₦airaland Forum

you should wait... when from 2 different banks it can take a lil longer.

women will not understand the above because they live in a different world than men...
- men would value RESPECT/PEACE/CARE/UNDERSTANDING from a woman, rather than her millions
- women would value the millions of a man above his RESPECT/PEACE/CARE/UNDERSTANDING

GanagiBitrus:
How did you know there was a skipper available to do the ferrying? Did the puzzle state there was a skipper available?
Needs to be ferried BY A BOAT not
Needs to be ferried by a skipper.

it doesnt matter whether a skipper is available or not, they NEED TO BE FERRIED therefore someone has to ferry them across the river. its very simple to understand IMHO.

GanagiBitrus:
The boat skipper is one of the 25persons.
The puzzle didn't say there is an extra person who is the skipper.

it says: "a team of 25 people NEED TO BE FERRIED" (and not "need to cross" )...so someone has to ferry them across the river (aka the skipper of the boat).

if it was just 25 people and a boat then it would simply say:"25 people need to cross a river"

immortalcrown:
You are correct. But why telling me to focus on the question? Was I focusing on your head before?

lol...

i was gonna say KONJI IS A BASTARD... but that cant possibly be the result of konji. this is just PURE MADNESS!

GanagiBitrus:
4 persons dropped per trip
5 trips =20 persons
Boat crossing to & fro = 10 trips
Last crossing carries remaining 5 persons
Total crossing = 11 times 👍

so who drives the boat on the last crossing since you are bringing the remaining 5 people along (and not the boat skipper)?

green pill= jesus, Spiderman and Harry Potter are all the same things... and religion is a scam orchestrated to brainwash people and turn them into gullible follow-follow sheep

13 times...

immortalcrown:
14 times if all the people will cross to the same side and the pilot is not counted among the 25 people. The boat crosses the river twice per trip (going and coming). The boat carries 4 passengers and the pilot per trip. The boat will need 7 trips to cross the 25 people. Each trip will have 5 people on the boat, except the 7th trip that will have 2 people on the boat.

10 times if all the people are crossing to the same side and the pilot is counted among the 25 people.

focus on the question: all the people will need to cross the river, so if each boat trip carries 4 people, then it will take the boat 12 trips (6 trips back and forth) to carry 24 people, and thereafter only ONE more trip to carry the last person over the other side.

that would make it 13 trips, not 14...

ChristCee:
For every five person's ferried, the boat crosses the river twice except for the last trip. Technically there are 30 persons. Because the skipper has to journey with four people on every trip (maximum of five)
We should have 30/5 will be 6. But there are two crossings for each ferrying so that would be 6*2 which is twelve crossings.
But remember the boat does not need to return on the last trip so that will b 12-1 to adjust for this logic.

you mean 12 + 1...

RodgersAkpafu:
oh please
it's your fundamental human right to have an opinion
its also my fundamental human right to have an opinion ON your opinion......
If you have the profile I believe you have
you will understand the above

I will excuse a motor park tout or someone in ojuelegba for being homophobic
but for someone like you (I have read your comments overtime and built a profile on you virtually) being homophobic will be a disappointment in my opinion.....

But since you said you are not one
*shrugs*

here is what you should understand about my stand.... i respect everyone and their ideology, so long as they dont take away my freedom of speech and expression. the minute someone wants to force me to look at a man in a dress and call that person "she" (while i fully well know thats a man) then you are forcing me to live your lie... and as much as anyone has the right to identify as anything they desire, i dont have to follow your madness. whats next?
look at what direction this madness is taking the world... men identifying as women competing in sport and annihilating female record that havent been broken in decades; men identifying as women going to female jails and impregnating all the females there;

BTW being against something that is obviously WRONG is not homophobia... as if anything LGBT must be right, lol! i am not against their sexual orientation i am against their mad desire to have the whole world accept their madness of being called what they are not.
- so tomorrow if i identify as god, then you people MUST call/treat me as such?!
- so tomorrow if a man identifies as a 12yr girl and want to be allowed in gym locker room of primary school, then you people will accept it too?!
- so when 60yr old pedos brainwash 12yr old girls and have sex with them, but the pedo identifies as a 12yr old, he shouldnt be prosecuted for the rape of that underage child?!
WHEN IS THIS MADNESS GONNA STOP?!

RodgersAkpafu:
so you are homophobic?
Damn disappointment

disappointed because i have an opinion?
i am not homophobic, i have nothing against gays and lesbians.... i only am against the force-feed of their agenda down everyone's throat. anyone has the right to be whatever they desire, but the minute they start making THEIR cause above any other, thats when i have a problem with it. i dont need my kids or anyone else to be brainwashed in school about LGBT issues and told we have to call somebody what they are not. i believe that a MAN is a MAN and a WOMAN is a WOMAN. if these transgenders and whatever want to call themselves unicorn and dress in whatever clothing then they have the right to do so but they certainly shouldnt force me to live their madness. i have many gay/lesbians friends and acquaintances around me, and the catch is that as much as i accept their lifestyle, they should also accept mine, and never try to force their lifestyle upon me. thats the only we can all live happily together.

Calitoscassius:
They didn't force any country to take their loans, do business with them or borrow from them, they dey their dey until Naigeria and all the other poor countries came begging for money, business and loans. So they gave their conditions for loans, money and business.
If una no like am then fix your own country! so no country would force LGBT on you. Otherwise shut up!
Remember, no man is an island, you have to do business with other countries at some point.

remember, i dont blame these people with their LGBT agenda, i blame the yeye greedy ignoramus ready to destroy a country for their greedy selfish need to enrich themselves and their families.
REMEMBER $150billion would solve poverty in Nigeria for the next 10/15years, but sadly, we all know that it will NEVER be used to help common Nigerians!

ayotade09:
I rather live with rainbow people that buy beans 2k per Derica my own be say sha no carry your rainbow touch be

so you believe that after receiving that money, the price of goods in Nigeria will change? lol...

Flamemignon1:
Just say you are a bigot and move on

Trueprophet91:
If you can have all you need as a man without a woman,why do you have to add an extra burden if you're not tricked?

again, women are not a burden to men, they are a well needed lifemate.. without women, men cant create a great family environment with children etc. so pls dont get me wrong, we men need women just like women need us, but to claim that women have any power over men, apart from that 30mins sex therapy, is a lie from the pit of hell.

verifiablefacts:
The said man would stay off the crime,a good deterrent.

frog12:
and e no fit the punishment ??

he got 17yrs in jail... but again, as they say:"if you cant do the time, dont do the crime"

Meteng:
Lol. Black nyash strong die! Before blood go comot, the cane don hear nwii

that black nyansh will be bloody and teared in half within that 5th lashes... na 15 lashes go remain, lol!

i once saw a caning video, and within the 2nd lash, that man's bare nyansh was already dripping blood and he was screaming like a mad person in serious pain... this punishment aint no joke.

they will use money to push their yeye agendas, as usual...and many foolish countries will bend down (and open nyansh) to receive the money...

victory36:
Honestly, of it will bring an economic bailout of some sort, then we had better sign it. Better to live with gays than live in hopelessness and poverty

all these loans and money dashed has to be repaid and comes with serious strings attached.... tomorrow when they start teaching gay/lesbian nonsense to your kids in school, you will be the 1st one to cry foul.
1st they want you to accept their agenda, then they want you to have a LGBT group freely advertising in your country and airwaves, that same group will organize gay pride and defiles where they will invite all to proudly come out the closet, by then they will start to lobby to decriminalize gay sex in Nigeria...to thereafter start to ask you to recognize transgender and call these people them/they or whatever other yeye nonsense they want you to go out of your way to call them.

thats like borrowing money from the local gangster and now he wants you to repay him by pushing drugs for him.
***spit on floor***

MikeofKd:
1st question ; Having children is a beautiful thing ,it gives you a great sense of purpose and existence. Makes one more responsible.

if this is how you feel therefore it doesnt matter whether you have children at 18 or 64yrs of age

2nd question ; Nobody prays to have a handicapped child or a down syndrome , these are just silly excuses tbh. Let's be optimistic pls

having a handicapped/slow or deaf/dumb child is part of life.... we can be optimistic all we want but there are a lot of yeye useless children out there who amount to nothing with their lives...look around you, dont you think that all the rapists, pedos, ritualists, armed robbers, murderers, kidnappers, body parts salesmen etc are someone's children? a man can hope for whatever but life often deals you a different hand. the catch is to make sure that you go into this issue with the "RIGHT" mindset.

3rd question ; having kids that would grow to help you in old age is a great blessing but it's optional , I would have my retirement plans so I'm not totally dependent on my children.

a man's job is to make sure that he gave his children all the necessary tools/values in this life so that they can have a great life.... regardless of whether they will take care of you (or not). i believe it is a curse/burden for a man to expect his children to take care of him in his old age... if thats what these children want to do then so be it, but they certainly shouldnt be forced to do it.

4th question ; A man should have a child at an early stage e.g. late 20s I believe at this age your emotionally , physically ,mentally and financially stable to raise children. (Its only dat the finances might not be enough to give them certain privileges dat one didn't enjoy as a child and that why I created dis thread so fathers can advice me on how they were able to navigate through all that financial challenges)

there is no science to being a great father because all men are different... some are financially/emotionally/physically ready at 18 while others aint ready before 45... also, some were ready and failed as parents while others were not ready and succeeded as great parents. furthermore, you can have 3 children that you raise exactly the same way and two will turn perfect and the 3rd one would be the complete opposite... being a great parent is the only job in the world where you dont need any qualification/diploma/experience etc, thats the only job you learn on the go, and with each child it could be a different outcome. BUT ITS STILL A BEAUTIFUL EXPERIENCE BECAUSE YOU TRY TO GIVE YOUR BEST, WITH NOTHING EXPECTED IN RETURN if you give your best and dont expect anything in return, then you cant possibly do something wrong (even if your child end up as the biggest failure on earth)... because you gave your best.

Memberclub:
the real question should be where is the beautiful girl

very true, but i didnt want to argue with anybody on that, as they say beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

priest with a demonic child... BASTARD PIKIN DEM!!!

would it make her achievement any less if she was ugly?

because majority believe that having sex with a man is their gift to men... and they cant take sex back, can they?

Peacecore:
I don't care much about euro n Copa bcoz it's all different tournaments all together. What I have problem is comparing euro with WC bcoz a baby, Mbappe said that n Ronaldo has not won it.

now you are changing the subject... abeg go to the appropriate thread to discuss this subject: https://www.nairaland.com/8123903/messi-responds-mbappes-claim-euros

Trueprophet91:
Some say " poteto", some "potato"... your choice!
You just repeated everything the article said.
You had to turn it around and make it sound like you're winning.
Losers usually do that

this is certainly not about winning but about facts about men vs women through times. any person who believes that women ever had the upper hand over men through our entire history, are certainly living in a cave. marriage has absolutely nothing to do with anyone winning, its a partnership between two individuals but we certainly all understand who is more than often the leader in marriage and/or who profits from marriage... and it aint women (if women ever profited from marriage, they wouldnt beg for alimony and support AFTER marriage, duh).

any woman who tries to claim otherwise is not honest with the truth... coochie aint got that much power, MONEY AND STRENGTH is what men have used for centuries to control women... aka i give you a comfortable house and life (where you can pretend that you are in charge) while you give me children and cook and clean for me, for the rest of your natural life. lets get real!
men have to work and get a house, regardless of whether they have a woman or not.... if a man's job and house can also get him a FREE wife who will give him children and cook and clean, then why wouldnt he take it? isnt that a better deal?
men have never been losers in marriage, only simps are!

this issue of having a child late or early all depends on the individual and their lifestyle...
there are many questions that needs to be answered:
- 1st and foremost why do you want to have children? to give life, have a family OR simply to have someone to take care of you in old age?
- 2nd you do understand that you may have a child that will be useless to you when you are old...aka a child with down syndrom or blind or handicapped. are you saying that such child would be a waste of life because they wont be able to support you in old age?
3rd do you actually believe that its a childs duty to take care of his parents during old age? wouldnt that child have their own family and struggles to take care of?
- 4th shouldnt it simply be: A MAN SHOULD ONLY HAVE A CHILD/CHILDREN WHEN HE IS EMOTIONLLY/PHYSICALLY/FINANCIALLY READY TO SUPPORT A FAMILY FOR THE NEXT 18YRS?

Chickenandchips:
Cristiano Ronaldo laments as son spends $5k weekly on haircut, $40k allowance on clothes, girlfriends

In an exclusive interview, the football star spoke about his son, expressing concern over his extravagant spending habits without concern.

Ronaldo explained that he would like to take steps to limit his son’s spending, but he is hesitant due to potential media backlash accusing him of mistreating his son.

He said, “To be honest, my son is very expensive for me. He wastes $40,000 a week on haircuts, clothes, restaurants, and everything else.” 

“I know he’s young and wants everything, but I think that’s too much for a kid of his age. Currently, I give him a weekly allowance of $15,000, but even Georgina thinks that’s too much for him.”

“He spends almost all his money on clothes, haircuts, restaurants, and other things that are useless. I don’t know if I’ll be able to handle his expenses in the future.”

“I want him to suffer in life so he can understand the real value of money, but if I do that, the media will think that I am selfish and a bad father, so I have no choice but to deal with it.”

In another video attached to the article, he added that his son is the most expensive part of his life while revealing that his barber charges over $5,000 to give his son a haircut.

some of what was said makes very little common sense....
- you want your son to limit his spending? then why dont you limit the amount of pocket money you give him?
- you want your son to suffer in life so he can value things, yet give him $15k per week pocket money?
- whats more important to you...the media backlash or your son's proper upbringing?
- before you blame the barber for charging 5K for your son's haircut, how much is your own haircut from that same barber? abi cheaper good barber don finish for Saudi Arabia?

... i think what he meant to say is that, since he is a superstar millionaire footballer, then its normal that his son spend as much on security/driver/private schools/girlfriends/clothes/restaurant/fun etc...

HellVictorinho6:
And italy is above argentina avin won it 4times
I once created a thread 2 show that euros greater than copa
But MrCork and Knightred derailed
Turned it upside down
A messi fan said it was disrespectful 2 messi 4 me 2 compare him 2 cr7
Then he spoke of europe avin more teams
I was like who cares

sadly, many people are making this European VS South american football a messi vs CR7 thing, while it aint.

whats the best football leagues in the world: 110% European football leagues!
and the fact that these European teams are buying a few South American and African players makes European local players better. Messi or CR7 without playing in Europe would have been NOTHING! look at them now (although they are old now), they are playing for yeye leagues and both of them are NOTHING! same with Benzema and any other player at the top who suddenly goes to play for a yeye league.

ask anyone to name 2 South American local team that can rule the world of football, and you will hear flies buzzing... now, i can name no less than 10 top European teams that can rule the world of football, thus the reason why out of the 20 club world cup championships ever, 16 times it was won by European teams while it was only won 4 times in 20 championships by South American teams (BTW no Argentine team ever won it, only Brazilian team won it for South America)

Peacecore:
Then how many countries are there in each that participate in their tournaments? Have you heard of percentage? Europe has more countries than South America.

percentages does NOT Matter, thats why you always have the same teams at the top.... you can have 100s of teams from south America (if it was possible) and the outcome will almost always never change.... Brazil, Germany, Argentina, Italy and France etc would be at the top.

if any other South American team was that good, then dont you think that by now they would have won the world cup too? the reality is that today, you can only vouch for Brazil and Argentina as top world cup contender in South America, while you can vouch for no less than 6 European teams as WC contender. France, Germany, Italy, Spain, England, Portugal, Belgium.... and even Croatia who has shown in the last 2 WC that they can hold their own.

Feldie:
that's not feasible in Nigeria. There are more people in just 4 states in Nigeria than the whole of Italy, same with Canada. One aboki man planting sugarcane who gives birth to 17 children and his neighbors and brothers doing the same thing, how will government pay all those people?

A) if majority of Nigerians had a job, then the above will easily be attainable in Nigeria too... because there would be so much taxes paid to the gov each month that it wouldnt be a problem to help the poorer Nigerians... sadly, not enough Nigerians are gainfully employed AND paying taxes for the above to be sustainable (or too many are making money that aint taxed by the gov).
B) also, the problem is not about whether someone has 10 kids while you only have one... the real problem is MINDSET! in the west, although the gov helps families with basic necessities (if/when they dont have a lot of money), the majority of people in the west would rather work and make their own money to survive rather than wait for yeye handouts from the gov. it wouldnt work in Nigeria because the reality is that majority of Nigerians are lazy/greedy and would rather do nothing and receive handouts from gov than work.
C) look at how much Nigeria is paying politicians senators etc... you could have a somehow working social service today that helps families in need, but to do so you will have to take away billions from these very same politicians salaries and give it to the poorest. sadly, the very same people who would have to vote on such law, are these politicians whose salary would be reduced.
D) some of the poorest countries in the world have social service that gives something to the poorest in their country.... why Nigeria cant do it is a mystery... i guess the more for these yeye politicians, the better for them.

they can afford it because everyone pays taxes in a working country... and the taxes can easily pays for the education of all children in that country, whether citizen or not. the above happens everywhere in western Europe... Germany, France, Belgium, UK etc

ARRANT PILE OF GIBBERISH NONSENSE!!!!
- men have cared for women for generations while women stayed home to care for the offsprings/family. this aint no "trick", thats common sense. what man in his right mind would want his woman to go on hunts and wars with him? of what use will be a WEAK woman in hunts and wars anyway? who will thereafter care for the kids?

- how does a man who provides for his FAMILY is serving a woman? doesnt that woman cook and clean and raise the kids?! although things have slightly changed today, for generations women were useless outside of their home, thus why a man cared for them (not because of yeye tricks)... but simply because women were useless unless a man took them out of their papa's home and marry them and thus taking over what their father did aka now take care of them (because a woman without a husband was truly useless). their mother was already taking care of their home, cooking and cleaning, so of what use would such a single woman be at home with her parents?

- the urge that women have to own their men is the exact same urge that men have to own their women for themselves... what man in his right mind would want a woman that anybody can have and play with? what value does such woman possess if not ZERO? the value of women is in her coochie, the value of men is in his being. thats why men can have multiple women and retain their value. we men have evolved and are able to have multiple women at the same time and still be seen as great men of value, while women have NEVER been able to have multiple men (and retain their value), thus why polygamy is rampant all over the world, while polyandry is almost inexistant and unheard of (apart from few remote culture). women have absolutely NO POWER whatsoever.

- MEN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN CONTROL in marriage, thus why through generations, so many men have had multiple wives, while very few women have had multiple husbands. lets not fool ourselves here, men are the power here, not women. men have been PHYSICALLY/EMOTINALLY AND FINANCIALLY stronger than women for generation, and it aint about to change. yes, some women may believe that they have the power over some yeye simps, but being a family man is NOT SIMPING. here is a simple clue: if women really had any power over men then there would be no divorce ever, there would never be single mothers ever.

- the only power women have is between their legs, and sadly that aint powerful enough to control men because any smart man knows that what a woman doesnt offer, another will... then put body clock and desperation into the mix, and you have a product (women) that loses value VERY FAST against a product (men) that GAINS value with time and age!

- protecting women is not a trick... they are physically weak and they need to be protected by men... back in the days, men would just do with them how they please, thus why they needed men protection so other men couldnt come and just use them willy nilly. thats where the patriarchal foundation came from.
back in the days of cavemen, any women you desire, you just walk up to her, just grab her and she was yours. no questions asked!
that weak woman without husband was worthless because without a man of her own she couldnt eat! how will she get food if not that her husband goes on hunt to fend for the family? you think her older/weaker father could fend for her all her life?

ALL YOU PEOPLE READING AND BELIEVING THE RUBBISH THAT SOME BUTTHURT FEMINIST WROTE SEF!!!

Peacecore:
But your almighty Germany, Spain, Belgium could not survive the group stage when it comes to world stage. Portugal couldn't reach quarter final. How does that show how good they are?

the answer is below... focus on what i wrote earlier (in bold):

MrBrownJay1:
and close to the top we have Spain, Italy, England, Uruguay, Portugal (even though some may have had bad WC sometimes)

Peacecore:
What happened to Euro champion, Italy when Argentina met them?

same thing that happened to Argentina when they won the WC in 1990 then won the Copa America in 1993 and thereafter played in the WC1994 and lost miserably against yeye Romania in the 16th round. then in WC1998, they lost against Holland in the quarter finals and then n the WC2002, they didnt even get pass the group stage where the drew against Sweden and lost against England (same year that even France we were WC champions, and couldnt pass group stage).
again, as i told you, football aint mathematics... a team that wins today against another, can lose tomorrow against that very same team. it depends on many different variables, but there is a reason why the same teams comes over and over again at the top of the sheets (Germany, Brazil, Argentina, France, Italy, Spain etc).

Peacecore:
And the teams from the yeye tournament have won only 2 short of your top teams in Europe.

here, let me educate you about the different between European and south American teams in WC football.... with a simple image, to show you how diverse and powerful European football is (compared to South American football):

odenkirk:
they done ban ur mrbrownjay1 and u come back to this ur main moniker. if you guys do not leave me alone u will keep getting banned

OLODO... stop trying to pretend that people who bust you for your scams have multiple profiles (like you)
i only have ONE profile, and bust scammers like you on a daily!!!

NO NEED FOR MULTIPLE PROFILES TO BUST YOU YEYE NL SCAMMERS AND FRAUDSTERS!!!