the fear of Allah they have they don’t commit sin.

In this line,if a muslim dies today,can he be held reliable for not praying the salat of tomorrow?no!!!therefore it is only logical that there is a deeper meaning when Allah is telling the Prophet that even his future sins are forgiven.its because Muhammad does not sin against Allah.the Quran in surat an-Najm describe the Prophet in high esteem that no human being have being described.

As for those your hadith have given visa to paradise,some or most of those hadith are faulty.and those that are not faulty should be examined very well.as for hell fire,Allah will decide that.but don’t be surprised if Aisha or Abu Bakr end up in hell or even if I myself end up there.the essence of this life according to islam is for trials and tribulations.even when you are given wealth and riches that is a trial.even when you’re comfortable in your home,that is a trial.the wives of previous prophet (Noah and Lot) were condemned.the son of Noah was condemned and he drowned and Allah told Noah that “he is not from you”!!!

If someone has being granted paradise when the person is still alive,one would definitely think that those people have being granted perfection.Allah cannot give you paradise when yet you can still misbehave and commit major sins.is Allah granting you a password to sin?take the christians for example who say that they are saved because Jesus died for their sins.are the christians sinless today?what about those christians who sin and commit evil and still believe in the precarious sacrifice?would they not be judged?is anyone above judgement?for as long as we live,we are prone to sin and we will be judged for our actions.those you hadiths say were granted paradise were later on far from perfection and were corrupt.take Usthman’s rule for example who even sunnis accept was corrupt and he favored his relatives when he was in power.we can only say that those who were aroung the messenger have a higher responsibility to act better than us and they should be exemplary.if not then they are worse because they have met the Prophet himself.

This verse has nothing to do with the verse that I quoted. I also had earlier this week or last quoted verses and then a hadith that supports the view that the people who fought in Badr were forgiven of all their sins, including future sins. This was the reason Hatib (RA) was not killed for spying for the Makkans.
Further, a mere fast on the day of Arafat is a means of forgiving the sin[s] of the future for 1 year. Imagine the actual battle of Badr should be less! Yet even in our present day, there are many events tat you can be involved in that will equal in value. You are my imam. But there is no imam that knows everything. The only one who came close told us that the meaning of Alif Laaam Miiim of Surah Baqarah and others like it are known to Allah, Alone.

The people who fought in badr and those with the Prophet were forgiven their past sins.that is fine with me.as for future sins,I don’t think so.only the Prophet is mentioned in the Quran in surat al-fath to have being forgiven even future sins.that is because only the Prophet among those sahaba is faultless.in the Quran we read in more than one place,how Allah questioned and cautioned and warned the sahaba.teh foremost that can come to my mine is Umar.Umar abandoned the Prophet in the battle of Uhud because there was rumor that the Prophet was killed.the Quran then says:

Many Messengers have gone before him; if then he dies or is killed, will you turn back upon your heels?" [3:144]

This shows that if they turn back upon their heels into disbelief,then the consequences would be there.we cannot say Allah forgave anyone their future other than the sinless and chosen Prophets and Messengers and Imams.

When we do acts of Ibadah we are rewarded greatly no doubt.i have already explained how hisab (account) works.we also know that there is minor and major sin.the justice of Allah is perfect.nontheless,we as individuals must shun evil and enjoin good and love the good people and dislike the bad people.its part of taqwa.you just cannot do evil and still say I have fasted and prayed and gone to hajj.when I say evil,I don’t even mean things like fornicating and drinking.am not about harming others and not just harming oneself.harming oneslf and neglecting your duty to Allah,Allah will call you to order for that.harming others and taking their right Allah will judge you for that and unless the ones you harmed for give you,you will be held accountable.its either your goodness would be reduced and given the person you harmed or your bad deeds would be added to from the bad deeds of the person you harmed.read surat al-Zilzal:he who does an atom weight of good shall reap it and he who does an atom weight of evil shall reap it.

ENGLISH LECTURES:

1.) Maqtal (Killing) of Imam al-Husayn [a] - Sheikh Hamza Sodagar | Day of Ashura - Muharram 1432:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md14KQtBznA



2.) Balancing Logic & Emotion - Hajj Hassanain Rajabali | Lecture 08 Muharram 1432 2010 [HD]:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkBi9Ev0j8c

Abuzola !:
Mr man if you cannot support your lie with any hadith pls shut up and stop tarnishing the family of the Prophet. You are indeed pathetic, wikipedia is now part of your proof, lol, is it not wiki that said Prophet muhammad was a cunning propagandist, too bad for you.

you actually think that stretching your mouth wider constitute proof for your case and using adjective is what will convince people.
how is it mt problem that you dont recognize your books?i have given hadith,you said those are not hadith.the below hadith was part of what i presented.you talk like a fool.how can you accuse me of tranishing the Prophet's family?are you stupid?may God punish you!!!what did i say from my own that i tarnish anyone?
as for wikipedia,they can say what they like.i will read everything and use my god-given brain to know truth from falsehood.and besides i dont blame wikipedia.the myth that are full in sunni hadith books have what is worse about the Prophet (sa).the kuffar actually go and search your mythical and fake hadith to attack islam and the Prophet.take for example the story of the satanic verses.that fabricated story is found in your book called Tabari.

here is the hadith one last time.if you want to be ignorant i will move on:
Usdul Ghaba fi Marafat e Sahaba:
“The Prophet(s) had married Ruqiyyah with Utba bin Abi Laheb kaafir and the sister of Ruqiyyah i.e Ume Kulthoom with Uteeba bin Abi Laheb kaafir. When [to counter Abu Laheb] Surah Tabata was revealed, Utba’s and Uteebaa’s father Abu Laheb and mother Ume Jameel asked them to separate [means to divorce] both the daughters of Muhammad(s). Hence they divorced them without making relations with them, this was a grace from Allah (swt) for both Ruqiyyah and Ume Kulthoom and a disgrace for both Utba and Uteeba. Then Uthman bin Affan married Ruqiyyah in Makkah and Ruqiyyah along with Uthman migrated towards Habshah”

@Abu Zola!

here is evidence for Sayyida Fatima's protest firstly from the mouth of your beloved aisha (now tell me who is the thief,Sayyida Fatima or abu bakr):

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 325:

Narrated 'Ayesha: (mother of the believers) After the death of Allah's Apostle Fatima the daughter of Allah's Apostle asked Abu Bakr As-Siddiq to give her, her share of inheritance from what Allah's Apostle had left of the Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting) which Allah had given him. Abu Bakr said to her, "Allah's Apostle said, 'Our property will not be inherited, whatever we (i.e. prophets) leave is Sadaqah (to be used for charity)." Fatima, the daughter of Allah's Apostle got angry and stopped speaking to Abu Bakr, and continued assuming that attitude till she died. Fatima remained alive for six months after the death of Allah's Apostle.


the sermon of Fatima (as) in the masjid an-nabawi in protest to abu bakr is long and i will post it and i hope it doesnt disappear as a spam post.you can find it in these references:

[1] Al-Ihtijaj, vol. 1 p. 132-141, Sharh Nahjol Balagha by Ibn Abil Hadeed, vol. 16 p. 210, Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 29 p.216. Some other Historians and scholars mentioned parts from this sermon such as: al-Mas’udi in Murooj ath-Thahab vol. 2 p.311, Ibn Mandhur in Lisan al-Arab vol. 12 p.,331, Kahhalah in A’lam an-Nisa’ vol. 4 p. 116-119, Ibn Tayfur in Balaghat an-Nisa’ p. 414, Ibn Tawus in Kitab at-Tara’if p. 263, Ibn al-Atheer in Ghareeb al-Hadith vol. 4 p. 273.

(my initial reply to you with "LagosShia" has disappeared and my account disabled)

Abuzola !:
Shia shia shia, how many times did i call you, now i believe 100% that you are restless and conceded. You don't even know what to say, lol. ALLAHU AKBAR !

You just go round about pretending, up sunnah !

Ladies and gentlemen, shia has no more point thats why he retorted to use another I.D so as to evade my current challenge, that it is prophethood that was inherited and not property, the verse he quoted above is the proof.
He again had to lie that fatimah quoted the verses, if you ask him for proof he will quote a write up by some individual which i know many of you including me never heard of their name before, saying it is the hadith. Shine your eyes, shia is a dangerous sect like you now know,

the problem with you is that you keep assuming.brother "Muharram" is not me.both of us decided to come to this forum from shiachat.com

i do have other ID's which i use when need be,like when i am banned with this one."LagosShia" is my main one.thanks to brother "Muharram" for making his presence felt.


i presented you verses which you say you want without much talk.the verses talk about inheritance.i dont know where you see "prophethood" in those verses.the verses are talking about prophets being inherited by their children.

it is not my fault that you dont even know the names of your books.you likely have the idea that aside from the 6 sahih books,sunnis dont have any other reliable hadith books.that is not my fault sincerely.you have to acquire knowledge.stop parroting rhetoric and expose your ignorance.i have not declined once in presenting you with evidnce.but you keep jumping up and down.

Abuzola !:
You must be sick to expect me to believe your gibberish factitious sporus hadith, in your village you may regard those nonsense as hadith but not here. This shows how ill educated you are, to believe silly write up by unknown people. What a pity.

first thank God you saw my post.i have replied to your earlier post thrice but they keep disappearing.

so you are confessing that sunnis have fictitious and gibberish hadiths?those hadiths were not authored by me nor written by my father.you asked for hadith i showed you.when they prove you wrong you either conceal or deny them.

As for the rest of your rambling i leave it to viewers to read and judge it themselves coz what you did is just incentive and pretexting, silly excuses, i got no time for that. That remind me, we didn't see you yesterday, have u slap your face like an slowpoke, beat your body like a paranoid man and weep like a two years old boy , this is an ethic of shia on Ashura Day, a day of mourning for them instead of fasting and jubilating that it is a Day which Allah showed mercy to bani Isra'ila, as for me am happy he died on Ashura bcoz Ashura is a great Day, so i thank God that he died on a day of mercy. The Holy Prophet warn us on slapping, beating ourselves like the time of the jahiliya when mourning, in sahh bukhari. Though i know you do not believe in sahih bukhari. Hahahaha, ignorant people, Up Abubakar, umar, uthman, Aisha, Muawyya, Yazeed, hassan, and hussein.

you're a fool who does not even know his own beliefs based on his sect.you're chanting like a mad person who would say :"up hitler,up jews"!!!does that make sense?yazeed and Imam Hussain are two opposites.

bani ummayya have thought you well how to celebrate ashura.they have fabricated hadith to distort the significance of ashura and conceal the revolution of Imam Hussain against tyranny and injustice.ashura is a sad day.we will always remember Imam Hussain.we dont mourn like jahiliyya.rather we commemorate an event dear to our heart that rescued Islam from the chains of the tyrant.

no one is inviting you to cry.but as for us,we will continue to cry and mourn for Imam Hussain.it was through his sacrifice that Islam survived.crying and weeping are acts of taqwa and not jahiliyya.you can see examples of that in the Quran.that is if you understand what you read from the Quran.

we dont mourn like jahiliyya who cry because they dont believe in Qiyama (resurrection).we are commomerating a great event that is sad.for our relatives we dont mourn more than 3 days.but that doesnt mean you cannot remember the dead.even your Umar used to remember his brother after years and cry for him.

Is Fatimah immune not to make mistake and be corrected by her elders, Abubakar and umar ? Guy reason, reason. May Allah show us the right path amin

asking me to reason on the issue is like asking the Prophet Muhammad to reason (God forbid!).it was the Prophet that said that what angers Fatima angers Allah.you should ask him why he said that?doesnt she make mistake?

so you should ask the Prophet that question.i am only obeying the Prophet!

or are you under-estimating the upbringing and manners the Prophet gave Fatima?

being an elder does not mean you are wise or always right!!!

depiction of Imam Hussain (as) holding his matyred baby in the battle of karbala:

https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1190.snc4/154263_174746629217355_100000460578116_511666_1776217_n.jpg

Umar’s assault against the house of Sayyidah Fatimah (as)

Abu Muhammad Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaybah (d. 276 Hijri) who in his famous book al Imama wa al Siyasa pages 18-28 states as follows:

Abu Bakr was after group of people who failed to give bayya and gathered with Ali, he sent Umar in their direction. He (Umar) called them to come out from the house of Ali, but they refused to come out. Thus (Umar) asked (his men) to bring wood, then he said: 'I swear by He who controls the life of Umar, if you people do not come out of the house I shall set fire to it, and everyone inside shall perish. Some people said: 'O Abu Hafs (Umar), Fatima is also in this house'. Umar replied, 'I do not care' Then the people came out from the house and gave bayya except Ali.
Al-Imama Walsiyasa Page 12


The most renowned Sunni historian Ibn Jareer al Tabari recorded the event of Umar threatening the house of Imam Ali (as) and Sayyidah Fatima (as),the Prophet's beloved daughter,with fire. We read in al Tabari (English translation), Volume 9 page 187:

Ibn Humayd - Jarir - Mughirah - Ziyad b. Kulayb:Umar Ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Ali. Talha and Zubair and some of the immigrants were also in the house. Umar cried out: "By God, either you come out to render the oath of allegiance, or I will set the house on fire." al-Zubair came out with his sword drawn. As he stumbled (upon something), the sword fell from his hand so they jumped over him and seized him."
History of al-Tabari, Volume 9 page 187

Umar’s assault against the house of Sayyidah Fatimah (as)
Abu Muhammad Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaybah (d. 276 Hijri) who in his famous book al Imama wa al Siyasa pages 18-28 states as follows:

Abu Bakr was after group of people who failed to give bayya and gathered with Ali, he sent Umar in their direction. He (Umar) called them to come out from the house of Ali, but they refused to come out. Thus (Umar) asked (his men) to bring wood, then he said: 'I swear by He who controls the life of Umar, if you people do not come out of the house I shall set fire to it, and everyone inside shall perish. Some people said: 'O Abu Hafs (Umar), Fatima is also in this house'. Umar replied, 'I do not care' Then the people came out from the house and gave bayya except Ali.
Al-Imama Walsiyasa Page 12

Abu Muhammad Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaybah (d. 276 Hijri) who in his famous book al Imama wa al Siyasa pages 18-28 states as follows:

Abu Bakr was after group of people who failed to give bayya and gathered with Ali, he sent Umar in their direction. He (Umar) called them to come out from the house of Ali, but they refused to come out. Thus (Umar) asked (his men) to bring wood, then he said: 'I swear by He who controls the life of Umar, if you people do not come out of the house I shall set fire to it, and everyone inside shall perish. Some people said: 'O Abu Hafs (Umar), Fatima is also in this house'. Umar replied, 'I do not care' Then the people came out from the house and gave bayya except Ali.
Al-Imama Walsiyasa Page 12


The most renowned Sunni historian Ibn Jareer al Tabari recorded the event of Umar threatening the house of Imam Ali (as) and Sayyidah Fatima (as),the Prophet's beloved daughter,with fire. We read in al Tabari (English translation), Volume 9 page 187:

Ibn Humayd - Jarir - Mughirah - Ziyad b. Kulayb:Umar Ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Ali. Talha and Zubair and some of the immigrants were also in the house. Umar cried out: "By God, either you come out to render the oath of allegiance, or I will set the house on fire." al-Zubair came out with his sword drawn. As he stumbled (upon something), the sword fell from his hand so they jumped over him and seized him."
History of al-Tabari, Volume 9 page 187

Abuzola !:
What a blatant liar, show me the names of Abubakar , umar and uthman in the Quran being condemn, you should be ashame of yourself for clinging to such a baseless and unfounded rhetoric lie,

as for sahih bukhari and muslim, yeah everything is intact, authentic hadith, maybe u should check the meaning of 'sahih' since you lack knowledge.

how can i show you when i do not say that they were mentioned in the Quran.how can i also show you when i dont say they were usurpers in the time of the Prophet.it all happnened after the Prophet and i can show you the words of the Prophet to that effect from your books:

Musnad Ibn Hanbal Volume 12 page 128, (printed Egypt) under the Chapter Musnad Abdullah bin Umro bin Aas:

Abdullah narrates at that time of the sun rising I was sitting next to Rasulullah (s) who said 'Allah (swt) shall raise a people with a leader on The Day of Judgement whose faces shall shine like the sun. Abu Bakr said 'O Rasulullah (s) are we those people?' He replied 'No these are the poor and the Muhajireen are famous on the Earth'.


Sahih Bukhari, Hadeeth: 8.578:

Narrated 'Abdullah:
The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount". 'Abdullah added: The Prophet said, "I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount, and some of you will be brought in front of me till I will see them and then they will be taken away from me and I will say, 'O Lord, my companions!' It will be said, 'you do not know what they did after you had left.'

in the days of the Prophet,during the battle of uhud,it was umar who abandoned the Prophet and the Quran condemned:

Muhammad is but a messenger, messengers (the like of whom) have passed away before him. Will it be that, when he dieth or is slain, ye will turn back on your heels? He who turneth back on doth no hurt to Allah, and Allah will reward the thankful(Holy Quran 3:144)


as for your sahih,i dont have all the time to delve into it and bring out for you stupid hadiths that defames islam.but i will contain myself with the one i quoted above for you to first accept.anyone can call anything "sahih",that does not make it "sahih".

i feel your pain.you get frustrated easily and you start to throw insults and being rude for seeing the truth with your two eyes.pele!

THE INFALLIBLES


Household of the Prophet

This section of Al-Islam.org contains information about the Most Noble Messenger, Muhammad, his household (Ahlul bayt), and their companions, peace be upon them all.

The Ahlul Bayt or household of the Prophet Muhammad - peace be upon him and his household [pbuh] - refers to his daughter Fatima al-Zahra, his successor and son-in-law, Imam Ali, their two sons Imam Hasan and Imam Husayn, and the nine Imams from the lineage of Imam Husayn, peace be upon them all.

The Holy Qur'an

Regarding them, Allah (God), the most Glorified and High, says in the Holy Qur'an:
, Allah only desires to keep away the uncleanness from you, O people of the House! and to purify you a (thorough) purifying,
[Source: The Holy Qur'an, translated by M. H. Shakir, Chapter 33, verse 33]


Muhammad [pbuh], the Prophet of Islam

The Prophet of Islam [peace upon him and his household], in the well-attested tradition called Hadith al-Thaqalayn said:


Verily, I am leaving behind two precious things (thaqalayn) among you: the Book of God and my kindred (`itrah), my household (Ahl al¬Bayt), for indeed, the two will never separate until they come back to me by the Pond (of al¬Kawthar on the Judgement's Day).
[Source: Please see Hadith al-Thaqalayn: A Study of its Tawatur]

Ali [a], the first Imam, successor to the Prophet

", We the people of the house (of the Prophet - Ahlul bayt) possess the doors of wisdom and light of governance. Beware that the paths of religion are one and its highways are straight. He who follows them achieves (the aim) and secures (the objective). And he who stood away from it went astray and incurred repentance." [Nahj-al-Balagha Sermon 119]

"We are the near ones, companions, treasure holders and doors (to the Sunnah). Houses are not entered save through their doors. Whoever enters them from other than the door is called a thief." [Sermon 153]

"Where are those who falsely and unjustly claimed that they are deeply versed in knowledge, as against us, although Allah raised us in position and kept them down, bestowed upon us knowledge but deprived them, and entered us (in the fortress of knowledge) but kept them out. With us guidance is to be sought and blindness (of misguidance) is to be changed into brightness. Surely Imams (divine leaders) will be from the Quraysh. They have been planted in this line through Hashim. It would not suit others nor would others be suitable as heads of affairs." [Sermon 143]
[Source: Nahjul Balagha, translated by Syed Ali Raza]

"We are lights of the heavens and the earth and the ships of salvation. We are the repository of knowledge, and towards us is the home-coming of all the matters. Through our Mahdi all (false) arguments shall be refuted, and he is the seal of the Imams, the deliverer of the Ummah, and the extremity of the light. Happy are those who hold on to our handle and are brought together upon our love.
[Source: Sibt Ibn al-Jawzi, Tadhkirat al-khawass, p. 138]

Therefore, based on the above and other lines of evidence, it is the belief of Islam that the Holy Prophet and his family [peace be upon them] were blessed by Allah and purified to the level of being pure and sinless throughout their distinguished lives.


source:
http://www.al-islam.org/masoom/main.html

https://islamicinsights.com/images/stories/Shaikh_Husayn.JPG
Shaikh Husayn El-Mekki



How Does Ashura Affect Me?
Sunday, 27 July 2008 22:35 Shaikh Husayn El-Mekki Abdullah-Aziz .47


The Book and the Holy Progeny

In a Mutawatir (corroborated) tradition from the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his progeny), it is narrated, "Verily, I am leaving behind two precious things (Thaqalayn) among you: the Book of God (the Holy Qur'an) and my kindred (Itra), my household (the Ahlul Bayt), for indeed, the two will never separate until they come back to me by the pond [of al­-Kawthar on Judgment Day]."

The message of the Book, the Holy Qur'an, which the Prophet Muhammad spoke of was carried out, propagated, and upheld by the immaculate Imams (peace be upon them), who are this same Itra whom the Prophet had referred to.

Amongst our beloved Saint Imams who were truly valiant heroes, we see the clearly illustrated actions of obedience and submission to the Book as evident in the characteristics of our third Imam, Hussain the son of Ali, the Commander of the Faithful (peace be upon them both). This is surely why the Prophet Muhammad, the greatest of Allah's creation, was regarded as saying "Hussain is from me, and I am from Hussain." Imam Hussain carried out his duties as a Muslim and a believer throughout his lifetime. And he followed in the footsteps of his grandfather, the Apostle of God, just as it encourages us to do in the Noble Qur'an on so many occasions.

Shaikh al-Mufid quotes in his Kitab al-Irshad a letter which Imam Hussain would write to the people of Kufa prior to him accepting their invitation and embarking toward Kufa, he identifies and distinguishes his duties as an Imam. In the closing of that letter, Imam Hussain states, "If he (Muslim the son of Aqeel) writes to me that the opinion of your leaders and of the men of wisdom and merit among you is united in the same way as the messengers who have come to me have described, and as I have read in your letters, I will come to you speedily, God willing. For by my life, what is the Imam except one who judges by the Book, one who upholds justice, one who professes the religion of truth, and one who dedicates himself to the essence of God."

Imam Hussain carried out these duties of an Imam for the pleasure of Allah, and as a result today, Muslims throughout the world – in Nigeria, Iran, the United Kingdom, the United States, Indonesia Australia, Colombia, and countless other countries, Muslims across the globe, be they in remote villages or huge cities – mourn and remember the tragic day of Ashura which marks the martyrdom of Imam Hussain and so many of his faithful companions and family.

The Effect of Ashura

The quintessential element of man's ability to reach proximity towards God is also one of the most unique and powerful instruments man possesses: the human heart. What feeling does one feel when he hears or sees tragedies occurring throughout the world? We see many of mankind join in unison on many occasions when they feel a tragedy has come upon others, whether it is incidents such as "Columbine High", "September 11th", the Katrina hurricane, or numerous innocent women and children being killed in Palestine or Iraq.

How heavy does one's heart feel when he is brought the news of the death of a relative or perhaps a dear family member? How much more pain does one express when they know that the death of this family member was resulted in a tragic or catastrophic manner?

When I think about the day of Ashura and the tragedy that occurred there, the grief is incomparable, and the tragedy itself seems unparalleled, to say the least.

It is extremely difficult to imagine the Holy Progeny of the prophet Muhammad on that blazing hot desert plane of Karbala not being allowed to have even a taste of water. How could anyone not give a young girl like Sakina or even a six-month-old infant like Ali Asghar a drop of water to drink? It breaks my heart to know that the innocent women and children were forced to suffer with their throats parched and dry on that scorching day.

I am devastated to know that 72 soldiers fought gallantly and courageously for the sake of Islam but were outnumbered and murdered by individuals who supported oppression and tyranny. I weep when I realize that the oppressive opposition was not infidels, rather Muslims. People who claimed to be Muslims and believers would murder true Muslims and believers like Ali Akbar who would go forth to defend Imam Hussain. What type of Muslims would fight against Aba Abdullah and spill the precious blood of the Prince of Martyrs upon the battlefield of Karbala? What type of human beings would behead and decapitate the beautiful head of the grandson of the Seal of the Prophets, Prophet Muhammad, and then trample and crush his body into the sands of Karbala?

For me, to say that I feel sorrow, sadness grief, heartache, pain and deep compassion would only be an understatement. For me to refer to this event as only a tragedy would be simply unfair and unjust. This event was much worse than a tragic misfortune, mass murder, manslaughter, or massacre. That which occurred on this day was so tremendous that narrations say the sky blackened on the day of Ashura, and the earth became such that people feared that the Day of Judgment and Resurrection had begun. Of course for many people that day when it does come, will be the Day of Regret. The Heavens and the Earth and the angels wept on the day of Ashura. Surely Muslims and believers throughout the world from that day on would continue to weep and mourn on the day of Ashura.

This is my inspiration to cry out "Ya Hussain!" and to cry and remember this tragedy. I can now understand why the Prophet cried when Imam Hussain was a mere young child. He looked at him and wept. Lady Fatima (peace be upon her) asked the Prophet, "O father, why are you crying?" He was saddened and replied to her, "Because one day he will die, and there will be nobody to bury the body of my grandson."


Our Imam, Our Duty Today


Indeed time changes our way of life. And we can all agree that society and people have changed in many aspects since the time of the prophet Muhammad until now in this day and age where we live. Some people have come up with the misgiving that Islam is not a modern religion or that it does not conform to modern times. Some people also have similar misgivings about the events of Ashura and Karbala. These individuals feel that the events of Karbala have no relevance or affect on us today.

One of the attributes of Allah the Most High is that he is Just. It would be outside of Allah's justice to place mankind on Earth with free will and without guides or guidelines to recognize what is right and wrong. This is why the Holy Qur'an is an everlasting guide for mankind (2:2). And this is why Allah revealed the Qur'an to the Prophet to teach and propagate the complete religion of Islam. He has also used the Imams as the guides for mankind after the Last Prophet.

Today in the absence of our present Imam, Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his reappearance), we still have many ways that we can implement this message of Islam, this message which Imam hussain sacrificed his life to carry out. We have many ways that we are affected today by the occurrence of the events of Ashura and Karbala.

It is ironic that history often repeats itself, as there will be several instances similar between Imam Hussain and Imam Mahdi's situations.

When Imam Mahdi comes, like Imam Hussain, he too will be deserted by many people, even some of his so-called followers. It is narrated in a Hadith in Mizanul Hikmah that when Imam Mahdi begins his uprising, some people who thought themselves to be his clan will desert Imam Mahdi, and some others who used to worship the sun and stars will join and follow him. We can see how on the battlefield of Karbala many people called themselves followers of Islam but in reality they were pretenders and hypocrites – the same ones who would betray the Quran and the Holy Progeny of Prophet Muhammad.

Imam Mahdi's soldiers will be few. In a tradition from Imam Muhammad al-Baqir (peace be upon him), it is stated that he will have 313 close followers. Imam Hussain had a reported 72 soldiers.

Another common facet is the patience of these two Imams. Imam Hussain awaited the end of the truce which Imam Hasan had with Muawiya before he began to make his open invitation towards true Islam and the Right Path. Imam Hussain was patient in waiting for the readiness and willingness of the people and their support – or claim to support. Imam Mahdi is still waiting. Scholars have given the glad tidings and have acknowledged that we are approaching the end of times. Thus, each Muslim and follower and lover of the Ahlul Bayt, now more than ever, regardless of their race, color, citizenship or nationality, becomes affected, and hence each Muslim must prepare for the arrival of the Imam of Our Time. The reality is that Imam Mahdi is not just waiting and twiddling his thumbs. Imam Mahdi is waiting for us. Not as individuals, but as one Ummah, one Muslim nation to coming together in unison for the pleasure of Allah and for the sake of Islam.

This starts with a practical goal. I have to willingly choose to implement these lessons which we learn from Imam Hussain. This means that I must willingly decide that I want to elevate my faith to be like that of the brave Prince of Martyrs Imam Hussain, that I must raise my own standards, that I must elevate from being a Muslim to being a Momin (a true believer) and Muttaqi (God-fearing).

As the famous saying goes, "Every day is Ashura and every land is Karbala." This means that Ashura is not simply one day during which we mourn for our beloved Imam Hussain and his family and companions; rather, it is a day which we must remember every single day throughout the year. If I am truly affected and touched by these incidents, then I must make an effort to not forget them. Unfortunately for many of us who mourn for Imam Hussain during the first ten days of Muharram or during the tragic day of Ashura or even during Arba'een, we don't always make the effort to remember that we too have a duty to prepare for the return of the Imam of Our Time.

As Allah says in the Holy Qur'an, he will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in their hearts (13:11).


Born in the United States, Shaikh Husayn El-Mekki Abdullah-Aziz moved at an early age with his parents to the seminary in Iran, where he studied Islamic jurisprudence, philosophy, and exegesis. He is a popular speaker among the youth in several Shia communities around North America.

Majalis Commemorating the Matyrdom of Imam Hussain (as)-pictures from Northern Nigeria:

https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1220.snc4/155226_479363629906_155138739906_5521116_6305709_n.jpg


https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1220.snc4/155226_479363634906_155138739906_5521117_667091_n.jpg



[img]http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.neat/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs600.ash2/155226_479363639906_155138739906_5521118_6307773_n.jpg[/img]



https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs560.ash2/148197_479980134906_155138739906_5529040_3661821_n.jpg


https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1120.snc4/148197_479980139906_155138739906_5529041_4365000_n.jpg


https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1120.snc4/148197_479980144906_155138739906_5529042_5995878_n.jpg


https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1140.snc4/148197_479980149906_155138739906_5529043_6411746_n.jpg

2nd of Muharram 1432:Second Day of Commemorating the Matyrdom of Imam Hussain (as) , Zaria,Kaduna

https://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs1220.snc4/155226_479363644906_155138739906_5521119_3340323_n.jpg

The Ashura Mourning Majlis in Zaria entered the second day on Tuesday the 2nd of Muharram 1432. Sheikh Zakzaky explained the significance of mourning of the brutal killing of the Household of the Holy Prophet, which is duly commemorated by Shiáh worldwide.  He emphasized that, Ashura Jalsah is part of Islamic rituals, and not a tradition like the Eid festivals.
Sheikh Zakzaky said, the Prophet himself was the first to mourn the killing of Imam Husain even before the event occurred by many years. He cited the Sayings of the Prophet with regard to Ashura in which Imam Ali was reported to have on a particular day found the Prophet weeping. Whereupon the prophet narrated to Imam Ali of the killing of Imam Husain at karbala, as the reason which made him shed tears.

Similarly, the prophet once informed one of his wives, Ummu Salamah, of what will befall Imam Husain at karbala, and condoled her as he gave her sand in a guard. He told her that when ever the sand turns blood red, then it is a sign of the occurrence of the killing of Husain(AS).

Ashura Majlis is not a new thing in this part of the World.

Sheikh Zakzaky stated that Ashura was never a new thing is this part of the world as it has been observed through ages in history. He cited the example of its popularity among the Zage-Zage clan in Zaria city over the years. The Zage-Zagi clan historically migrated from Bengazi, Libya 600 years ago. It is also popular among the Alhazawa clan in Zaria city too.

There are Fabrications and distortions regarding the Ashura Chronicle 

The Leader of the Islamic Movement revealed many baseless fabrications and distortions with regard to Ashura event by the enemies of Imam Husain, who turned it into day of rejoicing. Banu Ummayyah in particular regarded the day as day of merry-making, because they celebrated their  "success" in destroying the  Prophet’s Household.

The Umayyads even fabricated a Ahadeeth to show that all blessings of Allah descend on Ashura day, for example, they asserted that Noah was saved from drowning on Ashura Day; that Prophet Ibraheem was save from the Namrud Fire on thesame day; Adam’s repentance was accepted on this day; Yunus was delivered from the belly of whale on this day. Some even recorded that the holy Prophet(SAWA) was born on this day!

The mass Acceptance  of Ashura is a sign of re-emergence of Imam (AJ)

In another part of this speech, Sheikh Zakzaky explained that the mass acceptance of Ashura gathering worldwide can be considered as a sign of re-emergence of the long awaited Imam Mahdi(AJ), for the fact that the Imam will be the one to take vengeance on the killings of Imam Husain(AS).

Sheikh Zakzaky said, what was inflicted upon Imam Husain (AS) on Ashura day at Karbala was not unconnected with what happened to his predecessors, the Ahul Bayt, such as Sayyidah Az-Zahra(SA) and Imam Ali(AS).

dear Sister "Uplawal",

i said the following in another thread (am not using a third username to reply to you after the other two were disabled.and this is my last):

ShiaMuslim:
thanks Sister!

my account with "LagosShia" have being disabled.am now using my first username (ShiaMuslim) to reply to you-it was also initially disabled.my account under "LagosShia" was disabled after i was replying to you on the questions you asked in the thread below:

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-540305.0.html

i'd post the answer as a reply on the "Imam Ali" thread in the religion forum away from the hands of Jarus Hitler,the taghoot in the islam forum!

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-550247.64.html

in order not to get my third and now only username disabled,i will only provide you with two links that can help you get all your answers and references from the Quran and hadiths:

http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/imamate/en/chap1.php

AND:

http://www.al-islam.org/search.php?selected_tab=&having=941864&cat=0&sid=543948068

you can also search the sites for as much topics as you would like.