₦airaland Forum

erico2k2:
Bro check am how many prophets in the bible get one wife ?
This one wife thing is not from the bible, its from England

Several. Isaac, Moses, Isaiah, etc.

Let's be clear though, the Bible supports both monogamy and polygamy.

kingxsamz:
This is the man who many Nigerian so called MAGA Christians look up to btw.
If Obama said this, they'd call it satanic agenda to make degeneracy acceptable. Imagine a president who's a married man, making sexual remarks at another married woman.

Melania Trump thinks it's ok, it's just locker room talk she says.

WriterNig:
Iran & Qatar Leaders Meets Putin In Moscow To Discuss War (Photos)

---

🔗 Al Jazeera | | Times Of Israel

Wait the same Qatar that gave Trump a 747 jet? LoLz.

muhmeen:
Prophet Israel T. Ford and Pastor Lydia Ford, leaders of LifeWorks Church near Cleveland, Ohio, announced Shakayla Ford as Israel's second wife, framing it as God's will and citing Exodus 21:10.

Lydia herself introduced Shakayla positively to the congregation, and photos show the three posing happily together.

Israel posted on Facebook that the 'one wife only' teaching is unbiblical, while critics cite 1 Timothy 3:2 and traditional Christian emphasis on monogamy from major denominations.

Supporters reference Old Testament examples of polygyny, sparking wide online reactions from shock to defense.

Moment an American pastor and prophetess, who are both married, introduce a new wife to their congregation and announce that they are now in a polygynous marriage with a female church member, claiming it is the “will of God.” 😭🤦🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️ pic.twitter.com/Pu52Uf7LWy

— 𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍 (@AsakyGRN) October 26, 2026

/video/1?t=2

This is how Mohammed claimed the god told him he can have more wives. LoLz.

Interesting15:
We also explored believers like us who walked in some out-of-the-roof dimensions by the Spirit, including how Philip was teleported spectacularly right before the Ethiopian eunuch.

Now, why are we not seeing these things in today's Christianity circles? It is simply because we have reduced faith to Sunday service and rationalized away the supernatural.

Rather the simple explanation for why such doesn't happen today is that such "magic" doesn't exist. No matter how irrational you get you will never be teleported anywhere just by prayer or some wuuwuu holy spirit shenanigans. The fact is modern Christians can see that these so called supernatural things are so far fetched that some have began to take these tales as allegorical.

DeepSight:
You can say that again my friend.

Bro when you have the chance listen to this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcpQkvBCACw

Roycemadeit:
GOD-FEARING: A PERSONAL REFLECTION ON MORAL AGENCY

I have once wondered why people present being God-fearing as evidence of good character. I find the idea unconvincing because religious belief does not automatically make anyone honest, compassionate, faithful, or responsible.

I consider myself a realist. I believe in principles, learning from experience, and taking responsibility for one's decisions. When I do something and the outcome is bad, I examine what went wrong and adjust my approach. I do not need an invisible authority to explain why harmful actions have consequences.

Religious people, like everyone else, can lie, cheat, exploit others, and abuse their positions. Some attend church every Sunday and still behave dishonestly. Others occupy pulpits, preach morality, and claim to represent God while contradicting the principles they teach.

This does not mean religious people are inherently bad. Many genuinely draw inspiration from their faith and practise compassion, honesty, and generosity. My objection is to treating religious identity as proof of moral superiority.

The same problem appears in relationships. Someone says they want a God-fearing husband or wife, presumably expecting faithfulness, honesty, and responsibility. But those qualities must be established through conduct, not from religious affiliation.

I also question the tendency to outsource moral judgment to God, religious authorities, or the law. Laws are necessary, but those who make and enforce them can break them too. Some are Christians who proudly describe themselves as God-fearing. Their positions do not prevent misconduct, and their authority does not excuse it..

My concern is broader: people sometimes hide behind instructions, traditions, religious teachings, or established procedures rather than accept responsibility for their choices.

Obedience is not the same as integrity, just as God-fearingness is not the same as goodness.

A person who follows instructions without questioning their consequences can still cause harm. Saying "I was following orders" does not automatically absolve anyone of responsibility.

I would rather associate with people who think critically, understand the consequences of their actions, and accept accountability when they are wrong. Religious belief may inspire good conduct, but it cannot replace independent moral reasoning.

Ultimately, I am more interested in the principles people practise than the authorities they claim to obey. I would rather live among people who understand why they should do good than those who simply depend on external authority to tell them what is right.

To me, genuine moral maturity begins when we take responsibility for our choices.

I wish this was how we brought up children, society would be a whole lot more cooperative.

Great100000:
Elon Musk has shared an ambitious timeline for the future of artificial intelligence, predicting that the technology could transform nearly every aspect of human work within the next decade. According to his projections, Al could surpass human intelligence as early as 2026, followed by a major shift in 2027 when artificial intelligence may become capable of handling virtually all digital work. By 2028, Musk believes Al systems could reach a point where even the most skilled human software developers would struggle to outperform them.

His predictions extend far beyond computers and into the physical world through advanced robotics. Musk has suggested that Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot could eventually perform surgical procedures better than the world's leading human surgeons by 2029. Looking further ahead, he envisions more than 100 million humanoid robots operating worldwide by 2031, with artificial intelligence eventually becoming more capable than the combined intellectual abilities of humanity.

By 2036, Musk predicts a future in which approximately 1 billion humanoid robots could be deployed across industries, potentially generating more physical labor output than the entire human workforce combined. While these timelines remain speculative and depend on major technological breakthroughs, they highlight just how dramatically Musk expects Al and robotics to reshape the global economy, employment and everyday life over the coming decade.

Elon Musk the hype man.

QuinQ:
Someone who invented Space X, Neurolink, the Boring company, Tesla, etc, and be running all of them simultaneously is NOT a "pretender"!

Bwahahahahaha! How do you invent a company? Bro please go away you are simply out classed.

BTW he didn't invent anything. All the technology and ideas those companies use were already known or in development before he came along. Musk a hype man and hype men make money off gullible rubes like you.

Also store is closed no more feeding the troll for you.

QuinQ:
See below. That's why I'm number one. I reason with the the greats while your reasoning is mundane

Low level reasoning that has no appreciation of nuance. You just regurgitate half digested things you don't even care to understand.

How does either of these mean that future knowledge will INVALIDATE our current knowledge?

This is trolling I swear.

QuinQ:
See below. That's why I'm number one. I reason with the the greats while your reasoning is mundane

.

QuinQ:
See circled below. How does a "language tree" become sentient or conscious??

LordReed:
What it is now is different from what it will be in the future.

BTW how is this the concession you claimed?

QuinQ:
Debunked how? We moved on once you conceded that IA is not just a language tree as that YouTube video says, once you conceded that you really don't know

LoLz. Quote where I made such a concession.

DeepSight, I think we are being trolled. This person is an intellectual ant in a clown suit.

QuinQ:
This is what I mean when I say I am first. There are lots of things we know that will turn out we know wrong, say, a thousand years from now. Yet generations will live and die thinking we know!
Your thinking doesn't extend to that. That's why I am number one

LoLz. This is what I am saying intellectual lightweights like you think their fantasies are knowledge. Your fantasies will become invalidated but human knowledge will continue to increase based on what we know now.

QuinQ:
How is it conceit when it is true??
"Pretender" Elon Musk is richer than you

If it took intellectual prowess to be rich Einstein would have been a trillionaire before Musk was a glint in his father's eye.

It is conceit because it isn't true. Your inflated ego has revealed your intellectual poverty.

QuinQ:
What instrument has told you what consciousness is and that there is only one form of consciousness? Or told you what dark matter/energy is, which make up over 95% of your knowable reality. Mind you we'er only talking of your microscope part of the universe and the microscope part of your microscope world knowable to you, never mind those you'll never suspect that you don't know that you don't know!

You show your ignorance of these subjects by not knowing that it is through instrumentation that we know of the existence of dark matter and energy.

No matter how much we don't know it will never invalidate what we do know.

QuinQ:
I beg to differ. He doesn't even know organic doesn't always mean agricultural. It is me first, then the rest of you

Your conceit already shows that you are very low on the intellectual totem. Then your fanboyism of a like minded intellectual pretender like Elon Musk solidifies that assessment.

QuinQ:
You are really not very smart, are you? That's why I quashed the idea that you and LordReed could be one and the same person. See below

BTW DeepSight runs miles ahead of you when it comes to intellectual prowess. You are outclassed and outgunned when it comes to you and him.

QuinQ:
Because unlike me, I'm suspicious there are NLers with more than one account

What are you talking about? Is QuinQQ not YOUR 2nd account?

QuinQ:
Stating a fact is not questioning reality. Our senses pick up very little of what there is. See below

That is why we make instruments to detect what we cannot. To now claim that our particular lack means what we do know is invalidated is nonsense.

QuinQ:
The discussion has gone way beyond that, even into spirits and humans lacking true consciousness

Right, you switched up your nonsense once your initial nonsense was debunked. LoLz.

QuinQ:
You are really not very smart, are you? That's why I quashed the idea that you and LordReed could be one and the same person. See below

Why are you always looking for people who are one and the same?

QuinQ:
Bottom line is, we don't know. If you really think about it and you're honest with yourself, you'd have to admit we know very, very little. We just think we know, just as we tend to think we can perceive wirh our senses all there is

There you go again later you'll claim you aren't questioning reality. There is no shame in admiting you are wrong.

QuinQ:
Ancient history. We've since gone way beyond that. See screenshots below

LoLz. The thing you said yesterday is ancient history? I bet if we hadn't pushed back strongly against your nonsense you'd still be spouting it.

QuinQ:
How do you know?

Because if it was then all your "gurus" would be out of a job. We don't need wuuwuu to understand energy.

QuinQ:
I have always said "extremely complex" or extremely advanced will be indistinguishable...

No you have not.

QuinQ:
Thank you very much for the video but it is extremely simplistic and therefore not factual. Like I've told you before, I have heard one of the pioneers and vanguard of AI interviewed and directly heard him say that no one understands exactly how AI works. Which is supported by the screenshots below. How does AI know to the second what time it is if it is trained only once? How is it so current about everything that is going on to the second?
Also, the reference for this video is 2020, over 6 years ago, when AI people had 10 fingers and you can instantly tell if something was AI.
Finally, based on ideas from this video, think of a question you will ask AI that you can trick it into getting wrong.

None of what you said in this post is future tense.

QuinQ:
So what is wrong with statement below? But that's even besides thr point. The point is that we don't really know what is consciousness nor what it entails and therefore are in no position to say what might become conscious. In our view a plant is not conscious yet various plants use all sorts of tricks to discourage being eaten, flowers know how to attract butterflies, etc. Everything is energy and if things are combined or manipulated a certain way we don't know that consciousness won’t organically arise

This the thing with you you stretch the meanings of words to project whatever half-baked fantasy you want to say. A flower doesn't know anything. It and the butterfly are a product of their environment, acting/reacting according to what they are.

Energy is not spirit.

QuinQ:
That's what we've been discussing - the future. Everybody knows it is neither conscious nor sentient now

You have not been using future tense in referring to AI.

QuinQ:
They are the ones who managed to step outside the lack of consciousness of man

You can choose to be hoodwinked, I reject it though. Anybody selling spiritual wuuwuu is a joker in my view.

QuinQ:
Really? Haven't you been saying it is just a "language tree? Are there two of you on this platform?

What it is now is different from what it will be in the future.