₦airaland Forum

smoothcrim2014: She is better looking than 99.9999 percent of all Nigerian women I have ever met and I've met a lot .

u ar mad...u crazy dirty ugly black looking ghanian bia**tch.upload ur pic if this is a lie!

??adjmdwtgpjmd

a

Texas.Cowgirl:
I'm also tired of seeing Nadia's thread on FP.
The Mods have now realized that like Tonto's threads, Nadia's threads are getting unnecessary attentions.
Believe it or not, Nadia has now become a NL household name.

it's like were on the same page.leave those freakin mods,they keep fantasising about d b##

i dont know why useless and unimportant threads makes it to the front page.picture of ordinary nadia, very soon picture of nadia excretals will make front page. These mods really sucks **deactivates nL acc.**

No one ever said that life was
easy, and none of us ever
assumed that we'd get all
that we desire without
hitting at least a few
obstacles along the way. But
come on! Does everything
have to always be so hard? If
this sounds like you, take
heart; you're not alone. And
believe it or not, the answer
to that question is no, it
doesn't. Things don't have to
always be so difficult. So why
are you hitting all those brick
walls? And more importantly,
what can you do to stop
hitting them?
1) You're Not
Organized
Now don't take offense—I'm
one of the most unorganized
people you'll ever meet, a
talent I come by naturally. And
I can tell you with great
certainty that it most
definitely affects my ability to
be as productive as I'd like to
be. After all, it's not easy to
conquer the world, tame the
universe, and be all that you
can be when you're
surrounded by clutter and
chaos.
Being unorganized creates
unwanted stress. It makes it
difficult to concentrate, and it
almost guarantees that your
schedule won't run smoothly.
When I'm not organized, I'm
forgetting things. I'm
misplacing things. And I'm
almost always moving in high
gear because I'm running
late. It's exhausting. All of
these things suppress the
creative flow and thus, your
ability to problem-solve,
daydream, and get things
done. As a result, even the
smallest of tasks can become
monumental challenges, and
by the time you've finally
muddled your way through,
you're no longer operating in
that peak state where the
really good stuff happens.
How do you fix it? If like me,
your organization skills are
lacking, it might be time to
find a way to remedy that
situation and instill a little
order into your life. You may
not ever become the poster
child for neat and tidy, but
even the smallest steps can
make a difference and you'll
be amazed how much you
can accomplish when it
doesn't take you three hours
just to find a matching pair of
socks.
2) You're
Overwhelmed
In addition to struggling with
organization, I also have a
knack for taking on more
than I can handle or, as my
mother used to say,
"spreading myself too thin."
It's not that I want to operate
at such a high stress level—
it's just that I get excited
about new projects and can't
wait to get started.
As a result, I frequently have
several projects running
simultaneously at any given
time and before I know it, I
have too much going to really
concentrate on any one thing.
And if you can't give
something your full attention,
it won't reflect the benefits of
all your brilliance. Stay in this
state for too long, and you'll
find that your motivation
leaves you completely. You're
no longer just feeling the
anxiety that comes from
being so "stretched" - you'll
actually lack the inspiration to
tackle even the smallest of
tasks and when you do force
yourself to take action, it will
never be your best work.
How do you fix it? The
solution, of course, is to stop
and take inventory of where
you are. Get your priorities in
order and force yourself to
work from that list, so that
you stay focused and on
track. If that feeling of being
overwhelmed is due more to
the size of your projects
rather than the number, then
concentrate on breaking
those big jobs down into
several doable chunks. You
should also seriously consider
learning how to say "no" or
at the very least, "later," so
that you can manage your
time more effectively and
avoid that "where do I start?"
feeling from creeping in and
slowing you down.
3) You're Not
Following Your
"Bliss"
Plain and simple—if you don't
like what you're doing, you're
not going to thrive while
you're doing it.
Now, we all have times when
we "have to do what we have
to do." And that's perfectly
OK. I've taken jobs that
offered little in the way of
personal fulfillment but went
a long way in helping us
make ends meet and when
you're faced with that kind of
situation, well, you do what
you have to do. But all too
often, we resign ourselves to
that goal of "just getting by."
The temporary fix becomes a
permanent safety net and we
forego our dreams in
exchange for predictability
and security.
How do you fix it? If you're
spending your time selling
insurance or typing memos
or installing bath fixtures and
your passion lies somewhere
else, you'll never feel the
satisfaction and fulfillment
that you're seeking, which
means you need to take steps
to figure out what your
passion is, and then find a
way to follow it.
4) You're Not Taking
Enough Risk
Speaking of safety nets, you'll
never know what you're
capable of if you always insist
on playing it safe. That
doesn't mean that you can't
take precautions and that
doesn't mean you shouldn't
do your research or ask
questions or weigh your
options. Continue on www.lifehacker.com/5980457/six-reasons-youre-not-as-happy-as-youd-like-to-be-and-what-you-can-do-about-it

rubbish!@op.if i may ask how old are u op? Crazy mods wif crazy threads.***defecates on the thread nd 4gets to flush it ***.

Durchmann: How about the joy and release that comes with knowing that you are free from silent moanings and torturing co-habitation? People feel you having a swell marriage and you know the truth is different.
Worst of all, you've got just one lifetime to live and then it is lived in pains and regrets.
That's hell on earth, my dear...
Humans are not cats with nine lives, remember.

Guy park well nd carry your problem go 1side. U 2 do.

I ABHOR SHORT GIRLS. Also gals wif terrible legs are just a big turn off.

another means for GEJ to load his account.and to the detriment of G boys

matter! plus issue!

they should all go and get their cutlass and hoes ready...*farming on point* i think that is our default occupation that weve left to suffer.

y?

[img][/img]LONDON (Reuters) - Machines
with the ability to attack targets
without any human intervention
must be banned before they are
developed for use on the
battlefield, campaigners against
"killer robots" urged on Tuesday.
The weapons, which could be
ready for use within the next 20
years, would breach a moral and
ethical boundary that should
never be crossed, said Nobel
Laureate Jody Williams, of the
"Campaign To Stop Killer
Robots".
"If war is reduced to weapons
attacking without human beings
in control, it is going to be
civilians who are going to bear
the brunt of warfare," said
Williams, who won the 1997
peace prize for her work on
banning landmines.
Weapons such as remotely
piloted drones are already used
by some armed forces and
companies are working on
developing systems with a
greater level of autonomy in
flight and operation.
"We already have a certain
amount of autonomy," said Noel
Sharkey, professor of Artificial
Intelligence and Robotics at the
University of Sheffield.
"I think we are already there. If
you asked me to go and make
an autonomous killer robot
today, I could do it. I could have
you one here in a few days," he
told reporters.
But the technology is a long way
off being able to distinguish
between a soldier and a civilian.
"The idea of a robot being asked
to exercise human judgment
seems ridiculous to me," Sharkey
told Reuters.
"The whole idea of robots in the
battlefield muddies the waters
of accountability from my
perspective as a roboticist," he
added.
NO INTENTION
The British government has
always said it has no intention
of developing such technology.
"There are no plans to replace
skilled military personnel with
fully autonomous systems," a
Ministry of Defense spokesman
told Reuters.
"Although the Royal Navy does
have defensive systems, such as
Phalanx, which can be used in
an automatic mode to protect
personnel and ships from enemy
threats like missiles, a human
operator oversees the entire
engagement," the spokesman
added.
But the organizers of the
Campaign to Stop Killer Robots
say Britain's rejection of fully
autonomous weapons is not yet
watertight.
"We're concerned that there is a
slide towards greater autonomy
on the battlefield and unless we
draw a clear line in the sand
now, we may end up walking
into acceptance of fully
autonomous weapons," said
Thomas Nash, director of non-
governmental organization
Article 36.
Rapid advancements in
technology have allowed
countries such as the United
States, China, Russia, Israel and
Germany to move towards
systems that will soon give full
combat autonomy to machines,
according to a report by Human
Rights Watch.
"We think that these kinds of
weapons will not be able to
comply with international
humanitarian law," Steve Goose,
Human Rights Watch executive
director, told Reuters.
www.yahoo.com/news[img]LONDON (Reuters) - Machines
with the ability to attack targets
without any human intervention
must be banned before they are
developed for use on the
battlefield, campaigners against
"killer robots" urged on Tuesday.
The weapons, which could be
ready for use within the next 20
years, would breach a moral and
ethical boundary that should
never be crossed, said Nobel
Laureate Jody Williams, of the
"Campaign To Stop Killer
Robots".
"If war is reduced to weapons
attacking without human beings
in control, it is going to be
civilians who are going to bear
the brunt of warfare," said
Williams, who won the 1997
peace prize for her work on
banning landmines.
Weapons such as remotely
piloted drones are already used
by some armed forces and
companies are working on
developing systems with a
greater level of autonomy in
flight and operation.
"We already have a certain
amount of autonomy," said Noel
Sharkey, professor of Artificial
Intelligence and Robotics at the
University of Sheffield.
"I think we are already there. If
you asked me to go and make
an autonomous killer robot
today, I could do it. I could have
you one here in a few days," he
told reporters.
But the technology is a long way
off being able to distinguish
between a soldier and a civilian.
"The idea of a robot being asked
to exercise human judgment
seems ridiculous to me," Sharkey
told Reuters.
"The whole idea of robots in the
battlefield muddies the waters
of accountability from my
perspective as a roboticist," he
added.
NO INTENTION
The British government has
always said it has no intention
of developing such technology.
"There are no plans to replace
skilled military personnel with
fully autonomous systems," a
Ministry of Defense spokesman
told Reuters.
"Although the Royal Navy does
have defensive systems, such as
Phalanx, which can be used in
an automatic mode to protect
personnel and ships from enemy
threats like missiles, a human
operator oversees the entire
engagement," the spokesman
added.
But the organizers of the
Campaign to Stop Killer Robots
say Britain's rejection of fully
autonomous weapons is not yet
watertight.
"We're concerned that there is a
slide towards greater autonomy
on the battlefield and unless we
draw a clear line in the sand
now, we may end up walking
into acceptance of fully
autonomous weapons," said
Thomas Nash, director of non-
governmental organization
Article 36.
Rapid advancements in
technology have allowed
countries such as the United
States, China, Russia, Israel and
Germany to move towards
systems that will soon give full
combat autonomy to machines,
according to a report by Human
Rights Watch.
"We think that these kinds of
weapons will not be able to
comply with international
humanitarian law," Steve Goose,
Human Rights Watch executive
director, told Reuters.
www.yahoo.com/news[/img]LONDON (Reuters) - Machines
with the ability to attack targets
without any human intervention
must be banned before they are
developed for use on the
battlefield, campaigners against
"killer robots" urged on Tuesday.
The weapons, which could be
ready for use within the next 20
years, would breach a moral and
ethical boundary that should
never be crossed, said Nobel
Laureate Jody Williams, of the
"Campaign To Stop Killer
Robots".
"If war is reduced to weapons
attacking without human beings
in control, it is going to be
civilians who are going to bear
the brunt of warfare," said
Williams, who won the 1997
peace prize for her work on
banning landmines.
Weapons such as remotely
piloted drones are already used
by some armed forces and
companies are working on
developing systems with a
greater level of autonomy in
flight and operation.
"We already have a certain
amount of autonomy," said Noel
Sharkey, professor of Artificial
Intelligence and Robotics at the
University of Sheffield.
"I think we are already there. If
you asked me to go and make
an autonomous killer robot
today, I could do it. I could have
you one here in a few days," he
told reporters.
But the technology is a long way
off being able to distinguish
between a soldier and a civilian.
"The idea of a robot being asked
to exercise human judgment
seems ridiculous to me," Sharkey
told Reuters.
"The whole idea of robots in the
battlefield muddies the waters
of accountability from my
perspective as a roboticist," he
added.
NO INTENTION
The British government has
always said it has no intention
of developing such technology.
"There are no plans to replace
skilled military personnel with
fully autonomous systems," a
Ministry of Defense spokesman
told Reuters.
"Although the Royal Navy does
have defensive systems, such as
Phalanx, which can be used in
an automatic mode to protect
personnel and ships from enemy
threats like missiles, a human
operator oversees the entire
engagement," the spokesman
added.
But the organizers of the
Campaign to Stop Killer Robots
say Britain's rejection of fully
autonomous weapons is not yet
watertight.
"We're concerned that there is a
slide towards greater autonomy
on the battlefield and unless we
draw a clear line in the sand
now, we may end up walking
into acceptance of fully
autonomous weapons," said
Thomas Nash, director of non-
governmental organization
Article 36.
Rapid advancements in
technology have allowed
countries such as the United
States, China, Russia, Israel and
Germany to move towards
systems that will soon give full
combat autonomy to machines,
according to a report by Human
Rights Watch.
"We think that these kinds of
weapons will not be able to
comply with international
humanitarian law," Steve Goose,
Human Rights Watch executive
director, told Reuters.
www.yahoo.com/news

a

Promix Tuhh: WTF did u read that his death came as a result of drugs?

u can get dat 4rm yahoo news and stop actin like som brand new p****y

mods una dey craze .i posted this news b4 the op and i didnt make it to the fp.this is nepotism.... all d same R.I.P hommie

A 5-
year-old boy accidentally shot his
2-year-old sister to death in rural
southern Kentucky with a rifle
he had received as a gift last
year, authorities said.
The children's mother was home
at the time of the shooting
Tuesday afternoon but had
stepped out to the front porch
for a few minutes and "she
heard the gun go off,"
Cumberland County Coroner Gary
White said. He said the rifle was
kept in a corner and the family
didn't realize a bullet was left
inside it.
White told the Lexington Herald-
Leader the boy received the .22-
caliber rifle as a gift.
"It's a Crickett," White said,
referring to a company that
specifically makes guns, clothes
and books for children. "It's a
little rifle for a kid. ... The little
boy's used to shooting the little
gun."
The shooting, while accidental,
highlights a cultural divide in the
gun debate. While many
suburban and urban areas work
to keep guns out of the hands of
children, it's not uncommon for
youths in rural areas to own
guns for target practice and
hunting.
"Down in Kentucky where we're
from, you know, guns are
passed down from generation
to generation. You start at a
young age with guns for
hunting and everything," White
said Wednesday. What is more
unusual than a child having a
gun, he said, is "that a kid would
get shot with it."
"Accidents happen with guns.
They thought the gun was
actually unloaded, and it wasn't,"
the coroner said.
White said the girl died of a
single gunshot wound to the
chest area.
In a brief news release, state
police said the shooting
occurred when the boy was
"playing" with the rifle, but did
not elaborate. It is not clear
whether any charges will be
filed, said Kentucky State Police
spokesman Trooper Billy
Gregory.
"I think it's too early to say
whether there will or won't be,"
Gregory said.
The AP is not identifying the
children because of their ages.
www.crickett.com

kriss kross

The chief executive of Shell Peter
Voser has stunned investors
with a surprise announcement
that he is to retire next year.
Peter Voser, who is 55, said his
decision was driven by a desire
for a change of lifestyle.
Voser has run Europe's top oil
company since 2009 and led it
to a position of sector leader in
the burgeoning industry of
liquefied natural gas (LNG).
He said: "After almost 10 years
as CEO and CFO and more than
25 years in Shell, I have elected
to retire in the first half of 2014.
"After such an exciting executive
career I feel it is time for a
change in my lifestyle and I am
looking forward to having more
time available for my family and
private life in the years to come."
Shell, the last of the western
world's top four oil companies
to report results, joined its peers
in delivering a result that topped
market expectations, thanks in
part to strong refining and
trading performances, and
despite production troubles in
Nigeria and lower oil prices.
Adjusted net profit on a current
cost of supply basis rose to
$7.5bn (£4.82bn) in the quarter
from $7.3bn a year ago.
Shell did not take a writedown
on its unsuccessful Alaskan
drilling programme as some
analysts had expected but it was
the retirement announcement
which dominated talk after the
results were released.
Shares rose slightly in value
when the FTSE 100 opened for
business.
Shell chairman Jorma Ollila
praised Voser's leadership of the
Anglo-Dutch company.
He said: "Peter's leadership of
Shell over the last four years has
been impressive, reorganising
the company, delivering growth,
and developing a clear forward
strategy with a strong portfolio
of new options.
"I have enjoyed working with
Peter, in a period of great
change and progress for Shell,
and I wish him well for the
future."

Chris Kelly, known as one half of
the 1990s US rap duo Kris Kross,
has died at the age of 34 in
what police say may have been a
drug overdose.
Police were called to Kelly's
home in south Atlanta at around
4:30pm (local time) on
Wednesday.
He was taken to the south
campus of the Atlanta Medical
Centre and pronounced dead
around 5pm.
Corporal Kay Lester of the Fulton
County police said "it appears it
may have been a possible drug
overdose".
A post-mortem examination is
due to be carried out to
establish an official cause of
death.
Kelly, known as "Mac Daddy," and
Chris Smith, known as "Daddy
Mac", were introduced to the
music world in 1992 by music
producer and rapper Jermaine
Dupri.
He had discovered the pair in an
Atlanta shopping centre.
Their most famous song was the
frenetic Jump, taken from their
multi-platinum debut album
Totally Krossed Out.
And they were also known for
their fashion style, wearing their
clothes backwards.
Jump reached number one in
the US and Australia and two in
the UK.
Their musical achievements led
to instant fame. They toured
with Michael Jackson, appeared
on TV shows, and even had their
own video game.
The duo was never able to
match the success of their first
song, though they had other hits
like Warm It Up and Tonite's Tha
Night.
Earlier this year, the pair
performed together to celebrate
the anniversary of Durpri's label,
So So Def.

babeface3: a pannel of 4 niggers sat on this question till da grin was gone
undecided, each had a guun bunt none with the guts
confusion ensued and the parley was dismissed


But truth be told, Olamide has got talents, when i listened to eni duro, i knew immediately that nigger would go far. Da grin danced after 50 cents and somehow dmx or 2pac. Olamide is very original.

u ar mad

phransix147: Grandfather go and sing ur own na leave us babies alone! Nonzense...

u havent answer the question..have u be suckling on goat t*its?

Odinaka00: Lol guy jamb never start na

why ar u paying attention to this kid.. I fink he has intellect myopia.

phransix147: Indomie N50 ata weh-weh N1500 shey ole je e ton? Meaning IndoMie N50 pepper N1500 u fit chop am finish? OLAMIDE all the way, He is wat Da Grin was aspiring to be but death snatched him RIP Da Grin

even u kid still want to comment .when did u started listening to music? When u ar 18+ then u can comment.

tru luv

04kaa: This baby is richer than all of you ;DThis baby is richer than all of you

we don hear u.why ur phone come com dey double write or na u get High blood pressure?

jg

what have they done since their mega plan on boostin our electricity?nofin .Now i know my president is sicker than a luekemia patient.