₦airaland Forum

Wizzzzmike:
Dude if you don't understand alata fo) ma guy u no be Ghanaian

you no go blame me na. I have lived most of my life in Nigeria. I just go to visit my grandparents in Ghana once or twice in a year.

chrisagyei:
forgetti amo chale na alata fo) wei de3 w)n aso y3 den.

I'm trying hard to understand this. I think I get part of this. What dialect in ghana is this?

chrisagyei:
are you travelling for holidays? By the way am a Ghanaian currently in Accra

Where in accra do you stay?

Fine job, madrid. Hala madrid.

aligloria02:
Does Itel p36 pro support otg?

What is otg?

kriss27:
That was how I went and bought Umidigi A5pro, because of Umidigi thread on nairaland. And good reviews on Jumia and it ended in tears. Buy a well known product

What are the problems you encountered with the phone? Please share and help us.

songzDaniel01:
got gionee s10 , 6gb ram, 64gb rom

Please, how long have you used the phone?

songzDaniel01:
yep.. Its available for 35k

Your location?

Lexusgs430:


The God's have spoken.......

Oga lexus, abeg suggest good budget phone of 35k for me. Abeg.

franciskaine:
lol.

3gig ram,
4g network,
Excellent camera.

Who still uses 3G network fone in 2020?

Brand new, right?
What's your location?

Kingsean:
POP4 screen size is 6" inches. if u don't want POP4, go for Umidigi A7s on Jumia. u can check it out

My fear is that the brand is unknown, but is the A7s a nice phone? What could be it's downsides?

Kingsean:
I have brand new Tecno POP4 for sale 32gb rom, 2gb ram 35k

Thanks for the reply but I'm seeing that the pop4 isn't 4G enabled. And it's screen size is 5.5".
Is there any better budget phone of 35k with 4G, 2gig ram and 6" and above screen?

songzDaniel01:
yep.. Its available for 35k

Is it new or is it fairly used? If used, for how long?

franciskaine:
I've Nokia 5.1plus, but ur location is d issue

Does the Nokia 5.1 support 4G? And does it have 2gig ram?

ClassyJay:
Tecno Pop 4 doesn't support 4G,he can get the Pop 4pro instead

Thanks for this information? Please can the pop 4pro be bought for 65k?

songzDaniel01:
got gionee s10 , 6gb ram, 64gb rom

Can one buy it at 65k?

Guys please I'm looking for a new phone with a budget of 75k. Features I'm hoping for are 4gig ram and above, 6" and above screen and 4G. At least 64gig rom
Any sellers available?
Location : Port Harcourt

Please suggest any phone that has at least 2 of those features, thanks.

Guys please I'm looking for a new phone with a budget of 35k. Features I'm hoping for are 2gig ram, 6" and above screen and 4G.

Please suggest anyone that has at least 2 of those features, thanks.

Hendrix50:
Brand new
Call or whatsapp 09090299670
Lagos deal only
Pay on delivery

What's the screen inches?

Guys please I'm looking for a new phone with a budget of 35k. Features I'm hoping for are 2gig ram, 6" and above screen and 4G.

Please suggest anyone that has at least 2 of those features, thanks.

Guys please I'm looking for a new phone with a budget of 35k. Features I'm hoping for are 2gig ram, 6" and above and 4G.

Please suggest anyone that has at least 2 of those features, thanks.

swiz123:
mumu don turn to Chinua Achebe in order to justify his own madness.. I can see right through your bullocks. You are trying to drag atheist and agnostics alike to side your argument because their doctrines are usually based on facts.

I deliberately don't want to post my friend who lost his life at the toll gate. Doing so just to prove to some idiots that lives were lost would be an insult to his memory.

So, if you are looking for facts, go out and find it like Sanwo-olu did.

I swear down. I think he did that brilliantly.
In this situation, he is wrong or simply blind to the truth. This is a situation whereby silence is golden. I think that is the reason other reasonable people here are silent. If you're not sure of something, you keep quiet.

donjazet:
I was smirking while reading this post.
There is nothing i haven't been called today simply for proffering my own truth. By now you must have realized I'm now immune to the name-calling.

I pride myself on being the bold, courageous and firm arbiter of logic. I say what others might be scared of saying despite thinking because of the fear of the mob and the herd.
I could care less about what people here think of me so far as my message is passed. My history should tell you that.
Let me give you a short example to elucidate my stance.

A woman who is having difficulty bearing children in her marriage visits both her pastor and a gynecologist for solutions to her problems. Her pastor gives her anointing oil and some bullet prayer points, while her gynecologist performs a medical procedure and at last, she gives birth to a child. Then she goes to the church and gives her testimony. She tells the congregation of how the pastor prayed for her and rubbed her belly and gave her anointing oil and how God has now "blessed" her with a child. She makes absolutely no mention of the medical procedures undergone.

Now she has triggered a mass delusion. Every person of faith there now believes that anointing oil can make one pregnant.
Now imagine a sole dissenting voice standing up to challenge the mass delusion, to probe for real evidence of the process that has triggered the mass delusion.
Of course, the individual who is now the black sheep amongst the group becomes the sacrificial lamb on the alter of alternative facts.

The individual is called a psychopath, an attention seeker, a gay fool, a devil, an idiot, a thing, a heartless bastard and more and more and more.

At that point, the individual is faced with pushing on with his effort to break the mass delusion and seek the truth or to quietly retreat into his shell.
Well, it's left for you to figure out what he does next, knowing the individual in question.

You are indeed a very brilliant fellow notwithstanding the abuses you are receiving. This post was indeed brilliant. I do support most of your positions especially on the American politics section but i do not support your current position. I strongly disagree with you.

I think that perhaps you haven't adequately researched on this issue before taking your stand. You also seem to support the status quo of the situation in your country.

Many African countries have been yearning for a political revolution to take place. I do think that this is the beginning of that. If Nigeria is successful in this, other countries will follow suit. You will have to be a selfish person who perhaps things are working out for who doesn't see the need for change but that is selfish coming from someone who prides himself on intellectualism (especially in the American politics section).

Please watch this clip below and see for yourself all the evidence you need. I really disagree with you on this. Take it from someone who really admires your contributions there.
https://mobile.twitter.com/12dddd3356/status/1319328078502498305

A mass shooting just happened in Nebraska.

Could you guys minimize the insults and just exchange words cordially?

Disstroy, i have seen your post but because of the numerous points you made and the length of your post, I will highlight the points individually and respond to them.

But for the time being, let me quickly highlight some points you made and respond to them.

First of all, to understand Obama's presidency, you have to understand the very dire situation and circumstances he faced. I see that most of your points is centered on foreign policy.

Obama inherited and met a destabilized Middle East and a shambolic economy. The way you are going on about this, one would think that Obama instigated the problems in the Middle East, I see how you have disingenuously left out the role played by George Bush in starting needless wars there and the role played by Regan in arming Libya and later doing an about face.

The very funny thing about you conservatives is that you will term democrats weak and soft on crime or terrorism and when the democrats now try to use force, you will turn around to now criticize the forceful strategy, convienetly leaving out the fact that republican presidents have done far worse.

How did George Bush Jr come into power?
Towards the end of Clinton's tenure, the Islamic fundamentalists in the Middle East (who Regan had armed) started becoming terrorists and even bombed an American embassy, Clinton tried negotiating with them softly, to which republicans started criticizing Clinton as being very weak on terrorists and started pushing for America to use "it's full military might" to confront the terrorists and voted in the candidate who promised to do just that.

On the Clinton crime bill which you criticized, again I love how you skip precedence to shape your narrative.
During bush's snr reelection campaign, his primary rhetoric was that the democrats were very soft on crime, they kept using the face of black criminals who were pardoned to trigger white fear that democrats were very soft on crime which the democrats responded to by creating that crime bill.

Listen the truth is that whatever you think Obama did wrong, the republicans have done much worse. The Republicans are the worse war mongers.
The democrats actually advocate cutting the military spending bill which is usually close to one trillion dollars and channeling that money into better health care for Americans, but guess the president that vetoes this and brags about how he has the biggest military spending bill.
Yes, I agree that so far, trump hasn't started any war in the Middle East and a part of me wishes it remains so but what happens if he does this during his second tenure, after all, Obama also started his during his second term.

What will he do if he suddenly finds himself in Obama's shoe's where suddenly there is a new destabilized country about to get a brand new nuclear weapon? Or Russia suddenly annexes further parts of Eastern Europe and starts making inroads and military incursions into a new territory suddenly??
These were the new challenges then Obama faced then and now we now have hindsight on our side to know that perhaps some of his responses were wrong, but what happens when a new sudden dire situation arises
Can we bank on Trump to respond with a diplomatic or cool head?

We have seen how he has also terribly handled North Korea, first he was petty and aggressive, trading insults with Kim, then he claimed he wanted peace with them, that failed utterly and North Korea is still amassing nuclear weapons. What happens when they fire one? How will trump react?

I'll reply your further points on the media and cancel culture and the rest below.

Happney65, why the ban?

basilico:
l

The democrats are strategic. They over indulge the minorities not because they care but because they want power.
To democrats all that grovelling for minorities is a pathway to power.
Open borders, free healthcare to all, voting rights to felons, etc are methods to permanently retain minority votes.
It has nothing to do with white democrats loving blacks so much that they send good wish messages to them and death wishes to conservatives.
Its all about power.

And you can also ask yourself.
Which party members have burnt the American flag? Which party members have destroyed monuments. Which party officially does not like religion; removing God from its platform im 2012,
and forcing secularism( abortion n birth control) to faith adherents?.
Democrats by virtue of dominating media has attacked conservatives as racists, homophobic, etc .

Finally which party in your opinion is the evil party .

It has come to the internet notice that Ronald Reagan was the first to have a woman judge in the Supreme court. For Ginsburg her confirmation was queried on why she had never hired a blek law clerk during her time as a district judge. Later on she only hired one black clerk. So much for inclusivity and diversity from the democrats.

It comes to no one as a surprise that you are one of the most foolish and brainless cultist here.

I gave you a full breakdown of how the two parties realigned both geographically and demographically over the last 5 decades, but as expected from the uneducated trump cultists here who watch Fox News via poor Startimes, you couldn't retort with facts, rather going down the road of supposition and assumptions.

Answer one simple question.

How did southern racist slave states like Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, north and South Carolina, Georgia etc switch from solidly blue to solidly red?

How did the more developed slave resisting northern states like New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Chicago, Michigan etc switch from solidly red to solidly blue?

Secondly, why do you think the civil rights leaders all align with the Democratic Party? What do you think makes the Democratic Party have a very vast array of diverse leaders and candidates, from black, Latino and Asian backgrounds with more women while the Republican Party is predominantly white men??

Start using your brain, dumb basilico. Stop being a cultist. You say the democrats are only "playing towards" or pandering to minorities, is it not better than the one that outrightly hates the minorities (of which you are one) and sees them as threats?


Again, start using your brain and stop being dumb basilico.

Please can someone tell me how this game is played?