₦airaland Forum

Mademan5:
Then after announcing what next?. You haven't been to an occassion where a governor was invited and he sends a representative and after the organizers of the program announcing that the governor was represented. They will still refer the representative as the governor. If there is anything like governor's closing remarks. The representative goes and takes the remark. At that time he is taking that closing remarks he is taking it as the governor while the words are coming out of the representative mouth. What that means is, physically the closing remark is coming out of the representative mouth, but Mystically it is coming out of the governor's mouth even though he is not there. I think your problem is the word "Mistically" you can look it up in the dictionary so that you can understand what it means.

Beautygoddesss:
but they said the quora dnt encourage killing and yet muslims kill anyhow

Beautygoddesss:
thats very stupid

Damzy101:
Hmm professor of History. You must really lack a comprehensive understanding of what history is all about.

Why then do we have a standard and generally accepted history calendar (i.e BC and AD) ?


Your comment really shows you're bored...get some food and sleep, you'll be fine.

Beautygoddesss:
but it has stopped thank GOD u used d english"THEN".now why wont islam stop killing.u wnt ever hear of a christian killing someone becuz of blasphemy now they will only say"MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON U" BECUZ THEY KNOW GOD CAN DEFEND HIS NAME.NOT LIKE THAT DEAD god called allah that cant defend his name to talk of his prophet who is mere man

div111:
Na the thing be that.. christians be forming gentle gentle... If christians should start massive revenge for every senseless killings in the north, the killings will reduce massively

Kobojunkie:
1. When it comes to religious ideas, things aren't really open to interpretation. Scrpture tells you what is and either you accept it or you don't. Scripture does not show itself at you but it does require you be willing to be willing to accept what is written without injecting your personal delusions in an attempt to explain it all away in whatever fashion you chose. Where many of those who end up indoctrinated along with those who claim to be "reasonable minds" fail is both groups somehow operate under the same delusion that scripture is open to interpretation.

2. Scripture isn't malleable. The delusion that it is is what lead you to considering of worth the many bullsheet ideas from which your OP questions were based on..

Janosky:
In the Greek/English Interlinear Bible, when the reference is to Yahweh the Most High, He is addressed as Theos or ho Theos (the God).
But whenever Theos refers to another being , the interlinear address that being as "a god/gods"
For example,1 Corinthians 8:5-6 & Acts 12:22-23, Bill mounce Greek interlinear Bible.

Shalom.

Janosky:
In the Greek/English Interlinear Bible, when the reference is to Yahweh the Most High, He is addressed as Theos or ho Theos (the God).
But whenever Theos refers to another being , the interlinear address that being as "a god/gods"
For example,1 Corinthians 8:5-6 & Acts 12:22-23, Bill mounce Greek interlinear Bible.

Shalom.

And why are using the interlinear Bible?
English Bible VERSIONS are written from Septuagint Bible(Greek) and the masoretic text, none from interlinear Bible. The interlinear Bible was also written from these same sources. I don’t know why you brought up the interlinear Bible, it has no use, but agenda must agend abi Jehovah witness

Janosky:
In the Greek/English Interlinear Bible, when the reference is to Yahweh the Most High, He is addressed as Theos or ho Theos (the God).
But whenever Theos refers to another being , the interlinear address that being as "a god/gods"
For example,1 Corinthians 8:5-6 & Acts 12:22-23, Bill mounce Greek interlinear Bible.

Shalom.

Janosky:
Jesus is a god, not ho Theos (the God) his Father.
Trinitarians REMOVED Greek definite article "ho" ("the" in English) to create a false impression that Jesus is ho Theos the God his Father ( in 2nd sentence of John 1:1, Check Bill Mounce Greek Interlinear Bible.
Ho Theos the God is at John 4:24,John 14:1, Bill Mounce did not remove it.
John 1:1 should read the same as Acts 12:22-23, to differentiate ho Theos from other god as Paul did at 1 Corinthians 8:5-6).

Shalom.

Mademan5:
Oga try to read carefully before rushing to reply. I never said buhari's son is equally to his father, I specifically said in that particular occassion that he is representing his father, he will be accorded the same respect that would have been given to the father if he was the one that came. If they had book sharaton hotel for Buhari, that same hotel is what his son will stay, they they have reserved a gold plate to use and serve the president alone, even though he didn't come, they will still serve the representative with that same gold plate, what does this mean? It means at that point he is representing the president, he is one with the president that is why they will put him in the same hotel room reserved for the president , give him food in the same gold plate reserved only for the president because in that particular occassion he is being seen as the president even though the main person isn't present in the ocassions. Read slowly and carefully, so you can understand the point .

Mademan5:
Oga try to read carefully before rushing to reply. I never said buhari's son is equally to his father, I specifically said in that particular occassion that he is representing his father, he will be accorded the same respect that would have been given to the father if he was the one that came. If they had book sharaton hotel for Buhari, that same hotel is what his son will stay, they they have reserved a gold plate to use and serve the president alone, even though he didn't come, they will still serve the representative with that same gold plate, what does this mean? It means at that point he is representing the president, he is one with the president that is why they will put him in the same hotel room reserved for the president , give him food in the same gold plate reserved only for the president because in that particular occassion he is being seen as the president even though the main person isn't present in the ocassions. Read slowly and carefully, so you can understand the point .

Mademan5:
Oga try to read carefully before rushing to reply. I never said buhari's son is equally to his father, I specifically said in that particular occassion that he is representing his father, he will be accorded the same respect that would have been given to the father if he was the one that came. If they had book sharaton hotel for Buhari, that same hotel is what his son will stay, they they have reserved a gold plate to use and serve the president alone, even though he didn't come, they will still serve the representative with that same gold plate, what does this mean? It means at that point he is representing the president, he is one with the president that is why they will put him in the same hotel room reserved for the president , give him food in the same gold plate reserved only for the president because in that particular occassion he is being seen as the president even though the main person isn't present in the ocassions. Read slowly and carefully, so you can understand the point .

Mademan5:
Oga try to read carefully before rushing to reply. I never said buhari's son is equally to his father, I specifically said in that particular occassion that he is representing his father, he will be accorded the same respect that would have been given to the father if he was the one that came. If they had book sharaton hotel for Buhari, that same hotel is what his son will stay, they they have reserved a gold plate to use and serve the president alone, even though he didn't come, they will still serve the representative with that same gold plate, what does this mean? It means at that point he is representing the president, he is one with the president that is why they will put him in the same hotel room reserved for the president , give him food in the same gold plate reserved only for the president because in that particular occassion he is being seen as the president even though the main person isn't present in the ocassions. Read slowly and carefully, so you can understand the point .

Mademan5:
You keep mixing my words up. Note I am not talking about mystic word or anything. I am talking about the relationship between God and Jesus Christ. Let me use this analogy to clarify you but if you don't get it this last time, I don't think I can help you any further. Here we go. For instance let's let's use President Buhari and his son as an example they are two different entities right? One is the father while the other is the son. That is how you have God and Jesus, one the father while one the son. This was what I meant by physically/ Positionally the father is greater that the son. Then I said but "Mystically" they are the same. Now let me use this exampl to clarify what I mean by Mystically. If President Buhari is invited to an occasion and he couldn't go and he sends his son to go represent him, in that ocassion his son's presence there is as though the president is there himself. When the organizers wants to relate to him in that ocassions, they will say, M"President" ........... Even though he is being represented . So Mystically in that occassion, the president is inside the representative even though he can't be seen, and everything said in that occassion by the representative is taken as the word of the president even though is not the president saying it physically, so at that moment, in that occassion, the president and his representative are one and equal at that moment . So Mystically God is inside Christ and Christ is inside God, so as far as they are inside each other mystically, they are equal unless God removes himself from Jesus which will never happen. Where as the president being equal with his representative is for a short period of his representation in that occassion and after the ocassions they go back to who they used to be individually, it's not so with His and Christ because their is permanent and not temporal like the president and his son.I rest my case

Mademan5:
You keep mixing my words up. Note I am not talking about mystic word or anything. I am talking about the relationship between God and Jesus Christ. Let me use this analogy to clarify you but if you don't get it this last time, I don't think I can help you any further. Here we go. For instance let's let's use President Buhari and his son as an example they are two different entities right? One is the father while the other is the son. That is how you have God and Jesus, one the father while one the son. This was what I meant by physically/ Positionally the father is greater that the son. Then I said but "Mystically" they are the same. Now let me use this exampl to clarify what I mean by Mystically. If President Buhari is invited to an occasion and he couldn't go and he sends his son to go represent him, in that ocassion his son's presence there is as though the president is there himself. When the organizers wants to relate to him in that ocassions, they will say, M"President" ........... Even though he is being represented . So Mystically in that occassion, the president is inside the representative even though he can't be seen, and everything said in that occassion by the representative is taken as the word of the president even though is not the president saying it physically, so at that moment, in that occassion, the president and his representative are one and equal at that moment . So Mystically God is inside Christ and Christ is inside God, so as far as they are inside each other mystically, they are equal unless God removes himself from Jesus which will never happen. Where as the president being equal with his representative is for a short period of his representation in that occassion and after the ocassions they go back to who they used to be individually, it's not so with His and Christ because their is permanent and not temporal like the president and his son. I rest my case

abc115:
You are covering ground for GEJ.

GEJ was approached.

He agreed...but wanted consensus, backing and anointing of President Buhari that was why he visited APC Chairman.

PDP Miscreants and wailers were confused, obtained BMC forms... suddenly stopped criticism of APC.

President Buhari said, he is not a Pastor and has no Anointing Oil.

GEJ backed out

Mademan5:
When I wrote that physically, I thought you will be confused as you now that was why I had to put"/Positionally" thinking you will get the point, but it's unfortunate, you don't get it

renheart:
.
What about the days of salahadeen that lead to the era of the crusaders?

cornelboy:
Prove that your not a failure by mysteriously putting money in my aza.
I thought you said you're the god, who's him now?

Mademan5:
I don't think you know what "Mystically" means. So I will leave you with your understanding

IamANigerianMan:
Your gods know you are going to hell, why kill people for him if he truly god as you call him, your god cannot fight for himself, you sacrifice human being for him in the name of blasphemy.

Mademan5:
To answer your question in the most simple way, Physically/Positionally God is greater than Jesus Christ but Mystically God is inside of Christ and Christ is inside of God so they are inseperable, making them to be one/equal.

IamANigerianMan:
Repent now and give your life to Christ, tomorrow may be too late

Kobojunkie:
So the opinions born of the mind of the many ignorant men make more sense to you then?

Kobojunkie:
1. According to Scripture. Satan happens to work for God, in the capacity of a quality control test manager of sorts. His work seems to entail testing the resolve of men on behalf of God. It was so in Job 1, the same when he, Satan, tested Jesus Christ in Matthew 4 vs 1 - 10 , and even so when Jesus Christ handed Peter over to Satan to be tested - Matthew 16 vs 22 - 24

We forget that God Himself created Satan to serve Him, in pretty much the same way He created for Himself Angel's to serve Him. How can Satan be the enemy of man when God uses Him to test man whenever God pleases?,

2. If God commands Satan to test a man's resolve on behalf of God, and Satan does as God commands, why is Satan to blame man failing God's test?

Take a look at the example in the book of Job to give you a good insight into how these things go. God commanded Satan to test Job and Satan die exactly as God asked Him to - Satan obeyed God. Job, the man under test, refused to budge. He stood firm in his resolve for God no matter how many times his friends, even his own wife, tried to dissuade him from believing God's Truth over their lies. What was even more interesting is that not once did Job turn to blame Satan for his woes this since Job was well aware that it was all God's doing - Job 12 vs 7 - 9

If job could pass God's test as administered by Satan, what right does any other man have to blame Satan when he fails?

3. The Enemy is not out there somewhere, but the bad things/lies which you have stored up in your heart that keeps you from doing what God wants - Matthew 15 vs 10 - 20

Ken4Christ:
It does not make the master more human than the apprentice.

Ken4Christ:
It does not matter who had used the title. Now Jesus is the Saviour. Have you accepted him as your Lord and Saviour? Or you want to remain a lost soul?