₦airaland Forum

Magnoliaa:
Sorry to comment o. I'm veli veli sorry, but I don't know...but you don't sound the way you look.


But damn! Wait. That's you?? I'm shookedt.

Lmao..yes that's me
How do I sound abeg?

iamoyindamola:
Na lie
Na me be legelege I be like Darlington or Segedinho
No body at all

Lmaoo una dey get spiritual strength

Theflint1:
Na okpa Dem konck

OH that story

Ellexy:
I been think say na VeryDarkMan oo

Lmaooo.. Ahh that one na hulk

iamoyindamola:
if one of your muscle cut we go use glue join am
Is this your own version of taking care of the body🤣🤣
You need to see ibime and raumdeuter big pot belly to know good life

That pot belly life na last year.. I gats lose am this year😁.

seankafor:
na you be this na em woman knock for your head

Knock my head? When? 👀

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
See muscle... Come be like those anti-cult guys wey dey mend students 4 unizik those years. The regime dey favour u & ur family

Bros I lazy oo.
If person like iamoyindamola catch me.. The beat ehn

nihilistjnr:
Guy what's going on with that green trouser?

You flex hand you come flex prïck join?

Lmaooo at this point I nor dey bother again😩

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
dis one Agbado FC no wan press our neck with supreme court victory?

Lmaooo.. It's a sad Day ish.
Na gym get me 😌

Inside the madness that is Nigeria, try dey take care of your body

Amigoss:
Strong enough to remove tinubu sitting on a presidential seat?

Politicians will bring it up again in 2027,this time without the 180days rubbish,we shall know if it is strong enough case to punish an incumbent certificate forger president who lied under oath

This is how they will dodge it in 2027

BlueRayDick:
Now u are taking the advice I've always given you

Lmao my oga, I've clocked out for a while.

BlueRayDick:
I'm not claiming anything, I'm only letting u know the reason for supreme court throwing out the case ni. U can agree or not agree with their reason.

But then u are in Nigeria and not some western nation.

Bros.
The same supreme court has admitted evidence before even after the stipulated timeline.
Abeg make we free this issue.
I have alot of good news this month for this country to ruin my happiness 😌

BlueRayDick:
If Atiku has had all those evidence before now he would've had a strong case na

What was weak about the case?

BlueRayDick:
lol...Just dey play.

So u expected that to happen ? maybe u should go and read the Imo state governorship judgement again. U will come back to reality

If you dey tell me say make I nor expect am to happen.
That na different thing because we know our country.

But to claim that the supreme could not do anything.. Lmao.. Make we bone that thing

Amigoss:
And you think the supreme court will not interpret it to favour the certificate forger who lied under oath

This is the kuku.
This man lied under oath and submitted fake certificate.
This is not a pre election issue.
This is a severe criminal offence that the constitution talks about.
The supreme court judges dey hide under election when they also admitted the significance of the evidence.

Even strongest apc supporter cannot defend what is happening right now.
Make we dead that talk😁

There's no explanation for what has happened.
Lmaoo anything anybody sees especially when applying for international roles.. That's their business.

BlueRayDick:
Na the timing of Atiku's case mess am up na , the 180 days timeline. i don't think there's anything the supreme court can do about it.

Baba the supreme court can easily admit new evidence based on the severity of the evidence.

We are talking about certificate forgery that is enshrined in our constitution. It's not just an electoral issue

BlueRayDick:
E don go na.

I no dey always pity people like Atiku and Tinubu when they lose money; dem don too chop public funds....losing few out of it will not kill them or make them broke

Atleast we know say certificate forgery nor hold meaning for this country,😌

Handwriting has been on the wall

Itsrm:
Seun press this Senator neck no be small. I can't laugh alone


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGdfty209Z4

It's not a funny matter sadly.
Na idiots like this dey rule person

larride:
Na serious colos them dey on.

The fact that Kalu was doubling down.
Honestly na proper colos

larride:
How far Prosper

Wetin dey happen for here?

I nor understand the igbo wey these 2 people smoke.
I happy as the dey cook them

Hehehe

Izzou BlueRayDick larride

Any idea why Alaba is still closed?

BRIEF OF WHATS HAPPENED SO FAR:

-Chris Uche SAN (Atiku) says the appeals are ripe for hearing.
He said there are some pending interlocutory application and moves a motion filed 6 October 2023.

He seeks five minutes of adumberation of the application.

They are praying for an order of leave to present fresh evidence on appeal based on the deposition on oath from Chicago State University.

He said the application is predicated on 20 grounds and an affidavit of 20 paragraphs filed on behalf of Atiku.

He went on to say upon the receipt of counter-affidavit from Mr Tinubu, APC and INEC, they filed a written address dated 18 October.

He adopts the application and urges the court to grant their request.

Chris Uche also said the issue involving Tinubu’s certificate is a weighty, grave and constitutional one, which the Supreme Court. He urged the court to admit the fresh evidence of President Tinubu’s academic records from CSU presented by Atiku.

He said the Supreme Court has a duty to take a look at Mr Tinubu’s records and reach a decision devoid of technicality.

-The presiding judge , John Okoro SAN, asked Chris Uche SAN whether the Supreme Court should rely on the Electoral Act or the Constitution.

In his response, Chris Uche says the issue about Mr Tinubu’s certificate is a constitutional matter which the court should look into.

—A member of the panel, Emmanuel Agim, asks Chris Uche to explain the nature of Atiku’s fresh documents he seeks to tender before the Supreme Court.

—Justice Agim asked whether the testimony by CSU registrar was conducted in a court.

Justice Agim says from Chris Uche’s court filing, the testimony by the CSU registrar held in Atiku’s lawyer’s law office in the US.

—Justice Agim says The CSU did not issue any letter discrediting Mr Tinubu’s certificate

“We are dealing with a matter that touches on the national unity of Nigeria,” the justice also says.

—Justice Okoro seeks clarification from Atiku’s lawyer, Chris Uche.

— Justice Okoro asks Mr Uche on why he wants the Supreme Court to brush aside constitutional provisions and entertain the fresh evidence.

—Chris Uche SAN explained that section 233 of the constitution gives the Supreme Court the power to entertain questions about whether a person has been properly elected.

—Chris Uche responds to the issue raised about the CSU proceedings. 

“There is a slight distinction between proceedings in the US and the UK.

“In the US, that is how court proceedings are done.

“Mr Tinubu was represented by a US lawyer, but he did not object to the proceedings being held in Atiku’s lawyer’s law office.”

Chris Uche said the depositions are more effective than letters from the CSU authorities regarding the authenticity of Mr Tinubu’s academic records.
9:43 a.m: Justice Okoro says criminal matters have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. But in this case, there are two conflicting letters from the CSU – one authenticating the president’s certificate and another discrediting it. “Which do we rely on?” He asked.

Chris Uche refers the court to a letter earlier issued to Michael Enahoro-Ebah, a lawyer, who testified for Atiku against Mr Tinubu at the Presidential Election Petition Court in Abuja.

—INEC lawyer, Abubakar Mahmoud SAN, asked the Supreme Court to dismiss Atiku’s application seeking to tender Mr Tinubu’s academic records.

-Wole Olanipekun SAN , appealed to the Supreme Court to “dismiss this very unusual application” seeking to tender fresh evidence against Mr Tinubu.

He sayid the fresh evidence is NOT admissible.

Olanipekun argues that the CSU depositions are dormant until the deponent comes to court and testify. INEC should have been a party at the deposition proceedings in the US, the aeniorawywe says

The question of 180 days (the statutory period within which an election petition should be filed and determined) is clear. It is sacrosanct, can’t be shifted. Therefore, Atiku CAN’T seek to tender fresh evidence at the Supreme Court.

Make of this whatever you will

User09:
Outright Ban. Same for all dorm accounts.

It's a radical measure but one that'll likely have the effects needed.

All means that creates the need for a Dollar needs to be taken out

Lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I had honestly refused to believe that someone will reason like this.

Ibime:
Elaborate please

Their inflation rate

Abeg..
Honest question, how did Zambia drop their inflation rate?
Like what did they do?