₦airaland Forum

Haywhymido: GUS ROCKS c u 2morrow

vosquare: fotocopi ko easy!!!

Pweedylipsmoi: exactly, dat tracy talks too much, all talk no action nd she behaves like mumu sef

C'est moi:
Tony is strong sha.

vosquare: upon all ur oyinbo dennisi.....''i and tony''....haha....

vosquare: u ft jump insyd t.v nd shut im

homesteady: Yes oh!! Spear won! I feel so emotional!

vosquare: sword dn loose ds 1.....go teamwork spears.....sword cnt win everidae....#stilteamsword

zeelo2014: Something in me tells me that Dennis has crush on Ify. It won't be a bad idea if he blocks her outside, the girl seems to be cool.

vosquare: sword oooooo.....u cn stil mit d spears

vosquare: sword oooooo

Doc_Miss: [color=crimson]K[/color]

odizeey: affrey »̶-̶̶ †̥ånKz-►,n originbm I'm sorry,I am d one at fault,sorry once again

Dericinh: ********HOW MANY TIMES DO U WANT ME 2 TELL U....HHHMMM WEIRDDOO

odizeey: I tire o,who call am sef,c him head like origbim

exPLIcit7: Mickey I understood what y0u were saying 0...but y0u are partially right...d0n't be offended...and d0n't think I'm trying to ridicule y0u...okay...
.
I'm n0t like that...

originbm: Of course.It is fully independent and are only limited by the level of the international pecking order.they were fully sovereign.apertheid was a situation in which the afrikaans which are a minority non-indeginous tribe in south africa lorded over the black majority and insisted on the maintenance of chasm between the blacks and afrikaans,insisting that the blacks should develokn at their own social evolutionary rate.But the afrikaans were legal citizens of the country.
would u say that because of the presence of nazism in germany,that germany was no longer an independent state?or the religoous apertheid of bosnia and herzegovina?or the economic apertheid of nigeria?what of the united state of the mid twentieth century?did the apartheid in usa make the country independent?

Dericinh: ******GOOD P.M....2 YU'L.....EXPECIALLY MY DAMSELS...@ MEHLENA AND FAITH..OW U GURLZ DOING......HHHMMMM WERZ MY BELOVED..@ AFFREY

originbm: There is a great difference between colonization and the apertheid of south africa.colonization presupposes that nation is totally,politically and economically subject to a greater power.it is a colony,(even lesser than a client state),of a greater power.
Apertheid in south africa was a politico-social doctrine founded in an already politically and economically independent state.the country already had a foreign policy with full sovereingty.
so they are very different.

mhizz_bernie: dats y i askd d questn bout colonialism n aparthied policy.wat z d diff.btw both?

exPLIcit7: What Is He Saying...

Mexyz: Gud one bernie.....even sme self acclaimd scholars here don't knw wat Mandela was actually fightn for den. The oda one is sayn nt everybody can use google, oya u dat can use google, wat did Mandela fight for.

odizeey: no lol pls

odizeey: i tire o,dem go just see preview of answers n run com here com post,na wetyn denrich too,dey tell me holy alliance,him no like sinfull alliance?

odizeey: u no like aba?
Dat 1910 was nt d main. The main was 1931 or so,. Bt it was in 1994 dat d became a country with full independence,no let book decieve u,cos duncan sqy akonuche is beta dan silver n gold,so use am well

odizeey: from who