Hugo Chavez was the president of Venezuela from 1999 till his death in 2013. He was a marxist-socialist and he alligned Venezuela with America's enemies like Fidel Castro of Cuba and other socialists governments in Latin America. He was also a great critic of the US.
The United States imposed tough sanctions on Venezuela that made it difficult to sell its crude oil. It was also alleged that the US was behind a failed coup against Chavez.
The current president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, is a protege of Chavez and the US has imposed sanctions that have crippled Venezuela. The sanctions make it almost impossible for Venezuela to buy or sell anything and it punishes US and foreign companies that have dealings with Venezuela.
It is alleged that Alex Saab was on his way to Iran to broker a deal to buy goods from Iran and sell goods to them. He stopped over in Cape Verde to refuel his plane and the Americans demanded that Cape Verde should extradite him.
The US Government has been opposed to the Venezuelan Government since the days of Hugo Chavez. Alex Saab is a Venezuelan-Lebanese businessman who is closely linked to the Venezuelan Government.
His private jet stopped over in Cape Verde to refuel and he was detained due to an Interpol red notice. The US Government had declared him wanted on money laundering charges.
Some Nigerian and foreign influencers recently tweeted a hashtag calling on the Cape Verde Government to free him. The people who tweeted that sponsored hashtag had their Twitter accounts suspended.
naptu2: That's what they do. They get paid to tweet.
I bet most of them had never heard of the guy until they were paid to tweet that hashtag.
naptu2: 1) It is against Twitter rules to coordinate and sponsor a hashtag. Hashtags must grow organically. Anybody that manipulates a hashtag can be suspended and this is the number one reason why many Nigerian influencers are often suspended.
2) Twitter still exists within political spheres, which means that you are not meant to use it to do anything illegal. Twitter is an American company and the US has sanctions against Venezuela.
But what does Alex Saab have to do with Nigeria? What's the connection? Well there are several.
1) Alex Saab has appealed to the Ecowas Court of Justice (ECJ) and the court has made several rulings in his favour. His lawyer at the ECJ is Mr Femi Falana (SAN), a famous Nigerian lawyer who has handled many cases at the ECJ.
2) Cape Verde is in West Africa and Nigeria is known as the big brother of West Africa and so Venezuelan government officials have visited the Nigerian Embassy in Venezuela to appeal for help in getting Mr Saab released.
3) The question that some Nigerians on Twitter are asking is, who brokered the deal? Who was the Nigerian that brokered the deal between the Venezuelans and the Nigerian Twitter influencers?
The Twitter accounts of some Nigerian Twitter influencers were suspended overnight (see previous thread here (https://www.nairaland.com/6493809/twitter-suspends-nigerian-influencers-accounts) and this Financial Times report from March (almost a month ago) might be the reason that Twitter took that action. The influencers were accused of trending a hashtag about Alex Saab, a Venezuelan businessman that is wanted by US law enforcement agencies.
Venezuela accused of waging Twitter war to free dealmaker.
Intelligence study cites use of fake accounts to sway government of Cape Verde
March 14, 2021 7:07 pm by Gideon Long in Bogotá and Michael Stott in London
The Venezuelan government is using fake Twitter accounts to sway public opinion and stop authorities in the West African islands of Cape Verde from extraditing its chief dealmaker to the US, according to an intelligence analysis.
The report, a copy of which was passed to the Financial Times, analysed more than half a million Twitter posts related to Alex Saab, a Colombian citizen accused by Washington of running illicit fuel and gold trading schemes to help Nicolás Maduro’s government evade sanctions.
The Maduro regime, it concluded, “and/or its proxies (witting or unwitting) are involved in a co-ordinated campaign to influence both the government of Cabo Verde and its population to obstruct Alex Saab’s extradition”.
Saab was detained in Cape Verde, also known as Cabo Verde, last June on a US arrest warrant when his private jet landed to refuel. The Maduro government said he was on a humanitarian mission to secure food and medical equipment to combat coronavirus. The US and the Venezuelan opposition said he was going to Iran, probably to secure supplies of fuel in defiance of US sanctions.
Saab has been held on the islands since then while the courts consider a US extradition request. Washington hopes Saab will provide valuable information about the inner workings of the Maduro government. It accuses him of helping the regime import petrol from Iran, buy state-subsidised food in Mexico and export illegally mined Venezuelan gold to Turkey and the United Arab Emirates while channelling money through a web of companies in Panama, Hong Kong and elsewhere.
Caracas has made a concerted effort to try to ensure Saab is sent back to Venezuela. The Maduro government wants him set free because it claims he has diplomatic status as a “special envoy” from Venezuela to Iran, while the US state department says there is no basis for him to claim immunity.
The intelligence report, passed to the Venezuelan opposition, examined 547,000 tweets related to Saab’s case published in Africa and South America from October 2020 to February 2021.
“Our analysis suggests that there has been an increasing effort, organised (at least in part) by the Maduro regime . . . to direct pressure towards the government of Cabo Verde regarding the judicial decisions issued in Saab’s extradition case,” it concluded.
The study identified two groups of suspicious Twitter accounts. Those in the first group were all set up last October. Their owners tweeted extensively about Saab and then fell silent by November 3. Five of the accounts tweeted about Saab more than 800 times over the span of just a few weeks.
The second group contained 86 accounts, all set up between December and February, that published identical content about Saab’s case. None of them included a banner picture or profile biography and some of them shared the same profile photograph. Most of them had no followers and did not follow other accounts.
The report concluded that the evidence suggested “a co-ordinated effort designed to pressure the government of Cabo Verde into releasing Saab” and said agents of the Maduro regime appeared to be “both progenitors and active participants in this campaign”.
Pro-Saab Twitter traffic had increased since the new year and “the primer driver of that increase appears to be the deployment of Nigeria-based social media influencers”, the analysis said.
Saab has had close links to Venezuela for years. In 2011 he signed a joint venture contract as head of a Colombian company to build prefabricated houses in Venezuela. The US Department of Justice says he and his company never fulfilled the contract. “[They] transferred approximately $350m out of Venezuela, through the United States, to overseas accounts they owned or controlled,” it said in 2019.
The US Treasury says Saab laundered the profits from a Venezuelan government scheme to import food “through a sophisticated network of shell companies, business partners and family members”.
Saab’s defence team, which includes high-profile Spanish lawyer Baltasar Garzón, has complained that he has been held in inhumane conditions in Cape Verde and his health has deteriorated. In late January he was granted house arrest.
His legal team said in a statement: “It is not for us to enter into an assessment of any information regarding the government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela as our work is limited solely and exclusively to the technical and legal defence of our client in the face of the extradition request of the US.”
The Venezuelan government did not respond to a request for comment.
The US Government has been opposed to the Venezuelan Government since the days of Hugo Chavez. Alex Saab is a Venezuelan-Lebanese businessman who is closely linked to the Venezuelan Government.
His private jet stopped over in Cape Verde to refuel and he was detained due to an Interpol red notice. The US Government had declared him wanted on money laundering charges.
Some Nigerian and foreign influencers recently tweeted a hashtag calling on the Cape Verde Government to free him. The people who tweeted that sponsored hashtag had their Twitter accounts suspended.
naptu2: That's what they do. They get paid to tweet.
I bet most of them had never heard of the guy until they were paid to tweet that hashtag.
naptu2: 1) It is against Twitter rules to coordinate and sponsor a hashtag. Hashtags must grow organically. Anybody that manipulates a hashtag can be suspended and this is the number one reason why many Nigerian influencers are often suspended.
2) Twitter still exists within political spheres, which means that you are not meant to use it to do anything illegal. Twitter is an American company and the US has sanctions against Venezuela.
27Pushing30: Ensars did not grow organically, it was pushed by these influencers and people adopted it.
It grew organically as a response to several incidents involving policemen. People were already talking about it before the influencers jumped on the bandwagon. It had been trending periodically since 2016 or 2017 and every time it trended was in response to an act of police brutality or a suspected act of police brutality.
Most of the people that were talking about it were not paid to talk about it.
Myanmar trended because it was on all the satellite news channels. In fact, it was being talked about daily on the NTA, Channels TV, etc.
How many times have you seen Channels TV refer to Alex Saab?
27Pushing30: Was the Endsars hastag not coordinated? yet Twitter even gave them an Emoji?
Twitter being an American company doesn't mean it is not an International platform for airing opinions.
All i see is censorship.
The End SARS hashtag grew organically because many people were talking about it. I bet you that those influencers had never heard of Alex Saab before they were paid to trend the hashtag.
There are no freedoms that are absolute. Every freedom has its limit.
27Pushing30: Is that so bad enough to warrant an account suspension?
Sheni u see selective punishment?
naptu2: 1) It is against Twitter rules to coordinate and sponsor a hashtag. Hashtags must grow organically. Anybody that manipulates a hashtag can be suspended and this is the number one reason why many Nigerian influencers are often suspended.
2) Twitter still exists within political spheres, which means that you are not meant to use it to do anything illegal. Twitter is an American company and the US has sanctions against Venezuela.
emmyN: Oh really? Since when did Twitter become a government organization? I believe everyone has a right of association.
1) It is against Twitter rules to coordinate and sponsor a hashtag. Hashtags must grow organically. Anybody that manipulates a hashtag can be suspended and this is the number one reason why many Nigerian influencers are often suspended.
2) Twitter still exists within political spheres, which means that you are not meant to use it to do anything illegal. Twitter is an American company and the US has sanctions against Venezuela.
The US Government has been opposed to the Venezuelan Government since the days of Hugo Chavez. Alex Saab is a Venezuelan-Lebanese businessman who is closely linked to the Venezuelan Government.
His private jet stopped over in Cape Verde to refuel and he was detained due to an Interpol red notice. The US Government had declared him wanted on money laundering charges.
Some Nigerian and foreign influencers recently tweeted a hashtag calling on the Cape Verde Government to free him. The people who tweeted that sponsored hashtag had their Twitter accounts suspended.
malcom1X: I don't see anything wrong in the government negotiating with them and maybe paying them. If the government had channeled the money to the right place (because it's all about money) we wouldn't be having these issues now.
So negotiate with them, come to terms, if it's giving them cash, give to them after all the agitations are Bourne out of neglect.
That's what I said. Government should not bother paying workers, should not waste its time and money on schools, hospitals and roads or any such thing, instead government should be paying every armed group that shows up so that the warlords can build their private zoos like Ateke Tom (https://www.nairaland.com/1559018/ateke-tom-shows-off-pet-lions) or build universities in Benin Republic like Asari Dokubo or buy more weapons like Shekau.
That should be government's goal.
Young Nigerians should forget about school or other aspirations and become the latest warlord so that they too can negotiate with government and get their own pay.
Then the domino effect will begin, because the next set of people (teenagers) will want their own arms to intimidate their enemies, rape girls (maybe they can even kidnap girls from school and use them as sex slaves) and negotiate with government so that they can be the next set of people to build zoos and foreign universities.
malcom1X: It's not true bro, have you ever heard of the domino effect?
Let me explain, people break into Lagos warehouse to take palliatives because it wasn't given as at when due, then all of a sudden all over Nigeria people starts breaking into warehouses.
Nigerians were attacked in SA then people starts attacking ShopRite in Lagos, then ibadan, then Oyo, then Osun, just like that. Remember MTN offices?
Remember ENDSARS? Remember Trump, when social media banned him, then all other social media started banning him
Once this prison break has happened, it's going to continue just like that, non stop, it's growing into something bigger, don't count south west out of anything that happens in Nigeria.
You need to be praying for peace. The government need to come to the table.
Going by this theory, the government must not negotiate with them because if they negotiate with them it will lead to a domino effect in which other groups will stage prison breaks in order to force the government to negotiate with them.
You see?
We've had Niger Delta militants, Boko Haram and ISWAP, bandits and now unknown gunmen. So where will the negotiations end?
Aha! Here it is. This is probably the biggest incident in recent times.
This happened almost exactly 20 years ago (April 1st, 2001).
A US Navy signals intelligence plane was flying off the coast of China and collecting intelligence about a nearby Chinese military base when the Chinese Navy scrambled 2 fighter jets to intercept it.
The US plane was a propeller plane, while, as I said, the Chinese planes were jets.
The Chinese planes flew very close to the US plane and one of the jets had to fly very slowly in order to match the speed of the US plane. The jet was not designed to fly so slowly and it became difficult to control.
One of the jets collided with the US plane and broke into 2. It is assumed that the Chinese pilot ejected from the plane, but his body was never found. He is presumed to have died.
The American plane had to make an emergency landing on a Chinese airfield. The crew of the plane quickly destroyed sensitive intelligence documents and equipment so that they would not fall into Chinese hands.
The Chinese arrested and detained the crew of the American plane. I remember that it was a very tense period.
This incident happened just a few weeks after George Bush The Second was sworn in as president.
The US eventually sent a vague letter of apology to the Chinese. The letter said that the US was sorry about the death of the Chinese pilot and they were also sorry that their plane made an unauthorised landing on a Chinese airfield. The US crew were released after the letter was delivered.
However, the US did not apologise for flying their plane close to Chinese airspace and they did not accept responsibility for the incident. Rather the letter was deliberately vague so that both sides could save face and so that the crew of the US plane would be released.
President Bush also sent a letter of condolence directly to the widow of the Chinese pilot.
However, some official and unofficial US sources continued to blame the Chinese pilot for the crash. Some US conspiracy theorists even claimed that the Chinese pilot was actually alive and that the Chinese Government was hiding him.
The Chinese initially refused to release the US plane. However, the plane was eventually disassembled and released to the US via a Russian airline. The Chinese billed the US Government for the feeding of the US aircrew and the transportation of the plane back to the US.
The video below contains footage from the US plane just before it collided with the Chinese plane. You can see how close the Chinese plane was.