₦airaland Forum

coogar: there's no point debating with stark illiterates.

haba...na fight? only losers resort to name-callings when on the verge of losing argument....c'mon we all learn everday afterall

TheBigUrban2: Tolulana

Yomilana

lol...m seriz..it aint stictly feminine here joorh

TheBigUrban2: Coogar can lie

based on the few fallacies i've seen in his post....i'm beginning to concur

coogar: in the united states.
google is your friend

i think you shud take your advice

coogar: are you kidding me?
consent was given to the act, consent wasn't given for the man to ejacülate. she told her hubby to pull out but the hubby refused telling her "i am your husband and i shall do what i please". she got pregnant as a result & she took the matter to court.

at first hearing, the case was dismissed then it went to the high court & 3 lord judges deliberated and re-examined the case. this time they came with a verdict that it was räpe since her choice was taken away from her. i will look into my archives later & send you the link. even british women were embarrassed with the ridiculousness of the verdict & how it's a mockery to the genuine victims of räpe.




just so you know - a woman can never räpe a man in the west. at worst, she can only get sëxual assault. the only instance women get charged for rapë is when she's an accomplice to a man räping another woman.

so if a woman spikes your drink & mounts you without your consent, it doesn't amount to räpe. the explanation is only a man carries an organ that can penetrate so women cân never râpe.

I'm still curious to read the facts of that case..aii,until then sha.
That is so because most american states now refer to the act as sex.ual assault nd d likes and as a matter of fact the US federal laws doesnt use the word 'r@pe' and a woman can actually be charged for assaulting a man sexually.
Btw are u speculating here or stating facts because the penalty for that act of spiking drinks can be up to 15 years gender notwithstanding!

TheBigUrban2: lana del ray?

lana turner?


Feminine name

adelana...oluwalana

coogar: after 2013, they included the penetration angle. two teenagers are making out. the girl unzips the boy's trousers & grabs his manhood. the boy returns the gesture by sticking a finger in. since she didn't consent to that particular act, he has räped her.

in what jurisdiction is the boldened act criminalized as rape

Actually d thing is most african countries focus their definitions of rape on consent and its really tough proving lack of consent

coogar: that's why it's on tape.
from the whole conversation since she got into the bedroom to the actual do, a sensible prosecutor would deduce if she was coerced or gagging for it. prosecutors would quickly strike off the case before their client gets charged for claiming false rapë.

it wasn't one case - this was in a high court. lord judges sat down & examined the case and they all agreed the woman was räped since she was deprived of choice with the consequence that her consent was negated.

sighting the case wud be rily helpful if u dnt mind.
My point remains until proven that her consent wasn't given to the action,d r@pe thingy remains a claim

TheBigUrban2: It is feminine

it is not oh..,that lana is a fictional xcter na

coogar: don't be too hasty to say excuses of shock to resist get rebutted. in the UK, if the woman didn't say yes, the accused cops a rapë charge.

a woman took her husband to a UK court that she was räped. the agreement was that husband should not ejäculate into her. hubby got carried away and did otherwise. the judge agreed she was räped because what was agreed prior the sëx act was breached by the hubby.

so my friend, räpe in my neck of the woods is very delicate. men here practically put a tape recorder somewhere in the room before proceeding & we make sure we ask 20 times before doing the do. if she does not say yes verbally, no sensible man should proceed otherwise.......

actually i tot we were referring to african jurisdictions? btw...thats jez one case,a particular judge's decision that could have been appealed against until i see the facts...evennif its on tape and u say yes to the man due to coercion,she can still make her case because she said yes under duress....all that matters s a good counsel,solid evidence and a really good judge/jury

TheBigUrban2: Rap£ is complex.


If there arent signs of forced entry/struggle or an inconsistency with the victim's story, the rap£ might be deemed to be false.
http://www.cotwa.info/p/false-rape-allegations-assault-on.html

YAGA!

coogar: no, it doesn't
a woman has to say yes to sex to qualify it as consensual sex. lack of resistance does not suggest consensual sex. lawyers will use the technicality that she was too scared or too shocked to resist. this is why i said rapë cases are very complex cases.

of course rape cases are always technically complex as per d suspected rapist is innocent until shown otherwise and its always hard to prove that she didnt consent to the s£x in cases like this.
Excuses that she was too shocked to resist get rebutted mostly and cases where they are tolerated are highly elusive

TheBigUrban2: Wassap Lana?

The only man with a heroine's name

lmao it aint a feminine name tho :p m pretty good sha....how's ur end?

ATMC: #smiles...I copied it from someone on here. No it doesn't. Yhu now 'knoh'.

Is it who i think it is?

I asked d simple question below:

lanaVello1: how exactly does homosexuality affect you? except threat of human extinction and thats y u r meant to procreate

and u tried dodging it with this:

freshdude2: Nah, humour me. Tell me what you think.

still you're asking me "to debate your rationality"....smH

freshdude2: Shut up and park well, oga. You have nothing to say. I have stated my opinion, you can either debate my rationality or shut up. Don't come here dropping "big words" hoping to sound smart. If you've got nothing to say stop quoting me, fvcking faggit.

haba,we dey fight? only retards resort to name-calling when on the verge of losing arguments...

freshdude2: Nah, humour me. Tell me what you think.

mtscheeew..circumvention...smH

MrAnony1: Good now consider this scenario presented by InesQor

" I will drop a really very subtle one here; the case of a woman [b] THAT LETS A MAN HAVE HIS OWN WAY without any physical resistance because she is desperate for a child. But she does not actually consent to the se'x. . .

E.g. the woman has a husband/partner who she'd rather sleep with, but someone else is taking advantage of her because she is facing pressure about having no children. She may then not physically resist the attacker (in her desperation) even though she is entirely disgusted by the means to her end. For some victims, when rap'e is set into motion, they cope with the event by forcing their minds to think of themselves as third party observers. This is the only way their minds can deal with the violation they are experiencing. Such as this example would often involve such a coping mechanism. But never forget that rap'e is always about CONSENT. Not purpose."[/b]

Is this scenario above different from the one involving John? If so how? Secondly, would you say that the woman has been r[color=#000000]ape[/color]d in this scenario? If so why?

To me,the statement in capitals has already connoted an element of consent

freshdude2: Homozexuality affects you more than you know buddy

how exactly does homosexuality affect you? except threat of human extinction and thats y u r meant to procreate

freshdude2: Meanwhile, be aware that iincest is a crime: google David Epstein, iincest case . And what does justifiable offence mean?

freshdude2: Meanwhile, enjoy your homosex world, brother-that-unnecessary-sarcasm-annoys. . I'm not the cause of your pain, don't bring your saltiness this way.

i'ld pretend i didnt see that..

FrancisTony: LOL! Your ID is kinda funny now.

Welcome back tho'

its quite annoying o...left for few months en a new nick z now imposed on me...ah taya o,tanx buddy

Omodaddye: C.A.C Mount of Salvation

rily? thats great..

hey guys...hope y'all are gud? just saying hi..

rape as a crime is not just about plain consent,consent could also be obtained by coercion or under duress,u knw

MrAnony1: Responding to the part highlighted in bold: I wonder how you can say that the woman was "physically subdued" when not only did she not physically resist sex from the man, she also wanted to have sex because she hoped to conceive by the act.

The scenario I showed you isn't any different. The man in my case equally did not physically resist his attacker because he wanted to have babies by her.

If you can't see that all you really presented was a woman who was committing adultery with the intent of having a child and saying that she was being taken advantage of then you are truly blinded by your bias towards the fairer sex.


Since you clearly don't count a r[color=#000000]api[/color]st turned from his evil ways as an example of an improved character, I would have liked you to explain to me what character building really means but alas you are gone.


I see no problem with violating a person who violates someone else. This to me is fair and deserved punishment for crimes committed. You never gave a single reason why it isn't. Thanks for your time anyway.


Edit: I have rephrased my senario again (I know you won't respond but please read it now and judge for yourself if I am really being ridiculous or if I have been right about you being biased towards females. Only you can truly answer that question to yourself)

"I would rather sleep with my husband but I sleep with my male colleague John because I am desperate to have children. As you can see, he is obviously taking advantage of me.
I do not physically resist him when he touches me even though I am entirely disgusted by the sex we are having but I let it happen because I am desperate for children. Clearly you can see that John from the office is attacking me
For victims like myself, when my co-worker starts having sex with me r[color=#000000]aping[/color] me, I can only cope by forcing my mind to think I am outside my body watching the act. This is the only way I can deal with the experience of being "violated" by him.

Never forget that [color=#000000]rap[/color]e is always about CONSENT. Not purpose. The fact that I didn't resist John because I actually want a baby is irrelevant. All that matters is that I never actually said yes to John."

Is John a r[color=#000000]api[/color]st in this scenario? You be the judge.

john is no r@pist in this scenario

masonkz: To the young girl whose innocence may have been taken away, nope it is not only silence, but outright denial of her right to marry whom she wants to.

thats most prolly due to d ;arents' greed,anyways pple are advocating for anti-pedophile laws

masonkz: So marrying of under-aged girls is illegal in Nigeria?

i think the position of the law is silent regarding that

beryl04: Well dear, in this your sick country the latter is legal while the former is the norm,so, u go figure.

where in your country is that legal?

freshdude2: The world is civilising. Homozex has been accepted and legalised. Next on the list is iincest and pedophilia. Rejoice for progress.

homosexuality is being legalized coz it most probably dpesnt affect you in any way,i'm not sure incest is a crime anywhere as it is not a justifiable offence. But paedophilia is another bal entirely,that encroaches on the rights of innocent kids so stop being sarcastic unnecessarily!

Atmmachine: They are really sick.. why would someone fork holes full of shits with his dicckk

why would someone concern himself with another's activities in the closet?

rationalmind: which school is akokite? And why preferably female ?

nt skul buh tz students,na unilag. Lol na dem sure pass nau

Elantracey: am kul dearie...u...y re u lookin 4 one,,re u am engr stu

nah,law.....jez wanna meet a fella frm same skul