₦airaland Forum

The point here is that you need to look at what your source of knowledge is and what your criteria for truth are. You accept your God belief to be true, even though you lack the evidence for your position. You take it by faith. This is an irrational position.
Its is not necessarily wrong and neither is it objectionable, but it is irrational nonetheless

@ luridguy
I fully agree with banning reproductive cloning. Therapeutic cloning should not be banned, though

luvu567:
yeah if they make a clone of u and your clone goes out and commit a crime u could be arrested instead of your clone and be punished for something u didn t do....................all because u have a clone that has the same DNA as u......................a clone is basically u

No, not really. You are far more than your DNA. From the moment of conception, your environment plays a role that is equally as important as your DNA in what you will become

Seun:
When you warn people, most of the time they will want to argue with you. Or Nferyn, are you volunteering to be the one in charge of warning people?

Possibly, depends on what the specific boundaries of the moderation would be. By having 2 or 3 moderators per sub-board, you can monitor traffic (and possible violations) without too much trouble

gracious:
@ nferyn. i have a lot of current education sources. They range from books to websites. I did my thesis on same- sex marriage last fall. so i am very well informed on this topic. it was an amazing research topic. i have up to 20 sources/references on this topic. i will put them up.

I would be eternally grateful if you could
What were you studying if I may ask?

chrisd:
It seems here what people are interested in is either proving God exists, or God does not exist. Or proving he does not have this attribute or not. A bit crazy.

If some people come up with silly reasons for their God belief, I do like to point out what exactly is silly about these reasons. You have probably noticed that I have not called you on your God belief. What you have currently explained is reaonable, unnecessary perhaps, but still reasonable.

goodguy:
I asked you to explain but I wasn't expecting you to digress into predestination. That was why I said we should not deviate.

Predestination [b]is [/b]part of that explanation
Topically, yes, please answer. Are both possile?

gracious:
According to study by MFI, homosexual couples can raise good children but the only problem they encounter is that the couples face high domestic violence which could affect the children

Sources please

goodguy, you asked me to explain why Free will is incompatible with an omniscient God. Don't tell me that I am the one deviating. You explicitely asked me to explain.

gracious:
@ nferyn, i have a lot of proof to back up my thesis. I will post them later if u really want to read it.

yes, I really want to read it. Looking forward to the great unmasking of the gay conspiracy to take over the world, the protocols of the elders of gayon, recoverd by passing through great dangers out of the hell gates of San Fransisco (sorry, just couldn't let that pass)

No I don't find evidence, not at all. Please present that evidence here in this thread for all to see, so that we may be (or may not be) convinced by it.

chrisd:
"Free will is incompatible with an omniscient God"

Stop telling God what to do.

What on earth are you saying here?