₦airaland Forum

Image123:
It will surprise you when i tell you that my Father did. But you are an unbeliever, you don't believe. Lolz.

If it is truly your father, should you not know, why do you need to believe again, believer?

Image123:
Lolz, better than basing my life on nothing or whatever you are basing your life on.

Why should you base your life on anything?
Who told you you should, no wonder you are a slave basing your life on Jewish books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS.

The books you are basing your life on, you don't even know. Like a good slave that loves his masters, you just gobbling it.
Bible means collection of books. Help yourself boo.

Image123:
The Holy Bible. If you don't know it, i can't help you friend.

Whose books are you quoting?

Dustbinbint:
This particular issue is about whether or not a sperm cell is needed for an egg cell to be fertilized, and nothing more. The link I provided showed that it is possible. Anything beyond that isn't an issue of contention.

And it's so funny how you are looking for science discovery and the same science proved to you that evolution is fact, what's the basis/criterias of the cherry picking?

Dustbinbint:
Should I seriously reply to this? Someone else will, don't worry.

Keep running....

Dustbinbint:
This particular issue is about whether or not a sperm cell is needed for an egg cell to be fertilized, and nothing more. The link I provided showed that it is possible. Anything beyond that isn't an issue of contention.

No it didn't, stop lying, go and read it.
Here
https://www.wionews.com/science/baby-without-sperm-and-egg-scientists-create-synthetic-human-embryos-in-major-leap-604576

Dustbinbint:
In the illustration I gave, the program got corrupted by a virus, certainly not the programmer's fault.

Of course it's the programmer fault, a perfect program won't be corrupted.
Who created the virus?

diamond68:
its metaphysical not literal

It's fiction not real.

Jesus was a sicarii, those that were killed beside him were also in the sect.
Anywhere you see "sword" in the new testament in the context of Jesus or his disciples, it's taking about dagger 🗡️
https://biblehub.com/greek/3162.htm

Dustbinbint:
Now if you can kill a program you made by reason of its defectiveness, and if you kill an animal you own because if the danger it poses to you and others, can not God do the same to the things he created—living or not?

The defectiveness shows the limitations of the programmer.

Dustbinbint:
An egg CAN be fertilized without a sperm.
https://www.wionews.com/science/baby-without-sperm-and-egg-scientists-create-synthetic-human-embryos-in-major-leap-604576

Did you even read your link?
Is this how you research your beliefs?

MaxInDHouse:
OK henceforth i'll ignore you!

Just like you god that dictated the Torah, DEAD

MaxInDHouse:
Can't you see i don't want to chat with you?

Yet you keep replying.

Eye service

Dustbinbint:
As it is highly unlikely that a hypothetical Christian interpolator would have called Jesus "Chrestus", placed him in Rome in 49, or called him a "troublemaker", the overwhelming majority of scholars conclude that the passage is genuine.[26]

"placed him in Rome in 49", and this man was called chrestos.

22jumpstreet1:
Torah is the way the truth and the life....whoever is lead by it can never be lost...

Your god created you to be led by a book he allegedly dictated to Moses?

MaxInDHouse:
OK nah!

Ehn nah!

MaxInDHouse:
OK nah!

Dead like Yahweh

Dustbinbint:
Did you read what the scholars said about that account? Haven't several scholars analyzed that report and concluded that it was genuinely about Jesus? Otherwise what is it doing in an article about the historicity of Jesus?

The only issue I see here is that Christ was called Chrestus. Is that the problem?

I'm sure it is more underlying than that.

What did the scholars say about it? Which one did you read?
Please talk intelligently, sorry

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ your Torah is DEAD!

Dead like the god that dictated it

Dustbinbint:
I suggested the Old KJV because it mentioned the original word the apostles used. If you refuse to check it out, look for any interlinear version of the Bible

The King James is just a VERSION like the rest. (I'd advise you look up how the VERSION was created)
The new testament was written in Greek, Jesus or Joshua will be called lesous in it.

Since you've checked it out from interlinear version, why did you "refuse" to post it?

Dustbinbint:
And I'm here to talk about the historicity of Jesus and of his disciples. Remember I asked you for the original topic?

I already talked about it, starting from Suetonius.
Remember?
Go check.

Dustbinbint:
You're not upsetting me because you're calling Jehovah a dummy. OP called him a fool, and I didn't express any resentment, or did I.
Look harder for what you're doing. I've replied to several of your posts, so examine them all.

I never said I'm upsetting you, not like I care.
The history is there for you to see, I called Yahweh, a dummy because that's what he is, there is no resentment but FACTS.

Now read, https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

Dustbinbint:
This conversation isn't going anywhere, man. I don't know where all this resentment is coming from.
What was the original topic of this discussion again?
You see, you're really beginning to upset me because one of us is acting like a child, and that isn't me.

If you have a beef with Jehovah (or Yahweh or whatever you want to call him), spill. Don't keep it and let it fester.

The history is there for you to see, I called Yahweh, a dummy because that's what he is, there is no resentment but FACTS, it's you in your feelings for your isrealite god.

Are you here to talk Facts or your beliefs, please if you don't have facts next time, don't quote me.

https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

Dustbinbint:
As for Jesus, what does Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8 say? Isn't it Jesus?
Evidently, Joshua isn't literally Jesus in Greek. It has been Latinized and Anglicized. Anything I don't mention isn't because I am ignorant of it, but because I think it is too obvious to warrant mention. Or should we start using Greek alphabets to denote words in Greek? How about Hieroglyphics for words in Old Egypt?

My RSV says "Joshua".
Joshua is an English name.
Jesus is a latinised name, they even had to remove I(esus) and replace with j(esus). Who is esus?

Dustbinbint:
I don't know, bro. But if that's how you see it, I appreciate a different perspective on any matter.

Just look "Yahweh" up, the poor dummy god history is all over.

https://www.worldhistory.org/Yahweh/

Dustbinbint:
Jehovah has a more solid root in the minds of people, that's why we use it.

You know, I have a good example:

You know Joshua in the Bible? The Joshua who led God's people into the promised land, yeah that one. Well, in Greek his name translates to Jesus, and that is what Stephen and Paul called him. (see Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8; Old King James Version)

This is jargons.
Let's take it one by one.
First off, Jehovah is a nonsense mispronounced word,so calm down and read properly.
https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Jehovah


Secondly, Joshua is not Jesus in Greek, it's lesous in Greek, Jesus is a LATIN name called iesus, it was TRANSLITERATED from the Hebrew yeshua, which means "Yahweh saves".

Lastly, Please confirm what you are saying before posting not what they taught you.

Dustbinbint:
)
Okay.
Well, Jehovah, (or Yahweh if you prefer)

There's nothing like "Jehovah".
https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Jehovah

Dustbinbint:
LoL. No bro, Peter used the expression “we” in saying “WE were EYEWITNESSES” to indicate that he was in fact present. Reading Matthew 17:1 we see that Peter, James, and John were the ones who saw the vision. So, it is not true that “the disciple that was present didn't talk about it.” The disciple that talked, as you said, “EXTENSIVELY,” about it, is the one who was present. And isn't that what you would expect? That only an eyewitness would report extensively on a matter?

I was talking about Matthew or what did you read?

Which vision did they witness?
Did peter mention any vision?
Which vision did Matthew say they saw?

Dustbinbint:
)
Okay.
Well, Jehovah, (or Yahweh if you prefer) condemned the Jews for worshipping goddesses, including Queen of Heaven, and others.

Yahweh' is just a local god that was worshipped by the isrealites.
His father is El, that gave him israEl as a nation.

Calm down and read on how yahwism evolve to Judaism after the Babylonian exile.

Dustbinbint:
They kept it among themselves, apparently. They didn't write it. Even today, it isn't everything that you write.
Peter was the only one who ventured to write about it. It is there in.

2 Peter 1:16-18 wasn't talking about it.

The disciple that was present didn't talk about it, but the one that wasn't, talked EXTENSIVELY about it 😂

Dustbinbint:

Indulge yourself

First one is Suetonius, who was talking about "chrestus" living in Rome.

Dustbinbint:
Surely, Judaism was the first religion God instituted for his people on earth. It painted a picture of what the ideal conditions of God's people should be.
When the time came for that religion to replaced as an old wine and wineskin is replaced by new wine and wineskin, (Matthew 9:14-17) Jesus came on scene and laid the basis for Christianity.

And I believe that I have researched into the evidences for Christianity.

Judaism is from yahwism.