₦airaland Forum

The zoo must fall

Boko haram is here to stay

He said that his actions were in line with the teachings of the Muslim faith, which he professed that leadership comes from God which he accepted in good fate.






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-e1lyzNstI

Be fooling yr self there
OPC are just words
I

Like you want us ti forget ITT
Buhari is boko haram
Buhari is fulani headsmen and improve bandits

Too late mate

Armed bandits
Come on
This is boko haram
Why fool your selves on something so easy
I begining to like the islamics they very clever..

Which one is kano zoo again
A zoo inside a zoo

We at least know what Biafrians want
As for the rest who knows what they about?
The zoo must fall.

You want to know the number under muslim control
Help will be hard here.

The zoo

Buhari try stay away from cheap drugs

Abdulmumuni Abiola, a son of the acclaimed of the 1993 presidential election, Chief MKO Abiola has declared that his father was betrayed by his own kinsmen.



Afonjas dont take prisoner's
Not even one of their own

South east and SS
Hope you watching

Buhari pls name the country Abiola
Make we rest

This people and millions sha
The same people you killing every day

Just that the zoo is not about to change

AmTruth:
It's becoming a reality and fact that the South South are becoming more mature in Nigeria politics than the South East.

1. The Chairmen of the two major political parties are from the South South.

* APC. .. Comrade Adams Oshiomole of Edo

* PDP.... Uche Secondus of Rivers.

2. The immediate past president Dr Goodluck Jonathan of Bayelsa. I am convinced that a South Southerner would be given the presidency anytime it moves back to the South after 2023 set of the South West.

South East wake up and learn to love her whom you hate. No one allows the one who Hates her to Lead her. A word is enough for the wise

Just looking forward to what would unfold in the inauguration of the National Assembly, who knows they will still clinch a Viable sit.

This is one of the reasons Why the South South is Totally and unarguably different from the South East.
Look up for more evidence.

We are proudly South South.

God bless Nigeria

I am convinced that a South Southerner would be given the presidency anytime it moves back to the South after 2023 set of the South West.


What you on about here
Wakeup men

Still not sure if you from the south south
This Abdul sef

Joblessness is a disease
Who wan listen to this morons anyway
They ve time to waste
Spit

Though i ve love for jona he is a foolish man

There is nothing here to believe
Afonjas watin be this
What do you people want

What ever

How much Osho baba pay for this write up

Op look left you see that empty building there
Na Bahari commission that empty building and na osho baba world class cancer hospital be that .

Obaseki is alright
Apc is a scam

We 've eyes
We don't need OBJ to tells us
The agenda is real

tsdarkside:
thinkin that nigeria will just roll over and accept defeat and scrape the constitution that they fought each other to even get this far sef is stvpid way of thinkin....

Who is nigeria

oteneaaron:
This looks like war to me. . . .

We're already suffering with

- Millitants in the south south

- Cultism and killings in the south-south, south-east, and south-west

- Bokoharam in the North-east and North-west

- Fulani disturbing everybody everywhere

- SARS on every young man's case

and now

You bring the Bakassi boys into the party. .our troubles have just begun.

One of this group must be fighting your course
Which one ?
Mind you no fence to sit on

Muslims that way believers this way

Muslims don start again

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCf-nxpXq3w










So you can not defend yr land

The Muslim pact coming soon to you



The ruler would provide security for the Christian believers who follow the rules of the pact.


Prohibition against building new churches, places of worship, monasteries, monks or a new cell. (Hence it was also forbidden to build new synagogues,

The law that prohibits to build new synagogues was not new for the Jews, it was applied also during the Byzantines. It was new for the Christians.)

Prohibition against rebuilding destroyed churches, by day or night, in their own neighborhoods or those situated in the quarters of the Muslims.


Prohibition against hanging a cross on the Churches.
Muslims should be allowed to enter Churches (for shelter) in any time, both in day and night.
Obliging the call of prayer by a bell or a kind of Gong (Nakos) to be low in volume.
Prohibition of Christians and Jews against raising their voices at prayer times.


Prohibition against teaching non-Muslim children the Qur'an.
Christians were forbidden to show their religion in public, or to be seen with Christian books or symbols in public, on the roads or in the markets of the Muslims.
Palm Sunday and Easter parades were banned.
Funerals should be conducted quietly.


Prohibition against burying non-Muslim dead near Muslims.
Prohibition against raising a pig next to a Muslims neighbor.
Christian were forbidden to sell Muslims alcoholic beverage.

Christians were forbidden to provide cover or shelter for spies.
Prohibition against telling a lie about Muslims.
Obligation to show deference toward Muslims.

If a Muslim wishes to sit, non-Muslim should be rise from his seats and let the Muslim sit.
Prohibition against preaching to Muslims in an attempt to convert them from Islam.


Prohibition against preventing the conversion to Islam of some one who wants to convert.


Prohibition against riding animals in the Muslim custom, and prohibition against riding with a saddle.
Prohibition against adopting a Muslim title of honor.
Prohibition against engraving Arabic inscriptions on signet seals.

Prohibition against any possession of weapons.
Non-Muslims must host a Muslim passerby for at least 3 days and feed him.
Non-Muslims prohibited from buying a Muslim prisoner.


Prohibition against taking slaves who have been allotted to Muslims.
Prohibition against non-Muslims to lead, govern or employ Muslims.
If a non-Muslim beats a Muslim, his Dhimmi is removed.

The worship places of non-Muslims must be lower in elevation than the lowest mosque in town.
The houses of non-Muslims must not be taller in elevation than the houses of Muslims.
See also
Notes
References
External links

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare via Email
The thorny question of Saudi Arabian political influence across the Middle East and Africa is back in the spotlight again with Washington taking the unusual step of effectively telling Riyadh to end Sudan’s military crackdown.

In an unusual public statement the US state department revealed that its undersecretary for political affairs, the diplomat David Hale, had phoned the Saudi deputy defence minister, Khaled bin Salman, to ask him to use the country’s influence to end the brutal repression against peaceful protesters by the Sudanese Transitional Military Council (TMC) in Sudan.

At least 60 killed in Sudan crackdown, say protest groups
It has hardly been a secret that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have gained influence in Sudan following the overthrow of the dictator Omar al-Bashir in April. Critics of Saudi Arabia will see a pattern of behaviour, evident in Libya and Yemen, in which Saudi Arabia moves to marginalise rivals Iran and Qatar, as well as to install autocratic regimes built on repression.


But it is rare for the Americans, normally so close to Saudi Arabia on regional issues, to make so public their representations to Riyadh on the need for civilian rule and for democracy to run its course.

Saudi Arabia may claim the Sudanese crackdown was an independent judgment by the interim leader, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, but the army general has in recent weeks paid visits to Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt.

More importantly the deputy president of the council, Mohamed Hamdan Dagolo, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia leader known as Hemedti, met the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, in Jeddah on 24 May, and pledged to stand with the kingdom against all threats, including Iran. He vowed Sudanese troops would continue fighting alongside Saudi Arabia against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.


Dagolo is widely seen as the true decision-maker in Khartoum, and the figure behind moves to stall negotiations about the transition to democracy and resist protesters’ demands that they be included in the transitional body.

Hemedti: the feared commander pulling the strings in Sudan
That Dagolo chose Riyadh for his first overseas trip since the fall of Bashir was hardly surprising. In April Saudi Arabia pledged to provide $3bn in funds to Khartoum, a move designed to stabilise the exchange rate and strengthen the military.

Until recently there was no sign that the US disapproved of its great ally gaining influence in Sudan. The US made no complaint when, on 30 May, Sudanese security officers notified al-Jazeera’s office in Khartoum saying the military council had decided to withdraw the Qatari state-owned TV network’s work permits without providing an official reason. The shutdown came as the authorities began a clampdown against a protest camp in the capital.


But the scale of the bloody assault on the Khartoum protesters this week led to a change in tone in Washington, and an irritation if not exasperation with Saudi foreign policy.

The US national security adviser, John Bolton, tweeted: “The unprovoked violence of Sudan’s security forces against peaceful demonstrators in Khartoum is abhorrent. The TMC must respect the right to peaceful demonstration and speed transition to a civilian-led government, which the Sudanese people have rightfully demanded.” The tweet was followed by the publicised call between Hale and bin Salman.

Yet the involvement of Saudi and the UAE, the leading Sunni “counter revolutionary” states, is part of a wider pattern of jostling for influence across the mainly Muslim Horn of Africa. Between 2000 and 2017, Gulf states invested $13bn in the region, mainly in Sudan and Ethiopia, according to a study by the Clingendael Institute, a thinktank in the Netherlands.


Broadly, on one side lies Qatar and Turkey, and on the other the counter-revolutionary states opposed to Islamism. At stake is the capture of strategic ports, improved maritime security, and privileged access to the rapidly emerging economies.

Saudi has been particularly active across the Horn of Africa and instrumental last autumn in negotiating a peace treaty between Ethiopia and Eritrea. Abiy Ahmed, Ethiopia’s prime minister, was given $3bn in aid and investments from the UAE upon taking office in April 2018, including a $1bn deposit in the country’s central bank.

In Yemen again it is the UAE and Saudi Arabia that head a coalition that has led to a four-year civil war aimed at reinstalling Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, as leader. Hadi spends most of his time in Riyadh and is no poster boy for democracy but Saudi will not abandon the war, regardless of the casualties, because it regards Iranian-backed Houthis as a permanent security threat.


Equally in Libya, where a bloody military stalemate persists in Tripoli, Marshall Khalifa Haftar by most accounts would not have tried to seize the capital in defiance of a UN peace plan without UAE military hardware, and Saudi political backing.

The question now is whether in Sudan, unlike Libya and Yemen, the US government is prepared to do more than simply dial Riyadh once.

Topics
Sudan
Saudi ArabiaUnited Arab EmiratesOmar al-BashirMohammed bin SalmanJohn BoltonMiddle East and North Africaanalysis
Share on Facebook

sarrki:
Lime baby

The bridge will be named Muhammadu Buhari

N every Christmas you will ply it to east from Lagos

Is not Lagos but Eko

Hiss spit