₦airaland Forum

SIRTee15:
🥱🥱🥱
Good u did some work on yourself after that brutal humiliation. You almost cried.

Anyway, even u know what u wrote up there is unconvincing.

Why should Herod be thinking of becoming a Christian if what Paul was telling him wasnt related to Christianity. How does that makes sense to u.

That’s because you don’t understand what “christ” means.
Constatine worshipped Helios christos.
Not to forget there is difference between Iesus chrestus and jesus of Nazareth.

Aemmyjah:
I do read your comments sometimes as when you draw attention of people here to what the Bible says against some of their religious doctrines
We all know how Christianity started
The one who started it foretold that counterfeit of it will form

Pure Christianity was and has never been a state religion
It has never been a tool for war and politics

You're just being black and white thinking you can mislead me but foolish history and deception... It's like a mad man trying to show off his clothes and jewelries, he just amuses others cos nothing he does is responsible

Keep sharing Roman myth n history
We know the truth
Continue convincing me about atheism
Awon most intelligent people

Indoctrinated yahweh slave, madness is more prominent in you guys orgy organization 😂

Aemmyjah:
This slave of Roman mythology keeps sharing nonsense that has nothing to do with me or my faith
Keep posting
People that claim to be intelligent as atheists can't come up with anything tangible about themselves but be pointing accusing fingers and posting nonsense

Yahweh Slave, hope you know it was Roman Catholic that they made state religion in Rome and not christianity

SIRTee15:
Why then should I believe other nonsense u've been posting here.

Please don’t believe me, i want you to know.

SIRTee15:
So u used a pseudepigrapha to rebute an argument. A dubious source to counter a claim.

I don’t think you know what pseudepigrapha means

https://www.nairaland.com/7397330/pseudepigrapha

SIRTee15:
The evidence u denying.

How can i deny an evidence?

SIRTee15:
So u used a pseudepigrapha to rebute an argument. A dubious source to counter a claim.
How does that make sense to u.
Why then should I believe other nonsense u've been posting here.
They could as well be dubious articles from false writers.

The gospel is what?
I don’t think you know what “ pseudepigrapha” means

Aemmyjah:
You're quoting from mythology or legends or whatever does not even interest or concern me...
Go find handwork

And your iesus chrestus is what?

Go be a slave to yahweh

SIRTee15:
It's either u have no shame or u have a short memory.
I humiliated u on this topic and now u back again to receive another dose of humiliation.
Are u not the one that said Herod called Jesus followers Christians in Antioch?

Anyway this is your answer.

Understand the context illiterate.

Shaul does not endorse the term "Christian" here when Agrippa suspects him of being a "chrestos /christian". Shaul instead deflects away from such an idea and clears things up for the undiscerning Agrippa, the man who judges in the flesh (1 Pet 4:6):

Acts 26:28-29 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian. (And) *but Paul said, I would to Elohim (pw God), that not only thou, but also all that hear me this day, were both almost, and altogether such as I am.

The context would have been far clearer if "but" had been the chosen translation here (Greek "de" instead of "and" since the Greek allows for either option. I believe "and" was chosen to further sell the lie that Shaul thinks himself to be a Christian. The use of "but" on the other hand would signify Shaul opposing Agrippa's false perception that Shaul is a "Christian". Addtionally Agrippa states "almost" (Greek "oligos"

[*StrongsGreek*]
3641 oligos ol-ee'-gos of uncertain affinity; puny (in extent, degree, number, duration or value); especially neuter (adverbially) somewhat:--+ almost, brief(-ly), few, (a) little, + long, a season, short, small, a while.

Agrippa, for a while, had the preconceived idea that he was being persuaded to be a "Christian" because of the way Shaul was arguing his case so strongly.

Aemmyjah:
So carry your own stupid concept and go away
Common child will not even mention that nonsense concept of the universe
If you're not ment, you'll understand the concept of Cause and Effect regarding the Universe and that the universe can not be an effect of itself but an Uncaused Cause and that Cause cannot be mere chance
As if you don't know what makes up the universe as to design and other
Go and give it to your fellow, negative thinking atheists

Besides, I wonder why you sent me such photos as they don't apply or object to anything I believe... If that's your own think to be posting mythology to those it does not concern

Atheists should go and promote their own religion or philosophy... People with the school of thought that there existence has no meaning or purpose... Why should I converse with such people?
Their existence is nothing

Cause and effect is the same thing, slave of yahweh.

SIRTee15:
I hope u know Jesus had more than 12 disciples.
Papais clearly called John the Presbyter a disciple of the Lord.

Jesus didn’t exist.
The 12 disciples represent 12 cosmic sign.
Jesus started preaching in the gospel books at age 12.
12 tribes of Israel.

You are worshipping a Roman Parody.

SIRTee15:
I buried u on this point in the past. I'm not going back on it.
Herod clearly referred to Paul as a Christian.

You are little like your creator, both of you will be buried together.
No he didn’t refer to paul as a Christian.

SIRTee15:
U mentioned him. Why did u mention someone u don't know.
Are u confused.

I said Pseudepigrapha

Are you dumb?

SIRTee15:
As usual denying evidence. Once an evidence shatters their claim, they deny it.

Which evidence?

SIRTee15:
They tried to push a narrative that christianity is a continuation of judaism and that some of the mosaic law should be followed- read the book of acts.

There was nothing like “Christianity” then, there was nothing to push.

Paul was called leaders of nazarene not a christian.

SIRTee15:
And further down, it said he met and heard from John.

He specifically mentioned the john he met

And Papias, of whom we are now speaking, confesses that he received the words of the apostles from those that followed them, but says that he was himself a hearer of Aristion and the 172 presbyter John.

SIRTee15:
Is Ignatius of Antioch a real person or not.

Who is ignatius of Antioch?

SIRTee15:
Don't be lazy and dumb the same time. Read further down, that's why I brought it here.
Number 1 simply stated these are the only known works of papias according to Irenaeus.
Number 3 and 4 are quotation from papias work itself.
And further down, it said he met and heard from John.

Don’t be stupid and unfortunate.
How do you know it is from papais itself because the book says so? And this book was found by?

TenQ:
I think some Muslims should educate us
1. If it is possible to get normal looking women in paradise and not these transparent women
2. If it is possible to request for a normal erection that would not be perpetual
3. What happens to the women. Are they not gaining anything in paradise?

Thank you

Allah and Elohim means same thing.
Yahweh is only god of israelite.

SIRTee15:
Is he a real person or not. That's the question.

Which ignatius??
The one that wrote letters?

Aemmyjah:
Cherry picking what to believe and what to argue
See the stupid question he came to ask me about the universe

I am not an hypocrite like you, who came to ask a ask a jewish worthless slave any question? When?

SIRTee15:
Wow, few minutes back Ignatius was a real person.
All of a sudden he has become a ghost writer.

Pseudepigrapha

SIRTee15:
That was papias own words not irenaeus.

No Illiterate, the person was explaining the book.
Number 1 said the book were said to be written by papias according to iranaeus
Number 2 said in the book, papias was not even a eye witness, he never met the apostles.
He never met the apostles he said it himself, he got to know from a friend of a friend according to the book 😂😂
Read!!!

SIRTee15:
But u didn't see this.
Irenaeus is really tormenting u tonight.

What did you underline?
What does it mean?

Iraeneus has really put you in bondage.

SIRTee15:
Another apostolic father is Papias of herapolis. Known to John and other apostles.

Don’t you get it?
Iesus chrestus doesn’t exist, there is no John or apostles.


The 12 apostles represents the cosmic signs.
When jesus died in the story, the weather went dark.

Look up helios christos.

SIRTee15:
Another apostolic father is Papias of herapolis. Known to John and other apostles.
He lived 60 AD to 130AD.
His works the exposition of the Sayings of the Lord is an important early source on Christian oral tradition and especially on the origins of the canonical Gospels.
Papias confirmed Mark wrote the gospel according to him as dictated by Peter.

Here is what he wrote about gospel of Matthew.

Therefore Matthew put the logia in an ordered arrangement in the Hebrew language, but each person interpreted them as best he could.

The writings of papais
https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.viii.xxxix.html

Free yourself from the bondage of ireneaus.

Look up “jewish christians”.

https://www.bible.ca/history-ignatius-forgeries-250AD.htm
Everything you have been saying since have been FORGERY.

Look up “jewish christians”

SIRTee15:
Ignatius mentioned him in his writings.

And who is this ignatius, mention his writings.

One of iraeneus ghost writers.

SIRTee15:
So another apostolic father was evodius of Antioch.
He was the 2nd bishop of Antioch and actually coined the name Christianity. He was well known to Peter himself.
He died 69 AD and was succeeded by Ignatius.

Have you looked up “jewish christians” yet?

SIRTee15:
So another apostolic father was evodius of Antioch.
He was the 2nd bishop of Antioch and actually coined the name Christianity. He was well known to Peter himself.
He died 69 AD and was succeeded by Ignatius.

According to who? Hope it’s not Eusebius the master forger

SIRTee15:
Today I'm curing u of ignorance regarding 1st century Christianity.
Next time I will take u up on other centuries

Haven’t i told you to look up jewish christians?

Save yourself from ireneaus bondage.

SIRTee15:
Today I'm curing u of ignorance regarding 1st century Christianity.
Next time I will take u up on other centuries

There was no “Christianity” in first century.


I hope you have learnt where the apostolic fathers come from.