₦airaland Forum

eyonigger:
Khayne, mukina is so so in love with YAYA, if that guy shows up on NL, she'll quickly leave her loff iice sharp sharp for him.

mukina2:
why are you asking?

mukina2:
Am supporting Yaya

i hope he scores

tosinaded@:
Wut do u mean?

2face ft beenieman and reggie rockstone

2face ft sway

sway ft 2face

2face ft chakademus and pliers

shank ft akon

and many more!

hype man:
2. Sound Sultan ft Wyclef "King in my country"

rapjunkie:
Maybe Terry G should  recommend his drug dealer to MI so MI can be more energetic when he's on stage . . . . , lol. . .  .

Its a joke o !!! . . . . I know all these oversensitive people on NL will try to rush me now

"I would prefer to beat Chelsea because if we lose against Madrid we will still be in front, whereas in the Champions League there is no room for error," - Messi

lai-lai:
i hope our midfield isnt tired yet cos we need the midfield to control the game
puyol better play his life out since he is suspended for the midweek game

btw, where are d madrid fans

Krayola:
Yeah, Caceres is faster than puyol and a very good tackler, but i'm worried that between him and pique there isn't enough experience. Both our CB will be rookies pretty much, and Alves is too attack minded,. Playing SYlvinho, another attack minded fullback , against drogba-Anelka/Kalou (I think they will play with 2 forwards at Stanford bridge), that is a suicide mission imo. I hope i'm wrong.

lalaboi:
Ofokasibe. . . .lie

That is not Phewrowshiouz no dey gimmie bread 4 here now

lalaboi:
Am thinking the only reason peeps are clicking on this link is cos of the picture on the home page lol . . . .na wa oh!

nyabinghi:
@toxic,

probably u just started watching soccer this year. How many times has Liverpool outscored United in a football year. Liverpool is the most boring top 4 team in England. A typical route one football team.

~Sauron~:
United had injury worries.

~Sauron~:
We disgraced Milan at Old Trafford.

~Sauron~:
Beautiful football will win you Bleep ALL.
A good team should be able to break down teams who put 10 men behind the ball.
The cream of England get to face stubborn teams week in week out in the Premiership and they always find a way of breaking obstinate defences.
Barcelona should learn how to break teams down. Winning is the name of the game.
On the evidence of what i saw last night, Barcelona CANNOT beat STOKE.

allboyz:
Word!!!


and the funniest thing was that over 4 Billion people watch that footie and were shcoked at Cheslea's display( a team in EPL's top 4 for the past 7 years) - I agree that the point matters but there is something called Score - draw ( 1- 1 , 2 - 2)

shaddie:
To start with, I want to say a big congratulation to Chelsea for:

1) not conceeding goals at Nou Camp.
2) for succeeding in their game plan of "anti football tactics"
3) for deciding not to play football on a night like this
4) for not even making an attempt to play football

However, I'll be doing great disservice to football and lovers of good football if i don't say how disappointing it is to see a great team like Chelsea with their array of world class players putting up a below par performance. It is sad that at the semi-final level of the most elitist of all club-side competitions such damage is being done to football.

For God sake, 69-31 ball possession in favor of Barca. Hiddink - I'm disappointed not because I'm supporting Barca 2 win but because we all expect to see good football and so also are 96,000 fans that paid money to watch the match live. They deserve to get value for their money. But, contrary to all expectations, Chelsea superstars were turned into a bunch of mediocre players at Nou Camp. There was nothing professional in their performance at all. I actually expected Chelsea to show some respect to Barca being the team that plays the best football on the planet but i don't expect expect them to be turned to cowards and weaklings on the pitch as it turned out to be. Imagine how Barca utterly dominated the possession (69 to 31) , scoring chances, attempts at goals, corners etc, Infact the only thing Chealsea dominated was fouls committed and yellow cards obtained.

They were contained in their own half thru out the match. They could not even manage coherent passes, create chances and even keep the ball. no sooner had they gotten the ball that they end up loosing it. The only real opportunity they had came as a result of an error on the part of Marquez and Drogba, I think Chelsea Coach needs to watch the video of this game again and see how weak his team was. They only clustered in front of their 18 just to prevent Barca from scoring and not that they have any intention of playing real football. That on it's own, is an attitude of losers. For me (and I believe am speaking the mind of other good football lovers) I rather see a team playing attacking football, creating chances, making attempts at goals, giving and collecting accurate passes, dominating possession etc. to end up loosing and than to see cowards called stars queuing up in front of their goalie in the name of playing football end up winning. Such makes football boring.


Inspite of my disappointment with Chealsea, Hiddink and their stars, my main disappointment goes those EPL fans that kept saying that Barcelona got to this stage because they neva met English opposition. That Barca kept meeting weaker teams which accounted for their success so far. according to such fans, EPL teams are the best sides in Europe. Thus, when Barca was drawn against Chelsea, I was eager to watch the so - called strength of English football. but to my disappointment, I ended up seing the most one sided match at this level of the competition. This was the same thing Man U did last year. Thus, I kept wondering where lies the so-called strenght of the English teams that turns them to cowards/weaklings whenever they meet Barca? Pls EPL fans help me out.

As far as i know, even the weaker teams in La liga will manage to play better than Chelsea did yesternite or at worst, make attempt to play football unlike Chelsea that made no attempt to play football and caged themselves in front of their keeper like Bouncers at a party premises. If this is what u guys watch in EPL matches that deceives u to say that EPL has the best teams in Europe then I'm sorry for u guys coz u re really missing a lot.

For those of you that think that Chelsea has any advantage in the 2nd leg playing at home should have a rethink. In the first instance, the best place to attack is when playing away coz any goal u score has double implication on the opposition. Now that the game is to be decided at Stamoford bridge, the pressure will be on Chelsea to stop Barca from gettin an away goal advantage thus they'll do more of defending. Secondly, Barca is naturally an attacking side thus they'll be doing their own thing while Chelsea will be left with the task of trying to contain them. Since Hiddink used all his players to defend at Nou Camp (where they ought to be looking for away goal advantage) I wonder whether he'll use all his 11 players with the reserve bench to defend at Stamford bridge to prevent Barca from getting the highly coveted away goal. As for the Barca I know, they rather fight and loose gallantly than to defend and win like cowards. That to me is the distinction between great teams and weak teams. Any body think otherwise?

lalaboi:
Kpish. . . .since its 2legged what do u expect
Offcourse the inexperienced coach will play his fantastic attack(dumb) at the bridge which will eventually knock them out. . . . .he'll play an away game like its a home game. . .tshior!

~Sauron~:
United did not score an away goal against Barca last season.
United did not score an away goal against Inter this season.

Away goal is no KEY!!!
The KEY is beat your opponents convincingly at home!!!

allboyz:
I understand that you defeated them in a Grand style but friend . . . i definately don't see that happening this season to any team.

for christ sake . . .i can bet everything with it . .that, if Chelsea goes out to attack at SB . . .Barca would score . . that would leave penalties out of it . . it will be down to the Club with the highest numbers of goals. . .lets be objective.

next week . . .Guus won't play Mikel and Essien together from the starts except if he does not want to score (maybe he wants penalty coz of cech. . i don't know) . . .if mikel/essien do not start. . Barca would control that midfield again . . .and deny the Blues a chance of playing football and Hence scoring goals . . .except for sharp counter attackers . . .

its Dicey . . .i wouldn't bet on it at all!

allboyz:
Chelsea got a good result tough but the style of play was annoying.

Its shows that Chelsea don't have the charismas to attack Barca.

assuming its a Barca/Chelsea final and its to be decided on a single leg. . .would you guys play this way and settle for penalties or what? its disgraceful tough . . but the points matters

well,in SB, Chelsea would come out to play . .and by so doing,Messi,iniesta and Eto would penetrate freely and wreck havoc at Chelsea's Defense. . . its hard to predict . . .its gonna be tight.

Conclusion - i want to play Barca at the finals - ROME is the Place

kayality:
i hope arsenal take the way so that,the repeat of paris we come to rome