The United States has deployed a number of attack aircraft to an airbase in southern Turkey, a US military official says. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told AFP on Tuesday that 12 A-10 ground-attack planes arrived at Incirlik over the weekend. They have already been scheduled to help the US-led coalition fighting against Daesh (ISIL) terrorists in Iraq and Syria, the official added. The official claimed that the deployment had "added capability" to the coalition's fight against ISIL. Known by soldiers on the ground as “Warthogs,” A-10 is a tactical military aircraft that has a primary role of carrying out airstrikes with greater precision than bombers. The planes are heavily strengthened and designed to withstand direct hits from armor-piercing rounds. "There's more significant risk than other aircraft due to the flight path they typically fly," the official said. The United States has increased its militaristic activities in the Middle East region after Russia launched an air campaign last month against terrorists wreaking havoc in Syria. Russia has carried out scores of airstrikes against terrorists there, killing hundreds of them. Earlier this month, Russia fired 26 long-range cruise missiles from its warships in the Caspian Sea against terrorists in Syria. Unnamed US officials have told The Associated Press that Russia has directed parts of its military campaign against US-backed terrorists and other extremist groups in an effort to weaken them. They say the CIA-trained militants are now under Russian missile strikes with little prospect of rescue by their American supporters.

more pics

The United States has deployed a number of
attack aircraft to an airbase in southern Turkey,
a US military official says.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity,
told AFP on Tuesday that 12 A-10 ground-attack
planes arrived at Incirlik over the weekend.
They have already been scheduled to help the
US-led coalition fighting against Daesh (ISIL)
terrorists in Iraq and Syria, the official added.
The official claimed that the deployment had
"added capability" to the coalition's fight against
ISIL.
Known by soldiers on the ground as “Warthogs,”
A-10 is a tactical military aircraft that has a
primary role of carrying out airstrikes with greater
precision than bombers.
The planes are heavily strengthened and designed
to withstand direct hits from armor-piercing
rounds.
"There's more significant risk than other aircraft
due to the flight path they typically fly," the
official said.
The United States has increased its militaristic
activities in the Middle East region after Russia
launched an air campaign last month against
terrorists wreaking havoc in Syria.
Russia has carried out scores of airstrikes
against terrorists there, killing hundreds of them.
Earlier this month, Russia fired 26 long-range
cruise missiles from its warships in the Caspian
Sea against terrorists in Syria.
Unnamed US officials have told The Associated
Press that Russia has directed parts of its military
campaign against US-backed terrorists and other
extremist groups in an effort to weaken them.
They say the CIA-trained militants are now under
Russian missile strikes with little prospect of
rescue by their American supporters.

IMPORTANT TO THOSE WHO CARE AND BELIEVE Some thirty (30) years back, Maolana Sheikh Muhammad Jamiu was reported to had told some of his disciples that "SATURN( a planet known as ZUALI in arabic) has navigates into SCORPIO (one of the twelve ZODIACS). Nigeria shall experience a lot of difficulties, until it completes it navigation in all the ZODIACS, and starts another navigation into SCORPIO" Thus, SATURN stays in every ZODIAC for thirty (30) months, which means it will complete these planetary movements in a period of 360 months, which is 30 years. With the authority Maolana Sheik Abdulrasheed Nkrumah said, I am pleased and happy to say Monday 12th October 2015(29 dhul-hijja 1436) shall be the the end of these trying periods. Insha Allah, Tuesday 13th October 2015 (1st Muharram 1437) shall be the BEGINNING OF A NEW ERA. Maolana Sheikh Jamiu Bulala had predicted that evil and evil doers start start falling, corruption and corrupted persons shall fall. Nigeria shall starts experiencing good moments, Allah shall support and help those with good intentions. RECOMMENDED PRAYER: Suratul-Fathi 1, 3, 7, 11 or 14. Lahillah'Illallah anta Naa'sir 111, 114, 313, or 1111. May Allah count us among the blessed.

The United States has pulled out the USS
Theodore Roosevelt, a massive, nuclear-powered
aircraft carrier, of the Persian Gulf as Russian
warships have entered the area.
For the first time since 2007, the US Navy has
now no aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf,
according to NBC News.
The warship was withdrawn from the Persian Gulf
on Thursday, a day after Russia fired 26 long-
range cruise missiles from its Caspian Flotilla
against terrorists in Syria, Pentagon officials
said.
US military officials claimed that the aircraft
carrier, which the houses about 5,000 sailors and
65 fighter jets, was withdrawn because it needed
to undergo maintenance.
Tensions between the United States and Russia
escalated after Moscow began its military
campaign on September 30 against Daesh (ISIL)
terrorists wreaking havoc in Syria.
Russia has carried out more than 110 airstrikes
against terrorists in Syria so far, killing hundreds
of militants.
The Pentagon announced on Wednesday that the
United States had adopted measures to ensure a
safe distance from Russian fighter jets flying over
Syria.
Republican Senator John McCain, the chairman of
the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on
Thursday that Washington should "just leave"
Syria "if all of your [US] actions are dictated by
the risk of confrontation with Russia."
Peter Daly, a retired Navy vice admiral, noted that
the absence of a US aircraft carrier is being
noticed by Russians.
"The most important thing you need a carrier for
is for what you don't know is going to happen
next," Daly told NBC News.
Three unnamed US military officials claimed on
Thursday that some cruise missiles fired from
Russian ships at targets in Syria landed in Iran.
Russian navy ship launches a cruise missile in
the Caspian Sea on Wednesday . ( Russian Defense
Ministry Press Service)
The officials stated that four Russian cruise
missiles went off course and crashed in Iran,
adding that they don’t know if the errant missiles
caused any damage.
In response, the Russian Defense Ministry
statement said that the new Kalibr-NK cruise
missiles all struck within nine feet of their
intended targets in Syria.
"No matter how unpleasant and unexpected it is
for our colleagues in the Pentagon and Langley,
our strike yesterday with precision-guided
weapons at ISIS (Daesh/ISIL) infrastructure in
Syria hit its targets," the Russian Defense
Ministry spokesman said on Thursday.

http://presstv.ir/Detail/2015/10/10/432800/US-warship-Persian-Gulf

Missy89:


So You believe an Iranian official but you are refusing to believe an American official why?

America has space satellite that can track missiles, why can't they tell the world where the missiles crash and give satellite aerial view of the sites.

NairaMinted:
Something embarrassing and that I must say, I am unhappy to announce has happened: Russian cruise missiles crashed in Iran a couple of minutes ago.

that is a lie America media propaganda Iranian official have rejected the claim.

CSTR2:
And what will russia do if america ''mistakenly'' shot down a russian jet?
Invade america?
lol.
Putin would just rave and rant and that would be the end of it.

the America government understand and believe that the Russia air defence is formidable considering latest s-400 Russia surface to air missile. American jet will shivering in sky

whatsapp on +2348060221449

kingkaspa:
I will appreciate if you can give us the source. Thanks.

http://off-guardian.org/2015/07/26/
beyond-propaganda-the-russia-u-s-
conventional-military-balance/

Beyond propaganda: Russia-U.S conventional military balance. “The US military was never designed to fight a major war against a sophisticated enemy….As for the Russian military, it was designed to be purely defensive and it has no capability to threaten anybody in Europe, much less so the United States…” In a recent column for the Unz Review I wrote that “under any conceivable scenario Russia does have the means to basically completely destroy the USA as a country in about 30min (the USA, of course, can do the same to Russia). Any US war planner would have to consider the escalatory potential of any military action against Russia.” This still begs the question of whether Russia could challenge the USA militarily if we assume, for demonstration’s sake, that neither side would be prepared to use nuclear weapons, including tactical ones. If, by some mysterious magic, all nuclear weapons were to disappear, what would the balance of power between Russian and the US look like? Why Bean Counting Makes Absolutely No Sense The typical reply to this kind of question resorts to what US force planners call “bean counting”. Typically, journalists use the yearly IISS Military Balance or a source like Global Firepower and tallies of the number of men, main battle tanks, armored personnel carriers, infantry combat vehicles, combat aircraft, artillery pieces, bombers, missiles, surface ships, submarines, etc. presented by each side in a chart. The reality is that such bean counting means absolutely and strictly nothing. Let’s take a simple example: if a war happens between, say, China and Russia then the fact that China has, say, 1000 tanks in its Yunnan province, will make no difference to the war at all, simply because they are too distant. When we apply this caveat to the Russian-US conventional military balance we immediately ought to ask ourselves the following two basic questions: a) What part of the US military worldwide would be immediately available to the US commanders in case of a war with Russia? b) On how many reinforcements could this force count and how soon could they get there? Keep in mind that tanks, bombers, soldiers and artillery do not fight separately – they fight together in what is logically called “combined arms” battles. So even if the USA could get X number of soldiers to location A, if they don’t have all the other combined arms components to support them in combat they are just an easy target. Furthermore, any fighting force will require a major logistics/supply effort. It is all very well to get aircraft X to location A, but if its missiles, maintenance equipment and specialists are not there to help, they are useless. Armored forces are notorious for expending a huge amount of petroleum, oil and lubricants. According to one estimate, in 1991 a US armored division could sustain itself for only 5 days, and after that it needed a major supply effort. Finally, any force that the US would move from point A to point B would become unavailable to execute its normally assigned role at point A. Now consider that “point A” could mean the Middle-East, or Far East Asia and you will see that this might be a difficult decision for US commanders. “Heavy” warfare We have one very good example of how the US operates: Operation Desert Shield . During this huge operation it took the US six months and an unprecedented logistical effort to gather the forces needed to attack Iraq. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia had been prepared for decades to receive such a massive force (in compliance with the so-called Carter Doctrine ) and the US efforts was completely unopposed by Saddam Hussein. Now ask yourself the following questions: a) In case of war with Russia, which country neighboring Russia would have an infrastructure similar to the one of the KSA, prepositioned equipment, huge bases, runways, deep ports, etc. ? (Answer: none) b) How likely is it that the Russians would give the USA six months to prepare for war without taking any action? (Answer: impossible) One might object that not all wars run according to the “heavy” scenario of Desert Storm . What if the US was preparing a very ‘light’ military intervention using only US and NATO immediate or rapid reaction forces? Light (or rapid reaction) warfare I will repeat here something I wrote in December of last year: The Russians have no fear of the military threat posed by NATO. Their reaction to the latest NATO moves (new bases and personnel in Central Europe, more spending, etc.) is to denounce it as provocative, but Russian officials all insist that Russia can handle the military threat. As one Russian deputy said “5 rapid reaction diversionary groups is a problem we can solve with one missile”. A simplistic but basically correct formula. As I mentioned before, the decision to double the size of the Russian Airborne Forces and to upgrade the elite 45th Special Designation Airborne Regiment to full brigade-size has already been taken anyway. You could say that Russia preempted the creation of the 10’000 strong NATO force by bringing her own mobile (airborne) forces from 36’000 to 72’000. This is typical Putin. While NATO announces with fanfare and fireworks that NATO will create a special rapid reaction “spearhead” force of 10’000, Putin quietly doubles the size of the Russian Airborne Forces to 72’000. And, believe me, the battle hardened Russian Airborne Forces are a vastly more capable fighting force then the hedonistic and demotivated multi-national (28 countries) Euroforce of 5’000 NATO is struggling hard to put together. The US commanders fully understand that. In other words, “light” or “rapid reaction” warfare is where the Russians excel and not the kind of conflict the US or NATO could ever hope to prevail in. Besides, if the “light warfare” was to last longer than planned and had to be escalated to the “heavy” kind, would the USA or Russia have its heavy forces nearer? Shock and Awe There is, of course, another model available to the US commanders: the “shock and awe” model: massive cruise missile attacks backed by bomber strikes. Here I could easily object that bombing Russia is not comparable to bombing Iraq and that the Russian air defenses are the most formidable on the planet. Or I could say that while the USA has an excellent record of success when bombing civilians, its record against a military force like the Serbian Army Corps in Kosovo was an abject failure. [Sidebar : 78 days of non-stop US/NATO airstrikes, 1000+ aircraft and 38’000+ air sorties and all that to achieve what? Ten or so Serbian aircraft destroyed (most on the ground), 20+ APC and tanks destroyed and 1000+ Serbian soldiers dead or wounded. That is out of a force of 130’000+ Serbian soliders, 80+ aircraft, 1’400 artillery pieces, 1’270 tanks and 825 APCs (all figures according to Wikipedia). The 3rd Serbian Army Corps basically came out unharmed from this massive bombing campaign which will go down in history as arguably the worst defeat of airpower in history! ] But even if we assume that somehow the US succeeded in its favorite “remote” warfare, does anybody believe that this would seriously affect the Russian military or breaking the will of the Russian people? The people of Leningrad survived not 78, but 900 (nine hundred!) days of a infinitely worse siege and bombing and never even considered surrendering! The reality is that being on the defense gives Russia a huge advantage against the USA even if we only consider conventional weapons. Even if the conflict happened in the Ukraine or the Baltic states, geographic proximity would give Russia a decisive advantage over any conceivable US/NATO attack. American commanders all understand that very well even if they pretend otherwise. Conversely, a Russian attack on the USA or NATO is just as unlikely, and for the same reasons. Russia cannot project her power very far from her borders. In fact, if you look at the way the Russian military is organized, structured and trained, you will immediately see that it is a force designed primarily to defeat an enemy on the Russian border or within less than 1000km from it. Yes, sure, you will see Russian bombers, surface ships and submarines reaching much further, but these are also typical “showing the flag” missions, not combat training for actual military scenarios. The sole real purpose of the US military is to regularly beat up on some small, more or less defenseless country, either in order to rob it of its resources, overthrow a government daring to defy the World Hegemon, or just to make an example of it. The US military was never designed to fight a major war against a sophisticated enemy. Only the US strategic nuclear forces are tasked to defend the USA against another nuclear power (Russia or China) or actually fight in a major war. As for the Russian military, it was designed to be purely defensive and it has no capability to threaten anybody in Europe, much less so the United States. Of course, the western corporate media will continue to “bean count” US and Russian forces, but that is pure propaganda designed to create a sense of urgency and fear in the general public. The reality for the foreseeable future will remain that neither the USA nor Russia have the means to successfully attack each other, even with only conventional forces. The only real danger left is an unprepared and unforeseen sudden escalation which will lead to a confrontation neither side wants nor is prepared for. T he Israeli attack on Lebanon in 2006 or the Georgian attack on Russian peacekeepers in 2008 are two scary reminders that sometimes dumb politicians take fantastically dumb decisions. I am confident that Putin and his team would never make such a dumb decision, but when I look at the current pool of US Presidential candidates I will tell you that I get very, very frightened.

Its only mouth they can't attack Iran.

Israel can only make mouth of attacking Iran but can never attack Iran.

Obi1kenobi:

What is "suicidal" about Israel attacking Iran? An invasion of Iran is suicidal and impossible, because Iran is a far bigger country than Israel. Surgical air strikes are very feasible and there's not a damn thing Iran would be able to do about it. What will make Tel Aviv to be "gone". I've got no love for Israel, but they have by far the greatest military in the Middle East.

Israel has tasted some of Iran missiles technology through hamas in the last year onslaught. when 93% of all the hamas missiles landed in Israel with iron dome interceptor failed wholefuly. Can Israel withstand rains of 500 shabab-3 missiles at a time that will be a disaster for Israel. All of their commanders know it as well as their war planner. Israel can't afford that war.

yettybaby112:
Omg! Kinda of scary

yettybaby112, omo I gbadun your swag.

yettybaby112:
Omg! Kinda of scary

yettybaby112, omo I gbadun your swag.

7B57706B

wordcat:
A begger can receive any type of abusive word, can this Leahy of a man dare say so about Iran or North Korea not to talk of Russia?

Since we are beggers; we've to learn how to live like beggers.

While America is busy begging Iranian military; they're calling Nigerian military Rap1sts

America is begging Iranian military for what?

Lilswaghanxum:
Please guy,dont be deceived by the US,that country is an evil to all nations.
Albeit we need to preach peace and not this talk about crushing the militants. for america abeg forget that country na them go even destroy naija if the wish. no forget der prediction abi u tink say dm don forget.

yes peace my brother

Well, since they didn't not disclose the reason behind their meeting. No comment now otherwise, if it is what am thinking that meeting entails therefore it is too late. Now that Nigeria has mend her relationship with USA and USA is now Nigeria ally now. No country will want be supply Arms to MEND not even Israel. Tompolo and other should not result to violence it wouldn't augur well.

hardywaltz:
Igbos don't beg for food
Moreover it's a Muslim celebration.

Are u saying that there is no Igbo that is muslim

eyeview:
Based on this statement from DSS,they got nothing on this man. Are they now the EFCC to prosecute the man for having 12cars or for having 5 bullet-proof cars from 'tax payers' money? Or are the bullet proof cars now a security threat to the nation.
The got nothing to prosecute him on threat to nation's security,really.

Nigerian that's all what we are, trying to cover up truth with lies. Is it only bulletproof car u are seeing in the report, what about the weapons may be you didn't read that part.

[quote author=sainty2k3 post=36025538]But why DSS and not EFCC. If its corruption charges,DSS should allow EFCC do their work and face other business[/quote

This is security issue more than corruption. comprehendo?

The Department of State Services (DSS) has disclosed that its operatives invaded the Abuja home of the immediate past National Security Adviser (NSA), Colonel Sambo Dasuki (rtd), after it received intelligence report that the former security adviser to former President Goodluck Jonathan, was allegedly planning to commit “treasonable felony against the Nigerian State.” A statement signed by Mr. Tony Opuiyo, said the action of the secret service on Thursday, was in “line with current management resolve to be proactive and pre-empt individuals with penchant for impunity and lawlessness from putting back the nation to the dark days.” The statement accused the former NSA of preventing a legal assignment by operatives of the DSS, who were said to have presented a validly issued and signed search warrant. It said the operation, which was planned to last no more than two hours, entered the next day (Friday), owing to Dasuki’s alleged refusal to allow the DSS’ personnel access to his No. 13 John Kadiya Street in Asokoro, Abuja. The DSS said it recovered “incriminating items”, including seven high calibre rifles, (high assault weapons), several magazines and military related gears, 12 new vehicles, out of which five were bullet proof. The statement reads in full: “On 16th July, 2015, about 1650 hours, based on credible intelligence linking the immediate past NSA, Mohammed Sambo DASUKI (Col Rtd) with alleged plans to commit treasonable felony against the Nigerian State, operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) conducted a search on the properties belonging to the former NSA, Mohammed Sambo DASUKI (Col Rtd). The properties are on Nos. 13, John Khadya Street, Nos. 46, Nelson Mandela Street, both at Asokoro, Abuja, and Nos. 3 Sabon Birni Road, Gwiwa Area, Sokoto, Sokoto State. “The search operations was planned to be simultaneously conducted, but DASUKI, refused the operatives entry into his main residence located at No. 13 John Khadya Street, Asokoro, despite being presented with a genuine and duly signed search warrant. Consequently, what was to last not more than two (2) hours, lasted more than ten (10) hours, up till the early hours of 17th July, 2015. Indeed if not for the sense of maturity and professionalism of the officers and men assigned this task and the very good understanding and timely intervention of the new Chief of Army Staff, Tsukur Y. BURATAI (Maj Gen), there would have been a clash between the Army operatives guarding the house and Service operatives, as SAMBO directed the soldiers on duty not to allow any movement into his house, despite the subsisting court order. SAMBO thereafter raised a false alarm to the military authorities to come to his aid as he failed to correctly tell the military that his property was about to be legitimately searched. “Gentlemen, please recall that SAMBO retired from the Army as a Colonel, and therefore not entitled to have military guards, if not for the fact he was NSA. Even as NSA, such guards should have been withdrawn after his removal as NSA since he would not have been entitled. “The search was thoroughly conducted, and several items recovered, among which were some incriminating items. These include seven (7) high calibre rifles, (high assault weapons), several magazines and military related gears. “The team also recovered twelve (12) new vehicles, out of which five (5) were bullet proofs. These vehicles which are all exotic vehicles were retrieved from SAMBO’s residence having failed to produce evidence of ownership. For instance, what could he be doing with five (5) bullet proof cars as a retired NSA?. These cars which from all available evidence were purchased with tax payers’ money were being kept for possible sinister enterprise. “The Service would want to state categorically that this search operation is not a witch hunt. The Service decided to move at this time in line with current Management resolve to be proactive and pre-empt individuals with penchant for impunity and lawlessness from putting back the nation to the dark days. The Service is also aware that the lethal arms and the vehicles recovered were not reflected in SAMBO’s handover notes or what could a former NSA be doing with destructive weapons and bullet proof cars which put together could disrupt the peace of any city in Nigeria for a while. “On the search of his three (3) properties, including the Sokoto residence, the Service is aware that in his capacity and given his antecedents, he might decide to use any of his residences for such diabolical plans, rather than his main residence. “Gentlemen of the press, the Service Management would want to assure members of the public that it would not trample on the freedom of individuals or groups as guaranteed by the Nigerian Constitution and emphasized by the current administration’s position on transparency, and probity underlined by justice and equity for all Nigerians. This is the driving force for all DSS operations. However, the Service would not hesitate to go after any person or group of persons, no matter how highly placed once such individual (s) breach or attempt to breach the laws of the Federation. The days for impunity and indecisiveness in the face of unpatriotic acts by individuals operating against the State are over. The Service hereby appeals to all Nigerians to be law abiding and partner with it in ensuring a peaceful and secured nation. In the same vein, those that are bent on breaking the rules governing our peaceful co-existence due to either the huge ill gotten wealth they have acquired or imaginary hold they think they have on our nation’s survival, are being warned to rethink. The DSS will use all constitutional means as defined by its mandate to deal decisively with such unpatriotic individuals. “The Management want to seize this opportunity to appreciate Nigerians for the tremendous acts of goodwill that is being extended to the new dispensation. The Management also wish to assure Nigerians that the gesture and confidence being expressed will be reciprocated with more dedication and service to our dear country Nigeria.”

barcanista:
Nonsense!
1. If he plays partisan politics, is his office not a partisan one? Is he a Service Chief or a civil servant? Is he not an appointee of a PDP government and a PDP member? Which NSA wasn't partisan?

2. If he has ties with IBB or Gusau what is wrong? Are they indicted for terrorism or outlawed? Is freedom of association not his right?

3. If Corruption, when did SSS have the mandate to arrest corrupt officials? Is SSS same as EFCC, ICPC and SFU? Is that even the legal procedure? Has he been invited/summoned? Is their any arrest warrant?

Why are Buharists so undemocratic? Is is despicable. Let me assure Buhari that he will be resisted if he wants to reinvent his dictatorial character. He's so undemocratic and hardened. If he has personal beef with Sambo Dasuki he should head to court and stop abusing agencies of the State.

Its like you are too sentimental or fool of the first order. All of these is attached to national security. So if you are trying to gain point from overruling the issue of national security then you get big ZERO.

kahara:

You have been bias! I thought you will have reasonable suggestion but am disappointed. "drastic measure" indeed, so are telling me that should enforce a new dressing code in the North without considering the Tradition, Culture and even the Religion of the people in the North. That cant be possible here in Nigeria particularly the most Islamic religious north. You are telling me that the skin of a goat should shed alive in which it has been living with for more than 100yrs even before the advent for this so called BH. mehnn that will lead to a disaster. Even when America Forces is fighting in Afghanistan and the Taliban result in using this mean, America or Afghanistan government didn't enforce anything like. There should be some other way. telling north people to do away with Agbada, Babanriga, Hijab e.t.c lolz it is unfeasible.



Thank u. I am enjoying ur argument. But btwin legalization of gayism n enforcement of temporary dress code wch do u think will attract popular n serious condemnation by d people? Do ur culture n religion accommodate gayism? Why do u think it is a cultural n religious offence to legaliZe gayism in Nigeria?

Islam didn't allow gay and as well as I didn't condone it either. The western country too know Nigeria is steadfast to their religion doctrine whether Islam or Christianity. With thorough persuasion I believe America and its Zionist entity will understand. Buhari is from North there is no way he will legalize gay marriage. I believe is not just Buhari that will Legalize gay marriage it must pass through House of assembly the people's representative and it will still end the same way.

kahara:



Thank u. You must agree wt me dat d greatest means uses by BH to inflict greatest harm is tru suicide bombings. A critical situation requires a critical measure. Boko haram is now critical therefore requiring a drastic measure. Elsewhere i hav said it n i will say it again that the surest way to curb indiscriminate bombings by BH is to enforce a new dressing code across d North. The traditional Hausa/Fulani wears help d terrorists in concealing dia weapons. Nobody can wear a t-shirt or polo shirt n conceal IED in it. It's hard if not impossible. So my suggestn is fr PMB to ban certain type of wears to curb suicide bombing in d streets while d security forces concentrate on dislodging dem out of dia hideouts.

You have been bias! I thought you will have reasonable suggestion but am disappointed. "drastic measure" indeed, so are telling me that should enforce a new dressing code in the North without considering the Tradition, Culture and even the Religion of the people in the North. That cant be possible here in Nigeria particularly the most Islamic religious north. You are telling me that the skin of a goat should shed alive in which it has been living with for more than 100yrs even before the advent for this so called BH. mehnn that will lead to a disaster. Even when America Forces is fighting in Afghanistan and the Taliban result in using this mean, America or Afghanistan government didn't enforce anything like. There should be some other way. telling north people to do away with Agbada, Babanriga, Hijab e.t.c lolz it is unfeasible.

milychocs:




Why you had to use Onitsha, a SE homogeneous-ly Igbo, Christian city in a region that has been clamouring for a separation from the Nigeria entity as an example is beyond me right now?
Was that a scare tactic? That region lost a 3 year war....so guns/bombs will not faze it

But I tell you....it would be very foolhardy of anyone who wants one Nigeria to let BH related violence happen in the SE
Even the tiniest bit of violence

Because that would be an answer to the separatist movement
Biafra will then rise sooner than you would want.
So just leave this region the hell alone
Thanks

Its an assumption bros, assuming what is happening in the North presently is what is happening there, if Niger delta militant decide to go extreme without the support of some part in that region and they are now using that medium. will your shot gun be useful.

kahara:


Thank you sir, can u please give a strategy in which our military can use to enter into hostile environment (sambisa) and engage an enemy who is using innocent humans as their shield without killing the innocent lives in the cross fire. USA military can assist Nigeria Army in one way or the other. One possible way is the using US military spy and surveillance satellites that can determine the movement and activities of the insurgent.


Thank u for ur submission broda. As a historian n international relations master, i am sure that no favor goes for free in the international system. When a state offers another state somthing it asks fr somthing in return. International aids are nt free. The US n leading European states hav hurriedly promised n even offered some aid to Nigeria almost immediately PMB assumed power. Guy u must hv read d thread here yesterday about how U.S.plan to persuade PMB to legalize gay marriage in xchange fr their support against Boko Haram. America does nt need our oil or money or anytin u may tink. All dey need frm u is to toe their policy line weda good or bad. My argument den is dat no amount of American or European aids to Nigeria can justify legalization of gay n lesbian bullshit in our dear country.

I agree with you and I believe everyone reading this too will believe the same. The hardest war to fight is asymmetric war which different from conventional war no force u repeat no force can boast of winning it. Even the elite America Army can't boast. Had it been the insurgents didn't use the tactics hiding behind the human shield, it will only take two jet fighter to level down the insurgent hideout. Now with all this what do you think can be the approach tactics that can be use, else many Soldiers and Civilians will die.

kahara:
Mr. President Sir,i am glad u okeyed what we the honourable opposition critics are doing on Nland tryin to put u on ur toes n showing u d road u should follow. Sir for ur information, some APC sheep here no deh let us point dem where to graze to avoid destruction of agricultural crops.
Sir,make i tell u say d road to defeating Boko Haram must nt pass tru Washington because deh fit wash ur brain dia. The shortest road passes tru Sambisa via Bornu State.

Thank you sir, can u please give a strategy in which our military can use to enter into hostile environment (sambisa) and engage an enemy who is using innocent humans as their shield without killing the innocent lives in the cross fire. USA military can assist Nigeria Army in one way or the other. One possible way is the using US military spy and surveillance satellites that can determine the movement and activities of the insurgent.

EUROBOMBER:

Is this the type of government that Buhari intends to run? He wants to use the EFCC to harass the opposition politicians and leave the thieves in his party to walk free?

Why is Sule Lamido being harassed by the EFCC while Rotimi Amaechi is left to walk around freely?

I smh at Buhari.

Also, if Buhari arrest Amaechi while Lamido go scot free you will say Buhari is tribal bias.

FowlYansh:
And he values wearing pampers and taking selfie with cows more important than the security of the nation.

that was how your drunken ex dances around when Nigerian are dying. Or have u forgotten?