₦airaland Forum

tobechi20: So haw d u satisfy urself sssixualy??

engrtee: CHILD ABUSE

shymmex: It seems illuminati is the new madness in Nigeria..

Must everything be illuminati with you guys?

Idowuogbo: Babes u still dey Birmz? Oh boi y u dey fuckkkk up o!

afam4eva: Lagos is not as sweet as some people here have painted it oo. It's very rough and dirty. You have to be at alert 24/7 or else you'll be an alert. Only the strong can survive in this city

amosy007: abeg ar the aworis not yorubas?

nku5: All this chest beating about people leaving. Its hot air as far as I'm concerned. The real Lagosians no dey do all this xenophobic gra gra. I believe exposure to diverse peoples, nations and tongues has ensured a level of sophistication that hinterland states may not easily meet up to.

If the country is to split, issues like the question of non-indigenes shall be addressed maturedly and properly by leaders of thought and not street mobs.


Back to topic - simple answer to the question is

1. Aworis originally owned the lands we refer today as Eko
2. The land use act of 1978 puts it in the hands of the governor on behalf of lagosians

mbatuku2: Lagos still remains a no-man's-land.

ITbomb: I just like the smell of teenage Secondary school girls . I dunno

REALITY101: Damn you are so fucking obsessed with Igbo men in the sense of being tribal bulldozer. You're kinda right cuz two of my yoruba friends are married to some older fat white women.

tpia@:
^black british are majorly of carribean descent while nigerian british are of nigerian descent. That's false.

this isnt a govt paper, so lets not split hairs.

a large proportion of AAs are also of carribean descent, just like the black british.

however, i agree with you about british of nigerian descent being hugely influenced by other places.