₦airaland Forum

SixSeven:
“He who laughs alone at his knowledge may be laughing at his own folly.”

naptu2:
2) There's a guy that does not like Bola Tinubu at all and he wrote something. He wrote that thing because of his dislike for Tinubu, yet hidden in what he wrote is a small grain of truth. He was criticising the Obidients because they were campaigning that Donald Trump should kidnap Tinubu. The guy wrote why he believed that that would never happen (the guy obviously does not like both Trump and Tinubu). Hidden beneath the guy's anger is a surprising grain of truth.

naptu2:
OK, let's see if I can remember what he said.

Basically he was criticising Obidients that believe that Donald Trump will invade Nigeria and kidnap Bola Tinubu. He said that Trump and Tinubu are alike. He believes that they are both corrupt politicians and he believes that they will do a deal.

He also had heavy criticism for Obidients that support Trump.

BetterScottish:
the BS propaganda wey you concoct put there..omo Dare yourself Oga, the shock wey u dey find na only Electricity fit grant you your request and renewed hope transformer dey near you, good luck 👍🏾

SixSeven:
Naptu2, I don't care about your public parade. That's your business. You may not know me and I really don't care because it's a public forum. I've been following your threads for a long time and give credit where it's deserved. Face the issues, don't come and school me at this age with those gaslighting tactics. You wey show archive where Murtala de present speech of Nigeria's sovereignty is now quite glad that Nigerian leaders need to prove to Trump pé kini kan kini kan. Anyway, Please don't reply me if you have nothing to say about the article. I am not here to talk about people. Nigeria is a sovereign country. The article is rubbish and countries are waking up to the idea that what Trump is doing is a test of the global world order despite conventions after the world war on how to respect each countries. The president was not elected to please Trump, he was elected to serve us, talk to us, defend us and uphold our sovereignty and integrity. What's the foreign policy statement of Mr Tinubu? Africa is the centrepiece of US foreign policy?

I'm not interested in Chatham House Analysts explaining from a different continent what my people are seeing and feeling here. Try another job.

SixSeven:
Oh please! Don't make us look like fools. The last paragraph is itself an insult. Do you know what it means when you have to do things to please Trump and you are telling us that is direction? Despite the fact that Canada stands to lose a great deal, Mark Carney made that speech that was bold enough to let Trump know that we're taking a new direction. Our President has not made any direct speech. This man is a hypocrite. He keeps releasing press statements and thank God you keep archives, check all he said when he was in opposition on issues like this. Please don't sell this to us. Some of us are not that stooppeedd. This is a poor PR job and no one is buying it. Moreover, you should understand that the critical issue of trust is gone, not by an external party but by the same government whose words lack the value of the mint it produces

BetterScottish:
You go explain taya.. Sovereign national cryers wehdone

Matthew T. Page provides in-depth analysis on security, governance and socioeconomic issues in Nigeria. 

He has written two books: Understanding Kleptocracy (Bloomsbury, 2026) and Nigeria: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2018). 

Matthew’s research and analysis also focuses on corruption and kleptocracy worldwide. Prior to joining the Africa Programme, Matthew was the US intelligence community’s top Nigeria expert, serving with the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Defense Intelligence Agency and Marine Corps Intelligence.

He also served as deputy national intelligence officer for Africa on the US National Intelligence Council. Matthew received his BA in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford and his MA in War Studies from King’s College London.

How Nigeria flipped the script on Trump

The Nigerian government has skilfully managed to maintain good relations with Washington despite Trump’s threats and US air strikes on northern Nigeria.


On Christmas Day 2025, President Donald Trump triumphantly announced that he had followed through on an earlier threat to bomb Nigeria, a country where he says Islamists have committed ‘mass slaughter’ of Christians.

Nigeria has been suffering from a long-standing security crisis in its northern regions, where armed groups including the Islamic State in the Sahel, a regional terrorist group, are operating. However, the Nigerian government has disputed Trump’s claim that Christians have been specifically persecuted and said that ‘terrorists attack all who reject their murderous ideology - Muslims, Christians and those of no faith alike’. Trump has indeed presented an overly simplistic view of Nigeria’s complex security situation, ignoring how insecurity is fuelled by other factors including resource disputes, misgovernance, policing failures and interethnic tensions.

The US attack was also more symbolic than strategic. Using intelligence provided by Nigeria, the US fired cruise missiles at multiple sites in northern Nigeria. But expert analysis informed by field research casts doubt on Washington’s claim to have targeted and hit ‘ISIS terrorist scum’.

Instead, the strike appears to have targeted the Lakurawa group – a small band of Islamist militants primarily focused on intimidating and shaking down locals in remote parts of northwestern Nigeria. US officials have not provided details on how many Lakurawa militants were killed or whether the missiles even hit their intended target.

Usually fiercely protective of their national sovereignty, Nigerian leaders showed great agency and strategic savvy in shaping Trump’s actions. By leaning into his unwelcome focus on Nigeria and helping to select his targets, they influenced the scope, scale and domestic consequences of his unprecedented actions. Moreover, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu – a Muslim – deftly used them to secure more military aid, intelligence support and political capital in Washington, instead of allowing himself to be cast as a villain in Christian nationalist narratives about Nigeria.

Securely insecure


Far from being an outlier, this episode reflects the recurring practice of Nigerian elites leveraging insecurity and humanitarian crises for political and financial gain. Fuelled by decades of misgovernance, unyielding socioeconomic pressures and endemic security sector corruption, Nigeria’s security challenges render Nigerians more vulnerable to coercion and co-optation by the country’s ruling class. Over the last two decades or so, insecurity has considerably weakened alternative power centres, such as opposition parties, civil society groups, traditional leaders, universities, labour unions, trade associations and independent media outlets.

Persistent insecurity has also enriched elites and their expansive patronage networks by justifying ever-larger amounts of opaque military spending. In addition, federal and state leaders still make widespread use of ‘security votes’ – notorious slush funds that date back to the era of military rule. Between 2023 and 2025, Nigeria’s 36 states reportedly steered as much as N525.5 billion (about $1.17 billion in 2023 dollars) into these budgetary black boxes. Ostensibly meant to pay for miscellaneous security measures, state leaders often channel these funds into political activities or embezzle them outright.

This political and financial commoditization of insecurity is evident in Abuja’s decision to not pick a fight with Trump over his simplistic characterization of their country’s security challenges. In doing so, the Nigerian government defused a potential international crisis and nudged the bilateral relationship back into a pattern established back in 2014. That year, 276 schoolgirls were kidnapped in northeastern Nigeria, sparking the #BringBackOurGirls campaign. Washington subsequently deprioritized longstanding concerns over democracy, governance, human rights and civilian protection, and ramped up counterterrorism assistance and arms transfers to Nigeria’s military.


Managing Trump?

Trump’s Nigeria gambit is an example of how leaders in countries across Africa and beyond can placate him or even take advantage of his foreign policy. In three short months since Trump refused to rule out troops on the ground in Nigeria, the country’s leaders have flipped the script and are now forging closer ties with Washington.  

As Tinubu spokesman Daniel Bwala explained in an interview following Trump’s initial threat to bomb Nigeria, Abuja’s steps to shape his actions were deliberate. Bwala said the Nigerian government received Trump’s threats ‘in good faith’ and interpreted them as requiring a meeting with the US on what Nigeria needs. He said they had worked around Trump’s ‘psychology’ and targeted messages to his base to counter the narrative that Christians were being specifically persecuted in Nigeria.


To this end, the Nigerian government has taken steps to increase its influence in Washington by reportedly signing a $9 million contract with a US lobbying firm. In January, it also hosted a high-level US delegation in Abuja that announced the Trump administration will increase intelligence sharing with Nigeria and deliver additional materiel to its military. While helpful, this assistance will not fix the fundamental deficiencies – such as corruption, mismanagement and chronic underinvestment – that continue to hobble its security sector.

This does not mean that Nigeria has completely escaped Washington’s crosshairs. Further high-profile attacks on Christian targets could prompt a reaction from Trump. The US president could withhold promised military assistance, order another round of strikes in Nigeria or levy punitive import tariffs. His administration has also reportedly mooted sanctioning Nigeria and recently stopped issuing several types of immigrant and non-immigrant visas to Nigerians.

Looking ahead, Nigeria’s leaders would be wise to provide Trump with occasional wins – like the Christmas Day strikes – to forestall renewed US interference or escalatory military action. Given the transactional nature of Nigeria’s domestic politics, they are more than capable of forging a new relationship with Washington structured around its demands for quid pro quos.

Mr. Peter Obi isn't a primary candidate, he's a general election contender 🗳️With GOD and the people on our side, he'll win! A new Nigeria is possible, we have all seen the results of the 2023 elections no governors no senators no representatives members just organic votes. pic.twitter.com/DzAjKR9FlG

— Yunusa Muhammad Salisu (@official_YmS) February 2, 2026