McDuncan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › McDuncan's Profile › McDuncan's Posts
JovialJune:You thought the ban silenced me and you rose up this morning to gloat. Let the ban come. It won't stop me. Now, back to your itching postpartum pùssy; I wonder how your vulva respond to excitement like the flowers opening up their leaves to the sunray when it's perpetually open 24/7. |
JovialJune:I guess your pùssy swells in delight to empty likes by like-minded, bitter old layers like you who litter this space. You only have to punch your keypads and the likes will start dropping. That's the way you old layers show solidarity to one another. It never bother us. I woke up to expunged diatribes, much to my fury. Can the mods moderate with the understanding that we're both adults who are willing to duel without their interference/intervention? Now, with this supposedly mutual understanding, let me jolt you back to what you probably missed last night. postmann: JovialJune:You probably had your fingers cupping your puna while chatting, while the conquered wimp you got at home was snoring away from the domestic chores you forced on him dear Mrs balanced and healthy family acting all affected when I apply sexual metaphors to convey my points. Pretentious bìtch. Thank your lucky stars I'm not willing to go vulgar tonight. Loose woman. |
JovialJune:I guess your pùssy swells in delight to empty likes by like-minded, bitter old layers like you who litter this space. You only have to punch your keypads and the likes will start dropping. That's the way you old layers show solidarity to one another. It never bother us. I woke up to expunged diatribes, much to my fury. Can the mods moderate with the understanding that we're both adults who are willing to duel without their interference/intervention? Now, with this supposedly mutual understanding, let me jolt you back to what you probably missed last night. postmann: |
FutureIsFemale:Question 1) What happens to men who impregnate? Sex with an underage is punishable by law. So, if a man have sex with consent and impregnates a woman of age, it is assumed, and rightly so, that she understands the implication of having unprotected sex. She bears the consequences. Question 2) What punishment is given to irresponsible fathers and boyfriends who impregnate and deny? Same thing as said earlier; a woman of age who consented to sex, unprotected sex for that matter before marriage, bears the consequences of her actions. Question 3) What punishment is given to rapists? Now, this is a dumb question. Even children in elementary school can tell what punishment the law prescribes for rapists. |
I've read from idiots with pile riddled butt and a certain certified moronic, irresponsible redpiler who had no scriptural base contribution to offer but made side jeers from the comfort of their compromised genes. When we assert that scripturally, women have no power of divorce, we have undertaken diligent research based on biblical accounts. The only grounds a man has for divorce is if his wife is sexually unfaithful. But does scripture accord women same right? I think not. Men in that era had always been polygamous. They marry as many as they could. The law gave them that much liberty. Should they sleep with someone's wife or a woman betrothed to another man, the law says they both should be stoned to death (duet 22: 22). But should a man, married or otherwise sleep with a free woman, the law compels him to marry her, subject to the approval of the woman's father(Exod 22: 16) So, naturally, there's no occasion a wife could seek divorce based on her husband's sexual unfaithfulness since the law has made provisions on how to handle that. It is even lawful for a man to marry his late brother's wife should she bear no children before his demise. Men then simply enjoyed so much sexual liberty. Had women had the law on their side to initiate divorce back then, divorce surely would have been rampart as they naturally would seek to curtail their husbands' polygamous exploits. In Matthew, like in Duet 24, JESUS was addressing men not women on the grounds for lawful divorce. Saint Paul sums it up nicely in 1 corintians 7 Vs 10 and 11; 10 And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the LORD, Let not the wife depart from her husband: 11 But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife. In conclusion, when we say there's no scripturally divorced man, we simply mean there's no man divorced by a woman in scripture, neither was there any provision given for a woman to seek divorce. Numbers 5: 12-31 even covers mere suspicion as well actual adultery committed by a wife but hidden from her husband. But none, not a quote from the first to the last book of the bible accommodate any provision where a woman can seek divorce. |
Kobojunkie:Reason why I don't talk scripture with you. Ain't no where was it mentioned that she divorced her many husbands. Rather, JESUS said, YOU'VE HAD 5 HUSBANDS AND THE ONE YOU HAVE NOW ISN'T YOUR HUSBAND. No where was it stated who divorced who. But going by biblical accounts, it's easy to deduce. She most likely could have been divorced by all 5 husbands especially if they found something indecent about her or It's possible her previous husbands died. She had no chance in hell divorcing her ex husbands because the law of Moses which was operational then didn't make any provision for a woman to issue divorced certificate to the husband. |
bukatyne:Ok, simply put; is there any scriptural narration of a woman who divorced her husband? A man who divorced his wife can be called a divorced man, this I know but, I'm talking about men who have been divorced by their wives in scripture. |
bukatyne:Regardless of today's nomenclature, you perfectly understand where I'm driving at. |
Kobojunkie:I knew you'd repeat the same question, even with your signature emoji. What blend of weed do you ingest? Surely, it is responsible for your repetition compulsion condition. I've made it clear -- and for the last time -- I won't be delving into scripture with a junkie and a deviant. So please, go weed up in peace. |
Mindlog:My earlier submission was clear; if a woman doesn't have the power to divorce, then there is no scripturally based divorced men. So I couldn't have alluded that because there's no divorced men in the scriptural sense. Luke was emphasizing on divorce outside the sin of adultery by the woman. The sole purpose of Luke's take on that subject matter is thus; any man who divorce his wife outside the ambit of the law commits adultery with the new wife and the man who marries the divorced wife also commits adultery. This is not about "divorced men" which is the original basis for the question by the OP. There's nothing like a divorced man scripturally. However the sexual sin of a man might be, it doesn't give the woman the right to divorce. She can only separate. Hence there's no scriptural provision for a woman to remarry unless by death of her husband. And no matter how she was divorced, whether scripturally lawful or otherwise, she's barred from remarrying because she remains the wife of her husband. And even when she's divorced lawfully owing to her committing adultery, she still can't remarry. For men, it is narrowed down to only when the wife is sexually unfaithful. He can divorce and remarry. So, while Luke points us to the reality of a man committing adultery by unlawful divorce and remarrying, it doesn't answer to "divorced men" remarrying. And this is what I think the OP was asking. |
Kobojunkie:To what purpose is it, delving into scriptural waters with you, Kobojunkie? You have refused to grasp common, everyday scriptural truths. So? I'm afraid, your question springs from your thirst for heretic postulation. |
Mindlog:My reply was tailored to fit the question from the OP who's asking about divorced people (man or woman). The question is simplified thus: "does it apply to a divorced man?" Question Is it only a divorced woman that shouldn't remarry? Does the same apply to a divorced man? And my answer is simple. A woman in the first place, by scripture, doesn't have the power of divorce. She can at best separate or be joined back to her husband or remain separated for the rest of her life. Luke 16 : 18 talks about intents while the question from the OP is centered on after the deed. |
. |
. |
Candidlady:You must have gotten your panties soaked up with your smelly discharge while fuming. |
nenyewrites:I'm afraid it applies to divorced women only. Scripturally, women only have the power of separation, not divorce. |
Polygamy is a natural, nay spiritual preserve of all males so long as he desires multiple women and possesses the temperamental and material means to sustain such. Virginity, or the lack thereof, does not in its self compels a man to be 'faithful' to his wife. The faithfulness a man owes to his wife is to love and care for her physically and spiritually. While a woman's faithfulness to a man is to love, respect and preserve her body and mind in a sexual and emotional capacity for him alone. |
cococandy:And you must have come away with the understanding that 'clean up' is the application of water and tissue. Simplistically naive of you! |
JovialJune:This is what happens when you lack the wherewithal to cover your shame or the humility to admit your stupidity. You're just another empty bîtch with a compromised cerebrospinal fluid, tinkered by excessive hormonal interference. |



