₦airaland Forum

OkCornel:
Since your name is spelt differently in different languages, I guess your very existence is a lie too.

Bravo!!!

You can say this but you can’t tell me which tribe Jesus referred as Christ? Hmmmm

OkCornel:
Ok, please bring the meaning(s) of canonization here. Here in the UK, “canonization” is an erroneous spelling. Canonisation is the right spelling.


Even my phone highlights that canonization as wrong spelling. Stop making a mountain out of a molehill.

That’s a lie. It’s so shameful what you are doing, you are not deceiving anyone but you.
Your sources are always rough not straight forward.
Even the dictionary brought out canonization and said “usually canonisation”

OkCornel:
Ijaw tribe

You can’t answer, you are worshipping a lie and you know.

OkCornel:
Go and read where I explained how the Roman Catholic Church started.

And again, the word church father is self explanatory

You don’t know the difference between Catholic and Catholic Church?
You said nothing on Roman Catholic Church, and paste link please.

Self explanatory what does that mean? See how you are defending your deity.

OkCornel:
Christ simply means Messiah.

Al-Masih in Arabic
Hamaschiach in Hebrew.

Same meaning, different words in different languages obviously.

It’s not rocket science.

So which tribe Jesus referred as Christ?

OkCornel:
So the issue is no longer spelling it as “canonisation”?

Mehn… this is a waste of my precious time.

You are yet to answer me what church father and Roman Catholic means, if it was me, you would have been restless repeating it over and over again.

OkCornel:
So the issue is no longer spelling it as “canonisation”?

Mehn… this is a waste of my precious time.

The Merriam Webster dictionary you used earlier didn’t bring it out for you?
And canonisation mean a different thing

OkCornel:
So the issue is no longer spelling it as “canonisation”?

It’s about knowing the meaning . Are you a selective reader?

OkCornel:
Who doesn’t know this?

They also don’t know it’s for pagan worshippers

OkCornel:
Lol, so if you’re born a Yoruba man in Yoruba land and a Hausa man writes your autobiography in Hausa language, does it mean you were born in Hausa land?


I’m in awe of your logic

So which tribe referred to “Jesus” as Christ?

[quote author=OkCornel post=112965124][/quote]I’m glad you know what canonization is now

OkCornel:
Again, not a big deal. Many people bear Jesus, Many people bear Chrestus or whatever, no one has monopoly over bearing a name…

It’s like claiming your existence is a fraud because someone else who bore your names lived centuries before you. Get it?

Yeshua was a common name in Israel, and different people bore the name before Yeshua Ben Yosef existed. Same explanation applies to “Chrestus”

Yeshua is a name, chrestus is a title. You understand yet?

OkCornel:
Good night

“When Jew Jesus was alive he was referred to as Christ” a Greek word, was Latin Jesus born in Greece?


You are yet to answer me what church father and Roman Catholic means, if it was me, you would have been restless repeating it over and over again.

I’m just happy that you are worshipping your god in lies and you know that’s why you finding it hard to be straightforward.

OkCornel:
Wow, such a detailed answer.

Good night

I overestimated you, thought you knew what canonization is. When I saw you write it as canonisation**, I don know sey something is up.

OkCornel:
And what’s the correlation between inference and canonisation?

It has everything to do with it.
Canonization **

OkCornel:
Again, not a big deal. Many people bear Jesus, Many people bear Chrestus or whatever, no one has monopoly over bearing a name…

It’s like claiming your existence is a fraud because someone else who bore your names lived centuries before you. Get it?

Yeshua was a common name in Israel, and different people bore the name before Yeshua Ben Yosef existed. Same explanation applies to “Chrestus”

They were first referred to as CHRESTIAN by TERTULIAN. Who is Tertulian?

The term is used for pagan worshippers.

OkCornel:
Did you see the phrase “I infer” there?

You’re relying on someone else’s inference as your absolute truth. Splendid

The Bible you read is it not a product of canonization? Bwahahahah

OkCornel:
Did you see the phrase “I infer” there?

You’re relying on someone else’s inference as your absolute truth. Splendid

These are the Greek Chrestus

OkCornel:
You’ve missed my point entirely. I’m not bothered with what outsiders labelled believers with. My question is, what did the believers call each other?

Brother, Sister, Followers of the Way, The Elect, Saints.[b]

This is what they called one another and what the Apostles identified them as.

Outsiders called them Christians, Nazarenes bla bla bla

They spoke English that time?
Is Latin Jesus not from Nazareth?

OkCornel:
Can you show us where believers called each other Nazarenes?

Can you show me where believers called each other Christians?

OkCornel:
Smh

https://m.name-doctor.com/Chrestian/

Christos? Nah. It is chrestos/Chrestian.
See the difference.

OkCornel:
Again, just like “Christian”, “Nazarene” was a label believers were tagged with.

If you can show me where believers called themselves Nazarenes… I’m more than happy to check it out.


Paul was called a leader of the Nazarene sect
Acts 24 v 5:
5 “We have found this man to be a troublemaker, stirring up riots among the Jews all over the world. He is a ringleader of the Nazarene sect


But here, this is Paul clearly stating he’s a follower of the way, he didn’t call himself a “Nazarene”
Act 24 v 14:
14 However, I admit that I worship the God of our ancestors as a follower of the Way, which they call a sect. I believe everything that is in accordance with the Law and that is written in the Prophets

Another reference
Acts 22 v 3-4

Then Paul said: 3 “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city. I studied under Gamaliel and was thoroughly trained in the law of our ancestors. I was just as zealous for God as any of you are today.
4 I persecuted the followers of this Way to their death, arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison,

Nazarenes have their own history. You can just google it out.
They were never referred to as Christians in the original copy, maybe they were in the VATICANUS.


They are jews right? they can’t use a Greek name to refer to them.

OkCornel:
Check for the meaning of both words. They mean the same thing.

Use for pagan worshippers. It’s derogatory term!

OkCornel:
Read your screenshot again. The label “Christian” was very much in use before Tertulian jumped on the bandwagon.

And obviously “followers of the way” would have a different root word in Hebrew…

They were called Nazarene. Is this how much lies you have to tel yourself to believe in your deity?

OkCornel:
Read your screenshot again. The label “Christian” was very much in use before Tertulian jumped on the bandwagon.

The famous Antioch reference in the book of acts is to “Chrestian” not “Christian. How can you miss that simple English?

OkCornel:
Roman Catholic was birthed from a mixture of Roman paganism and doctrines from the early church. Kicked off after Constantine became the emperor.

Origen, Ireneaus and Polycarp lived and died before Constantine…so they are not Roman Catholic. They are church fathers quite alright, but not Roman Catholic

What do you understand by Roman Catholic and church fathers, I’m still waiting. I’m still waiting OkCornel

OkCornel:
Roman Catholic was birthed from a mixture of Roman paganism and doctrines from the early church. Kicked off after Constantine became the emperor

You read this too in the foxes book? Bwahahahah

OkCornel:
The residents at Antioch labelled the believers “Christians” however, the believers actually called themselves “followers of the way”.

Apostle Paul’s narrative in the book of Acts

It was Tertulian that laballed them “chrestian”, and they were previously called “nazarene”. This Tertulian also created the trinity concept

“Followers of the way” dem dey speak English that time too?

Apostle Paul narrative are you sure? Or maybe it’s Catholic Epistle or Pauline epistle narrative.

OkCornel:
Continuing from where I stopped, that explains Paul’s letters addressed to the congregation of believers in a particular city. Or the letters of Hohn to the seven churches in Revelation 1 and 2

Was it not Tertulian that referred to them as “Chrestian”?

OkCornel:
Winners Chapel

It was the first church in Jerusalem, tell us the name now, na problem. Why are you dodging? Lying to defend your deity!

OkCornel:
Ah ok…my bad.

Origen, Ireneaus and Polycarp were not “Roman Catholic”

Yawn, What do you understand by Roman Catholic, and how is “church father” self explanatory?

OkCornel:
Nope, don’t shift the goalpost. The first church was established in Jerusalem the same year Jesus was crucified, resurrected and ascended.

To be precise, 40 days after his ascension…on the day of Pentecost, 3,000 souls were baptised and added to the fold.

Acts 2 v 41;
41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.

What’s the name of the first church?