₦airaland Forum

alutacontinua: Actually, i believe to know if a man is stingy or not, you don't have to test how much he gives you as pocket money, it's as simple as watching how much he enjoys giving to people in need around him. If he cannot willingly give out money to his friend who is in dire need when he can afford it,

Jarus: In Islam, we are told it's a test.

Davo93: My brother, since you admit strike has very dangerous effects on our education, then why proposing injuries on our sores. I still propose a 'strategic dialogue'. I so much have a huge believe in its effectiveness.

Davo93: @Lord Babs; Your choice of words are too strong... You can make your positions known without insulting anyone. Please try and work on that.

BTW, As per your question on the current ASUU strike, the article is neither justifying the FGN or ASUU but rather trying to explain why strike is not a good approach to our educational problems.

Another option to strike? I guess you didn't read the whole 'voluminous' write-up. I suggested two ways;
1. Strategic Dialogue
2. Court Action

The strategic dialogue i mean here is trying to carry some necessary groups along. In a situation whereby we realize we have a stubborn government in power, there is a need to be more smart in dialogues. I believe involving the lawmakers of our land in such crucial matter will be helpful. They are in charge of the budget allocation verification and approval. I believe once they are successfully integrated in such dialogue, they will have to let the FG be aware of their commitements whenever a budget is passed before the house thereby compulsorily ensuring that provision is made for such agreement in the budget plan. Also, the masses should not only get to know what is going on only when a strike has been initiated. They too need to be carried along.

wild child: A government signed an agreement in 2009 and has decided not to implement it for the past four years after so much dialogues and warning strikes...please tell me what ASUU should do?

Layolaw: true talk! there should be other way of drawing governmt attention

Lilaex: Wat is a better approach? Dialogue for 800yrs? Wit dis kind of corrupt government..!

AdimGreat: 3 posts and it's already on fp...mods una well done o

ITbomb: I thought they meant BANG-ABLE ACTRESSES

Uyi Iredia: It isn't. I might as well trash it out here and so sharpen my thoughts on this. I hold it to be valid given the following axioms:

* Space is nothing or nothingness being immaterial.

* Space is infinite and so can't be said to have shape or limits.

* Space is eternal and can't be said to start or end.

I think the stance by prominent scientists and philosophers that space began with the Big B@ng inane, moreso when I note that the BB would require space to start in. Space expansion is inane given the fact of expansion is generally known wrt physical objects, the fact that expansion requires space to expand in, the futility of presuming distance increases without motion given the favt that the only means of doing such outside of motion is by systematically or randomly increasing distance values. That said from the axioms proposed above the next axiom follows.

* Space is omnipresent.

* Space is whole and indivisible.

* Space is uncaused.

That said we see space has certain features ascribed over time to God, which is, depending on how seen, problematic. The tying of space to consciousness is easily done when I note this: consciousness is not material, it is immaterial. In life, we know consciousness to have a material substrate, the brain BUT the brain, despite affecting consciousness can't be said to cause it but rather begs how it has it given the following: matter lacks consciousness. I think it even more fitting now, because it puts God at a closer, and in a strange way still farther, to me. The only reason why you disagree is because consciousness is empirically associated with a material base which I said begs and doesn't explain consciousness.

Uyi Iredia: For that, I must recourse to our argument wherein I asserted God to be the space we (and all material things) are in, adding a consciousness to it, which, naturally, you rejected:

Uyi Iredia: Given laws of Nature which bar such, such laws of Nature consciously deigned by doG Seltzer thingz.

Eseries: THE SUPERNATURAL EXIST.....! Full stop!

Kay 17: 1. An intelligent computer can not create itself nor its intelligence.

2. An intelligent man can't create iself

Thus intelligent beings are incapable of self creation.

bad meat: The fool will say in his HEART that there is no GOD

Judas2013: Yahweh,Obatala,shongo,oya,asu ,aye lala, yemoja which one?

salt 1: Being an atheist is very depressing.

abouqi: Whenever you see Moses, ask him what happened to him when he attempted to see God.

Uyi Iredia: what happens to consciousness when a human body fails?

Uyi Iredia: Sure, if you hit my head or affect a part of my brain an aspect of my consciousness is affected.

Uyi Iredia: is consciousness material or immaterial ?

Uyi Iredia: I see. How then do you believe space exists since there is no evidence to substantiate it ? BTW do you agree that space is immaterial, infinite, eternal and omnipresent ?