₦airaland Forum

Dustbinbint:
I'm trying to understand you?

It plainly implies that the evidence REALLY talked about Jesus.

Take note of this statement under the subheading “Modern Scholarship.”

_Scholars regard the question of historicity as generally settled in scholarship in the early 20th century._

Let's take the "modern scholarship" and look into it, shall we?

Dustbinbint:
This is the link I provided on the historicity of Jesus, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus#:~:text=Only%20two%20key%20events%20of%20Jesus%27s%20life%20are%20widely%20accepted%20as%20historical%2C%20namely%20his%20baptism%20and%20crucifixion.%5B

and the link says: “Only two key events of Jesus's life are widely accepted as historical, namely his baptism and crucifixion.” After that it provides some citations.

I'm glad you also use Wikipedia.

The "historical context" that was used in Jesus case was this, lets look into them and see if they really talked about Jesus.

Dustbinbint:
I really want to know why you left Christianity to begin with.
If evidence is what you are seeking, it is SO abundant. In time, I will show them all to you, because I too have examined all bases for my beliefs. If on the other hand something else is responsible, perhaps the prevalence of wickedness, the hypocrisy of the churches, etc, we can discuss those as well.

Are you sure you have done anything on research on CHRISTIANITY which is from Chrestianity?
And not to forget that it also comes from JUDAISM which also came from yahwism.

Dustbinbint:
The disciples who saw that were strictly ordered by Jesus to keep silent on that experience until after his resurrection.—Matthew 17:9.

Where did the disciples who saw it write the story?

Bible means collection of books.

Image123:
My Bible.

Whose books are you quoting?

Ndipe:
Jesus Christ Alone is the perfect Lamb who alone offers salvation.

Salvation from what?

MaxInDHouse:
There are different ways we get information so your absence at an event doesn't mean it never happened most especially when you're seeing the EFFECTS all around you!

So he wasn't there, he just heard that Moses appeared too just as we are hearing.
So which book did these 3 that were present write this INFORMATION/story, let's see how they wrote it, I am sure it'll be different from Matthew that WASN'T THERE.

Funny how you are proving the Op right

MaxInDHouse:
you don't need to be told that the rest of the twelve heard from these three nah?

😂
So he wasn't there, he just heard that Moses appeared too just as we are hearing

So which book did these 3 write this story, let's see how they wrote it, I am sure it'll be different from Matthew that just heard it also

Image123:
Who are these slave masters?

Whose books are you quoting?

MaxInDHouse:
The writer (Matthew) wasn't present in this case those with Jesus that day were Peter, James and John! Matthew 17:1

How did Matthew then know about the story if he was not present?
Where was he when this was going on, and why didn't he record that?

MaxInDHouse:
[b]And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart,

Is the author not among those that were taken by Jesus to the mountain?

It should have read
"And after six days Jesus TOOK US, me, peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth US up into an high mountain apart"

MaxInDHouse:
And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him.

Is the author not with "them"?

It should read "And, behold, there appeared unto US Moses and Elias talking with him.

KnownUnknown:
The “real”jesus can only be found in the gospel if you dismiss the magical stuff. And after you dismiss the magical stuff, all you’re left with is a charlatan and a cult leader. Just dismiss the ridiculous Jew and keep it moving.

Apt, remove the miracles and Jesus is just an ordinary man that has anger issues.

CrystalBliss:
Luke wasn't an eye witness. He wasn't one of the 12 disciples. That of John was different. He was a witness. Dispute that.

John? 😂
John is not the disciple whom Jesus love ii

Image123:
SMH, what's the big deal about me being a slave or not again? LoLz.

Ask your slave masters if they would like to be a slave where they will genuinely love their slave masters like you are doing now😂

Image123:
If only you were a little bit more literate, you would read. SMH.

If you are not a slave you won't be quoting Jewish books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS.
And the part you are quoting is the one what you love your Jewish slave masters 😂😂

Image123:
You talk like you know so much or have more experience. Next time listen to the prime example instead of talking bunkum about what you know nothing about.

Exo 21:5 And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free:
Exo 21:6 Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever.

You are a prime example, you already said that you love your slave masters, keep quoting your Jewish slave masters books written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS 😂

Image123:
How would you know, are you one?

You are a prime example, keep quoting your slave masters book.

https://www.academia.edu/43061919/Chrestos_not_Christos

Image123:
Some of the things we do freely for humanity, hmmm.
Let me educate you yet again.

Exo 21:5  And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: 
Exo 21:6  Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him for ever. 

Still quoting your slave masters books, if you love your master, you love the slavery your master put you to.


A slave does not love his master, he only says that, If a slave does not pretend to love his master, the slave will be punished. Your Slave Master is a dummy isrealite god, let that sink in

Image123:
i love my Master, i will not go out free. Let this saying sink in.

A slave does not love his master, he only says that, If a slave does not pretend to love his master, the slave will be punished. Your Slave Master is a dummy isrealite god, let that sink in

Image123:
Your names are truly yours and they seem to be a good fit. Your drab name calling is drab.

Your chains are truly yours and they fit you perfectly, you love Basking in slavery which is what are you enjoy especially Jewish ones.

Image123:
Lolz, this ignorant fellow thinks calling me names online on a faceless forum is anything. Clown. i have faced and i face more important things as a christian, grow up if you can, or seek priceless advice from your mentor. i shut him up, who are you?

See this slave, as if you also didn't call me names?
Why are you complaining?

If not for Christianity, you will be a murderer wow 😂

uzohrome:
i have stayed with some guys after smoking w**d they sleep so deep thar one can easily pull off their battery.

Is that not what "sleep" is supposed to do?

Image123:
When a Christian talks about good or right or righteous, it is with a reference point to God. The definition is clear for all to see and access. It is not a continued revision per year and influencer as you and your cohorts confuse yourselves about.

Read until you may understand. Your boss was talking to a professing christian(the OP) about good.
i have reminded you both that christians pick their definition of 'good' from the Word, unlike his continued revision per year and influencer. So again, what is his and by right your current definition of 'good'? Are you good?

Learn to comprehend, "good, right or righteous" already has his own definition before Christianity was created.
And is reed a Christian? So what's your concern asking "What does it mean to be good"?

You just regurgitating what your slave masters Taught you without thinking, slave.
Without Christianity you'll be a murderer, only Christianity is stopping you from it.

Is your chain tight enough or they should add more to it, slave?

Image123:
Learn to read.
When a Christian talks about good or right or righteous, it is with a reference point to God. The definition is clear for all to see and access. It is not a continued revision per year and influencer as you and your cohorts confuse yourselves about.

Learn to comprehend, "good, right or righteous" already has his own definition before Christianity was created.
And is reed a Christian? So what's your concern asking "What does it mean to be good"?

You just regurgitating what your slave masters Taught you, slave.
Without Christianity you'll be a murderer, only Christianity is stopping you from it.

Image123:
The definition is clear for all to see and access.

Yahweh slave, if the definition is clear for all to see then isn't it stupid when you said "What does it mean to be good?"

Image123:
Are you good? No.
What does it mean to be good? You don't know.
Jokers.

But you also don't know what it means to be "good".
You are only following orders you read in a book, you can't think for yourself to know what it is.

Aemmyjah:
As if he can explain how the human mind works
Na evolution give us mind na

You don't even know the definition of mind to start with.

Na from clay wey dey Eden we get mind from 😂

Aemmyjah:
The other day, he made comments asking where God got the materials to make the universe? Did he reason same towards evolution?
SIRTee15 has been kindly resetting his brain but when you wash a pig clean and he keeps going back to play in the mud. It's best to allow him do what pleases him

You are just regurgitating what your watchtower slave masters taught you.

So your god created everything from nothing?


Even your daddy, SIRTee15, is my boy.

Aemmyjah:
The song of a drunk is romantic in the ears of another drunk. He will be mad seeing that sober people are not listening to it

I wonder who is listening to the creationists story apart from their fellow mad people in watchtower.

Aemmyjah:
Show us the facts about evolution you drop. I mean proven fact

If the universe has a beginning which you accept, isn't it common sense for you to accept evolution?
Cc jaephoenix

Aemmyjah:
Is it a proven fact?
Note that it is taught in Biology classes
Many of the theories we were taught were demonstrated ij the lab or were shown on screen. Only one was not. The only one that we were told not the question else, we are not intelligent. Is that not indoctrination? Brainwashing?

So the universe having a beginning, where is it taught in school?
Is it a proven fact?