CMdunk35:
Just want to have a meaningful conversation about why you are atheist. Tell me, and we'll talk.

There are several reasons but the central thing is when I asked myself if I never believed in a god and was presented with the evidence of all of human history and what we know of the universe then told there was a good god that made all of this, would I believe? And my sincere answer was know. I then moved on to so what explains all the evidence best, an evil god? A non character god? Or no god. The first 2 explain some things but not some others but the last fits every piece evidence we have. That means what we are experiencing is just men doing what we can, with what we have, where we are. I immediately discarded faith and I felt a relief of being unburden of belief in what in like a dream and embracing what is real.

Emusan:


You didn't answer my question.

And you don't answer question with question.

My question is rhetorical. In other words after repeatedly expressing how much beneath him humans are, there is no logical reason this so called god would choose to be human, the ability to do so notwithstanding.

Emusan:


So after you read all those scriptures, what you understand from them is that God said He can never BECOME A HUMAN BEING. Is that so?

Meanwhile, some of the scriptures he even quoted has nothing to do about the topic.

Why would the god who continuously denied being like a human want to become human?

Kobojunkie:
It is instead a very terrible question. Numbers 16 for instance where He pulled one of his claims from clearly highlights the fact that Balaam, the one who made the statement, was speaking about God's decrees, not God's appearance or physical form. The moment you abandon context, you abandon the ability to ask reasonable, even good, questions.

You are nitpicking a single quote and ignoring all the other places the god says he is not a man. Besides all of them make it make clear the god is supposedly not human whether in form or nature.

Good question.

basilico:


How do you know they didn't refer the case?

:Facepalm:

basilico:


I picture you laughing hysterically high on something the Good Lord would never condone when asking darn stoopid questions.
Recap. Start here to see how Hunter plea deal compares to another similar offence in a trial led by the same prosecutors.

https://technofog.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-two-plea-deals

how two prosecutors assigned to the Hunter Biden case, Leo Wise and Derek Hines, treated less serious tax cases as compared to the Hunter Biden case.

Don't be projecting your despicable behaviour onto me.

How does this answer the question I asked?

Angelfrost:
The woman's lover should arrest and charge the idiot and weak simp to court.

He should be made to pay for damages.

If you catch your wife or husband with another, your grouse should never ever be with the other man or woman...

Take out your annoyance on the one that swore to stay faithful to you. Leave out the other person.

Learn to master your emotions... Una nor want hear word.

Judge won't show you mercy based on the fact that you were cheated upon... Last time I checked, adultery is not an offense worthy of imprisonment or death. It's not even a criminal offense.

Guy adultery is a crime in the Nigerian Penal Code o! No joke.

basilico:


You are asking me why they didn't recommend. That means you have seen their recommendations. I have not seen their report, where is it ?

You go look for it, thats a question for you to answer.

basilico:


I would like to see their recommendations in total. Please paste it here

That's a question for to answer.

basilico:


Stupid . IRS knew he was cheating on taxes. Normally in such cases, the law is such that A republican led committee has to make recommendations before the criminal can be charged.
IRS /DOJ waits for Congress to investigate before they take action.

LoLz! You never answer simple questions why? Because it will reveal how stupid you are. Bwahahahahaha!

basilico:



Mr. Donalds (03:56:28):

Okay. Question for you, and also for Mr. Shapley, is it a clear line of potential investigation if somebody is charging a massive living expenses through a corporate account and not doing that through their own personal accounts and not accounting for that properly on their income tax returns? Is that the basis of a criminal investigation?

Mr. Shapley (03:56:50

Generally speaking, that would definitely be factors that would spur a criminal investigation, yes.

My question is very simple: Why didn't the committee recommend that the DOJ charge Hunter Biden? Answer this simple question.

basilico:


Arguing for the sake.What did not come up?If you have not read it then it does not exist?


https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/irs-whistleblowers-testify-at-house-hearing-on-hunter-biden-investigation-transcript

My 2nd question again: why didn't they recommend charges to the Justice Department?

bemeruca:


People tend to go to where will favour them, it is common sense. Me saying he may likely go to where he can get favourable judgement is me wanting him to go to new York. That is my analysis of the situation. You talked about dumb here but you cannot grasp simple things. Later you will claim I said the sky is red because along the line you cannot comprehend.

So tell me, where did I say I want him to take the case to New York? It's funny that you are now saying I made the case.

Where should Hunter take the case to? I don't know, I only said he has options and New York is one. He will go where it will favor him, where they can bend the law. That is my analysis. Should I get a dictionary and explain to you how analysis works?

The bold is so dumb

LoLz. Just accept that facts will show how dumb you are. The fact is they let criminals go all the time for all sorts of plea deals but stupidos wanna act like Hunter Biden is some sort of special case.

The Dominion case was tried in Delaware because that is where Fox is incorporated but sure Hunter should take it to NY because bemeruca gave an analysis. Bwahahahahaha!

basilico:


Lordreed is arguing out of ignorance
Its not his fault that he knows not how Hunter was handled by Weiss before Weiss was appointed Special Counsel. How a judge rejected a plea deal where he was to plead guilty to gun charges in return for a blanket immunity on his tax crimes.

Lordreed are you aware that Hunter was paying Eastern European hookers and charging it to his LLC account as a business expense , tax deductible. Are you aware that he has not been charged with violating FARA by virtue of being an unregistered foreign lobbyist? Unlike the case of Flynn and Manafort.

Why didn't the Hunter Biden probe bring it up? Why didn't they recommend charges to the Justice Department?

bemeruca:


You asked stupid question, no facts from you. Anyone that argues with you is the dumbest. Make up your mind. Am I the dumbest or basilico is the dumbest? This goes to show why you are like an headless chicken. Jump around with no direction.

Question to you, why was the plea deal rejected? Why should a system that indict a criminal give the criminal a deal that protects the criminal from the present and future crime?
New York has long-arm statutes that allow courts to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
If Fox News has sufficient contacts with New York (such as broadcasting there), New York courts may have jurisdiction.
Fox news is a national network, their headquarter is in new York, they broadcast from new York, the have significant contacts and presence in new York, so new York is an option. It's funny how you said I WANT HIM TO TAKE THE CASE TO NEW YORK.
This is how you put words into people's mouth because you are a headless chicken manufacturing lies, attribute it to someone then attack the lie.

LoLz. If there is an headless person here it is you. You practically make a case for the case to be in NY but turn round to say I am putting words in your mouth. Tell me where should Hunter take his case to?

I said you are too stupid but then you go and prove it. How many times have we seen criminals who become informants and are let go to continue committing crimes because of the information they would gather? Here comes stupido acting like it's a new thing then claiming I put words in his mouth.

You think talking out your arse is what this about? No sir, bring the facts or show us how stupid you are.

bemeruca:




your question is stupid because, in my previous response to you, I said the system wanted to give him a sweetheart deal. try and keep up. before you argue with someone, you should be able to comprehend and recollect.

you are here making claims no one made then attack it earlier. i called you out for it... now you are deflecting by asking stupid questions.



try and keep up. You cannot be arguing with no comprehension. Your question is dumb and when you put the "NOW" there, you are actually implying i said something rather than asking me a question.

You are the dumbass here. You make claims and when shown the facts you act like a stupid madman. Hunter was indicted and got a plea deal that was REJECTED but here comes stupid arses like you claiming he is favoured by the system. What a load of shit. Meanwhile dumbasses you are not aware that Fox is registered in Delaware so the case will be in Delaware. But stupido like you wants him to take the case to NY yet you claim to be aware of how things work. You are too stupid so it's a wonder you even know how NL works.

bemeruca:


You argue like an headless chicken. No direction, just making claims and insinuating what no one is saying.
A black woman who was stealing was giving a plea deal by the system, plead guilty and go to jail for 3 years. She said no, she was found guilty and sentenced 30 years.

Like I said, comprehension is important. The system, tried to give him a sweetheart deal. How did you land or come to the notion that plead deal is not the system?

Fox news headquarters is New York city, we all know what goes on in New York city.

And you respond like a seneless person. I asked a straight forward question "Is that the stance you are taking?" What claim or insinuation am I then making.

The system tried to give him a sweetheart deal which the same system rejected so what are you complaining about?

Fox is registered in Delaware. Why would he take the case to New York? The Dominion case was in Delaware not New York.

bemeruca:


So prosecutors tried to shield Hunter Biden from future indictment. That's the system, which should not be doing that.
Now, no one has claimed the whole system is compromised, but the DNC is trying its best. Hence, the attack on the Supreme Court etc.

Basilico is saying hunter knows where to go to get a favorable judgment against Fox.

When someone is sarcastically saying something, you don't grasp it, you also think everything is absolute.

LoLz. So plea deals are now not part of the justice system? Is that the stance you are taking?

So Hunter will take a case out of Delaware where Fox is incorporated in because?

bemeruca:


Who is deflecting? Wasn't not the justice system that was hiding is IRS issues and try to give him that sweetheart deal? Are they not the system?

Did the system not surprise his laptop? Wasn't there a letter from a security agency claiming the laptop was Russian propaganda? Is that not the system?

You want to deflect to Trump, stick to the topic.

Yet the system has indicted him for 2 separate matters plus a JUDGE of the same system rejected the deal so your narrative falls flat.

bemeruca:


The ones your side are actively trying to break down? The attack on judges who does not cowtow to the bidden of the DNC? Iean schumar was out there threatening them. Now see how they are using the justice system to keep Trump ftom campaigning. Bragg manufacturing crime and court case against trump because of a porn star.

Be sincere with yourself

Stop deflecting and tell me why Hunter Biden is not favoured by the system you said will favour him.

bemeruca:


You are not understanding. It's the justice system n the court. It started with the Russian collusion which the media, fbi, dnc and the courts partook in.

So why didn't this same justice system favour him in his other cases?

bemeruca:



The expression you put in bold is often sarcasm used to comment on what is perceived as a ojoro or magu-magu situation. It can reflect a cynical view where the outcome is seen as typical or expected, despite being unfair.

So you are putting words in Basilico's mouth and you haven't been following the pattern of American justice system.

Ok tell me the ojoro the Hunter Biden has done in the past that makes you think he will get a favourable judge now.

basilico:


Hunter walks, Hunter sues and wins against Fox.
He be just a democrat, the ones I listed will never be indicted.

Elders say , if you a take a chicken to the market and untie it, you need to kick it so that the chicken knows it's now free to move.

Gibberish.

basilico:


This was not granted.

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

The Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby serves his
suit against the Defendants, Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee,
DNC Services Corporation, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie
Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robert E. Mook,hillipe Reines, Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, Peter Fritsch, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Orbis Business
Intelligence, Ltd., Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, Neustar, Inc., Rodney Joffe, James Comey,
Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Kevin Clinesmith, Andrew McCabe, John Does 1 through 10 .

What has this got to do with Hunter Biden? As usual, nothing.

OLAADEGBU:
Russell Brand Announces Baptism after Months-Long Spiritual Journey: 'Taking the Plunge'
Good Gospel Channel


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2h3gBYSDf8

Actor and comedian Russell Brand announced Friday that he is going to be baptized this weekend, the culmination of his months-long public wrestling with the tenets of Christianity.

◾By Jon Brown, Christian Post Reporter

Another one, tomorrow you will deny him. LMFAO!

I am just wait for how y'all will deny Trump. LoLz!

OLAADEGBU:


Kanye’s Pastor BREAKS SILENCE & Reveals THIS
Ruslan KD


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1S-ZGECDIO8

Where in the video does Kanye say I am no longer a Christian or I no longer believe in Jesus?

basilico:


Weiss can wear a disguise and become the judge
Or he can change form and be tje judge.

Your attempt to deflect achieves nothing.

wirinet:
Trump is threatening violence again if he looses the November 2024 elections. When he was asked whether he expects political violence after the elections, he responded that it depends on the fairness of the elections. Now, who determines the fairness of an election?

I think the American political and justice system has bent over too much to accommodate the excesses of Trump. He is too embolden that he feels he is untouchable. The whole of the US political and justice system seems afraid of him, that he can practically get away with murder.

The US will have to confront the Trump menace headlong once and for all, and damn the threats and intimidation of his MAGA cult movement.

The problem with most governmental systems is they rely on the implicit honour of the people involved they have no way of calculating. Trump has no honor so the system is almost hamstrung by his faithless maneuvers. Plus his status as a wealthy man who won't hesitate to push his legal options makes it look like he is untouchable.

bemeruca:


Stop putting words in his mouth. He did not use the word always. I think you should comprehend what he says, that way you will understand why basilico mentioned Weiss.

Really? "That's justice for you in America" was implying what? That all former drug addicts get favourable judges?

You tell me what Weiss has got to do with Hunter getting a favourable judge in a likely suit against Fox.

bemeruca:


bas never said Weiss is a judge.
I know of the sweetheart deal. I already discussed the surprise hunter and his team along with the media and got from a judge they thought would go along with the deal

You don't seem to get it. He said Hunter will get a favourable judge because he always gets favourable judges so why the hell is he mentioning Weiss? He should mention the favourable judge Hunter has gotten so far.

bemeruca:


Actually, you were the one who brought up the plea deal



the bold from Basilico is a speculation and I can assume it is based on the previous judgments against Trump and others like Flynn etc.. they know where they will go to try and tilt the outcome to their favor. He can make such speculations.

Where did I bring up the plea deal, when it was basilico who mentioned it?

He can make speculations based on what, fantasy?