₦airaland Forum

Maynmann:
Aramaic is never persian. Where did you Get that absurd THRASH from?
No correlation between it ATALL!
Aramaic is one of the earliest languages on earth even before “spain and europe” was created.
Stop disgracing yourself.

Maynmann:
Illiterate, Where and when did jesus speak “yiddish”?
How is Aramaic a “persian language”?


Krismas Is a Dullard, BYE!

aboyaji:
Optical Illusions - Find the Hidden Man in the Forest within 11 Seconds

Maynmann:
Illiterate. Keep disgracing yourself
Dullard bye!

Maynmann:
Desperate illiterate bwahahahah

Dullard!

Maynmann:
Illiteracy is bad, which country did he defeat the persian?
Gallilee? Jerusalem?
Guagemela bwahahahah
ARAMAIC Is NEVER a “persian language”.

Maynmann:
Illiterate, codex sinaiticus is the oldest!

Maynmann:
What century did the greeks take over from persians?
You have to be stupid to believe aramaic is a persian language

Maynmann:
Illiterate, Where are you getting your own thrash from? From your ass?
Sinaiticus codex is 325BCE.

When was yiddish language created?

Dullard!

Maynmann:
Illiterate, The oldest codex is sinaiticus.
Jesus and his disciples spoke ARAMAIC!

Maynmann:
Illiterate, what century was yiddish language created?

Maynmann:
Illiterate, The first and original New Testament called codex sinaiticus was written in GREEK. What century was that?
Aramaic is a Semitic language, same way hebrew too.

Maynmann:
Illiterate, Jesus spoke ARAMAIC.
New Testament was written in GREEK HUNDRED OF YEARS AFTER JESUS DIED.

Jesus was dead before yiddish language was even created dunce.

Maynmann:
Illiterate when was yiddish language created, when was jesus born.
The New Testament was written in GREEK!

Maynmann:
Illiterate, The New Testament was written in Greek, jesus and his disciples spoke ARAMAIC.
Daniel is Old Testament written in Hebrew and Aramaic, dunce
The king was looking for the interpretation of the words, the MEANING OF WHAT DOES WORDS MEAN not the exact mere words, dummy.
Read!

Maynmann:
Illiterate just like the typical brainwashed sheep, they are hebrew and aramaic language. Before daniel and jesus was born HEBREW LANGUAGE existed.
The New Testament was written hundred of years after your jesus died.
Eloi is a common aramaic word meaning “my god”, which verse did they think it was “elijah”?
Daniel interpreted it to a meaning not “mene mene”.
The king was looking for who to interpret it to a meaning not the “exact words” dummy!
Where are you getting all these assertions, bring up the verse.

Maynmann:
Ignorance is not bliss. Which language again do you need the origin?
Have you forgotten that New Testament was written in greek, and jesus spoke aramaic lol
Old Testament was written in Hebrew and old Hebrew lol

Hebrew and greek languages are holy spirit language abi bwahahahah

Maynmann:
You speak in tongue to yourself not multitude, of what use is it to the “church”, read the verse slowly, don’t be a narcissist.
Also Look up the topic of the OP.
The disciples were praying without holy spirit lol, that means prayers can get answered without holy spirit.
Hope you know what “ghost” means?

OnknownSoldier:
If you are conversant with the modern-day gospel music industry, you would have noticed a sudden surge of unknown tongues in many gospel songs from gospel artists of mostly black descent. This sudden development in my opinion is worthy of serious interrogation as the Bible says that we should test all spirits so as know which is of God [1 John 4:1].

The gospel songs I knew while growing up emphasized godly living using language(s) that can be understood. The hymns for example are written in plain language(s) and one can attest to the fact that those songs are divinely inspired and spirit-filled. Meanwhile, the present crops of gospel music raving the moment are mostly incorporated with unknown tongues and spiritual chants that can not be understood by anyone and yet we have not found a single interpreter to interpret the tongues in these popular songs. I believe that in itself negates the fundamental injunction stated by Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 14:27.

I have been to megachurches in several regions of Nigeria where I have heard worship leaders repeating the same tongues in these popular gospel records verbatim and I get confused each time. Damn! Something is wrong somewhere. It's almost impossible to hear a gospel record these days without hearing an unknown tongue in it. Could that be the latest marketing strategy to sell gospel records?

Yes! I believe in tongues but I also believe that not all spirit-filled Christians must speak in tongues. Some operate in other gifts like prophecy, Discernment, word of knowledge, words of wisdom, walking of miracles e.t.c [1 Corinthians 12:4-11]. it is the spirit that distributes these gifts but I wonder while the present church places much emphasis on tongues. Well, maybe that's because tongues are the easiest to fake. Maybe I said.

Now to my honest questions:

1. If speaking in tongues only edifies the one who speaks it and not the body of Christ as it is in 1 Corinthians 14:4, why will any gospel musician incorporate an unknown tongue in his or her song lyrics for the body of Christ?

2. Where exactly is it written in the Bible that Christians should sing in tongues? Is there anywhere in the Bible the Apostles did? I know pentecostal christians will mention 1 Corinthians 14:15 but is that what Apostle Paul was really saying in that passage?

3. Why were the ancient gospel songs not incorporated with unknown tongues as we have now? Could it be that modern Christian worship has been hijacked by strange spirits?

Above are my reservations about the sudden proliferation of unknown tongues in modern gospel music. I will appreciate answers with biblical reference(s) to my questions in the comment section.

Thanks!

DaddyFabooluz:
From the way things are going, there is no doubt Peter Obi is loved by man and want him to win. But quite unfortunately for him, his party is a light weight in almost all parts of Nigeria and that is a very big disadvantage in the reality of today's politics in Nigeria.

Tinubu on the Apc side has a strong force around Nigeria but his chances are likely to be cut short because of his muslim muslim ticket. This means that votes will be shared between Tinubu, Peter Obi and Atiku in the South, East and West.

As for Atiku, his victory seems to smile because he has the most dominant forces in the North and that alone can clearly defeat the sharing of votes from the entire South, East and West.

Though the election will be very tight because Apc the ruling party will try to use all means in their disposal to rig and win the election, but PDP knows the game very well and will try to lock head with Apc anyhow they can. Unfortunately LP and Peter Obi can only rely on the huge followers called obidients that have his back but in reality, that will only help split the votes in the South, East and West while Atiku will crush all contestants in the North to claim his victory.

This is just my opinion from the way things are now and everyone is very free to have their own different options. So I come and go in PEACE.

Parpor:
5. c3

Parpor:
4. d4

SUFFERInSMILIIN:
You are making fun of Ghana when Nigeria is in 120 billion US dollar. The Debt repayments is 110 percent of the economy. Nigeria situation is hundred times worse than Ghana but you make fun of Ghana imagine all the pension all the salary and now going to get payment and the government is borrowing money to pay Dead

inoki247:
You people ar not getting if you say Nigeria is worst Ghana isn't an option cause dere worst nobody understand again dere Govt is clueless right now the way dere Dollar dey jump nobody understand again....

Derr fuel also is around 10GHC that's like 700naira to 750..

inoki247:
Which Ghana u dey talk the one I know or another one....

Ghana was Exchanging Dollar at 6.5GHC as at Dec right now as at today they're exchanging there dollar at 11.6 GHC which kain Inflation be that....


You people will just come online and be reading about country experience am first u go sing song nobody go tell u....

brandsoncharlie:
My brother they're not doing well, exchange rate is sky rocketing against the USA dollars (11.45 cedis to a dollar covert it to naira)
Food prices highest in Africa as we speak.
Cost of electricity is 130 % increased recently to avoid collapse on their electricity sector.
Taxes for a start up is nothing to right home about, imagine paying for covid 19 tax and other unnecessary tax.

The economy has been downgraded by the international credit agency (FITCH) to CC .
The last thing you don't want to hear is there are on their way to IMF.
The economy is no longer in control by the government.
The worst performing currency in the world behind Zimbabwe.

Antimarraige:
cocoa farming in my mom's hometown

Asour:
America's influences don't need to be looked for.

There are around you daily.

They created the information age.
The Operating systems 99% of the world uses for Mobile & Desktop are American created— Windows, iOS or Android. Including the one you wrote your comment with.

They have the world's most relevant /largest capital market. The next (China isn't up to one-third).

They have all the World's most popular social mediums of relevance — Twitter, YouTube, Facebook & Instagram.

The majority of the world's online Financial transactions goes through an American aggregator/platform: Mastercard & Visa.

Should I talk about soft power?
You know already about Hollywood & the Music industry. Artists world over YEARN for their Grammies.

The US holds the most Nobel Laureates (A Swedish award) in Medicine, Chemistry, Physiology & Economics.

The US (TODAY) is the most preferred international study destination for University students.

These are some of what constitutes influence.

The US may eventually fail but it wouldn't necessarily be in you & my lifetime.


One more thing,

America is NOT in 500trillion $ debt. No country has that much.
The world's economy is less than $ 100 trillion.

Cheers.

Asour:
True. Power is transient.

But they are the most ECONOMICAL influential NOW. Debating that would be laughable.

Economic influence = power nowadays.
Power isn't just brute force as it was in those days.

There's no such thing as Richest with countries.
Economic influence supersedes what you call rich.

The vast majority of Equipment that allowed the Saudis exploit their resources ARE Western developed. Now that's influence.

Asour:
I'm not comparing colonialism.

I'm only stating that Colonialism in itself was a show of strength.

THEY have been powerful for long. It was a dog eat dog world then. It no longer a dog eat world (relatively) BUT America IS still the MOST influential country in the world today.

America (as imperfect as it is) is more trusted (secretly) I'm not talking of openly. Than the very NEW emerging 'World powers' in China & Russia.

The elite in those countries TRUST America for their children's Welfare than their own country.

Asour:
The bolded answers your questions.

The west ($ & £) had the dominant currency PRIOR to your Breton woods conference.
AND THAT'S my point.
They WERE Dominant & are still ARE dominant.

Of course Colonialism is bad BUT every Nation had to show force before the 1900s. Even your (USS)Russia colonized others didn't they?

Why weren't they (Russians) as dominant?

Asour:
The problem with your argument is that BEFORE the WW2, the US($) & UK(£) already made 75% + of global reserves — PRIOR to 1940.

The US BECAME the world's largest economy before 1940.

If your Breton woods argument is true, why was the global reserve dominant currency a western one before 1940?