The above could make you wonder whether you read right. Indeed, you did. In this era of divorce cases upsurge, this discussion couldn't be timelier and attempts to unravel its root. As unprecedented as the question is, it draws attention to the unpopular viewpoint that divorce is facilitated before rather than during marriage as many people think. I argue so for a sole reason.


Divorce reflects a couple's inadequate preparation before marriage. It is worrisome preparation today has been reduced to secondary matters like outfits, halls, food, drinks, decoration, guests, family connections, and pictures. Primary matters of self-awareness, mutual desire, redefinition of love as a decision, visions compatibility, home vision-setting, values selection, envisaging best and worst (what if conception is delayed for long?) marital scenarios somewhat and suitable reactions, careers reconciliation, family financial priorities, managing in-laws, preferred pattern of raising children, ways of preventing and resisting extramarital affairs, love languages, and conflict management are neglected. This is core preparation, ask right questions! Seek objective analyses through self-discipline, overlook monetary/physical incentives, for your future's sake. Some couples may claim to have discussed them but investigation often reveals no depth. Most divorces are traceable to either shallow considerations or resolution misapplications. Needless to mention Basketmouth-Elsie Okpocha and Yul-May Edochie cases. Failing to prepare before marriage is preparing to divorce after marriage.


But someone may disagree and contend my position is rife with assumptions, because there are cases that some couples went with the flow, yielded to parental/peer preferences and personal whims, and remained together to date after several decades. Thus, the perspective above is redundant and an effort to complicate marriage. I respond thus: How truly harmonious is that couple outside cameras of your eyes? It is possible that husband and wife struggle through each year with disloyalty and silent rancour for their marriage to survive.


Hence, marrying based on assumptions, not thorough consensual resolutions, is a recipe for becoming a divorcee on paper or miserable spouse imagining divorce daily. Also, my view overcomes intervention of chance in avoiding divorce by ensuring purposefulness before and during marriage. Prevent "Irreconcilable differences" later by preparing now to the letter!


©Kelechi O. Naze (KON)

Captivate your reader(s) through relevant and excellent content, reach KON now!

Doing what is right can make you and mobilize efforts to break you. Often, we are flooded with instructions at home, school, Church, mosque, work, or social media on how our behaviours ought to be. These sermons come clothed in vehemence. But they lose this fervor, most times, in practice. Gap between verbalization and execution persists, appearing intractable. If this has ever puzzled you, know you're not alone. Why so this trend?

My observations answer preaching what is right is popular whereas doing what is right tends to be unpopular. The former involves written or spoken words which specify a status-quo. Intensity of compliance here isn't as acute as the latter which compels people and circumstances to conform to status--quo. Consequent discipline triggers resistance from many people, vilifying enforcers and adherents. This can discourage faithfuls, having them succumb to pressure and carpet-cross to antagonists' side. It is the easy way out of isolation by others. But is it the best move?

A positive answer could argue persevering in the face of antagonism is futile. The discomfort is needless. Why endure when others evade standards and enjoy? Life is short. Our natural inclination to pleasure and disinclination to pain support. This position is contradictory. Those here toy with pillars preserving their edifice, and expect to benefit and remain safe within lastingly. This viewpoint is delusional and unsustainable, reflecting absence of solid personality pillars and readiness to be tossed about by any blowing wind.

Alternatively, a negative answer points us to those, usually few, who stand unwaveringly. They say and do what is right, trying to uphold propriety. Their strictness is interpreted as wickedness. I reason what makes them formidable is congruence of their personal values with foundational values of their organization. It personalizes persistence before sabotage, hate or injustice. Borrow a leaf! Doing right amidst reward of wrong sometimes is a bitter pill that you, committed to rightness, must learn to swallow.


©Kelechi O. Naze (KON)

Excellence is always fashionable.

Meet your content-writing needs with relevance and excellence, contact KON now!

cc: Mynd44, seun.

cc: mynd44

Excellence or nothing.

cc: mynd44, OAM4J. Front page material.

Amidst groans of Nigerians, this piece attempts to unearth hope. Kindly forward to front page accordingly.

I think it is in the best Interest of most politicians today for Nigeria's challenges to persist; for Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to be dependent and semi-partisan, insurgents/bandits to roam, insecurity to be insurmountable, traditional/new media to lack objectivity, oil refineries to remain comatose, serving/retired civil servants to be owed, judiciary to be unjust, education to be funded with crumbs, corruption to creep in as a societal value, and integrity to be unpopular. This tide turning, that is, democratic dividends reaching needy Nigerians suggests shortage or stoppage of illicit gains they enjoy.


Hence, Nigeria cannot get better without first disinfecting our political class. This is achievable either by electorally stumbling on a patriotic Nigerian president that would spearhead a new dawn or Nigerians execute a revolution, preferably a bloodless one. I believe answers to prayers we've so religiously said for years to date would take one of those forms. Since the 2023 general elections proved luck is yet to shine on Nigeria and when is unknown (this may last for fifty or more years), the second possibility is left. But isn't it unconstitutional?


Expectedly, direct and indirect beneficiaries of of our national disorders would gaslight you with legal and moral arguments, hypocritically so, against a political revolution. Beware these are sophistries tailored to keep Nigerians docile, on their knees suffering and praying while politicians feast. Also, resort to brutal force through thugs and some security agents (others await a spark to side the people) for clampdown guarantees them no victory. One percent cannot in confrontation terms defeat ninety-nine percent. Nigeria will get better when Nigerians become exhausted.


©KON

Prejudiced assessment.

Fg