₦airaland Forum

Rashidi

We are actually compact today. I like that.


The question is can we score?

sleekdot:
There you go

Next question. I got banned posting the link but you can google it

Check the date of the news

From 1999 to 2013 that SAF retired, he only broke the transfer record twice. One on Veron and the other on Ferdinand.

Next.

raumdeuter:
You tell us when Man utd became the richest club and how Ferguson was breaking transfer records

Jaap Stam world most expensive defender
Few yrs later Rio Ferdinand world most expensive defender

Stop typing jargons together.

Stam was bought in 1998 for £10.6 million.

Stam and Ferdinand never played together. Ferdinand was bought 4 years after Stam.

He who allege must prove. Prove when Man Utd was the richest club in the world during SAF reign.

Stay on course, don’t shift the goalpost.

raumdeuter:
20yrs ago Ferguson was already spending 30m on Rio Ferdinand alone

Ferdinand was bought in 2002 and it took 6yrs before SAF buy another player higher than Ferdinand by £750k.

I hope you know SAF highest transfer was Berbatov £30.75million in 2008?

raumdeuter:
He was managing the richest team who could break transfer records anyhow they wished

Stop repeating this jargons jare Dayo.

When did Man Utd became the richest club in the world?

nihilistjnr:
I've always said that I respect his ability as a manager.

I'm just bringing out the ojoro.

It's easy to point out how many titles he won, but let's not forget he had the best squad for a large majority of his career in epl.

In the era you mentioned up there, at some point he had the best attackers in Rooney, Ronaldo, Tevez, Berbatov, Van Nistelrooy...and still stole van Persie who was the best striker in the league at the time

He had the best midfielders in Scholes, Keane, and Carrick....and he still kept trying to steal Gerrard

He had arguably the best centreback pairing in the history in Ferdinand and vidic.

He had Van Der saar.

The only player to win WPOTY while playing in EPL was a manyoo staff
Ferguson was the original point and kill manager

Berbatov, Tevez, Rooney, Nilsteroy, V. Persie, Ronaldo didn’t play together at the same time.

Mention just 1 player among them that was “bought” as a superstar apart from maybe V. Persie. He built the team himself.

We bought Ronaldo in 2003
We bought Rooney in 2004

We didn’t win the league in 2004,2005,2006. We won the league in 2007 3 yrs after buying Ronaldo and Rooney.

We bought VDS in 2005. We won the league in 2007.

Keane and Carrick never played together.

We bought Nistelrooy in 2001 and we only won the league once in his time with us. ONCE.

Rio Ferdinand was signed in 2002 and for the first 4 years, we only won the league ONCE.

Vidic was signed from Spartak moscow.

Tevez spent just 2yrs with us.


What all this point to is that Fergie was the one building and rebuilding his team to be the best in the league over and over again.

nihilistjnr:
Ask this man why he was doing it, it it had no use

Did he stop other manager from using the same trick? Who stop them from jumping up n down the touchline pointing to the watch?

nihilistjnr:
You already have the best team and you're breaking transfer records and stealing players on the cheap

No wonder a Manyoo majority shareholder took your man to court to question his transfer dealings

He was a criminal. I'm glad he's gone

Did he get the best team in world from Pluto? Wasn’t he the one that build that best team?

So it’s now stealing players on a cheap and not breaking transfer records again.

I’m glad SAF tormented you though, I’m sure you have nightmare anytime you think about the man. This make me happy.

nihilistjnr:
Yes it sounds like you don't understand numbers.

Manyoo between 1992 and 2004 had won the league 8 times, 5 more titles than anybody else.

Here without his photo we can see there's no such dominance and gap

City only have 1 league more than Chelsea.

If Liverpool win this year, it's 3, 2, 1, 1

Not 8,3,1,0

Imagine winning twice the number of titles than the other 19 contestants COMBINED

Your man was a criminal. I'm glad he's gone

He was able to win that much because he was better than everyone else.

From 2004 to 2013 when he retired, Chelsea and City had started spending mad money and outspent SAF every single season.

Man Utd - 5
Chelsea - 3
City - 1
Arsenal - 0
Liverpool - 0

So even when we had money bag in the league, SAF still won league title than every club in the league combined.

Rest the agenda abeg.

nihilistjnr:
This is from Opta

When Manyoo are leading, the referee would blow earlier than normal.

When they are losing , referee would give them a 3rd half

And that's your man confirming that is true. Unless you want to say sir rednose sidnt know what he was saying in the interview

Looking at your stats from opta. The difference between Man Utd and Liverpool and City is just 12 seconds and 25 seconds respectively.

Are you saying this is the reason why they both won 1 combined league title till SAF retired?

nihilistjnr:
If you already have the best team in the league, you don't really need to spend too much to top up.

See how Liverpool and Man City didn't really spend too much this season

But that your rednosed criminal put a heavy yoke on our neck those days.

He had the best team, then he will still be breaking transfer records, as well as stealing the best players from other EPL teams for under their real values.

Ferguson was a criminal mastermind.

I'm glad he's gone

All this yarns is just okoto meow kututu meow skr tbh.

All these breaking transfer record is bullshite. For someone that spend 25yrs in a club, he’s definitely going to break some transfer record.

The question is, how many times did SAF outspend everyone in the league. It wasn’t even up to 5 times. In over 20 seasons, there are 1 or more teams that outspend SAF, so where is this okoto meow yarns coming from?

nihilistjnr:


How many times did those teams win the league between 1992 and 2004?

Lemme help you

Liverpool - 0
Newcastle -0
Blackburn - 1
Arsenal - 3

Manchester United - 8 times

If not for Arsenal that at least put up a fight, it would have been Ferguson 11, the rest 1

Then a starboy omolope from Portugal teamed up with the Russian mafia to put an end to the nonsense.

Since SAF retired, how many club has won the league?

Let me help you:

Chelsea - 2
City - 3
Leicester - 1
Man Utd - 0
Liverpool - 0

If Chelsea did not at least put up a fight, City could have won it 5 times in 6.

See how it sounds?

kokaneprodigy:
when u are losing by a goal margin, tell me you don’t wish the ref never blows the final whistle.

When a team is trailing by a goal and the extra time say 5mins who has more to lose, the team already winning or the one trailing?

Later you’ll say you have sense shameless debtor.

Very silly argument.

A team that didn’t equalize or win in 90mins suddenly have advantage to win in 1min or 30sec added time.

Excuses upon excuses.

nihilistjnr:
That's just one of many ojoros.

Ferguson they combine multiple ojoros whilst also having the best players, and spending the most in the market

Ferguson was essentially mamman daura

List the multiple ojoros na.

How many times did Fergie outspend everyone in the league?

nihilistjnr:
Throwback to the bad old days...

I'm so glad this old man is gone

I guess Man Utd were the only one playing during those seconds. The other team just stand n watch.

nihilistjnr:
Who was the competition between 1992 and 2004?

Blackburn, Arsenal, Newcastle, Liverpool.

kokaneprodigy:
in your infinite wisdom if u inject huge money into a dying business u start seeing results immediately?

Yes Arsenal Liverpool and Spurs haven’t won the league but their financial resurgence is part of the reason top 3 ain’t guaranteed for u scummies anymore.

How do u win the league when u can hardly make top 3.

You really think we will be struggling like this if we still had SAF?

The jokes on you.

kokaneprodigy:
The seasons Chelsea and City won was when they started matching United in spending. Reason the league/ top 3 was shared by those three teams and Arsenal earned the coveted fourphy. With Liverpool, Arsenal and Spurs spending now baba would struggle badly.

If I look at ur post closely at a point it was btwn Ferg and Chelsea with the Abrahamovich effect and spending power, City took same route as Chelsea and started appearing up there later and they wrestled the frequency from Ferg. Now extrapolate and tell me how he would have fared with Spurs, Arsenal and Liverpool spending now and joining the league of spenders.

You have started sniffing your Kokane again.

Chelsea started spending heavily in 04/05 season. From that season till SAF retired, Chelsea outspend SAF yet SAF won 5 league titles to Chelsea 3.

City started spending heavily from 2008 till SAF retired, they outspend SAF during this period yet City 1 to SAF 3 titles.

Since SAF retired till now, Spurs, Arsenal or Liverpool haven’t won the league but you want us to use them as yardstick that’s SAF won’t win the league because they were spending money.

Your brain is paining you Kokane and I’m here to tell you.

kokaneprodigy:
[s]Y’all think if MOU had been Manu manager during that era he wouldn’t be winning trophies back to back?
Reason Mou kept complaining about how other clubs were spending talk about buying wing backs and defenders at the price of strikers. It wasn’t cod he wasn’t spending as well but he wasn’t the only spender.

Ferguson wouldn’t survive in this era they’ll drag him, even with his spending power at the time he still needed Webb’s backing to win his trophies.[/s]

Trash

kokaneprodigy:
Leave them they want us to drag Ferguson. How many clubs were actually competing for the title in Ferg’s era. Ferg’s ManU what was like Bayern in Bundesliga. Ferg was picking players as he wished.

With the rise of City and Chelsea matching them in the transfer market baba saw the writing on the wall and japa.

Trash.

05 - Chelsea
06 - Chelsea
07 - Man Utd
08 - Man Utd
09 - Man Utd
10 - Chelsea
11 - Man Utd
12 - Man City
13 - Man Utd

You were saying what again?

Oasis007:
Did you read the Interview Gary had with OGS?! The Dude has the Confidence of the Owner and the Board. They believe he's the right Choice along with clueless Phelan.

That’s how Moyes, LVG, Mou had the confidence of the owner and the board.

If we lose today and we are 1pt above relegation, you will see. It seems you think they will come out and say they have lost the confidence of the owner or the board? I laugh.

Make we sha no lose today. Na my prayer be that.

Oasis007:
Bitter Truth...... OGS ain't gonna be sacked. We should rather hope for Miracles to happen and kinda turn around the woeful Performances of the Team.

From my Observations, it seems the Board wanna stick with him, no matter the Results and Team's Position on the Table this Season.

They kinda believe he has the undiluted DNA in him, and with Time he's gonna return the Club back to his glorious Day.

If Liverpool should beat us, we will be 1pt above relegation zone. 1pt.

Hopefully we get a draw at least.

raumdeuter:
Will Man Utd fans not take that progression right now?
Poch comes in today make Europa finals
Next season top 4
3rd season CL final
4th season CL winner and missed league by a point
5th season running away with the league

Maguire and Bissaka could be VVD and Fabinho almost same price

Ole is a poor coach just like Mourinho and Moyes

Mou:
1st: Carabao cup n Europa league
2nd: 2nd and FA cup final
3rd: Not backed by the board.


Erhm you were saying?

Sirvingeo:
Although I am among the microscopic few that was privilege to graduate below 23 years but let us consider the inadequacy of the system that produce these graduate .The unsteady academic calendar and incessant strike .All this were caused as a result of our government lackadaisical attitude. Since they are the cause, they should find a way to accommodate most of these graduate that were affected age wise. The best way is to shorten their service years but no graduate should be disqualified because of age.

Graduate trainee are for graduates that will be trained whether they have experience or not. Do a survey of average age of graduates then you will see 28 was fair enough. There are even some that were born in 1990 and yet they are going through the recruitment process.

VisionE20:
The repentant Access Bank Theorist, all this insults are not needed here now no matter how provoke you are. Abeg, two wrongs don't make a right

Thanks.

Sotrue:
[s]I am sure you know this platform is not as faceless as you think it is. Your fake accounts ain’t gonna help you hide. Watch it! [/s]

...

Sotrue:
LARRIDE,

You are very ignorant for making this comment and let me warn you, do not comment on my post ever again. You must be a very rude fellow and I was thinking otherwise until now. This is your last warning.

[s]What controversy did you see in the DPR recruitment? Did they not follow the laid down procedures just like this recruitment? Or was it the purported merit list that was flying around that you call controversy? How dumb of you!
When I write anything, please never quote me again. If you believe it, it’s fine. If you don’t it’s fine. But NEVER you insult me in your entire life again . I never said the recruitment was cancelled but we should pray against it being cancelled because some people want the recruitment cancelled which is a fact.

Same way I wrote here in July that the recruitment was suspended and some of you were rejecting it and two months down the line you all realized it was true and started echoing the same thing.

From your words here,I can see you think like a child , please we are not mates. I did not even apply for supervisor cadre so that should tell you we are not mates. That we joke here sometimes does not mean we should throw caution to the wind when addressing ourselves. I advice you keep yourself busy. I assure you can’t keep half of this same energy you exude here when you see some of us in person. Be guided ![/s]

I have commented on your post again, Thunder will fire you if you don’t do your worst.

Fücking slowpoke

Beetek:
Dear Larride,
There's what we call contextual usage... In law, when the judge or magistrate asks the parties involved to maintain status quo, it means that any activity that was on going should stop... No further activities should take place on the existing state of affairs. So that when the case is finally decided, the object in question would still have value to the winner, because the usage or the progressive activities on that subject or object can be detrimental.

Let's say we are contesting ownership over a car, and the land is in your custody, the court would order that you maintain status quo, and that means you should stop any further activity on that land, if you were building and the house is at lintel level, you are not to add one more block to that house, so that when the matter is decided and I win the matter, I won't have a full house to bring down or I won't be given a Herculean task by how you built the said house.

Bros, if you are a lawyer, I’m sure you know that property law defer most times. The analogy you gave is for “Property law”. Car or house can be damaged or whatever. It doesn’t go along with this context.

The word you are looking for is “INTERIM INJUCTION”.

The case before the court is that the age limit is discriminatory. The judge order that status quo be maintained.

What is the status quo of the recruitment before the court case? What status were they maintaining? It simple means let things be the way they are. Don’t change the age limit, leave it the way they are until we hear the case.

It could have been a different case entirely if the judge had said; I hereby grant an interim junction to halt the recruitment process till an official decision is made.

There are several cases that support this but I don’t have the strength to start digging for cases.


Enjoy.

jaiye4love:
Yes, he is correct,but if nnpc continue all processes, they can never conclude this recruitment under the maintainance of status quo. How will they conclude a recruitment process that has a fulted criteria? So if the man wins nnpc, will nnpc reverse the appointments? Its a coomon sense!

If you follow political litigation, you will understand these things.

During political party primaries during the just concluded general election. There were a lot of issue as regard some state having 2 state chairman from different faction in the party. One will obviously be recognized by the National body while he second one won’t be recognized. Both of them will hold primary election and candidate will emerge from both faction. Then they go to court to determine which candidate should Inec record as the party candidate.

Once they get to court, the first thing they fight for is for the court to order status quo to remain. With that order, the one recognized by the national party will go ahead performing his duty as the state chairman of the party, even send the name of the winner of their primary to Inec.

Once the court hear the matter and rule otherwise, every action that the chairman has taken becomes null n void. They either call for fresh election or proclaim the other faction as the rightful chairman.

jaiye4love:
Yes, he is correct,but if nnpc continue all processes, they can never conclude this recruitment under the maintainance of status quo. How will they conclude a recruitment process that has a fulted criteria? So if the man wins nnpc, will nnpc reverse the appointments? Its a coomon sense!

They will appeal.

There’s no way NNPC is loosing that case. No way.

jaiye4love:
The court ultrances only stop nnpc from calling applicants to start the job,but cant stop nnpc internal processes on the recruitment. I belief once they win the case, APL will be disbursed in no distance time...This hearing will even make nnpc to sit more thight about the recruitment and eventually hasten up all processes...tbe case is a mere wake up call for nnpc!

You are getting there little by little.

What’s the status of the recruitment before the court case?

Ans: Recruitment ongoing

Judge said: let things remain the way they are.

What’s the answer?